*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
*

The complexity of mycobiota associated with chestnut galls induced by Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Galicia (Northwestern Spain)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 378-385 (2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4559-017
Published: Dec 14, 2024 - Copyright © 2024 SISEF

Research Articles

The European chestnut tree (Castanea sativa) is a highly valued deciduous species in Galicia (Northwestern Spain), mainly due to economic, landscape, and social or cultural reasons. However, the Asian wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus, one of the biggest threats to C. sativa, is severely affecting tree vigor and reducing chestnut yields. Some studies indicated that this wasp and the galls that it produces may play an important role in spreading fungal disease. The present work aimed to characterize the complex of fungi associated with galls induced by D. kuriphilus in Galician chestnut trees, focusing on the study of plant-pathogen diversity. For this purpose, branches with necrotic galls were collected from seventy-eight chestnut stands located in the four Galician provinces (A Coruña, Lugo, Ourense, and Pontevedra). In total, 1170 necrotic galls of the year of study were collected at the different sampling sites. In the laboratory, four galls were randomly selected from each point, thus analyzing 312 galls, which were surface disinfected and dissected, and tissue fragments placed on culture media. From the selected galls, 308 fungal colonies were isolated and then identified by the morphology of their fruiting bodies and the molecular analysis of the ITS, beta-tubulin, elongation factor, and histone regions. They were classified into 27 genera and 53 species, of which 5 genera and 29 species of fungi were reported for the first time associated with D. kuriphilus galls, including phytopathogenic fungi. Results show that further research is needed to study in detail the role of galls as entry points and reservoirs of pathogenic fungi.

Asian Chestnut Gall Wasp, Castanea sativa, Endophytes, Phytopathogens

  Introduction 

The European chestnut tree (Castanea sativa Mill.) registered under the Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) regulation “Castaña de Galicia” is a highly valued deciduous species in Galicia (Northwestern Spain), mainly due to economic, landscape, and social or cultural reasons. Chestnut trees are of great economic importance in this area due to their nutritional value, high fruit yield, and excellent wood quality. Spain is the second largest producer in the world, where approximately 60% of the European nut production originates, and 66% of the Spanish stands are located in Galicia, representing 92% of the country’s total nut production ([20]).

The Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae) is one of the most important pests of C. sativa. It prevents fruit production by altering the growth and physiology of the host plant, interrupting photosynthetic organ development, and altering flower growth ([18]). Consequently, it affects tree growth and reproduction, resulting in decay, fewer fruits and reduced crop yields, and, in severe cases, tree death ([19]). According to various studies, chestnut crop yields can be reduced by 50%-80% depending on the variety and the biological control measures used ([18], [19]).

This insect is listed as a harmful organism in Annex III (List of protected zones and the respective protected zone quarantine pests and their respective codes) of the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 and has been included in the A2 list of the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (EPPO) since 2003 ([19]).

The wasp is native to China, although it is currently present in Southeast Asia, most of Europe and the east coast of the United States ([19]). In Europe, this wasp was first recorded in Italy in 2002, spreading and invading the rest of the continent. In Spain, it was detected for the first time in 2012 in Catalonia and, two years later, in Galicia and northern Portugal ([41]). According to data collected in annual samplings carried out by the Regional Government of Galicia (Xunta de Galicia), this pest is now widespread in Galicia and its incidence has greatly increased. This wasp can spread locally as an adult since it is capable of flying. Additionally, it can be carried by the wind, transported by humans, or travel long distances due to the movement of infested plant material. The wasps may be inconspicuous within the plant tissues, making them difficult to detect visually ([18]).

D. kuriphilus is a univoltine cynipid (produces one generation per year) and reproduces by thelytokous parthenogenesis; that is, only females develop from unfertilized eggs, thus no males of the species are known ([19]). During their life cycle, D. kuriphilus larvae feed for 20-30 days before pupating, which induces green to reddish gall formation on buds, leaves, and male catkins ([41]). Depending on the climatic conditions of the area and the chestnut cultivar, pupation takes place between mid-May and July. Adult females emerge from the galls between late May and July and can infect new shoots immediately ([41]). After emergence, galls dry, become wood-like, and remain on the tree for several years ([19]).

According to some studies, the galls produced by this wasp can act as entry points and sources of inoculum, thereby causing an increase in the incidence of chestnut diseases, such as chestnut blight, caused by Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) M.E. Barr ([35]), or brown rot, produced by Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi L.A. Shuttleworth, E.C.Y. Liew & D.I. Guest (syn. G. castaneae Tamietti - [34]). On the other hand, several studies suggest that some endophytic species present in galls could be used as biological control agents against D. kuriphilus and other pests ([1], [49]).

This work aimed to characterize, for the first time in Galicia, the complex of fungi associated with galls induced by D. kuriphilus in chestnut trees, focusing on the study of plant-pathogen diversity.

  Material and methods 

Study area and sampling sites

Seventy-eight chestnut stands randomly selected in the four Galician provinces (A Coruña, Lugo, Ourense, and Pontevedra) were examined during dormancy. Of these stands, 70% belong to the area covered by the PGI Castaña de Galicia (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 - The location of Galicia in Northwestern Spain and the geographical distribution of chestnut sampling points in the region.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

In each site, three specimens of C. sativa showing symptoms caused by D. kuriphilus were selected. Then, several branches with necrotic galls were collected (Fig. 2), totaling five galls per tree, thus obtaining 15 galls per site. In total, 1170 necrotic galls of the year of study were collected at the different sampling sites (120 from A Coruña, 375 from Lugo, 255 from Ourense, and 420 from Pontevedra). Samples were then coded and stored cold until analysis.

Fig. 2 - Necrotic galls produced by D. kuriphilus on chestnut branches.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Isolation and morphological characterization

In the laboratory, four galls randomly selected from each site were surface sterilized with 1% sodium hypochlorite for one minute and rinsed twice with sterile water for at least five minutes. Subsequently, they were dried with blotting paper, labeled, and cut into small fragments (5 × 5 mm). Around 5-10 fragments were placed in 90 mm Petri dishes containing the culture media Malt Extract Agar with streptomycin 0.5 g L-1 (AMs) and kept in a laminar flow chamber under sterile conditions. Plates were sealed with Parafilm® and incubated in the dark at 24 °C. Fragments were checked daily under the microscope, and after 4-5 days, a portion of each mycelium grown from the seeded fragments was transferred to a new plate with Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) to obtain pure cultures.

Fungal isolates were first identified according to their morphology at the genus level and then by molecular techniques at the species level.

For the morphological study of each isolate, macroscopic features of the mycelium, such as colony shape, color, and texture, and microscopic features (size and shape of the mycelium and size, shape, and color of the conidia) were recorded for each isolate using a Nikon Eclipse® E600 microscope and compared with different fungal taxonomic keys.

Molecular identification

Molecular analysis was performed for all morphologically identified isolates by amplification, sequencing, and phylogeny of different fungal regions. Genomic DNA was extracted from 7-day-old pure colonies grown in PDA culture medium using the commercial E.Z.N.A. Fungal DNA Mini Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA) following the short protocol. According to the genus determined by morphological analysis, different molecular markers were amplified and sequenced for each isolate: ITS, beta-tubulin, elongation factor 1-alpha, and histone (Tab. 1).

Tab. 1 - Primers from the ITS, beta-tubulin, elongation factor and histone regions used in this study.

Region Primer name Reference
ITS ITS1F Gardes & Bruns ([22])
ITS4 White et al. ([50])
Bot2R García-Figueres et al. ([21])
Beta-tubulin T1 O’Donnell & Cigelnik ([38])
BT2B Glass & Donaldson ([24])
Elongation
factor 1-alpha
EF1 Geiser et al. ([23])
EF2 Geiser et al. ([23])
EF1-728F Carbone & Kohn ([12])
Histone H3-1b Glass & Donaldson ([24])
CYLH3F Crous et al. ([15])

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Selected regions were amplified in a SureCycler® 8800 thermal cycler (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). PCR products were separated on a 2% (w/v) electrophoresis gel in 0.5× TBE, stained with Midori Green® (Nippon Genetics, Europe), and examined under ultraviolet light. PCR products were purified with the Ilusta ExoProStar® 1-Step kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA). Amplicons obtained were sequenced in both directions (forward and reverse) using the two primers with the Big Dye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) on the ABIPrism 3500 Genetic Analyzer.

Bioinformatic analysis

The consensus sequence was obtained with the Mega v. 7 software (⇒ https:/­/­www.­megasoftware.­net/­) and compared with the homologous sequences using the BLASTn search application of the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database (⇒ https:/­/­blast.­ncbi.­nlm.­nih.­gov/­). Subsequently, a mono- or multi-phylogenetic analysis was performed for each isolate of the more complex genera Fusarium and Trichoderma analyzed, according to the loci used in the molecular identification process.

The sequences of one representative isolate per species were deposited in GenBank, and the accession numbers are specified in Tab. S1 (Supplementary material).

  Results 

From the analysis of 312 D. kuriphilus galls we identified 308 fungal colonies. Of the isolates, 91.6% belong to the Ascomycota phylum, being the Hypocreaceae (31.8%) and Nectriaceae (24.7%) the most abundant families (Fig. 3). At the morphological level, the isolates were classified into 27 different genera (Tab. S1 in Supplementary material), of which five were reported for the first time: Abortiporus Murrill, Neurospora Shear & B.O. Dodge, Phlebia Fr., Rosellinia De Not., & D. Hawksw. and Schizophyllum Fr. The most abundant genera were Fusarium Link with 76 isolates (24.7%) and Trichoderma Persoon ex Gray, having 98 isolates (31.8%) (Tab. S1 in Supplementary material).

Fig. 3 - Relative abundance of the isolated fungi at the family level.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

The morphological results combined with the molecular analysis of the ITS, beta-tubulin, elongation factor, and histone regions allowed the identification of 53 different species (Tab. S1 in Supplementary material), thus showing the great diversity of fungi in the analyzed galls. In fact, no references of presence in galls have been found for 29 species, accounting for 55% of the species detected (Tab. 2). A conclusive morphological and molecular identification at the species level was not obtained for 28 isolates, which is approximately 10% of all isolates. These unidentified isolates belong to 11 different genera, which can be consulted in Tab. S1 (Supplementary material). The presence of the genus Gnomoniopsis is highlighted since, in recent years, new species such as G. daii, G. castanopsidis, G. fagacearum, G. guangdongensis, G. hainanensis, G. rossmaniae and G. silvicola ([33]) have been described. The 5 isolates that could not be identified may belong to a new Gnomoniopsis species not yet described, as this genus is currently under study.

Tab. 2 - Taxonomic classification, number of isolates and relative abundance of the species reported for the first time associated with D. kuriphilus galls.

Species Phylum Family No.
isolates
Relative
abundance
(%)
Abortiporus biennis Basidiomycota Podoscyphaceae 1 0.32
Colletotrichum fioriniae Ascomycota Glomerellaceae 17 5.52
Diaporthe eres Ascomycota Diaporthaceae 4 1.30
Diaporthe phaseolorum Ascomycota Diaporthaceae 1 0.32
Diaporthe phillipsii Ascomycota Diaporthaceae 1 0.32
Diplodia corticola Ascomycota Botryosphaeriaceae 2 0.65
Diplodia mutila Ascomycota Botryosphaeriaceae 3 0.97
Diplodia sapinea Ascomycota Botryosphaeriaceae 5 1.62
Dothiorella iberica Ascomycota Botryosphaeriaceae 1 0.32
Fusarium acuminatum Ascomycota Nectriaceae 2 0.65
Fusarium culmorum Ascomycota Nectriaceae 2 0.65
Fusarium foetens Ascomycota Nectriaceae 3 0.97
Fusarium graminearum Ascomycota Nectriaceae 7 2.27
Fusarium solani Ascomycota Nectriaceae 3 0.97
Fusarium sporotrichioides Ascomycota Nectriaceae 18 5.84
Fusarium temperatum Ascomycota Nectriaceae 1 0.32
Fusarium torulosum Ascomycota Nectriaceae 1 0.32
Neofusicoccum eucalyptorum Ascomycota Botryosphaeriaceae 1 0.32
Neurospora crassa Ascomycota Sordariaceae 1 0.32
Pestalotiopsis brachiata Ascomycota Sporocadaceae 1 0.32
Pestalotiopsis paeoniicola Ascomycota Sporocadaceae 1 0.32
Phlebia acerina Basidiomycota Meruliaceae 16 5.19
Phlebia radiata Basidiomycota Meruliaceae 1 0.32
Rhizopus microsporus Mucoromycota Rhizopodaceae 2 0.65
Rosellinia corticium Ascomycota Xylariaceae 2 0.65
Schizophyllum commune Basidiomycota Schizophyllaceae 2 0.65
Talaromyces cecidicola Ascomycota Trichocomaceae 2 0.65
Trichoderma gamsii Ascomycota Hypocreaceae 10 3.25
Trichoderma koningiopsis Ascomycota Hypocreaceae 2 0.65

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Regarding life strategies, two large trophic groups stand out: plant pathogens and saprotrophs. Of the 53 species identified, according to the literature review, 37 species proved to be pathogenic. Of them, 21 were reported to cause damage to chestnut trees (Tab. 3), such as Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi ([34]), with 2 isolates in A Coruña, 2 in Lugo, 2 in Pontevedra, and 1 in Ourense) and Cryphonectria parasitica ([35]), although in this case, it was isolated from a single gall (see Tab. S1 in Supplementary material).

Tab. 3 - List of phytopathogenic fungal species isolated in this work and their presence in symptomatic chestnut samples.

Pathogen Distribution Host plants Reported
on
Castanea
Plant organs Reference
Alternaria alternata Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Leaves, fruits Ren et al. ([44]), Cakar & Akilli ([10])
Botryosphaeria dothidea Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Bark, fruits Akilli et al. ([5]), Hamasaki et al. ([25])
Botrytis cinerea Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Donis-González et al. ([17]), Rodrigues et al. ([46])
Colletotrichum fioriniae Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Cakar ([11])
Cryphonectria parasitica Cosmopolitan Castanea spp., Quercus spp., Acer spp., Carpinus betulus Yes Bark of stems and branches, fruits Rigling & Prospero ([45]), Cakar ([11])
Diaporthe amygdali Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Bark Aghayeva et al. ([2])
Diaporthe eres Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits, leaves Ivić & Novak ([29]), Jiang et al. ([32])
Diaporthe phaseolorum Cosmopolitan Broad host range No - -
Diaporthe phillipsii Europe Vaccinium corymbosum No - -
Diplodia corticola Africa, America, Europe Quercus spp., Vitis vinifera No - -
Diplodia mutila America, Europe Broad host range No - -
Diplodia sapinea America, Asia, Europe Broad host range No - -
Diplodia seriata Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Branches and stems Dar & Rai ([16])
Dothiorella iberica Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Branches Batista et al. ([8])
Epicoccum nigrum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Bark Aghayeva et al. ([2])
Fusarium acuminatum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Rodrigues et al. ([46])
Fusarium avenaceum Cosmopolitan Broad host range No - -
Fusarium culmorum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Donis-González et al. ([17])
Fusarium foetens Cosmopolitan Mainly Begonia × Hiemalis No - -
Fusarium graminearum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Donis-González et al. ([17])
Fusarium lateritium Cosmopolitan Broad host range No - -
Fusarium oxysporum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Rodrigues et al. ([46])
Fusarium proliferatum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Ivić & Novak ([29])
Fusarium sambucinum Cosmopolitan Broad host range No - -
Fusarium solani Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits He et al. ([27])
Fusarium sporotrichioides Cosmopolitan Broad host range No - -
Fusarium temperatum Cosmopolitan Zea mays No - -
Fusarium torulosum Cosmopolitan Broad host range No - -
Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi Cosmopolitan Castanea spp., Buxus sempervirens, Corylus avellana, Fraxinus ornus, Pinus pinaster, Quercus cerris, Quercus ilex Yes Leaves, flowers, fruits, shoots,
stems, branches
Lema et al. ([34])
Mucor hiemalis Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Jermini et al. ([31])
Neofusicoccum eucalyptorum Cosmopolitan Eucalyptus spp. and other Myrtaceae No - -
Neofusicoccum parvum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Bark, stems, branches, fruits Ciordia et al. ([13]), Seddaiu et al. ([47])
Penicillium glabrum Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Fruits Overy et al. ([39])
Pestalotiopsis paeoniicola America, Asia Paeonia suffruticosa, Pouteria sapota No - -
Rhizopus microsporus Cosmopolitan Oryza sativa, Zea mays, Helianthus annuus, Brassica juncea No - -
Rhizopus arhizus Cosmpolitan Broad host range No - -
Schizophyllum commune Cosmopolitan Broad host range Yes Bark, stems, branches Takemoto et al. ([48])

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

As mentioned above, the genera Fusarium and Trichoderma were the most abundant. The multilocus phylogenetic analysis allowed the identification of isolates at the species level. The galls’ condition at the time they were collected could explain the presence of a great diversity of species belonging to these genera, since they were necrotic and thus a great diversity of saprophytic fungi was expected to be found. In the case of the genus Fusarium, isolates belonging to 13 different species were detected, being F. avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc., F. graminearum Schwabe, F. oxysporum Schltdl. and F. sporotrichioides Sherbakoff those with the highest incidence (Tab. S1 in Supplementary material). For the first time, 8 species were reported in association with D. kuriphilus galls: F. acuminatum Ellis & Everhart, F. culmorum (Wm. G. Sm.) Sacc., F. foetens Schroers, O’Donnell, Baayen & Hooftman, F. graminearum, F. solani (Mart.) Sacc., F. sporotrichioides, F. temperatum Scaufl. & Munaut and F. torulosum (Berk. & M.A. Curtis) Nirenberg (Tab. 2). The isolates obtained from the genus Trichoderma corresponded to 7 different species, mainly T. atroviride Bissett and T. harzianum Rifai (Tab. S1 in Supplementary material), being T. gamsii Samuels & Druzhinina and T. koningiopsis Samuels, Suarez & Evans first reported associated with D. kuriphilus galls (Tab. 2).

  Discussion 

The presence of D. kuriphilus is one of the greatest threats to chestnut trees, as it limits tree vigor and nut yields. Moreover, this wasp and its galls may play an important role in spreading fungal diseases. Both in our work and in previous studies, it has been observed that most isolated fungal species are phytopathogenic, thus providing evidence that galls can serve as a reservoir for plant pathogens as well as other tissues, mainly leaves, stems, shoots, or bark ([37]).

As previously reported, according to the literature review, of the 53 species identified, 37 were found to be pathogenic (Tab. 3) and can be transmitted horizontally to other plant species by means of free-living or gall-inducing insects. Of these pathogenic fungi, 21 species were found damaging chestnut trees, mostly fruits (Tab. 3).

Among the pathogenic fungi causing significant damage to chestnut trees, C. parasitica and G. smithogilvyi are the most important. C. parasitica causes chestnut blight, a serious disease that forms perennial necrotic lesions on the bark of stems and branches, leading to their death ([45]). This pathogen requires natural openings or wounds to penetrate the host tissue, so the galls produced by D. kuriphilus represent an entry point that could be related to the increased incidence of the disease in areas where both species are present ([35]). However, in the present work, it has only been detected in one gall, probably due to the time of the year and the randomness of the sampling. This opens the possibility for conducting a detailed study of gall-associated fungi in trees with canker and proving whether the presence of C. parasitica in the galls could influence the incidence of the disease, as reported in previous studies. G. smithogilvyi, first described in 2012, is an emerging pathogen recently found in chestnuts trees in Galicia that significantly affects crop yield ([3]). The most characteristic symptoms of this disease are the formation of cankers, leaf, flower, and gall necrosis, fruit mummification, and rot, both pre- and post-harvest, damaging nuts still present on the tree ([34] - Fig. 4). In several studies, this fungus was found as an endophyte, being isolated from galls, shoots, leaves, stems, flowers and asymptomatic immature fruits, and producing symptoms in them once they mature ([3], [34]).

Fig. 4 - Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi symptoms and morphology: (a) premature fall of burrs with mummified nuts; (b) mummified nuts and premature opening of burrs affected by the pathogen; (c) characteristic brown rot of nuts; (d) colony morphology on PDA; (e) conidiomata formed on PDA; (f) conidia (scale bar: 10 µm).

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Among other phytopathogenic fungi, the genus Fusarium stands out due to the diversity of species present and the large number of isolates obtained. These fungi produce different types of degradative enzymes and entomopathogenic mycotoxins such as fumonisins ([36]) and, in several studies, strains belonging to the Fusarium incarnatum-equiseti complex and the species Fusarium proliferatum (Matsush.) Nirenberg ex Gerlach & Nirenberg were isolated in necrotic galls produced by D. kuriphilus, which showed a high wasp mortality rate in laboratory tests ([1], [49]). However, according to Cooper & Rieske ([14]), the mortality of D. kuriphilus inside the galls could be related to the dryness and hardness of their necrotic tissues, which would make it difficult for adults to emerge and rule out a direct entomopathogenic effect. The genus Fusarium is not only associated with galls but it has also been detected as an endophyte in other chestnut tissues such as leaves, buds, stems, and fruits ([37]). In terms of pathogenicity, according to previous studies, there is evidence of chestnut fruit damage on F. acuminatum, F. culmorum, F. graminearum, F. oxysporum, F. proliferatum, and F. solani, species identified in this study (Tab. 3).

Furthermore, eight species of the Botryosphaeriaceae family were identified, known to be important pathogens in Europe and worldwide, namely Botryosphaeria dothidea, Diplodia corticola, D. mutila, D. sapinea, D. seriata, Dothiorella iberica, Neofusicoccum eucalyptorum and N. parvum (Tab. 3). This family includes some of the most important emerging and invasive plant pathogens worldwide ([4], [9]). Many of these species were reported for the first time on chestnut and on the D. kuriphilus galls in the present work, but only 4 of them were found causing symptoms in chestnuts: B. dothidea in bark ([5]) and fruits ([25]), D. seriata in branches and stems ([16]), D. iberica in branches ([8]), and N. parvum in bark, stems, branches ([13]) and fruits ([47]).

On the other hand, fungal spoilage of commercially purchased chestnuts is a cause for concern as the fungal colonization may have occurred at any stage of flowering, harvesting, storage, sorting, or transport. It can cause great economic losses and poses a serious health risk to consumers due to their mycotoxins ([39], [46]). Among these fungi, those belonging to the genera Aspergillus and Penicillium stand out as mycotoxin producers, secondary metabolites showing toxic, mutagenic, and teratogenic effects, including potential immunosuppressive activity and carcinogenic effects, having a long-term chronic or cumulative effect on human health ([42], [43]).

Beside the pathogenic species, it is worth highlighting the presence of fungi that can be used as biological control agents, such as Clonostachys rosea (Link) Schroers, Samuels, Seifert & W. Gams ([30]), and Trichoderma spp. ([28]). The latter is an important genus due to its diversity and abundance, including T. atroviride and T. harzianum, which are the main species found in this study. Trichoderma is a genus of fungi frequently associated with soils and the rhizosphere, though they also appear to colonize different parts of plants, such as leaves; that is, they are opportunistic symbionts ([26]). These fungi exhibit an antagonistic behavior against various pathogens, especially fungi, by inhibiting their growth through direct interactions, namely by antibiosis, competition, or mycoparasitism, or indirect ones, by increasing plant vigor and tolerance to stress ([28], [26]). Various studies evaluated different species against important pathogens of C. sativa, such as T. harzianum, T. parceramosum Bissett and T. viride Persoon, which showed antagonistic and protective effects against C. parasitica ([6], [7]) and T. atroviride against G. smithogilvyi ([40]). Therefore, further studies need to be conducted with Trichoderma strains isolated from Galician chestnut trees and evaluate their antagonism against new threats, such as G. smithogilvyi, which is one of the most important diseases found in chestnut stands in Galicia.

  Conclusions 

This work is the first study of fungal communities in D. kuriphilus galls in Galicia. The presence of a wide diversity of fungi, both phytopathogenic and saprophytic, has been identified, and some genera and species were reported for the first time. Therefore, this study provides interesting results for managing D. kuriphilus at the local scale and comparing it with fungal communities in galls found in other regions. However, further research is needed to determine the role of D. kuriphilus in dispersing these fungi.

  Acknowledgments 

The authors would like to thank Carmela Menduíña, Estación Fitolpatolóxica Areeiro, Pontevedra, Spain, for her contribution to identifying the isolates, and Marisol Guerreiro Lemos, Fauna Útil S.L., Pontevedra, Spain, for taking part in the samplings.

The authors declare that part of the data included in this paper was communicated as a poster presented at the 8th Spanish Forestry Congress held in Lleida (Catalonia, Spain) from 27 June to 1 July 2022 and included in the proceedings (in Spanish) under the title “Hongos asociados a agallas producidas por Dryocosmus kuriphilus en castaños de Galicia” (⇒ https:/­/­8cfe.­congresoforestal.­es/­sites/­default/­files/­actas/­8CFE-1077.­pdf).

  References

(1)
Addario E, Turchetti T (2011). Parasitic fungi on Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Castanea sativa necrotic galls. Bulletin of Insectology 64 (2): 269-273.
Online | Gscholar
(2)
Aghayeva DN, Rigling D, Meyer JB, Mustafabeyli E (2017). Diversity of fungi occurring in the bark of Castanea sativa in Azerbaijan. In: Proceedings of the “VI International Chestnut Symposium”. Samsun (Turkey) 9-13 Oct 2017. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 1220: 79-86.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Aguín O, Rial C, Piñón P, Sainz MJ, Mansilla JP, Salinero C (2022). First report of Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi causing chestnut brown rot on nuts and burrs of sweet chestnut in Spain. Plant Disease 107(1): 218.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Aiello D, Bregant C, Carlucci A, Guarnaccia V, Gusella G, Linaldeddu BT, Mugnai L, Raimondo ML, Polizzi G (2023). Current status of Botryosphaeriaceae species in Italy: impacts on agricultural crops and forest ecosystems. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 62 (3): 381-412.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Akilli S, Katircioglu YZ, Maden S (2009). Chestnut cankers in Black Sea region of Turkey. In: Proceedings of the “International Workshop on Chestnut Management in Mediterranean Countries - Problems and Prospects”. Bursa (Turkey) 23-25 Oct 2007. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 815: 247-252.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Akilli S, Katircioglu YZ, Maden S (2011). Biological control of chestnut canker, caused by Cryphonectria parasitica, by antagonistic organisms and hypovirulent isolates. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 35 (5): 515-523.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Arisan-Atac I, Heidenreich E, Kubicek CP (1995). Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting identifies subgroups of Trichoderma viride and other Trichoderma sp. capable of chestnut blight biocontrol. FEMS Microbiology Letters 126 (3): 249-255.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Batista E, Lopes A, Alves A (2020). Botryosphaeriaceae species on forest trees in Portugal: diversity, distribution and pathogenicity. European Journal of Plant Pathology 158 (3): 693-720.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Batista E, Lopes A, Alves A (2021). What do we know about Botryosphaeriaceae? An overview of a worldwide cured dataset. Forests 12 (3): 313.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Cakar D, Akilli S (2023). Role of the fungal flora on kernel rot of chestnuts. International Journal of Agriculture and Wildlife Science 9 (2): 143-152.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Cakar D (2024). Significance of Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi as kernel rot of sweet chestnut in Turkey. Journal of Phytopathology 172 (2): e13293.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Carbone I, Kohn LM (1999). A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91 (3): 553-556.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Ciordia M, Loureiro MD, González AJ (2022). First report of Neofusicoccum parvum causing canker on Castanea sativa in Spain. Plant Disease 106(4): 1299.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Cooper WR, Rieske LK (2010). Gall structure affects ecological associations of Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Environmental Entomology 39 (3): 787-797.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Risède JM, Simoneau P, Hywel-Jones NL (2004). Calonectria species and their Cylindrocladium anamorphs: species with sphaeropedunculate vesicles. Studies in Mycology 50: 415-430.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Dar M, Rai M (2017). First report of Diplodia seriata causing canker on Castanea sativa in India. New Disease Reports 35: 19.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Donis-González IR, Guyer DE, Fulbright DW (2016). Quantification and identification of microorganisms found on shell and kernel of fresh edible chestnuts in Michigan. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 96 (13): 4514-4522.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
EFSA (2010). Risk assessment of the oriental chestnut gall wasp, Dryocosmus kuriphilus for the EU territory and identification and evaluation of risk management options. EFSA Journal 8(6): 1619.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
EPPO (2021). EPPO datasheets on pests recommended for regulation: Dryocosmus kuriphilus.
Online | Gscholar
(20)
FAO (2023). FAOSTAT online database: crops and livestock products. FAO-UN, Rome, Italy, website.
Online | Gscholar
(21)
García-Figueres F, Torres E, Luque J, Martos S (2004). Evaluación de la especificidad de los cebadores para la detección de hongos fitopatógenos de madera de vid [Evaluation of the specificity of primers for the detection of phytopathogenic fungi of grapevine wood]. In: Proceedings of the “XII Congreso de La Sociedad Española de Fitopatología”. Lloret de Mar (Cataluña, Spain) 26 Sept-1 Oct 2004, pp. 134. [in Spanish]
Gscholar
(22)
Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993). ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2 (2): 113-118.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Geiser DM, Del Mar Jiménez-Gasco M, Kang S, Makalowska I, Veeraraghavan N, Ward TJ, Zhang N, Kuldau GA, Donnell K (2004). FUSARIUM-ID v. 1.0: a DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. European Journal of Plant Pathology 110 (5): 473-479.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995). Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61 (4): 1323-1330.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Hamasaki K, Kawaradani M, Shibao M (2016). Control of the chestnut weevil, Curculio sikkimensis (Heller), and the black rot fungus, Botryosphaeria dothidea (Mougeot) Cesati and De Notaris, using hot water treatment. Annual Report of the Kansai Plant Protection Society 58: 51-55.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M (2004). Trichoderma species - opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2 (1): 43-56.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
He W, Shen R, Wang X (2001). Pathogenicity of pathogens contributing to dry rot of Chinese chestnut and their infection process. Journal of Beijing Forestry University 23 (2): 36-39.
Online | Gscholar
(28)
Hermosa R, Viterbo A, Chet I, Monte E (2012). Plant-beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology 158 (1): 17-25.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Ivić D, Novak A (2018). Fungi associated with nut rot in sweet chestnut, with the first record of Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi in Croatia. Pomologia Croatica: Glasilo Hrvatskog Agronomskog Društva 22 (1-2): 13-22.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Jensen DF, Dubey M, Jensen B, Karlsson M (2022). Clonostachys rosea to control plant diseases. In: “Microbial bioprotectants for plant disease management” (Köhl J, Ravensberg W eds). Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 44.
Online | Gscholar
(31)
Jermini M, Conedera M, Sieber TN, Sassella A, Schärer H, Jelmini G, Höhn E (2006). Influence of fruit treatments on perishability during cold storage of sweet chestnuts. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86 (6): 877-885.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Jiang S, Liu C, Wang Q, Jia N, Li C, Ma H (2011). A new chestnut disease-brown margin leaf blight and the pathogen identification. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 47 (5): 177-180.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(33)
Jiang N, Voglmayr H, Bian DR, Piao CG, Wang SK, Li Y (2021). Morphology and phylogeny of Gnomoniopsis (Gnomoniaceae, Diaporthales) from fagaceae leaves in China. Journal of Fungi 7(10): 792.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Lema F, Baptista P, Oliveira C, Ramalhosa E (2023). Brown rot caused by Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi (syn. Gnomoniopsis castaneae) at the level of the chestnut tree (Castanea sativa Mill.). Applied Sciences 13(6): 3969.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
Meyer JB, Gallien L, Prospero S (2015). Interaction between two invasive organisms on the European chestnut: does the chestnut blight fungus benefit from the presence of the gall wasp? FEMS Microbiology Ecology 91(11): fiv122.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(36)
Nelson PE, Desjardins AE, Plattner RD (1993). Fumonisins, mycotoxins produced by Fusarium species: biology, chemistry and significance. Annual Review of Phytopathology 31 (1): 233-252.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
Nicoletti R, Beccaro GL, Sekara A, Cirillo C, Di Vaio C (2021). Endophytic fungi and ecological fitness of chestnuts. Plants 10 (3): 542.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(38)
O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E (1997). Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 7 (1): 103-116.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(39)
Overy DP, Seifert KA, Savard ME, Frisvad JC (2003). Spoilage fungi and their mycotoxins in commercially marketed chestnuts. International Journal of Food Microbiology 88 (1): 69-77.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Pasche S, Crovadore J, Pelleteret P, Jermini M, Mauch-Mani B, Oszako T, Lefort F (2016). Biological control of the latent pathogen Gnomoniopsis smithogilvyi in European chestnut grafting scions using Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Trichoderma atroviride. Dendrobiology 75: 113-122.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(41)
Pérez-Otero R, Mansilla JP (2014). El cinípido del castaño Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu, 1951 llega a Galicia (NO de la Península Ibérica) [The chestnut cinipid Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu, 1951 arrives in Galicia (NW Iberian Peninsula)]. Arquivos Entomolóxicos 12: 33-36. [in Spanish]
Online | Gscholar
(42)
Prencipe S, Siciliano I, Contessa C, Botta R, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML, Spadaro D (2018a). Characterization of Aspergillus section Flavi isolated from fresh chestnuts and along the chestnut flour process. Food Microbiology 69: 159-169.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(43)
Prencipe S, Siciliano I, Gatti C, Garibaldi A, Gullino ML, Botta R, Spadaro D (2018b). Several species of Penicillium isolated from chestnut flour processing are pathogenic on fresh chestnuts and produce mycotoxins. Food Microbiology 76: 396-404.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(44)
Ren F, Dong W, Shi SQ, Wang HH, Dou GM, Yan DH (2021). Primary study on causes and associated pathogens for chestnut leaf scorch. Forest Research 34 (2): 185-192.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(45)
Rigling D, Prospero S (2018). Cryphonectria parasitica, the causal agent of chestnut blight: invasion history, population biology and disease control. Molecular Plant Pathology 19 (1): 7-20.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(46)
Rodrigues P, Driss JO, Gomes-Laranjo J, Sampaio A (2022). Impact of cultivar, processing and storage on the mycobiota of European chestnut fruits. Agriculture 12 (11): 1930.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(47)
Seddaiu S, Mello A, Sechi C, Cerboneschi A, Linaldeddu BT (2021). First report of Neofusicoccum parvum associated with chestnut nut rot in Italy. Plant Disease 105 (11): 3743.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(48)
Takemoto S, Nakamura H, Imamura Y, Shimane T (2010). Schizophyllum commune as a ubiquitous plant parasite. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 44 (4): 357-364.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(49)
Tosi L, Beccari G, Rondoni G, Covarelli L, Ricci C (2015). Natural occurrence of Fusarium proliferatum on chestnut in Italy and its potential entomopathogenicity against the Asian chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus. Journal of Pest Science 88: 369-381.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(50)
White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SJWT, Taylor J (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: “PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications” (Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ eds). Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 315-322.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

(1)
María Fraga Meizoso 0000-0003-4318-069X
María López-Burgos
Fauna Útil SL, Ctra. A Guarda-Tui km 194, Tomiño, Pontevedra (Spain)
(2)
Olga Aguín 0000-0002-8869-9674
Carmen Salinero 0000-0002-2061-0215
J Pedro Mansilla 0000-0003-3232-3712
Estación Fitopatolóxica Areeiro, Deputación de Pontevedra, Subida a la Robleda s/n, Pontevedra (Spain)

Corresponding author

 
María Fraga Meizoso
mariafragameizoso@gmail.com

Citation

Fraga Meizoso M, Aguín O, López-Burgos M, Salinero C, Mansilla JP (2024). The complexity of mycobiota associated with chestnut galls induced by Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Galicia (Northwestern Spain). iForest 17: 378-385. - doi: 10.3832/ifor4559-017

Academic Editor

Matteo Marchioro

Paper history

Received: Jan 11, 2024
Accepted: Aug 27, 2024

First online: Dec 14, 2024
Publication Date: Dec 31, 2024
Publication Time: 3.63 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2024

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 466
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 232
Abstract Page Views: 144
PDF Downloads: 81
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 9

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 8
Overall contacts: 466
Avg. contacts per week: 407.75

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 

iForest Similar Articles

 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info