*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
*

Recent insights in soil nutrient cycling: perspectives from Pinus and Eucalyptus forest studies around the world

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 394-404 (2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4530-017
Published: Dec 20, 2024 - Copyright © 2024 SISEF

Review Papers

Soil nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems is a dynamic process fundamentally influenced by climatic and environmental factors. This review synthesizes studies focusing on nutrient dynamics in forests of Pinus and Eucalyptus species, highlighting the sensitivity of these systems to current climatic extremes. We emphasize that most research has been conducted predominantly in natural forests and plantations of Pinus (77%), with an increasing trend of studies on Pinus in natural environments and Eucalyptus in planted forests. Noteworthy, soil sampling in these studies has been primarily concentrated on the upper 30 cm of soil, where nutrient interactions are most pronounced. The relationship between litter and plant organ nutrients as well as soil fertility has been a significant focus of these studies, along with the role of nitrogen and carbon in response to global change. Also, we noticed the importance of research on water availability in the broader context of nutrient cycling. Our review underscores the necessity for continued research in this field, particularly to support informed management and adaptation strategies for both plantations and natural forests in the face of environmental change.

Carbon (C), Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Natural and Planted Forests, Litter, Plant Nutrient, Soil Solution

  Introduction 

The multifunctionality of forest ecosystems, defined as “the simultaneous provision of multiple services and functions by landscape to society” ([87], [18], [90], [23]), provides climate regulation, water cycle, waste decomposition, nutrient cycling, and wood production ([135], [4], [18], [23]). The multifunctionality of ecosystems is enhanced by the diversity of forest resources such as litter composition and root exudates, which are found in environments with a variety of plant species ([84], [23]). This diversity can also influence several enzymatic activities related to cycles of nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, and sulfur ([9], [55]), as well as soil respiration and composition of microbial communities ([23]).

Ecologists have investigated the relationship between biodiversity-related factors and ecosystem functions under human-driven conditions, including land use changes, nitrogen additions, and climate changes ([88], [159], [10], [111], [146], [153]). These studies are important because the ecosystem services are current threatened by climate change, pests and diseases, wildfires, drought, soil compaction due to machinery use, and excessive exploitation due to forest harvesting ([23]).

Forest plantations cover 294 million ha worldwide, accounting for 7% of the global forest area ([39]). The selection of the tree species in plantations and the silvicultural practices aimed at maximum and constant wood production leads to a simplification and homogenization of the forest landscape. This results in a reduction in biodiversity ([110]) and in the complexity of forest ecosystems ([99], [6]), significantly impacting on the potential forest functions ([14], [101]).

Tree species belonging to the genera Pinus and Eucalyptus account for 30% of plantations worldwide. They play a pivotal role in meeting human demands while conserving native forests from logging ([104]). However, their fast growth, along with the canopy closure and the suppression of weeds, may deeply alter soil nutrient cycling and water availability ([127], [101]).

In recent decades, emphasis has been placed on designing forest treatments that mimic natural processes and disturbances to promote and preserve biodiversity, complex dynamics, and ecosystem functioning ([42], [128], [129], [6]). Nonetheless, monocultures are still prevalent in plantations and are often characterized by the introduction of non-native, fast-growing species, with short rotation periods and intensive harvesting, which can substantially alter the physical, chemical, and biological attributes of the soil. On the other hand, the establishment of Pinus and Eucalyptus plantations may act as a bulwark against soil erosion in many sites, also offering habitats for local wildlife, enhancing the aesthetic value of landscapes, and potentially restoring hydrological services on former denuded lands ([16], [8]). Evidence has been reported that Pinus and Eucalyptus plantations can locally provide more benefits than harms in terms of delivering ecosystems services ([149]). Further, the ability of such plantations to sequester significant amounts of carbon (C) due to rapid growth represents an important contribution to carbon dioxide mitigation efforts ([16]). Indeed, this forest C pool has been used in ecosystem models for developing climate mitigation policies ([154]).

Substantial evidence indicates that afforestation of previously arable land with planted forests has led to marked increases in total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and soil organic carbon (SOC), thus enhancing soil quality ([117]). While forest plantations may provide fewer ecosystem services than natural ecosystems, their benefits still outweigh those of leaving land unplanted ([25]). Such services, including soil aeration, water permeability, and fertility, are intimately linked to the integrity of soil physical properties ([15]).

This review aims to consolidate research findings on soil nutrient cycling in both natural and plantation forests of Pinus and Eucalyptus. It seeks to answer the following questions: (i) has there been an increase in studies on these topics in recent years? (ii) Has more research on nutrient cycling been conducted in natural forests or in plantations? (iii) Which elements (ions) have been primarily investigated? (iv) What factors have triggered the most significant changes or concerns regarding nutrient cycling?

We collected information to shed light on the significance and management implications of soil nutrients in these environments and summarize advances, trends, and gaps to guide future research in this field.

  Material and methods 

We searched the existing literature for studies focused on nutrient cycling in Pinus and Eucalyptus forests worldwide. The literature review (Fig. 1) was conducted according to the PRISMA methodology ([96]). Data were sourced from the Web of Science™ (WoS) and Scopus™ databases. The terms “Soil Nutrient Cycling”, “Forest”, “Soil water”, and “Pine” or “Pinus” or “Eucalypt” or “Eucalyptus” were searched in the paper title, abstract, author keywords, and Keywords Plus, focusing exclusively on research articles. This search yielded 152 articles from Scopus and 446 from WoS, including 132 duplicates that were removed, resulting in a corpus of 316 articles.

Fig. 1 - Workflow description of the PRISMA searching methodology, adapted from Moher et al. ([96]).

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

We carefully scrutinized these papers and discarded those that did not match the following criteria/topics: (i) review articles, solely analyzed; (ii) wood volume and production; (iii) production and mortality of fine roots; (iv) soil water use and physical properties; (v) rainfall partitioning and groundwater recharge; (vi) soil communities, including fungal and microbial presence; (vii) distribution and diversity of tree species. We retained 158 articles that specifically addressed various aspects of the nutrient cycle in forests of Eucalyptus or Pinus for further in-depth review.

We employed descriptive statistics using R v. 4.3.1 and RStudio v. 2024.04.2 to synthesize the data. The analysis provided an overview of trends in publication frequency and countries of study. Additionally, we examined the soil depth of the studies, the primary species of the genera investigated, and emerging topics of interest. Furthermore, we meticulously evaluated, extracted, and analyzed pertinent information from the selected 158 papers to comprehend the focal treatment applied (TR), the primary analyses undertaken (AN), and the main subject of analysis (SA). We established three categorical variables (TR, AN, SA) to facilitate the data organization according to the main genera studied - Pinus and Eucalyptus.

  Results 

Soil nutrient cycling studies in Pinus and Eucalyptus

The first study addressing the nutrient cycle in Eucalyptus or Pinus forests was published in 1991. Since then up to 2023, 158 papers were published in this field, with an average of 4.8 publications per year, from one (1991) to 15 (2023) publications per year, showing an obvious growing trend (Fig. 2). Although 58% of the publications were concentrated in the last ten years (2013-2023), this upsurge underscores a growing interest in understanding nutrient and ion dynamics in soil, particularly in response to extreme weather events such as droughts and floods. Valduga et al. ([137]) reviewed articles about the ecological effects of non-natives trees in Brazil such as Pinus and Eucalyptus from 1992 to 2012, finding that more than 80% of papers were published between 2005 and 2012. This period saw a surge in studies about Pinus and Eucalyptus, which were followed by the increase observed in this review about the soil nutrient cycling of these genera.

Fig. 2 - Number of articles per year.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

The retrieved studies span various environments: 44% took place in natural forests (8% in Eucalyptus and 35% in Pinus), 47% in plantations (12% in Eucalyptus and 34% in Pinus), and the remaining 8% covered both forest types. Further, 77% of the studies were conducted in Pinus forests and 23% in Eucalyptus, similar to the results found by Pinheiro et al. ([107]), with 92 papers on Pinus and 32 of Eucalyptus in their systematic review about proteomics involved in stress responses. However, it is notable that Eucalyptus-related studies predominantly occurred in plantation settings (64%), while Pinus studies were more common in natural environments (53%).

The United States of America is the leading country in terms of publications contributing 25% with 39 documents, followed by China with 18% (28 documents) and Australia with 11% (18 papers). These three countries accounted for 54% of the total publications, while the remaining 46% were distributed across 23 countries.

As for the thematic focus, the keyword “water” was the most prevalent, appearing in 23% of the documents, followed by “dynamics” and “forest” cited in 22% of papers each, and “nitrogen” in 20%. The high frequency of these subjects suggests a research effort focused on understanding nitrogen cycles in forests, particularly in relation to water. This focus is likely influenced by the context of climate change and reflects a broader concern for the sustainability of forest ecosystems.

Soil sample depths

The analysis of the experimental data revealed the adoption of a common methodology concentrated on the upper layer of the soil for physicochemical analyses. Among the studies reviewed, 24% (38 documents) sampled only the top 10 cm of soil and 47% (74 documents) sampled the top 20 cm, and over half of investigations (58% - 92 studies) focused on the topmost 30 cm of the soil profile.

Studied species

A key aspect of this review concerns the genera Pinus and Eucalyptus. Notably, 77% of the assessed studies pertained to Pinus species. Of the 122 articles examining Pinus sp., 27 featured Pinus sylvestris (22%), which was the more studied species. Although Pinus sylvestris is not a typical planted commercial species, it is prevalent in natural boreal forests, particularly within the European boreal coniferous forests predominantly composed of Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine) and Picea abies (Norway spruce). Due to their adaptability, Pinus sylvestris stands are more widespread in less fertile soils ([19], [35], [103]).

Pinus taeda, native to Southeast America, was the second most studied pine species, comprising 15% of research. It plays a vital role in subtropical forestry worldwide ([62], [106]) and has been a cornerstone of the timber industry in the Southeastern USA for over a century ([5], [40], [75], [92], [120]). Its cultivation extends to China, where it is recognized as a fast-growing timber species ([157]), and to Brazil, where it stands out among the 1.7 million ha of Pinus spp. and the 8.61 million ha of planted forests in the country ([71]).

Regarding Eucalyptus, the species primarily used in afforestation include Eucalyptus urophylla S.T. Blake, Eucalyptus grandis Hill, and Eucalyptus dunnii Maiden ([78], [156], [164]). The research corpus reveals a focus on the Eucalyptus urophylla-grandis hybrid - resulting from the cross-breeding of Eucalyptus urophylla and Eucalyptus grandis - as the most recent subject of nutrient cycling studies. Indeed, it is present in 7 out of 38 papers that studied Eucalyptus spp. (18%). This hybrid is extensively utilized in commercial forestry, reflecting its significance and relationship with the type of environment (planted forests).

Research subjects

We evaluated the subjects addressed in each study regarding the treatment (TR) applied (Fig. 3), and found that a primary focus was on comparing forest types and soil/land uses, which appeared in 34% of the papers (53 out of 158). These comparisons often involved alien vs. native species or contrasted species within the same genus or habitat. The second most prevalent subject was management (19%), which involves silvicultural activities of site preparation, including herbicide use and scalping, stand densities, planting or forest arrangement techniques such as agroforestry ([100]), harvest residue management ([24]), thinning, litter fall removal ([51], [130]), and prescribed burning ([51]).

Fig. 3 - Number of papers by treatment (TR) applied on research of the paper.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Fire-related studies constituted the third most prevalent subject, accounting for 16% of the research and divided between prescribed burns ([70], [86], [17]) and wildfires ([48], [23], [111]), which have been more explored in recent years.

The impact of climate change on fire incidence has been significant, as fires act as agents that rapidly mineralize and mobilize nutrients ([116]). They are pivotal in the carbon cycle ([21], [112], [126]) by affecting carbon release through soil and microbial respiration ([56], [98], [133]). Additionally, fires alter the composition of soil organic matter ([69], [118]) and disturb the soil litter, upper humus horizons, plant roots and detritus ([139], [125]).

Another significant topic is “Fertilization” (13%), which can refer to synthetic products such as chemical fertilizers ([105], [107]), organic fertilizer such as poultry litter ([76]), or even about natural fertilizers such as the deposition of atmospheric nitrogen ([61], [124]), which have been explored due to ecosystem changes.

Water factor is also one of the most explored subjects (13%). Several studies aimed to investigate the nutrients’ behavior in various environments with different water availability, mostly focusing on drought changes and water limited ecosystems ([91], [53], [63]).

Mulching is another significant subject, which was addressed in 13% of the articles. These studies encompassed a range of activities, from logging and harvest residues ([132]) to the application of biochar ([34]) and manure ([167]), and the comparison of different types of litter and organic residue management ([140]).

In terms of the main analyses (AN), nitrogen (N) emerged as the most examined variable (Fig. 4), featured in 79% of the studies (125 out of 158). Nitrogen in these ecosystems is primarily derived from biological fixation and atmospheric deposition, predominantly in organic forms ([154]). Carbon was the second most studied variable, present in 72% of the papers (113 out of 158). It is susceptible to climate shifts and essential to plant photosynthesis and respiration processes ([7], [154]). Phosphorus (P), primarily sourced from the weathering of parent material and atmospheric deposition and often present in forms inaccessible to plants, was examined in 41% of the articles (64 out of 158 - [141], [150], [49], [154]). Other significant analyses were about the shift of some nutrients, mostly due to the mineralization process and, to a lesser extent, immobilization as well. This analysis is important because the presence of nutrients in the soil does not necessarily mean that plants can utilize them. Most analyses have focused on inorganic nitrogen, specifically in the forms of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) ([132], [54], [34], [91]). These studies highlighted complex interactions between C and N cycling, which are associated with litter production and decomposition ([121], [22]).

Fig. 4 - Number of papers by main analyses (AN) of research.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

A vast majority of studies (86%) investigated biogeochemical cycle variables in the soil (Fig. 5). Nutrient measurements in forest litter were conducted in 30% of the articles ([47], [108], [136], [2]), with a predominant focus on leaf or needle components. Approximately 27% of the studies examined nutrients in water in the forest ecosystem, such as stemflow, rainfall, throughfall, and outflow ([97], [131]), with most studies concentrating on rainfall ([60]). Additionally, 20% of this research analyzed plant organs such as wood, bark, branches, and roots ([79]). Distinctions between absorptive and transport roots were made to elucidate nutrient pathways ([52], [151], [43]). Only one study assessed nutrients in the atmosphere ([123]).

Fig. 5 - Number of papers by the main subject of analysis (SA) of each paper.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

  Discussion 

In this systematic review, we found a rising number of papers published each year, which may reflect an increasing concern among researchers regarding nutrient cycling. When analyzing the number of publications per country, per genera and per type of forest (natural or planted), a distinct trend emerges. The USA researchers tends to investigate Pinus in natural environments, while Australian scientists are primarily concerned with Eucalyptus in natural forests. Interestingly, China, which is not a primary natural habitat for either Pinus or Eucalyptus, has emerged as the second country with more publications, focused mainly on comparing natural environments and planted forests with these genera.

Research commonly focuses on keywords such as water, dynamics, forest, and nitrogen, reflecting an effort by scientists to understand the nitrogen cycle in forests, particularly in relation to water, which is often affected by extreme climate events. Additionally, the papers analyzed in this review indicate that the upper 30 cm of soil is the preferred layer for sampling, as it provides a more detailed response.

The species more studied were P. sylvestris, P. taeda and E. urophylla-grandis. It is worth to note that the first one is a species frequently found in natural boreal forests, but the second and third species are frequently used in planted commercial forests, which can also provide some ecological services such as soil nutrient cycling.

The main subjects of the reviewed papers show that the majority of studies are aimed to compare different types of forest, especially between natural and monospecific forests. Regarding this aspect, it is well known that the soil nutrient cycling is richer in heterospecific forests compared to plantations due the composition and decomposition of litter. It is desirable that future research in this field should not only focus on management practices like site preparation, harvest residue management, and thinning - since these areas are vital for guiding commercial crops - but also explore less common and less intense techniques such as intercropping and mosaic planting. Investigating these methods could reveal their effectiveness in enhancing plant activities related to nutrient uptake and improving nutrient cycling overall.

Our results stress that climate change, particularly concerning water availability, is a critical issue for future research and the well-being of both natural and commercial forests. Indeed, many studies focused on soil nutrients - specifically nitrogen, carbon, phosphorus, and mineralization - in environments with varying water availability. These studies are essential for understanding how extreme weather events, such as heavy precipitation and droughts, can impact these forests. However, we recommend further research due aimed at disentagling the complex role of water in plant development, physiology, morphology, and anatomy. Additionally, we highlight the need of further investigations on plant plasticity in relation to nutrient availability, uptake, and use, especially given the rapid changes occurring in the environment.

Soil sample depths

In a Masson pine plantation, Justine et al. ([66]) observed a decline in total organic carbon (TOC) from 4.48% to 1.95% and total nitrogen (TN) from 0.32% to 0.14% when comparing the upper (0-30 cm) to the lower (30-60 cm) layers. Similarly, levels of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) predominated in the upper layer, underscoring its role as a significant reservoir of dissolved organic matter (DOM).

Consistent with these findings, a general decrease in soil carbon, TN, and total phosphorous (TP) with increasing depth was observed in a different-aged Masson pine forest plantation in Southwest China ([158]). In a temperate coniferous rain forest at the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest in the Cascade Mountains of west-central Oregon, USA, the mineral topsoil (0-2 cm and 0-10 cm, respectively) is the primary source of DOC and DON ([155], [140]).

In a detailed study by Versini et al. ([140]), six soil depths (2, 15, 50, 100, 200, and 400 cm) have been studied, finding that nitrate (NO3) concentrations were anomalously higher at 15 cm compared to 2 cm depth, diverging from the trend seen with other elements where calcium (Ca) and NH4+ fluxes decreased within the 0-15 cm layer.

Maxwell et al. ([91]) examined soil microorganism activity and nutrient availability down to a 90 cm depth. Their findings highlighted a link between soil microorganism activity and carbon and nitrogen levels, gauged by extracellular enzyme activities (EEA), which were notable at an intermediate depth of 15-30 cm. Additionally, they found that increased water availability amplified phosphorus-related EEA in the top 30 cm of soil.

Caldeira et al. ([20]) examined the chemical composition of soil solutions across a profile extending from 0 to 300 cm. They observed a general decline in cation and anion concentrations from the forest floor to the 15 cm depth, except for Mg2+ and NO3 in clay soils and SO2-4 in sandy soils, which peaked at 15 cm depth.

It has been commonly observed that the concentration of organic C, TN, TP, available N, and P tends to decrease with increasing soil depth ([32], [37]). This trend is likely due to the contributions from surface litter decomposition, animal remains, and feces ([154]).

Our analysis indicates that sampling within the upper 30 cm of soil is generally adequate for studies focused on soil nutrient composition and microbial activity, particularly in the top 15 cm, which is more affected by water, biological activity, and litter. However, for investigations into nutrient leaching and soil flux drainage, it is recommended to sample deeper, potentially reaching up to 100 cm.

Soil nutrients

The soil carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry is a critical indicator of the dynamic changes in soil mineral elements and has been widely used in studies to ascertain the interactions and balance among these elements ([38], [166], [163]).

Soil N originates primarily from biological N fixation and atmospheric deposition, and it is found mainly in organic form ([154]). However, it became available to plants in the inorganic form, which is available after decomposition of the organic compounds by microorganisms ([93], [13], [44], [154]). Soil phosphorus (P) primarily originates from mineral weathering and atmospheric deposition, and it exists in both organic and inorganic forms. However, most of these forms are unavailable for plant uptake due to their organic nature ([154]). As a result, the availability of certain nutrients is influenced by soil microbial activity.

Soil stoichiometry is affected not only by soil fertility but also by the ecological succession. Zhang et al. ([163]) noted that shifts in the C:N:P ratio and microbial biomass correlate with the age of restoration efforts. This correlation highlights the importance of monitoring these ratios as potential indicators of soil P limitations and N supply adequacy ([130], [115], [114]). Temporal changes in soil stoichiometry can significantly alter soil organic matter quality, thereby affecting the rates of crucial ecosystem functions ([84]). For example, a low C:N ratio can stimulate organic matter mineralization, whereas a high C:N ratio could lead to nutrient immobilization ([68], [84]). Baruch et al. ([8]) found that native forest soils exhibit significantly higher carbon and mineral content compared to Pinus caribaea plantations, yet interestingly, there was no discernible difference in soil C:N and N:P ratios between the two vegetation types.

A comparative analysis of soil use indicates that pine plantations may possess superior soil properties over farmlands, with notable improvements in soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and microbial biomass, which tend to increase with forest age ([163]). However, Yin et al. ([158]) reported a fluctuating trend in soil carbon, total nitrogen, total potassium, and total phosphorus in P. massoniana plantations, with available phosphorus increasing and available nitrogen initially decreasing but later increasing with plantation age. This can be explained by the mineralization process (i.e., the transformation of total to available N) due to forest ageing. This study also highlighted a positive correlation between total nitrogen and available potassium and a negative one between available phosphorus and soil water content, indicating the complex interplay between these elements.

While forest age is a significant factor influencing nutrient availability and mineralization, soil biological activity is equally crucial in organic matter metabolism, thereby impacting nutrient cycling ([46], [161]). Maxwell et al. ([91]) demonstrated that increased water availability could enhance phosphorus-related extracellular enzyme activity, which plays a pivotal role in the soil nutrient mineralization.

According to Liu et al. ([81]), soil available phosphorus in Pinus sylvestris plantations was substantially higher in wetter years compared to drier ones. This finding aligns with other studies indicating that both soil net nitrogen mineralization rates and phosphorus availability tend to be higher in wetter conditions ([168], [143]).

Coniferous forests have significantly higher concentrations of nitrate and sulfate compared to beech forests, likely due to higher throughfall N and S fluxes. The higher concentrations may affect the mineral soil cation exchange complex and could potentially lead to greater leaching of macronutrients ([31], [82], [12]). The study by Mareschal et al. ([89]) indicated that net nitrification rates in Eucalyptus stands were highest in younger forests and reduced in older ones, with rates significantly higher than those in local natural forests (Savannas).

Lastly, nitrogen fertilization has been shown to increase leaf nitrogen concentrations, reduce nitrogen resorption efficiency, and significantly increase soil NO3-, NH4+, inorganic N, and available P levels. However, these changes in soil chemistry do not appear to have a direct relationship with growth, as measured by stem diameter increment, of Pinus sylvestris plantations ([160], [81]).

Litter

Litterfall can affect soil fertility, soil community composition and nutrient uptake of succeeding plants, and plays a significant role in mediating the relationships between biodiversity and ecosystem functions ([111], [165]).

The process of litter decomposition, which plays a crucial role in nutrient resorption, is primarily influenced by litter chemistry ([81]). A comparative analysis of litter from pine plantations and native forests by Baruch et al. ([8]) revealed a significantly higher litter mass in the pine (Pinus spp.) plantations. However, the nutrient content (N, P, Ca, K) was found to be 3-10 times lower than that in the native forest soil. Despite lower nutrient content, the carbon storage in pine plantations can exceed that of other forest types due to the high biomass yield from fast pine growth and the slow decomposition of pine litter. In their study, Baruch et al. ([8]) recorded a 39% higher carbon storage in pine plantations compared to a lower montane cloud forest.

Achilles et al. ([1]) found that foliar litter fall was the predominant mechanism for the return of base cations to the topsoil. In a European beech forest, the return of base cations through litter fall was nearly twice that of the base cation deposition from throughfall and stemflow. However, in coniferous forests, these inputs were of the same magnitude. This indicates that native forests, with faster litter decomposition, may provide superior soil nutrient enrichment compared to pine plantations, where low litter quality and slower decomposition cause difficulty in nutrient cycling ([8]). However, this process, even when slow, is important because they are potentially the most important in mediating soil functioning during ecosystem recovery ([80], [111]).

Environment factors

The analysis of the reviewed papers allowed us to identify two main groups of subjects: the first is related to anthropogenic activities, such as management, fire (prescribed and due to illegal activity), fertilization, and mulching, whereas the second group of subjects is related to “natural events”, which are intensified and/or accelerated due anthropogenic activities such as climatic conditions, the growth stage of plants, fire (wildfire), and water factors.

We noted a major concern about the future of plant behavior and the characteristics of the environment due to changes caused by these accelerated events, such as the forest C cycle, which is sensitive to a higher soil temperature and changing of climate ([45], [162], [154]), and the nutrient cycling process, which is sensitive to changes in temperature and precipitation ([122], [3], [11], [154]), affecting the amount of soil available N and P ([58], [154]).

Wildfires became more extreme and uncontrollable with regime shifts, and are regarded as global drivers, pumping large amounts of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere ([142]). These events are expected to devastate ecosystems and communities ([28], [29], [111]). Soil water content, which is also affected by the extreme events, influences nutrient concentration, availability, migration, and the uptake ability of plant roots through soil microbial activity, aeration, and temperature ([77], [94], [64]).

Plant organs

Nitrogen is one of the nutrients more evaluated in green leaves or needles. The foliar total nitrogen mass is positively correlated with foliar N isotope composition (δ15N) and is an indicator of plant productivity ([152], [148], [67], [59], [86]). N availability influences the photosynthetic capacity of leaves because the Calvin cycle proteins and thylakoids contain most of the leaf N ([152], [148], [57]). N is also the main component of the Rubisco enzyme involved in photosynthesis ([36], [86]).

Liu et al. ([81]) hypothesized that decreased precipitation would decrease needle nutrient concentrations. Lu & Han ([83]) demonstrated that water addition increased N concentration in green leaves in an experiment with simulated precipitation. Many other studies corroborated the positive correlation between soil moisture and plants N and P uptake ([30], [147], [119], [81]), and nutrient concentration ([113], [102]). Indeed, low precipitation can lead to the reduction of mass flow and nutrient diffusion in soil ([26], [73]), reducing the activity of fine roots ([74]) and the nutrient uptake ([81]).

On the other hand, Liu et al. ([81]) found no correlations between needle N and P concentrations and soil available water in a four-year study, and similar results were obtained by Luo et al. ([85]) and Minoletti & Boerner ([95]). This inconsistency can be attributed to a decrease in precipitation, which limits mass flow of nutrients and their diffusivity in the soil. Such reduction can lead to low concentrations of nutrients in green needle or leaves, regardless of nutrient availability in the soil ([33], [134]). Additionally, it can be explained by the fact that foliar nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations are primarily driven by the plant demands rather than the availability of nutrients in the soil ([109]).

Fine roots play a key role in nutrient uptake and are essential for absorbing soil resources ([52], [151]). Studies show that higher concentrations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in the roots can limit plant growth ([41]). Additionally, fine roots may exhibit increased respiration rates and mycorrhizal colonization, which enhances their ability to uptake nutrients ([50], [138], [144], [41], [43]).

Several studies indicate that nitrogen (N) addition enhances the availability of inorganic soil nitrogen and increases root nitrogen concentration (RNC) and the nitrogen-to-phosphorus (N:P) ratio ([65], [72]). Additionally, Geng & Jin ([43]) found a positive correlation between N addition and root phosphorus (P) concentration, as well as available P, similar to the findings of Wang et al. ([145]). N addition also stimulates P activity, increases P absorption, and helps maintain the balance of N and P in plants. However, the study by Chen et al. ([27]) reported that while N addition increased the carbon-to-nitrogen (C:N) ratio, it resulted in decreased root N and P concentrations.

  Conclusion 

Nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems emerges as a highly sensitive and complex process, markedly affected by climatic and environmental variables. In the face of current climatic change and extreme weather events, it becomes increasingly essential to elucidate the specific roles, contributions, and limitations of each nutrient across diverse environmental contexts.

This review identified a significant body of research and an increasing trend of published papers over the years. These studies are primarily focused on pine forests, both natural and cultivated, providing useful insights into nutrient dynamics in natural forest and plantations. These studies have frequently focused on the upper soil layer (less than 30 cm), which is often rich in information due to higher biological activity.

We found a trend of Eucalyptus-related studies in plantation settings (64%), while Pinus studies were more common in natural environments (53%). The reviewed papers often compare different types of forests, especially monospecific (plantations) vs. heterospecific (natural), the latter having a richer litter and a better nutrient cycling.

Most research analyzed N, C, P and the mineralization process of nutrients, especially N, with an effort in water dynamics. These investigation are crucial in light of the climate change scenario, particularly changes in water regime, wildfires, and temperature.

The complex role of nutrient availability/deficiency in plant development, physiology, morphology and anatomy, calls for further research on the dynamics of nutrient cycling in forests and on the plasticity of plants to face the extreme events, which can dramatically change the dynamic of nutrient cycling.

The collective findings of these studies are invaluable, particularly in informing the adaptive management of both plantation forests and natural ecosystems. Understanding these complex interactions is crucial for fostering resilience and sustainability in forest management practices in view of the challenges posed by a changing climate.

  Acknowledgements 

The authors are grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Personnel Education (Capes, Brazil) for the financial support (scholarships).

  References

(1)
Achilles F, Tischer A, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Chmara I, Achilles M, Michalzik B (2021). Effects of moderate nitrate and low sulphate depositions on the status of soil base cation pools and recent mineral soil acidification at forest conversion sites with European beech (“green eyes”) embedded in Norway spruce and scots pine stands. Forests 12 (5): 573.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Adam WM, Rodrigues VDS, Magri E, Motta ACV, Prior SA, Moraes Zambon L, Lima RLD (2021). Mid-rotation fertilization and liming of Pinus taeda: growth, litter, fine root mass, and elemental composition. iForest 14: 195-202.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Allen K, Dupuy JM, Gei MG, Hulshof C, Medvigy D, Pizano C, Salgado-Negret B, Smith CM, Trierweiler A, Van Bloem SJ, Waring BG, Xu X, Powers JS (2017). Will seasonally dry tropical forests be sensitive or resistant to future changes in rainfall regimes? Environmental Research Letters 12 (2): 023001.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Aponte C, García LV, Marañón T (2013). Tree species effects on nutrient cycling and soil biota: a feedback mechanism favouring species coexistence. Forest Ecology and Management 309: 36-46.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Ashe WW (1915). Loblolly, or North Carolina pine. Bulletin no. 24, USDA Forest Services, Edwards and Broughton Printing Co., Raleigh, NC, USA, pp. 131.
Gscholar
(6)
Bagnato S, Marziliano PA, Sidari M, Mallamaci C, Marra F, Muscolo A (2021). Effects of gap size and cardinal directions on natural regeneration, growth dynamics of trees outside the gaps and soil properties in European beech forests of Southern Italy. Forests 12: 1563.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Barret DJ (2002). Steady state turnover time of carbon in the Australian terrestrial biosphere. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16 (4): 1-21.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Baruch Z, Nozawa S, Johnson E, Yerena E (2019). Ecosystem dynamics and services of a paired neotropical montane forest and pine plantation. Revista de Biologia Tropical 67 (1): 24-35.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Bastida F, Zsolnay A, Hernández T, García C (2008). Past, present and future of soil quality indices: a biological perspective. Geoderma 147: 159-171.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Berlinches De Gea A, Hautier Y, Geisen S (2023). Interactive effects of global change drivers as determinants of the link between soil biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Global Change Biology 29 (2): 296-307.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Berner LT, Law BE, Hudiburg TW (2017). Water availability limits tree productivity, carbon stocks, and carbon residence time in mature forests across the western US. Biogeosciences 14 (2): 365-378.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Binkley D, Fisher RF (2019). Ecology and management of forest soils. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, pp. 456.
Online | Gscholar
(13)
Boring LR, Swank WT, Waide JB, Henderson GS (1988). Sources, fates, and impacts of nitrogen inputs to terrestrial ecosystems: Review and synthesis. Biogeochemistry 6 (2): 119-159.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Bréchet L, Ponton S, Roy J, Freycon V, Coûteaux MM, Bonal D, Epron D (2009). Do tree species characteristics influence soil respiration in tropical forests? A test based on 16 tree species planted in monospecific plots. Plant and Soil 319: 235-246.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Brockerhoff EG, Jactel H, Parrotta JA, Quine CP, Sayer J (2008). Plantation forests and biodiversity: oxymoron or opportunity? Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 925-951.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Bruijnzeel LA (1998). Soil chemical changes after tropical forest disturbance and conversion: the hydrological perspective. In: “Soils of Tropical Forest Ecosystems” (Schulte A, Ruhiyat D eds). Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 45-61.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Butler OM, Lewis T, Chen C (2017). Prescribed fire alters foliar stoichiometry and nutrient resorption in the understorey of a subtropical eucalypt forest. Plant Soil 410: 181-191.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Byrnes JE, Gamfeldt L, Isbell F, Lefcheck JS, Griffin JN, Hector A, Cardinale BJ, Hooper DU, Dee LE, Emmett Duffy J (2014). Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: challenges and solutions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5 (2): 111-124.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Cajander AK (1949). Forest types and their significance. Suomen Metsätieteellinen Seura, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 1-71.
Gscholar
(20)
Caldeira A, Krushe AV, Mareschal L, Silva P, Nouvellon Y, Campoe O (2023). Low nutrient losses by deep leaching after clearcutting and replanting Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management 534: 120866.
Gscholar
(21)
Campbell J, Donato D, Azuma D, Law B (2007). Pyrogenic carbon emission from a large wildfire in Oregon, United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 12: G04014.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Campbell JL, Gower ST (2000). Detritus production and soil N transformations in old-growth eastern hemlock and sugar maple stands. Ecosystems 3: 185-192.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Carmona-Yáñez MD, Francos M, Miralles I, Soria R, Ahangarkolaee SS, Vafaie E, Zema DA, Lucas-Borja ME (2023). Short-term impacts of wildfire and post-fire mulching on ecosystem multifunctionality in a semi-arid pine forest. Forest Ecology and Management 541 (5): 121000.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Carneiro MAC, Souza ED, Reis EF, Pereira HS, Azevedo WR (2009). Atributos físicos, químicos e biológicos de solo de Cerrado sob diferentes sistemas de uso e manejo [Physical, chemical and biological properties of Cerrado soil under different land use and tillage systems]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa 33: 147-157. [in Portuguese]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Cavelier J, Tobler A (1998). The effect of abandoned plantations of Pinus patula and Cupressus lusitanica on soils and regeneration of a tropical montane rain forest in Colombia. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 335-347.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Chapin FS (1991). Effects of multiple environmental stresses on nutrient availability and use. In: “Response of Plants to Multiple Stresses” vol. 60 (Winner WE, Pell EJ eds). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 67-88.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Chen G, Tu L, Peng Y, Hu H, Hu T, Xu Z, Liu L, Tang Y (2017). Effect of nitrogen additions on root morphology and chemistry in a subtropical bamboo forest. Plant and Soil 412: 441-451.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Coop JD, Parks SA, Stevens-Rumann CS, Crausbay SD, Higuera PE, Hurteau MD, Tepley A, Whitman E, Assal T, Collins BM, Davis KT, Dobrowski S, Falk DA, Fornwalt PJ, Fulé PZ, Harvey BJ, Kane VR, Littlefield CE, Margolis EQ, North M, Parisien MA, Prichard S, Rodman KC (2020). Wildfire-driven forest conversion in Western North American landscapes. BioScience 70 (8): 659-673.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Correa DB, Alcntara E, Libonati R, Massi KG, Park E (2022). Increased burned area in the Pantanal over the past two decades. Science of the Total Environment 835: 155386.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Cramer MD, Hawkins HJ, Verboom GA (2009). The importance of nutritional regulation of plant water flux. Oecologia 161: 15-24.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
De Schrijver A, Geudens G, Augusto L, Staelens J, Mertens J, Wuyts K, Gielis L, Verheyen K (2007). The effect of forest type on throughfall deposition and seepage flux: a review. Oecologia 153: 663-674.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Deng H, Chen A, Yan S, Lin Y, Hong W (2015). Nutrient resorption efficiency and C:N:P stoichiometry in different ages of Leucaena leucocephala. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology 21: 522-527.
Gscholar
(33)
Dijkstra FA, Augustine DJ, Brewer P, Fischer JC (2012). Nitrogen cycling and water pulses in semiarid grasslands: are microbial and plant processes temporally asynchronous? Oecologia 170: 799-808.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Dumroese RK, Pinto JR, Heiskanen J, Tervahauta A, McBurney KG (2018). Biochar can be a suitable replacement for sphagnum peat in nursery production of Pinus ponderosa seedlings. Forests 9 (5): 232.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
Essen P, Ehnström B, Ericson L, Sjöberg K (1997). Boreal forests. Ecological Bulletins 46: 16-47.
Gscholar
(36)
Evand RD (2001). Physiological mechanisms influencing plant nitrogen isotope composition. Trends Plant Science 6: 121-126.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
Fan H, Wu J, Liu W, Yuan Y, Hu L, Cai Q (2015). Linkages of plant and soil C:N:P stoichiometry and their relationships to forest growth in subtropical plantations. Plant Soil 392: 127-38.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(38)
Fanin N, Fromin N, Buatois B, Hattenschwiler S (2013). An experimental test of the hypothesis of non-homeostatic consumer stoichiometry in a plant litter microbe system. Ecology Letters 16 (6): 764-772.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(39)
FAO (2022). The state of the World’s forests 2022. Forest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 166.
Gscholar
(40)
Frank HER, Garcia K (2021). Benefits provided by four ectomycorrhizal fungi to Pinus taeda. Mycorrhiza 31: 755-766.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(41)
Freschet GT, Pages L, Iversen CM, Comas LH, Rewald B (2021). A starting guide to root ecology: strengthening ecological concepts and standardising root classification, sampling, processing and trait measurements. New Phytologist 232: 973-1122.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(42)
Gardiner B, Blennow K, Carnus JM, Fleischer P, Ingemarson F (2010). Destructive storms in european forests: past and forthcoming impacts. Final Report to DG Environment (07.0307/2009/SI2.540092/ETU/B.1), Atlantic European Regional Office, European Forest Institute, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 138.
Online | Gscholar
(43)
Geng P, Jin G (2022). Fine root morphology and chemical responses to N addition depend on root function and soil depth in a Korean pine plantation in Northeast China. Forest Ecology and Management 520: 120407.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(44)
Gower ST (2003). Patterns and mechanisms of the forest carbon cycle. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28 (1): 169-204.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(45)
Giorgetta MA, Jungclaus J, Reick CH, Legutke S, Bader J, Böttinger M (2013). Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 5 (3): 572-597.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(46)
Gispert M, Emran M, Pardini G, Doni S, Ceccanti B (2013). The impact of land management and abandonment on soil enzymatic activity, glomalin content and aggregate stability. Geoderma 202: 51-61.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(47)
González-Arias A, Amezaga I, Echeandía A, Onaindia M (2000). Buffering capacity through cation leaching of Pinus radiata D. Don canopy. Plant Ecology 149: 23-42.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(48)
Granath G, Evans CD, Strengbom J, Fölster J, Grelle A, Strömqvist J, Köhler SJ (2021). The impact of wildfire on biogeochemical fluxes and water quality in boreal catchments. Biogeosciences 18: 3243-3261.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(49)
Gu C, Wilson SG, Margenot AJ (2020). Lithological and bioclimatic impacts on soil phosphatase activities in California temperate forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 141 (2): 107633.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(50)
Gu J, Xu Y, Dong X, Wang H, Wang Z (2014). Root diameter variations explained by anatomy and phylogeny of 50 tropical and temperate tree species. Tree Physiology 34: 415-25.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(51)
Gundale MJ, DeLuca TH, Fiedler CE, Ramsey PW, Harrington MG, Gannon JE (2005). Restoration treatments in a Montana ponderosa pine forest: effects on soil physical, chemical and biological properties. Forest Ecology and Management 213: 25-38.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(52)
Guo D, Xia M, Wei X, Chang W, Liu Y, Wang Z (2008). Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytologist 180: 673-83.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(53)
Hartmann M, Herzog C, Brunner I, Stierli B, Meyer F, Buchmann N, Frey B (2023). Long-term mitigation of drought changes the functional potential and life-strategies of the forest soil microbiome involved in organic matter decomposition. Frontiers in Microbiology 14: 1267270.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(54)
Hasegawa S, Macdonald CA, Power SA (2015). Elevated carbon dioxide increases soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability in a phosphorus-limited Eucalyptus woodland. Global Change Biology 22 (4): 1628-1643.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(55)
Hedo J, Lucas-Borja ME, Wic C, Andrés-Abellán M, De Las Heras J (2015). Soil microbiological properties and enzymatic activities of long-term post-fire recovery in dry and semiarid Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis M.) forest stands. Solid Earth 6: 243-252.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(56)
Holden SR, Treseder KK (2013). A meta-analysis of soil microbial biomass responses to forest disturbances. Frontiers in Microbiology 4: 88-104.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(57)
Hosseini Bai S, Sun FF, Xu ZH, Blumfield TJ, Chen CR, Wild C (2012). Appraisal of 15N enrichment and 15N natural abundance methods for estimating N2 fixation by understory Acacia leiocalyx and Acacia disparrima in a native forest of subtropical Australia. Journal of Soils and Sediments 12 (5): 653-662.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(58)
Hou E, Chen C, Luo Y, Zhou G, Kuang Y, Zhang Y, Heenan M, Lu X, Wen D (2018). Effects of climate on soil phosphorus cycle and availability in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology 24 (8): 3344-3356.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(59)
Houngnandan P, Yemadje RGH, Oikeh SO, DjidoHokpin CF, Boeckx P, Van Cleemput O (2008). Improved estimation of biological nitrogen fixation of soybean cultivars (Glycine max L. Merril) using 15N natural abundance technique. Biology and Fertility of Soils 45: 175-83.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(60)
Huang Y, Zhou G, Tang Jiang X H, Zhang D, Zhang Q (2011). Estimated soil respiration rates decreased with long-term soil microclimate changes in successional forests in Southern China. Environmental Management 48: 1189-1197.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(61)
Hungate BA, Hart SC, Selmants PC, Boyle SI, Gehring CA (2007). Soil responses to management, increased precipitation, and added nitrogen in Ponderosa pine forests. Ecological Applications 17 (5): 1352-1365.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(62)
IBA (2019). Dados e Estatísticas [Data and statistics]. Indústria Brasileira de Árvores - IBA, Brasília, Brazil, pp. 80. [in Portuguese]
Online | Gscholar
(63)
Jaeger ACH, Hartmann M, Six J, Solly EF (2023). Contrasting sensitivity of soil bacterial and fungal community composition to one year of water limitation in Scots pine mesocosms. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 99 (6): fiad051.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(64)
Jin Y, Xiang Y, Li C, Yan L, Li J, Li Z, Zhao B, Qi S (2023). Plant secondary succession and soil degradation in humid red beds areas, South China. Ecological Indicators 154: 110504.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(65)
Jing H, Zhou H, Wang G, Xue S, Liu G, Duan M (2017). Nitrogen addition changes the stoichiometry and growth rate of different organs in Pinus tabuliformis seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 19-22.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(66)
Justine M, Yang W, Wu F, Tan B, Khan MN, Li Z (2017). Dissolved organic matter in soils varies across a chronosequence of Pinus massoniana plantations. Ecosphere 8 (4): 1-11.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(67)
Kiers ET, Rousseau RA, West SA, Denison RF (2003). Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature 425: 78-81.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(68)
Killham K (1994). Soil Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 242.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(69)
Knicker H (2011). Pyrogenic organic matter in soil: its origin and occurrence, its chemistry and survival in soil environments. Quaternary International 243: 251-263.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(70)
Knoepp JD, Vose JM, Swank WT (2004). Long-term soil responses to site preparation burning in the Southern Appalachians. Forest Science 50 (4): 540-550.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(71)
Kulmann MSDS, Deliberali L, Schumacher MV, Stahl J, Figura MA, Ludvichak AA, Stape JL (2023). Can fertilization and stand uniformity affect the growth and biomass. Forest Ecology and Management 541: 121075.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(72)
Kumar A, Van Duijnen R, Delory BM, Reichel R, Bruggemann N, Temperton VM (2020). Barley shoot biomass responds strongly to N:P stoichiometry and intraspecific competition, whereas roots only alter their foraging. Plant and Soil 453: 515-28.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(73)
Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (2008). Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New York, USA, pp. 604.
Gscholar
(74)
León-Sánchez L, Nicolás E, Goberna M, Prieto I, Maestre FT, Querejeta JI (2018). Poor plant performance under simulated climate change is linked to mycorrhizal responses in a semi-arid shrubland. Journal of Ecology 106: 960-76.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(75)
Li B, McKeand S, Weir R (1999). Tree improvement and sustainable forestry impact of two cycles of loblolly pine breeding in the USA. International Journal of Genetics 6: 229-234. -
Online | Gscholar
(76)
Liechty HO, Blazier MA, Wight JP, Gaston LA, Richardson JD, Ficklin RL (2009). Assessment of repeated application of poultry litter on phosphorus and nitrogen dynamics in loblolly pine: implications for water quality. Forest Ecology and Management 258 (10): 2294-2303.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(77)
Lima TTS, Miranda IS, Vasconcelos SS (2010). Effects of water and nutrient availability on fine root growth in eastern Amazonian forest regrowth, Brazil. New Phytologist 187: 622-630.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(78)
Liu J (2009). Research status and development trend of Eucalyptus in China. Eucalyptus Technology 26 (2): 50-62.
Gscholar
(79)
Liu Y, Li P, Wang G, Liu G, Li Z (2016). Above- and below-ground biomass distribution and morphological characteristics respond to nitrogen addition in Pinus tabuliformis. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 46: 25.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(80)
Liu X, Huang Z, Havrilla CA, Liu Y, Wu GL (2021). Plant litter crust role in nutrients cycling potentials by bacterial communities in a sandy land ecosystem. Land Degradation and Development 32 (11): 3194-3203.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(81)
Liu L, Zhao Q, Zheng L-L, Zeng D-H (2023). Responses of nutrient resorption to interannual precipitation variability and nitrogen addition in a pine plantation. Ecosphere 14: e4395.
Gscholar
(82)
Lorenz M, Clarke N, Paoletti E, Bytnerowicz A, Grulke N, Lukina N, Sase H, Staeles J (2010). Air pollution impacts on forests in changing climate. In: “Forest and Society-Responding to Global Drivers of Change”. IUFRO World Series vol. 25, Vienna, Austria, pp. 55-74.
Online | Gscholar
(83)
Lu XT, Han XG (2010). Nutrient resorption responses to water and nitrogen amendment in semi-arid grassland of Inner Mongolia, China. Plant and Soil 327: 481-491.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(84)
Lucas-Borja ME, Delgado-Baquerizo M (2019). Plant diversity and soil stoichiometry regulates the changes in multifunctionality during pine temperate forest secondary succession. Science of the Total Environment 697: 134204.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(85)
Luo WT, Elser JJ, Lu XT, Wang ZW, Bai E, Yan CF, Wang C (2015). Plant nutrients do not covary with soil nutrients under changing climatic conditions. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 29: 1298-1308.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(86)
Ma L, Rao X, Lu P, Bai SH, Xu Z, Chen X, Blumfield T, Xie J (2015). Ecophysiological and foliar nitrogen concentration responses of understory Acacia spp. and Eucalyptus sp. to prescribed burning. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 22 (13): 10254-10262.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(87)
Maestre FT, Quero JL, Gotelli NJ, Escudero A, Ochoa V, Delgado-Baquerizo M, García-Gómez M, Bowker MA, Soliveres S, Escolar C (2012). Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335: 214-218.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(88)
Mahmoudi N, Caeiro MF, Mahdhi M, Tenreiro R, Ulm F, Mars M, Cruz C, Dias T (2021). Arbuscular mycorrhizal traits are good indicators of soil multifunctionality in drylands. Geoderma 397: 115099.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(89)
Mareschal L, Laclau JP, Nzila JDD, Versini A, Koutika LS, Mazoumbou JC, Deleporte P, Bouillet JP, Ranger J (2013). Nutrient leaching and deep drainage under Eucalyptus plantations managed in short rotations after afforestation of an African savanna: two 7-year time series. Forest Ecology and Management 307: 242-254.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(90)
Mastrangelo ME, Weyland F, Villarino SH, Barral MP, Nahuelhual L, Laterra P (2014). Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services. Landscape Ecology 29 (2): 345-358.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(91)
Maxwell T, Augusto L, Bon L, Courbineau A, Altinalmazis-Kondylis A, Milin S, Bakker MR, Jactel H, Fanin N (2020). Effect of a tree mixture and water availability on soil nutrients and extracellular enzyme activities along the soil profile in an experimental forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 148 (1796): 107864.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(92)
McKeand SE, Jokela EJ, Huber DA (2006). Performance of improved genotypes of loblolly pine across different soils, climates, and silvicultural inputs. Forest Ecology and Management 227: 178-184.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(93)
McGill WB, Cole CV (1981). Comparative aspects of cycling of organic C, N, S and P through soil organic matter. Geoderma 26 (4): 267-286.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(94)
Miki NH, Sasaki S, Yang L, Ogasa MY (2017). Effects of soil nutrient conditions on water transport properties and recovery from severe drought stress in Pinus densiflora saplings. Journal of Forestry Research 22 (3): 177-184.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(95)
Minoletti ML, Boerner REJ (1994). Drought and site fertility effects on foliar nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics and nutrient resorption by the forest understory shrub Viburnum acerifolium L. The American Midland Naturalist 131: 109-119.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(96)
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151 (4): 264-269.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(97)
Möller A, Kaiser K, Guggenberger G (2005). Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in precipitation, throughfall, soil solution, and stream water of the tropical highlands in northern Thailand. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 168 (5): 649-659.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(98)
Näthe K, Levia DF, Tischer A, Michalzik B (2018). Low-intensity surface fire effects on carbon and nitrogen cycling in soil and soil solution of a Scots pine forest in central Germany. Catena 162: 360-375.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(99)
Nocentini S, Buttoud G, Ciancio O, Corona P (2017). Managing forests in a changing world: the need for a systemic approach. A review. Forest Systems 26: eR01.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(100)
Nyakatawa EZ, Mays DA, Naka K, Bukenya JO (2012). Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in a loblolly pine-goat silvopasture system in the Southeast USA. Agroforestry Systems 86: 129-140.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(101)
Ontong N, Poolsiri R, Diloksumpun S, Staporn D, Jenke M (2023). Effects of tree functional traits on soil respiration in tropical forest plantations. Forests 14: 715.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(102)
Orwin KH, Buckland SM, Johnson D, Turner BL, Smart S, Oakley S, Bardgett RD (2010). Linkages of plant traits to soil properties and the functioning of temperate grassland. Journal of Ecology 98: 1074-1083.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(103)
Palmroth S, Holm AB, Nordin A, Palmqvist K (2014). Nitrogen-addition effects on leaf traits and photosynthetic carbon gain of boreal forest understory shrubs. Oecologia 175 (2): 457-470.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(104)
Paquette A, Messier C (2010). The role of plantations in managing the world’s forests in the Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8: 27-34.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(105)
Pegoraro RL, Falkenberg MdeB, Voltolini CH, Santos M, Paulilo MTS (2010). Produção de óleos essenciais em plantas de Mentha x piperita L. var. piperita (Lamiaceae) submetidas a diferentes níveis de luz e nutrição do substrato [Production of essential oils in plants of Mentha x piperita L. var. piperita (Lamiaceae) submitted to different light levels and nutrition of the substratum]. Brazilian Journal of Botany 33 (4): 631-637. - [in Portuguese]
CrossRef | Gscholar
(106)
Pereira M, Bassaco MVM, Motta ACV, Maeda S, Prior SA, Marques R, Magri E, Bognola IA, Gomes JBV (2023). Influence of industrial forest residue applications on Pinus. New Forests 54: 83-106.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(107)
Pinheiro C, Guerra-Guimarães L, David TS, Vieira A (2014). Proteomics: state of the art to study Mediterranean woody species under stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 103: 117-127.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(108)
Polyakova O, Billor N (2007). Impact of deciduous tree species on litterfall quality, decomposition rates and nutrient circulation in pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management 253(1-3): 11-18.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(109)
Prentice IC, Dong N, Gleason SM, Maire V, Wright IJ (2014). Balancing the costs of carbon gain and water transport: testing a new theoretical framework for plant functional ecology. Ecology Letters 17: 82-91.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(110)
Puettmann KJ, Coates KD, Messier C (2009). A critique of silviculture. Managing for Complexity. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 173.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(111)
Qin Q, Zhang Y, Qiu C, Zheng D, Liu Y (2023). Can litterfall input mitigate the adverse effects of high-severity wildfires on soil functions in temperate forest ecosystems? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 184: 109119.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(112)
Randerson JT, Chen Y, Van Der Werf GR (2012). Global burned area and biomass burning emissions from small fires: burned area from small fires. Journal of Geophysical Research - Biogeosciences 117: 82-91.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(113)
Reich PB, Oleksyn J (2004). Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 11001-11006.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(114)
Ren C, Zhao F, Kang D, Yang G, Han X, Tong X, Feng Y, Ren G (2016). Linkages of C:N:P stoichiometry and bacterial community in soil following afforestation of former farmland. Forest Ecology and Management 376: 59-66.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(115)
Ren SJ, Yu GR, Jian CM, Fang HJ, Sun XM (2012). Stoichiometric characteristics of leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of 102 dominant species in forest ecosystems along the North-South Transect of East China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 23: 581.
Gscholar
(116)
Rodríguez-Jeangros N, Hering AS, McCray JE (2018). Analysis of anthropogenic, climatological, and morphological influences on dissolved organic matter in Rocky Mountain streams. Water 10 (4): 534.
Gscholar
(117)
Rosenqvist L, Kleja DB, Johansson MB (2011). Concentrations and fluxes of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in a Picea abies chronosequence on former arable land in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management 259: 275-285.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(118)
Santín C, Doerr SH, Preston C, Bryant R (2013). Consumption of residual pyrogenic carbon by wildfire. International Journal of Wildland Fire 22: 1073-1077.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(119)
Sardans J, Penuelas J (2012). The role of plants in the effects of global change on nutrient availability and stoichiometry in the plant-soil system. Plant Physiology 160: 1741-1761.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(120)
Schultz RP (1999). Loblolly - the pine for the twenty-first century. New Forests 17: 71-88.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(121)
Scott NA, Binkley D (1997). Foliage litter quality and annual net N mineralization: comparison across North American forest sites. Oecologia 111: 151-159.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(122)
Serrano-Ortiz P, Were A, Reverter BR, Villagarcía L, Domingo F, Dolman AJ, Kowalski AS (2015). Seasonality of net carbon exchanges of Mediterranean ecosystems across an altitudinal gradient. Journal of Arid Environments 115 (6): 1-9.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(123)
Shafqat M, Shahid S, Eqani SAMAS, Shah SH, Waseem A (2016). Soil phosphorus fractionation as a tool for monitoring dust phosphorus signature underneath a Blue Pine (Pinus wallichiana) canopy in a temperate forest. Forest Systems 25 (3): e070.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(124)
Sleutel S, Vandenbruwane J, De Schrijver A, Wuyts K, Moeskops B, Verheyen K, De Neve S (2009). Patterns of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen fluxes in deciduous and coniferous forests under historic high nitrogen deposition. Biogeosciences 6: 2743-2758.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(125)
Soucemarianadin LN, Quideau SA, MacKenzie MD (2014). Pyrogenic carbon stocks and storage mechanisms in podzolic soils of fire-affected Quebec black spruce forest. Geoderma 217: 118-128.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(126)
Talucci AC, Matosziuk LM, Haatten JA, Krawchuk MA (2020). An added boost in pyrogenic carbon when wild fire burns forest with high pre-fire mortality. Fire Ecology 16: art21.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(127)
Tesfaye MA, Bravo-Oviedo A, Bravo F, Kidane B, Bekele K, Sertse D (2015). Selection of tree species and soil management for simultaneous fuelwood production and soil rehabilitation in the Ethiopian Central Highlands. Land Degradation and Development 26: 665-679.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(128)
Thom D, Seidl R, Steirer G, Krehan H, Formayer H (2013). Slow and fast drivers of the natural disturbance regime in Central European forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 307: 293-302.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(129)
Thom D, Seidl R (2016). Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biological Reviews 91: 760-781.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(130)
Tian HQ, Chen GS, Zhang C, Melillo JM, Hall CAS (2010). Pattern and variation of C:N:P rations in China’s soils: a synthesis of observational data. Biogeochemistry 98: 139-151.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(131)
Tian S, Youssef MA, Skaggs RW, Amatya DM, Chescheir GM (2012). DRAINMOD-FOREST: integrated modeling of hydrology, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and plant growth for drained forests. Journal of Environmental Quality 41 (3): 764-782.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(132)
Trottier-Picard A, Thiffault E, DesRochers A, Paré D, Thiffault N, Messier C (2014). Amounts of logging residues affect planting microsites: a manipulative study across northern forest ecosystems. Forest Ecology and Management 312: 203-215.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(133)
Tufekcioglu A, Kucuk M, Bilmis T, Altun L, Yilmaz M (2010). Soil respiration and root biomass responses to burning in Calabrian pine (Pinus brutia) stands in Edirne, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Biology 31: 15-19.
Gscholar
(134)
Tullus A, Kupper P, Sellin A, Parts L, Sober J, Tullus T, Lohmus K, Sober A, Tullus H (2012). Climate change at northern latitudes: rising atmospheric humidity decreases transpiration, N-uptake and growth rate of hybrid aspen. PLoS One 7: e42648.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(135)
Ushio M, Kitayama K, Balser TC (2010). Tree species-mediated spatial patchiness of the composition of microbial community and physicochemical properties in the topsoils of a tropical montane forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42 (9): 1588-1595.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(136)
Valadão MBX, Carneiro KMS, Inkotte J, Ribeiro FP, Miguel EP, Gatto A (2019). Litterfall, litter layer and leaf decomposition in Eucalyptus stands on Cerrado soils. Scientia Florestalis 47 (122): 256-264.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(137)
Valduga MO, Zenni RD, Vitule JRS (2016). Ecological impacts of non-native tree species plantations are broad and heterogeneous: a review of Brazilian research. Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences 88 (3): 1675-1688.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(138)
Valverde-Barrantes OJ, Freschet GT, Roumet C, Blackwood CB (2017). A worldview of root traits: the influence of ancestry, growth form, climate and mycorrhizal association on the functional trait variation of fine-root tissues in seed plants. New Phytologist 215: 1562-1573.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(139)
Vedrova EF, Evdolimenko MD, Bezkorovainaya IN, Mukhortova LV, Cherednikova YS (2012). Reserves of carbon in the organic matter of postfire pine forests in the southwest of Baikal region. Contemporary Problems of Ecology 7: 645-653.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(140)
Versini A, Mareschal L, Matsoumbou T, Zeller B, Ranger J, Laclau J-P (2014). Effects of litter manipulation in a tropical Eucalyptus plantation on leaching of mineral nutrients, dissolved organic nitrogen and dissolved organic carbon. Geoderma 232: 426-436.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(141)
Walker TW, Syers JK (1976). The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis. Geoderma 15: 1-19.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(142)
Walker XJ, Baltzer JL, Cumming SG, Day NJ, Ebert C, Goetz S, Johnstone JF, Potter S, Rogers BM, Schuur EAG, Turetsky MR, Mack MC (2019). Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils. Nature 572 (7770): 520-523.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(143)
Wang RZ, Creamer CA, Wang X, He P, Xu ZW, Jiang Y (2016). The effects of a 9-year nitrogen and water addition on soil aggregate phosphorus and sulfur availability in a semi-arid grassland. Ecological Indicators 61: 806-814.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(144)
Wang G, Xue S, Liu F, Liu G (2017). Nitrogen addition increases the production and turnover of the lower-order roots but not of the higher-order roots of Bothriochloa ischaemum. Plant and Soil 415: 423-34.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(145)
Wang R, Yang J, Liu H, Sardans J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Wei C, Lu X, Dijkstra F, Jiang Y, Han X, Penuelas J (2022). Nitrogen enrichment buffers phosphorus limitation by mobilizing mineral-bound soil phosphorus in grasslands. Ecology 103: e3616.
Gscholar
(146)
Wang C, Li X, Hu Y, Zheng R, Hou Y (2023). Nitrogen addition weakens the biodiversity single bond multifunctionality relationships across soil profiles in a grassland assemblage. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 342: 108241.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(147)
Waraich E, Ahmad R, Saifullah Ashraf MY (2011). Role of mineral nutrition in alleviation of drought stress in plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5: 764-777.
Gscholar
(148)
Warren CR (2001). Distribution of N, Rubisco and photo- synthesis in Pinus pinaster and acclimation to light. Plant, Cell and Environment 24: 597-609.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(149)
Wells JJ, Stringer LC, Woodhead AJ, Wandrag EM (2023). Towards a holistic understanding of non-native tree impacts on ecosystem services: a review of Acacia, Eucalyptus and Pinus in Africa. Ecosystem Services 60: 101511.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(150)
Wood T, Bormann FH, Voigt GK (1984). Phosphorus cycling in a northern hardwood forest: biological and chemical control. Science 223: 391-393.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(151)
Xia M, Guo D, Pregitzer KS (2010). Ephemeral root modules in Fraxinus mandshurica. New Phytologist 188: 1065-1074.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(152)
Xu ZH, Saffigna PG, Farquhar GD, Simpson JA, Haines RJ, Walker S, Osborne DO, Guinto D (2000). Carbon isotope discrimination and oxygen isotope composition in clones of the F(1) hybrid be-tween slash pine and Caribbean pine in relation to tree growth, water-use efficiency and foliar nutrient concentration. Tree Physiology 20: 1209-1217.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(153)
Yan P, Fernández-Martínez M, Van Meerbeek K, Yu G, Migliavacca M, He N (2023). The essential role of biodiversity in the key axes of ecosystem function. Global Change Biology 29 (16): 4569-4585.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(154)
Yang Y, Berhe AA, Barnes ME, Moreland KC, Tian Z, Kelly AE, Bales RC, O’Geen AT, Goulden ML, Hartsough P, Hart SC (2022). Climate warming alters nutrient storage in seasonally dry forests: insights from a 2.300 m elevation gradient. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 36 (11): e2022GB007429.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(155)
Yano Y, Lajtha K, Sollins P, Caldwell BA (2004). Chemical and seasonal controls on the dynamics of dissolved organic matter in a coniferous old-growth stand in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Biogeochemistry 71: 197-223.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(156)
Yao R, Chen J (2009). Introduction and conservation of Eucalyptus germplasm resources in China. Guangxi Forestry Science 38 (2): 92-94.
Gscholar
(157)
Yao W, Shen Y (2015). Effect of magnetic treatment on seed germination. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 30 (8): 1651-1891.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(158)
Yin X, Zhao L, Fang Q, Ding G (2021). Differences in soil physicochemical properties in different-aged Pinus massoniana plantations in Southwest China. Forests 12 (8): 1-16.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(159)
Yuan Z, Ali A, Loreau M, Ding F, Liu S, Sanaei A, Zhou W, Ye J, Lin F, Fang S, Hao Z, Wang X, Bagousse-Pinguet YL (2021). Divergent above-and below-ground biodiversity pathways mediate disturbance impacts on temperate forest multifunctionality. Global Change Biology 2: 2883-2894.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(160)
Yuan ZY, Chen HSX (2015). Negative effects of fertilization on plant nutrient resorption. Ecology 96: 373-380.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(161)
Zhang C, Liu GB, Xue S, Wang GL (2016a). Soil bacterial community dynamics reflect changes in plant community and soil properties during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 97: 40-49.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(162)
Zhang H, Wang E, Zhou D, Luo Z, Zhang Z (2016b). Rising soil temperature in China and its potential ecological impact. Scientific Reports 6 (1): 1-8.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(163)
Zhang W, Qiao W, Gao D, Dai Y, Deng J, Yang G, Han X, Ren G (2018). Relationship between soil nutrient properties and biological activities along a restoration chronosequence of Pinus tabulaeformis plantation forests in the Ziwuling Mountains, China. Catena 161: 85-95.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(164)
Zhang YX, Wang XJ (2021). Geographical spatial distribution and productivity dynamic change of Eucalyptus plantations in China. Scientific Reports 11 (1): 283.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(165)
Zhang WP, Fornara D, Yang H, Yu RP, Callaway RM, Li L (2023). Plant litter strengthens positive biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships over time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 38 (5): 473-484.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(166)
Zhao F, Kang D, Han X, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G (2015). Soil stoichiometry and carbon storage in long-term afforestation soil affected by understory vegetation diversity. Ecological Engineering 74: 415-422.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(167)
Zhao R, Liu Y, Page-Dumroese DS, Dumroese RK, Wang K (2022). Enhancing soil quality of short rotation forest operations using biochar and manure. Forests 13: 2090.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(168)
Zhou LS, Huang H, Lu FM, Han XG (2009). Effects of prescribed burning and seasonal and interannual climate variation on nitrogen mineralization in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41: 796-803.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

(2)
Kelly Cristina Tonello 0000-0002-7920-6006
UFSCar - Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, São Paulo (Brazil)

Corresponding author

 
Luara Castilho Balbinot
luaracast@gmail.com

Citation

Castilho Balbinot L, Marques R, Tonello KC, Pasquetti Berguetti ÁL, Larsen JG (2024). Recent insights in soil nutrient cycling: perspectives from Pinus and Eucalyptus forest studies around the world. iForest 17: 394-404. - doi: 10.3832/ifor4530-017

Academic Editor

Daniela Baldantoni

Paper history

Received: Nov 27, 2023
Accepted: Aug 21, 2024

First online: Dec 20, 2024
Publication Date: Dec 31, 2024
Publication Time: 4.03 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2024

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 117
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 54
Abstract Page Views: 38
PDF Downloads: 24
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 1

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 2
Overall contacts: 117
Avg. contacts per week: 409.50

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 

iForest Similar Articles

 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info