iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Species-specific morphological and physiological characteristics and progressive nitrogen limitation under elevated CO2 concentration

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 270-278 (2020)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3288-013
Published: Jul 03, 2020 - Copyright © 2020 SISEF

Research Articles

Elevated atmospheric CO2 (eCO2) concentration initially enhances photosynthesis, growth and ecosystem productivity, but the excessive use of nitrogen due to the increased productivity causes uncertainty in long-term ecosystem responses. We exposed Korean red pine, Chinese ash, and Korean mountain ash to current atmospheric CO2 concentration (aCO2), 1.4 times higher CO2 concentration (eCO21.4), and 1.8 times higher CO2 concentration (eCO21.8) in an Open-Top Chamber (OTC) experiment for eight years (2010-2017) to investigate the effect on the morphological and physiological properties of trees. We also assessed whether nitrogen limitation occurred with time by comparing leaf and soil nitrogen concentration. CO2 fertilization effect was observed on tree growth for the first two years (p < 0.05), but there was no difference thereafter. For photosynthetic properties, CO2 effects were species-specific; no effects on Korean red pine and Chinese ash vs. significant effect on Korean mountain ash. However, maximum photosynthetic and carboxylation rates significantly decreased by 24.3% and 31.3% from 2013 to 2017, respectively. Leaf nitrogen significantly decreased by 21.0 % at eCO21.4 and 18.5 % at eCO21.8 compared with aCO2 treatment. This study showed the decline of leaf nitrogen and species-specific responses to long-term high CO2 concentration, which will effect on species competition and ecosystem succession.

Elevated CO2, Photosynthetic Properties, Down-regulation, Progressive Nitrogen Limitation, Carbon dioxide


Elevated CO2 concentration has become a common phenomenon in the Earth’s atmosphere over the last half-century ([20]). The indiscreet use of fossil fuels and deforestation has raised the atmospheric CO2 concentration, thus promoting photosynthesis and growth ([9], [1], [40]) and affecting the productivity of plants ([29], [32]), which is referred to as the CO2 fertilization effect ([32]). However, there are conflicting opinions on whether such an effect will continue with increasing CO2 concentration ([19]). In general, the productivity of terrestrial ecosystems is affected by nutrient availability in the soil ([46]). It should be taken into account that, if CO2 fertilization promotes plant growth, the excessive nutrient use will result in insufficient nutrients in the soil, failing to meet the nutrient requirements needed for plant growth ([19], [51]) and decreasing the CO2 fertilization effect. Therefore, the expected increase of ecosystem productivity and carbon storage due to CO2 fertilization is still uncertain ([46]).

Early studies using pots and growth chambers hardly reflected the real forest ecosystem conditions ([7], [32]), therefore experiments with Open-Top chamber (OTC) and Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) techniques have been widely employed ([32]). Many OTC and FACE experiments reported an increased growth and photosynthesis under elevated CO2 ([18], [45]). However, whether these effects would last for a long time is questioned. In particular, experiments on elevated CO2 and soil nitrogen fertilization ([13]), which were conducted at the Duke-FACE and Oak Ridge-FACE, confirmed that nitrogen can directly limit the increase in forest productivity due to the carbon fertilization response, highlighting the relevance of nitrogen on forest productivity.

Nitrogen is an important component of plant photosynthetic organs and of functional and structural proteins ([21]). In particular, nitrogen in the leaves constitutes the photosynthetic enzymes, such as chlorophyll and rubisco (ribulose-1.5-biphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase), which determines the maximum carboxylation rate (VCmax - [27], [17]), with a decisive influence on forest productivity ([14], [15]). However, owing to increased productivity by long-term exposure to a high CO2 concentrations, the consumption of nutrients may overcome the nutrients input, leading to a reduction in effective nutrients in the soil, and consequently to a reduction of plants’ photosynthesis ability. In particular, as the nitrogen concentration absorbed by plants decreases, its concentration in the leaves is lowered, thus decreasing photosynthesis. This in turn results in a progressive nitrogen limitation (PNL), which offsets the CO2 fertilization effect ([9], [26], [4]). This phenomenon is more common under nitrogen deficiency in the soil ([35], [29]).

Under PNL, an increase in productivity due to the CO2 fertilization effect is a short-term phenomenon, whereas in the long term, the ecosystem productivity might decrease again and return to its original state ([26], [13]). This suggests that increased forest productivity due to a high atmospheric concentration of CO2 might be inhibited by soil nitrogen deficiency ([12]). Reich et al. ([37]) and Feng et al. ([12]) confirmed that the response of plants to CO2 fertilization was limited by nitrogen deficiency. Moreover, PNL is expected to be more prominent when the high CO2 concentration environment is maintained for a long time ([39]).

The main objective of this study was to determine the occurrence of nitrogen limitation under long-term CO2 fertilization on three major species of the Korean temperate region: Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora), Chinese ash (Fraxinus rhynchophylla), and Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alnifolia). The effect of the increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration on seedling diameter and height, as well as photosynthetic properties, such as maximum photosynthetic rate, maximum carboxylation rate, and maximum electron transfer rate, was evaluated over a period of 8 years. Moreover, we compared the nitrogen concentration in the leaves and soils to investigate whether the increased productivity due to CO2 fertilization is a short-term effect owing to a progressive nitrogen limitation (PNL) in the soil.

  Materials and methods 

Experimental system and design

This study was carried out in an Open Top Chamber (OTC) of the Forest Biotechnology Division at National Institute of Forest Science in Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea (37° 15′ 04″ N, 126° 57′ 29″ E). The OTC was made of a decagon structure of diameter 10 m and height 7 m (see Fig. S1 in Supplementary material). The angle of the roof was 45° in order to maintain an opening ratio of 75% or higher. A polyolefin film of thickness 0.15 mm with a light transmittance of approximately 88%, low specific gravity, and excellent chemical and water resistance was used as an external covering material ([23]).

The atmospheric CO2 concentrations kept in the chambers during the experiment were: (i) the current atmospheric CO2 concentration (Chamber 1, aCO2); (ii) 1.4 times higher CO2 concentration than the current concentration (Chamber 2, eCO21.4), which is expected to be the atmospheric CO2 concentration by 2050, according to the IPCC scenario ([20]); and (iii) 1.8 times higher CO2 concentration than the current concentration, which is expected to be the atmospheric CO2 concentration by 2070 (Chamber 3, eCO21.8). The exposure of CO2 were conducted for 10 hours (08:00-18:00) a day during the growing season (April-November). Pest controls were conducted every year and weed controls were conducted for first four years of the experiment. The annual average, minimum and maximum monthly temperature in chambers were 12.4 ± 0.2 °C, -1.3 ± 0.4 °C, 22.5 ± 0.2 °C, respectively. The annual rainfall range was 751.16 mm yr-1 to 1975.96 mm yr-1 over the 9 years of the experimental period.

In each chamber, the same three clones for each species were tested. Four-year-old seedlings of Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora), two-year-old seedlings of Chinese ash (Fraxinus rhynchophylla), and two-year-old seedlings of Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alnifolia) were planted in September 2009. The density within the OTC was 2547 seedlings ha-1.

Growth measurements

Growth measurements (height and diameter) on trees started in May 2010 and were repeated every year until 2017 at the beginning (mid-April, mean daily temperature: ~10 °C) and the end (end of October, mean daily temperature: ~5 °C) of the growing season. The annual increase in growth was obtained as the difference in these two measures. Also, the lack of differences in diameter between the last measurement of the previous year and the first of the subsequent year was verified.

Tree height was recorded using a measuring rod (A-15, SENSHIN Industry Co., LTD., Osaka, Japan), while the tree diameter was measured twice in orthogonal directions 10 cm above the root collar using a digital Vernier callipers (CD-10CPX, Mitutoyo, Kawasaki, Japan), and the average value was used. Exceptionally, since 2016, Korean red pine and Chinese ash trees were measured using a diameter tape (F10-02DM, KDS, Malaysia) because of their large diameters.

Gas exchange measurements

The photosynthetic parameters were measured on tree leaves using a portable device LI-6400 (LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). From 2013 to 2017, except for 2015, the parameters were measured 1-3 times a year from June to August on 3 sunlit leaves for each species. The temperature of the leaves was set at 25 °C and the relative humidity at 55%-60%. The leaves were stabilized before measurements. The area of leaves was set at 6 cm2 for all the species except Korean red pine. For this species the leaf area was recalculated by measuring the actual leaf area using a scanner after all measurements.

The light response curve was obtained using the photosynthetic rate recorded by sequentially varying the intensity of light irradiated on the leaves, using the following sequence in all the chambers: 1400, 1200, 1000, 800, 600, 400, 200, 100, 75, 50, 25, 0, and 1200 μmol m-2 s-1. The reference CO2 supplied in each LI-6400 chamber was set at the atmospheric CO2 in each OTC. The maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax) was estimated as the photosynthetic rate at light saturation (1200 μmol m-2 s-1) under the CO2 concentration in the chambers, which was measured using the light response curve ([44]).

The A/Ci curve was achieved by varying the reference CO2 concentration at light saturation point in the following order: (i) aCO2: 400, 300, 200, 100, 75, 50, 25, 0, 400, 400, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 μmol m-2 s-1; (ii) eCO21.4: 560, 400, 300, 200, 100, 75, 50, 25, 0, 560, 560, 800, 1000, and 1200 μmol m-2 s-1; and (iii) eCO21.8: 720, 600, 400, 300, 200, 100, 75, 50, 25, 0, 720, 720, 1000, and 1200 μmol m-2 s-1. The parameters VCmax and Jmax were derived using the model proposed by Sharkey ([41]) and estimated in Excel™ spreadsheet version 2.0 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA).

Leaf total nitrogen analysis

Three sunlit leaves were chosen on the same branch and used for photosynthetic measurements (n = 9 for each species, three repetitions for three species), and 1 cm2 leaf disk was collected in 2017. The leaves were dried in a 70 °C in the lab for more than 72 h, then crushed using a FastPrep-24® crusher (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, USA), homogenized, and finally analysed for nitrogen content using CHNS Analyzer Flash EA 1112® (Thermo Electron Corporation, USA) at the National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management (NICEM).

Soil nitrogen analysis

Before planting trees in 2009, the soil in the OTC was excavated to a depth of 1 m and replaced with forest soil to control the soil characteristics of all the treatment groups. Soil at depth < 30 cm was composed of forest soil and sand with a ratio of 1:1 ([23]). For all treatment groups, samples of soil from 0 to 5 cm depth were collected at five randomly selected points in September 2017, air-dried for 3 days at room temperature, and then analysed using the CHNS Analyzer Flash EA 1112 described above at the NICEM.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were carried using the software R ver. 3.3.2 ([36]). Growth, photosynthesis variables and leaf total nitrogen over time were analyzed by repeated-measures ANOVA with CO2 treatments as a fixed factor and the recording year as the repeated-measure. When significant CO2 × Year interactions and CO2 or Year effect were detected, means were compared using Tukey post-hoc comparisons. In addition, one-way ANOVA of individual species and Tukey post-hoc comparisons were conducted to assess the CO2 effect for each year.


To investigate the CO2 fertilization effect over the period 2010-2017, diameter and height increments of trees of different treatments and species were recorded (Tab. 1, Tab. 2). The cumulative increments for height and diameter over the 8 years of the experiment are presented in Fig. 1.

Tab. 1 - Annual growth in diameter (mm, mean ± SE) of Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora, Pd), Chinese ash (Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Fr) and Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alniflolia, Sa) in response to aCO2 (Chamber 1), eCO21.4 (Chamber 2) and eCO21.8 (Chamber 3) during 8 years. Different lowercase letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) multiple comparison results among CO2 treatments (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test). (ns): not significant.

Species Treatments Diameter growth (mm)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Pd aCO2 11.2 ± 1.4 ns 8.5 ± 1.4 b 11.6 ± 10.1 ns 19.0 ± 3.5 ns 9.3 ± 3.3 ns 18.8 ± 7.7 ns 25.8 ± 7.7 ns 16.7 ± 5.2 ns
eCO21.4 11.9 ± 0.2 ns 11.4 ± 1.1 ab 20.3 ± 4.2 ns 18.0 ± 6.7 ns 12.3 ± 3.8 ns 26.3 ± 6.3 ns 19.3 ± 9.1 ns 16.5 ± 3.8 ns
CeCO21.8 12.5 ± 2.9 ns 17.0 ± 1.7 a 8.9 ± 3.4 ns 40.0 ± 24.1 ns 20.1 ± 4.8 ns 25.2 ± 0.9 ns 31.0 ± 5.4 ns 19.2 ± 3.0 ns
Fr aCO2 11.7 ± 0.8 ns 8.6 ± 2.3 ns 8.8 ± 3.4 ns 2.0 ± 1.2 ns 12.6 ± 5.6 ns 13.8 ± 1.1 ns 6.8 ± 1.7 ns 5.5 ± 1.0 ns
eCO21.4 14.4 ± 2.0 ns 7.6 ± 1.4 ns 4.7 ± 6.0 ns 3.0 ± 1.7 ns 8.4 ± 4.6 ns 11.0 ± 1.9 ns 8.2 ± 2.0 ns 5.0 ± 2.2 ns
CeCO21.8 18.5 ± 2.5 ns 5.3 ± 2.9 ns 3.4 ± 6.0 ns 5.0 ± 3.1 ns 7.0 ± 0.7 ns 5.5 ± 0.1 ns 10.5 ± 1.9 ns 10.6 ± 2.7 ns
Sa aCO2 5.7 ± 0.7 b 4.5 ± 0.5 ns 3.8 ± 4.9 ns 1.7 ± 0.7 ns 3.0 ± 0.6 ns 6.1 ± 2.5 ns 6.0 ± 3.3 ns 4.9 ± 0.9 ns
CeCO21.4 7.0 ± 0.5 ab 6.3 ± 0.2 ns 5.1 ± 27 ns 2.7 ± 0.8 ns 4.7 ± 0.9 ns 9.0 ± 1.9 ns 8.0 ± 0.9 ns 7.6 ± 2.9 ns
eCO21.8 9.0 ± 0.5 a 6.9 ± 0.6 ns 3.2 ± 2.6 ns 7.7 ± 4.7 ns 2.3 ± 2.0 ns 9.6 ± 1.2 ns 7.4 ± 1.7 ns 3.5 ± 2.3 ns

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Tab. 2 - Annual growth in height (cm, mean ± SE) of Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora, Pd), Chinese ash (Fraxinus rhynchophylla, Fr) and Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alniflolia, Sa) in response to aCO2 (Chamber 1), eCO21.4 (Chamber 2) and eCO21.8 (Chamber 3) during 8 years. Different lowercase letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) multiple comparison results among CO2 treatments (one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test). (ns): not significant.

Species Treatment Height growth (cm)
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Pd aCO2 10.5 ± 1.6 ns 27.0 ± 0.9 b 65.2 ± 6.6 ns 52.3 ± 13.0 ns 41.3 ± 18.3 ns 72.0 ± 5.1 ns 35.3 ± 2.7 ns 73.0 ± 22.1 ns
eCO21.4 11.5 ± 1.5 ns 11.4 ± 1.1 b 57.6 ± 19.1 ns 59.3 ± 9.5 ns 65.7 ± 8.7 ns 94.7 ± 49.6 ns 50.0 ± 46.0 ns 17.7 ± 24.6 ns
eCO21.8 6.3 ± 1.6 ns 56.9 ± 7.5 a 70.5 ± 34.6 ns 77.0 ± 5.3 ns 63.0 ± 6.1 ns 60.0 ± 20.0 ns 99.0 ± 21.7 ns 48.0 ± 17.1 ns
Fr aCO2 136.2 ± 23.3 b 86.5 ± 11.9 ns 29.0 ± 16.0 ns 13.0 ± 2.1 ns 90.7 ± 34.7 ns 89.3 ± 44.9 ns 30.2 ± 22.3 ns 78.3 ± 2.6 ns
eCO21.4 145.4 ± 14.8 ab 7.6 ± 1.3 ns 22.9 ± 3.3 ns 27.7 ± 12.8 ns 60.3 ± 29.5 ns 73.7 ± 18.2 ns 29.3 ± 20.1 ns 86.7 ± 0.9 ns
eCO21.8 215.0 ± 8.3 a 84.4 ± 18.4 ns 9.0 ± 3.3 ns 75.7 ± 33.1 ns 92.0 ± 40.8 ns 81.7 ± 10.9 ns 70.3 ± 19.7 ns 82.7 ± 39.8 ns
Sa aCO2 39.1 ± 7.0 ns 27.0 ± 4.3 ns 18.2 ± 12.8 ns 51.0 ± 16.8 ns 42.3 ± 20.3 ns 38.0 ± 3.21 ns 43.0 ± 2.1 ns 18.7 ± 9.8 ns
eCO21.4 55.7 ± 15.9 ns 33.4 ± 9.7 ns 10.6 ± 5.5 ns 53.7 ± 33.7 ns 17.7 ± 7.2 ns 46.6 ± 13.1 ns 59.0 ± 11.5 ns 50.0 ± 8.0 ns
eCO21.8 85.8 ± 11.4 ns 17.3 ± 6.5 ns 22.3 ± 15.1 ns 16.0 ± 0.7 ns 29.3 ± 14.4 ns 45.3 ± 7.8 ns 35.7 ± 6.0 ns 36.0 ± 18.6 ns

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Fig. 1 - Effects of elevated CO2 concentration (aCO2, Chamber 1; eCO21.4, Chamber 2; eCO21.8, Chamber 3) on average tree diameter (a, b, c) and height (d, e, f) growth per year from 2010 to 2017. There were no significant differences among CO2 treatments (p > 0.05).

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Diameter growth

Tab. 1 summarizes the annual diameter increase measured after CO2 exposure. The results showed a significant increment in diameter growth under high CO2 concentration due to the CO2 fertilization effect (p <0.001 - Tab. 3). On average, the difference between aCO2 and eCO21.8 was 47.7%, 25.3%, and 3.1% in Korean mountain ash (41.4 ± 6.2 vs. 61.1 ± 7.9 mm), Korean red pine (144.7 ± 15.1 vs. 181.3 ± 13.5 mm), and Chinese ash (70.9 ± 9.2 vs. 73.1 ± 5.5 mm), respectively.

Tab. 3 - Results statistics for diameter, height, Amax, Vcmax, Jmax and leaf total N of all species with F statistics and p-values from two-way repeated-measure ANOVA.

Parameter Factor F p
Diameter CO2 58.03 < 0.001
Year 19.08 < 0.001
CO2 × Year 1.04 0.982
Height CO2 17.727 < 0.001
Year 9.201 < 0.001
CO2 × Year 0.367 0.416
Amax CO2 2.942 0.06
Year 13.474 < 0.001
CO2 × Year 0.771 0.594
Vcmax CO2 1.662 0.194
Year 2.791 0.030
CO2 × Year 0.545 0.819
Jmax CO2 0.192 0.825
Year 0.628 0.644
CO2 × Year 0.251 0.979
Leaf Total N CO2 3.701 0.026
Year 5.295 0.002
CO2 × Year 0.945 0.464

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

The annual diameter increment of individual species under eCO2 was significantly enhanced in all the species in 2010-2011 (maximum p = 0.029 - Tab. 3). However, since 2012, there was no significant difference in diameter increment under eCO2. Korean red pine showed a significant difference in diameter growth under eCO2 in 2011 in the order of aCO2 < eCO21.4 < eCO21.8, an increase of about 100.0% (aCO2 vs. eCO21.8, p = 0.015 - Tab. 1). Korean mountain ash showed significant difference under eCO2 in 2010, an increase of about 57.9% (aCO2: 5.7 ± 0.7 vs. eCO21.8: 9.0 ± 0.5 mm; p = 0.02).

Height growth

Similarly to growth in diameter, annual increase in tree height was recorded each year from 2010 until 2017 (Fig. 1). For all the species, the increase in height was high under eCO2 (p < 0.01 - Tab. 2). On average, the difference between aCO2 and eCO21.8 was 22.01%, 18.3% and 14.3% in Korean red pine (470.7 ± 22.8 vs. 574.3 ± 72.5 cm), Chinese ash (585.3 ± 39.1 vs. 692.3 ± 48.1 cm) and Korean mountain ash (299.3 ± 40.5 vs. 342.0 ± 8.2 cm), respectively.

Tab. 2 summarizes the annual growth of tree height measured after CO2 exposure. For all the species, results were similar to the diameter growth. Chinese ash showed a significant difference in height growth under eCO2 in 2010 (p = 0.029). Differences were observed under eCO21.8 and aCO2, which was increased about 57.9%. Korean red pine showed a significant increase under eCO2 in 2011, an increase of about 110.7% (p = 0.006). However, after 2012, there was no difference in the increase in height due to CO2 concentration for all the species.

Maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax)

The average Amax under eCO2 measured from 2013 increased in the following order: aCO2 (12.7 ± 0.7 μmol m-2 s-1) < eCO21.4 (13.6 ± 0.8 μmol m-2 s-1) < eCO21.8 (14.9 ± 0.8 μmol m-2 s-1) but did not differ significantly (p = 0.06 - Tab. 3). In terms of response by year, the average Amax decreased by about 28.9%, from 15.9 ± 0.8 μmol m-2 s-1 in 2013 to 11.3 ± 0.9 μmol m-2 s-1 in 2016 (p < 0.001). However, these results showed differences among species and year (Fig. 2, Tab. 4).

Fig. 2 - Effects of CO2 concentration (aCO2, eCO21.4, eCO21.8) on maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax), maximum rate of carboxylation (Vcmax), and maximum rate of electron transport (Jmax) in: (a, d, g) Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora); (b, e, h) Chinese ash (Fraxinus rhynchophylla); and (c, f, i) Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alnifolia). The values shown are mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences from multiple comparison among CO2 treatments. (ns): not significant.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Tab. 4 - Results statistics of diameter, height, Amax, Vcmax, Jmax and leaf total N of the studied species with F statistics and p-values from two-way repeated measured ANOVA. (Pd): Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora); (Fr): Chinese ash (Fraxinus rhyncophylla); (Sa): Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alnifolia).

Species Factors Diameter Height Amax Vcmax Jmax Leaf Total N
F p F p F p F p F p F p
Pd CO2 0.632 0.540 14.449 <0.001 0.266 0.771 0.618 0.554 0.719 0.506 1.459 0.247
Year 5.827 <0.001 9.673 <0.001 0.840 0.498 0.979 0.452 1.957 0.161 7.837 <0.001
CO2×Year 0.249 0.995 1.250 0.306 1.189 0.374 2.817 0.051 0.511 0.810 3.793 0.006
Fr CO2 30.737 <0.001 5.527 0.010 2.891 0.094 1.594 0.238 0.486 0.625 4.025 0.021
Year 10.920 <0.001 0.403 0.890 2.661 0.095 2.232 0.118 2.364 0.103 13.145 <0.001
CO2×Year 2.537 0.021 0.456 0.935 0.545 0.765 1.368 0.292 0.507 0.815 2.646 0.021
Sa CO2 11.368 <0.001 13.344 <0.001 6.983 0.014 2.890 0.094 1.782 0.210 0.178 0.838
Year 0.179 0.987 0.583 0.762 0.918 0.433 5.243 0.015 2.931 0.0768 0.765 0.522
CO2×Year 2.611 0.018 1.809 0.097 1.123 0.404 0.632 0.702 0.708 0.649 1.288 0.289

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Korean red pine and Chinese ash did not show a significant difference in the average Amax (minimum p = 0.094 - Tab. 4), but Korean mountain ash showed significant CO2 effect. Korean red pine in all the years under eCO2 showed no specific tendency. The Amax of Korean mountain ash was 14.0 ± 1.3 μmol m-2 s-1 under eCO21.8, which showed an enhancement from 10.7 ± 0.7 μmol m-2 s-1 under aCO2 (p= 0.014). The difference in the Amax due to CO2 exposure in each year did not show significant differences (Fig. 2c). The Amax of Chinese ash decreased in the following order: aCO2 (12.4 ± 1.2 μmol m-2 s-1) < eCO21.4 (15.0 ± 1.7 μmol m-2 s-1) < eCO21.8 (17.4 ± 1.6 μmol m-2 s-1), and also decreased steadily from 2013 (19.4 ± 1.1 μmol m-2 s-1) to 2017 (11.7 ± 0.8 μmol m-2 s-1) by about 39.7%, though not significantly (p=0.094, p=0.095, respectively - Fig. 2b). However, the enhancement of Amax due to elevated CO2 was 27.7% at eCO21.8, and the increase was constantly maintained at 28.6% under eCO21.8 in 2013 and 27.5% in 2017 relative to the rate under aCO2.

Maximum rate of carboxylation (VCmax) and electron transport (Jmax)

Unlike the maximum photosynthetic rate, the VCmax was decreased of about 13.6% from eCO21.8 (49.6 ± 3.4 μmol m-2 s-1) to aCO2 (57.4 ± 3.5 μmol m-2 s-1) but did not differ significantly (p = 0.194 - Tab. 3). Similar to the Amax, the VCmax value by year was 68.0 ± 5.2 μmol m-2 s-1 in 2013 and it significantly decreased to 46.7 ± 2.6 μmol m-2 s-1 in 2017 (p = 0.03).

In terms of response by species and year, Korean red pine showed no significant differences with CO2 and year (p = 0.554 and p = 0.452, respectively - Tab. 4). Contrastingly, VCmax showed a decreasing tendency of about 46.4% from 2013 (98.1 ± 8.1 μmol m-2 s-1) to 2017 (52.6 ± 5.9 μmol m-2 s-1). Depending on the CO2 concentration, it also showed same decreasing trend by about 14.8% from aCO2 (70.9 ± 7.1 μmol m-2 s-1) to eCO21.8 (60.4 ± 7.5 μmol m-2 s-1) and the difference between eCO21.8 and aCO2 was the highest and significantly different in 2017 (p = 0.002 - Fig. 2d). The annual VCmax of Korean mountain ash decreased significantly by 23.5% from 55.0 ± 4.5 μmol m-2 s-1 in 2013 to 42.1 ± 2.0 μmol m-2 s-1 in 2017 (p=0.015). For Chinese ash, no statistical differences were found. However, its annual VCmax decreased under eCO21.8 by 55.7% compared with that under aCO2 in 2015 (p = 0.03, Fig. 2e), but there was no difference thereafter. All species showed no significant differences in VCmax due to CO2 enhancement (minimum p = 0.094).

The Jmax showed no significant differences under eCO2 and year (Tab. 3, Tab. 4). However, it had a decreasing tendency of about 23.4% from 2013 (100.2 ± 7.2 μmol m-2 s-1) to 2017 (76.8 ± 3.1 μmol m-2 s-1) with no significance. Depending on the CO2 concentration, there was no significant differences and tendency (minimum p = 0.210). In terms of response by species, all species showed no statistical differences with CO2 and year (Fig. 2g, Fig. 2h, Fig. 2i).

Leaf and soil N

The leaf total nitrogen was significantly different under eCO2 and year (maximum p = 0.026 - Tab. 3). The leaf total N exposed to CO2 significantly (p = 0.026) decreased in the following order: aCO2 (1.57 ± 0.05 %) > eCO21.8 (1.28 ± 0.04 %) > eCO21.4 (1.24 ± 0.03 %).

Korean red pine showed significant differences in leaf total N under CO2 exposure (p < 0.001 - Tab. 4). The leaf total N decreased significantly by about 24.4% from 2013 (1.31 ± 0.08 %) to 2017 (0.99 ± 0.03 %). The leaf total N under eCO2 decreased in the following order: aCO2 (1.45 ± 0.15 %) > eCO21.8 (1.21 ± 0.09 %) > eCO21.4 (1.07 ± 0.04 %) but it was not significant (p = 0.247). The eCO21.4 treatment showed the lowest leaf total N and the difference between aCO2 and eCO21.4 were 31.0% in 2013, 27.9% in 2015, and 10% in 2017 (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3 - Effects of CO2 concentration (aCO2, eCO21.4, eCO21.8) on leaf total nitrogen content (%) in (a) Korean red pine (Pinus densiflora), (b) Chinese ash (Fraxinus rhynchophylla), (c) Korean mountain ash (Sorbus alnifolia). The values shown are mean ± SE. Different lowercase letters above the bars indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences from multiple comparison among CO2 treatments. (ns): not significant.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Chinese ash showed a significant decrease in leaf total N under eCO2 and year (p = 0.021 and p < 0.001, respectively). The leaf total N under eCO2 decreased significantly (p = 0.021) in the following order: aCO2 (1.78 ± 0.04 %) > eCO21.4 (1.41 ± 0.04 %) > eCO21.8 (1.36 ± 0.05 %). In particular, the leaf total N was higher under eCO21.4 and eCO21.8 than under aCO2 in 2013 (p < 0.001), but it became significantly lower under eCO21.4 and eCO21.8 than under aCO2 over time (Fig. 3b). The difference between aCO2 and eCO21.8 was 27.8% in 2016, and 18.8% in 2017 (maximum p = 0.04).

Korean mountain ash showed no significant differences under eCO2 and year (minimum p = 0.522). But it decreased significantly by 15.4% under eCO21.4 compared with aCO2 only in 2017 (p = 0.03 - Fig. 3c).

There was no significant difference in soil total N under eCO2 in 2017 (p = 0.125). The absolute concentration of soil total N was very low, and therefore, the variation depending on CO2 concentration was negligible (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4 - Effects of elevated CO2 concentration (aCO2, eCO21.4, eCO21.8) on the soil total nitrogen (%) in 2017. Values are mean ± SE. There were no significant differences among CO2 treatments (p > 0.05).

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer


Relationship between the CO2 fertilization effect and growth

Several studies have reported that elevated CO2 concentration due to climate change directly affects photosynthesis, suggesting that eCO2 promotes ecosystem production and biomass accumulation ([29], [32], [38]). For instances, the net primary production (NPP) increased by 22-32% in the Duke-FACE experiment, which conducted the CO2 exposure for more than 10 years. In the Pop-FACE experiment, the diameter increased about 5% and the 12 species leaf area increased about 8% in seven FACE ([1], [13], [29]). In this study, the annual growth of the three speices was analysed, confirming a significant enhancement in height and diameter under eCO2 for the first two years. However, the CO2 fertilization effect was not sustained thereafter (Tab. 1, Tab. 2, Fig. 1). Temporary CO2 fertilization effect was also reported by other studies. In the Oak-Ridge FACE and BioCON experiments, the reduction of CO2 effect was offset after 6 and 3 years, respectively, and nitrogen fertilization showed an immediate increase in NPP ([37], [32]). In addition, there was no CO2 effect in Picea abies growing on a very low-nutrient soil ([52]). Moreover, in the Duke FACE experiment, where the CO2 fertilization effect remained for more than 10 years, soil N positively correlated with productivity increment under eCO2 ([29]). Thus, soil nutrients and CO2 fertilization effect appeared to be closely related. In particular, in our study site, the soil total N was very low because the nearby forest soil was mixed with sand and leaf total N decreased over time. For this reason, we argue that growth promotion through the CO2 fertilization effect was not sustained.

Changes in photosynthetic properties under elevated CO2 concentration

Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration increases the difference in the partial pressure of CO2 between the atmosphere and leaf mesophyll tissues, increasing the maximum photosynthetic rate ([7], [2]). Twelve FACE experiments showed that the average Amax of all the tested species increased by about 31%. Depending on species, it was increased by about 37% in Pinus australis ([31]), 67% in P. taeda, and 62% in Liquidambar styraciflua ([10]). However, over time, the increase of Amax under eCO2 was reduced by the acclimation of photosynthetic properties ([2]). In our study, the reduction of Amax increase under eCO2 varied depending on the species (Fig. 2). Korean red pine and Korean mountain ash did not show a significant difference since 2013, which was only three years after eCO2 exposure. Chinese ash showed the enhancement in 2013, but the increase in Amax was reduced over time. Amax of Korean mountain ash under aCO2 was maintained over time, but it was decreased in Chinese ash, which might have been due to the low soil nutrient (Fig. 2, Fig. 4). This decrease in the Amax resulted in the down-regulation of the Vcmax and Jmax. In other words, the Amax is usually measured under the CO2 concentration of each treatment, therefore no difference or a decrease indicates that photosynthesis enhancement is not maintained, rather lowered over time. Similar to previous studies ([9], [28]), we observed a reduction in the Vcmax and Jmax under eCO2. This reduction usually occurs after long term CO2 exposure ([2], [32]). In P. ponderosa exposed to eCO2 for 6 years, the VCmax and Jmax were decreased by about 36% and 21%, respectively ([47]), and the VCmax was decreased by about 19% in P. abies ([48]). However, in some cases, the reduction of photosynthesic ability under eCO2 did not occur even in the long term (more than 6 years - [3], [8], [53]). In an experiment on Fagus sylvatica, Quercus petraea, Carpinus betulus, Acer campestre, and Tilia platyphyllos in mature deciduous forests, the increase in the Amax was maintained even after 8 years of CO2 treatment, and the down-regulation of VCmax and Jmax did not occur. Similarly, in the Aspen FACE experiment, the increases in Vcmax (48%-85%) and Jmax (23%-34%) were sustained for 11 years, and no reduction occurred. Warren et al. ([53]) also showed that the increase in photosynthesis was maintained during the first 8 years when the leaf N was 0.2 mg cm-2 or more, but after a decrease of leaf N, the CO2 fertilization effect disappeared. Thus, the increase in photosynthesis and the decrease in photosynthesic ability are largely affected by the nitrogen available in the environment. These studies were conducted in well-developed organic layer of forest floor, such as mature stands ([3]), or soil N of 3% or more ([8]), i.e., environments with considerably higher N than normal forest soil. On the contrary, the long-term exposure under eCO2 leads to nitrogen limitation in common forest soil, which results in PNL that decreases photosynthesis and growth increment ([37], [32], [12], [39]).

Relationship between photosynthetic properties (Vcmax and Jmax) and leaf nitrogen

In general, the leaf total N is positively correlated with the photosynthesis ability ([11]). Several studies have shown that the leaf N decreased in response to long-term eCO2 condition ([10]). The elevated CO2 concentration increases the capacity of the rubisco enzyme to adsorb carbon dioxide, thereby causing carboxylation and a decrease in the demand of nitrogen for rubisco ([34], [25]). Similarly, in this study, the leaf N was significantly lowered under eCO2 over time (Fig. 3). In addition, studies have shown that the Vcmax and photosynthesis ability, decreased as the leaf N decreased ([1], [53]). Thus, fertilization at the time of nitrogen limitation increased the CO2 fertilization effect again or the decreasing rate was reduced ([24], [6], [46]).

In general, there is a strong correlation between VCmax and Jmax, with Jmax/VCmax = 1.5-2.0 at 25 °C ([30], [50], [5]). Similarly, VCmax, Jmax, and leaf N showed correlation under eCO2 ([6], [53]). Therefore, when the leaf N and VCmax were decreased after long-term eCO2 treatment, the Jmax also decreased in some cases ([16], [30], [43], [6], [3]). As in our study, the decrease in Jmax (Tab. 4) was relatively lower than that of Vcmax in some cases ([24], [53]). Moreover, these changes are different depending on species. Chinese ash and Korean red pine showed a decrease only in the VCmax, while Korean mountain ash did not show any decrease in both the above photosynthetic parameters (Fig. 2). These differences due to the change in intracellular nitrogen distribution under eCO2 are dependent not only on the environment but also on the species. Further studies are needed to examine how species change the intercellular nitrogen distribution under elevated CO2 ([11], [17]).

CO2 fertilization effect and PNL

The enhanced productivity of forest ecosystem due to the CO2 fertilization is heavily influenced by the nutrients available in the soil ([13]). PNL is a hypothesis that the increased forest productivity due to eCO2 decreases over time because of the increased N accumulation in the biomass, resulting in a decrease of soil N availability, an increase of N immobilization and a decrease of N mineralization ([26]). In the long-term eCO2 at Duke-FACE, Oak-Ridge FACE, and BioCON experiments, N fertilization led to an immediate increase in NPP. Therefore, there seemed to be an interaction between eCO2 and N in terms of increased productivity ([37], [29], [32]). In particular, the soil N is important and N deficiency leads to a decline in production due to PNL even under eCO2 ([33]). Such N deficiency changes the N distribution in the plants’ organs for effective nitrogen utilization, resulting in a decrease of the N used for above-ground photosynthesis ([35]). In addition, N distribution in photosynthetic apparatus such as Rubisco is greatly reduced. Therefore, nitrogen-use-efficiency is increased generally ([49], [42]), but the persistence of such an increase is controversial ([2], [22]). There is limited information about N distribution in the above- and below-ground under eCO2. Therefore, it is necessary to determine and quantify the distribution of N in the above- and below-ground through follow-up studies.


In this study, we investigated the physiological and morphological characteristics of Korean red pine, Chinese ash, and Korean mountain ash, which are native tree species in Korea, under eCO2 over a period of 8 years. We also examined the longevity of CO2 fertilization effect in our study sites.

The CO2 fertilization effect caused by eCO2 led to an increase in growth in the early stage of exposure, but there was no significant difference thereafter. Photosynthetic properties showed a decreasing tendency in all species and a down-regulation of photosynthetic capacity increase with time, especially in Korean red pine and Korean mountain ash. The analysis of leaf and soil N to identify the cause revealed a significant decrease of leaf N under eCO2. We argue that the enhancement of productivity might have decreased due to low soil N.

In conclusion, progressive nitrogen limitation (PNL) caused by the N reduction might have already started or is about to start in our study sites. Further investigation is needed to clarify N use efficiency and nitrogen distribution according to species.

  List of abbreviations 

(OTC): Open Top Chamber; (aCO2): current atmospheric CO2 concentration ; (eCO21.4): 1.4 times higher CO2 concentration than the current concentration (Chamber 2); (eCO21.8): 1.8 times higher CO2 concentration than the current concentration (Chamber 3); (Amax): maximum photosynthetic rate; (VCmax): maximum rate of carboxylation; (Jmax): maximum electron transport rate.


This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea, by the projects “Evaluation of climate change adaptation mechanisms of native temperate tree species and its ecological effects using open-top chambers” (2014R1A1A2055127) and “Testing progressive nitrogen limitation and nitrogen use efficiency increment through the quantification of leaf nitrogen allocation” (2017R1A2B2012605). We thank members of forest ecophysiology laboratory for their assistance with field sampling.


Ainsworth EA, Long SP (2005). What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytologist 165: 351-372.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Ainsworth EA, Rogers A (2007). The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant, Cell and Environment 30: 258-270.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Bader MKF, Siegwolf R, Körner C (2010). Sustained enhancement of photosynthesis in mature deciduous forest trees after 8 years of free air CO2 enrichment. Planta 232: 1115-1125.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Cai C, Li G, Yang H, Yang J, Liu H, Struik PC, Luo W, Yin X, Di L, Guo X (2018). Do all leaf photosynthesis parameters of rice acclimate to elevated CO2, elevated temperature, and their combination in FACE environments? Global Change Biology 24: 1685-1707.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Cho S, Ser-Oddamba B, Batkhuu N, Kim HS (2019). Comparison of water use efficiency and biomass production in 10-year-old Populus sibirica and Ulmus pumila plantations in Lun soum, Mongolia. Forest Science and Technology 15: 147-158.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Crous KY, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (2008). Elevated CO2 concentration affects leaf photosynthesis-nitrogen relationships in Pinus taeda over nine years in FACE. Tree Physiology 28: 607-614.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Curtis PS, Wang X (1998). A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 113: 299-313.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Darbah JN, Kubiske ME, Nelson N, Kets K, Riikonen J, Sober A, Rouse L, Karnosky DF (2010). Will photosynthetic capacity of aspen trees acclimate after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 and O3? Environmental Pollution 158: 983-991.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Drake BG, Gonzàlez-Meler MA, Long SP (1997). More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annual Review of Plant Biology 48: 609-639.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Ellsworth DS, Thomas R, Crous KY, Palmroth S, Ward E, Maier C, DeLucia E, Oren R (2012). Elevated CO2 affects photosynthetic responses in canopy pine and subcanopy deciduous trees over 10 years: a synthesis from Duke FACE. Global Change Biology 18: 223-242.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Evans JR, Seemann JR (1989). The allocation of protein nitrogen in the photosynthetic apparatus: costs, consequences, and control. Photosynthesis 183: 205.
Online | Gscholar
Feng Z, Rütting T, Pleijel H, Wallin G, Reich PB, Kammann CI, Newton PC, Kobayashi K, Luo Y, Uddling J (2015). Constraints to nitrogen acquisition of terrestrial plants under elevated CO2. Global Change Biology 21: 3152-3168.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Finzi AC, Norby RJ, Calfapietra C, Gallet-Budynek A, Gielen B, Holmes WE, Hoosbeek MR, Iversen CM, Jackson RB, Kubiske ME (2007). Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 14014-14019.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Harley PC, Loreto F, Di Marco G, Sharkey TD (1992). Theoretical considerations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO2 flux by analysis of the response of photosynthesis to CO2. Plant Physiology 98: 1429-1436.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Harrison MT, Edwards EJ, Farquhar GD, Nicotra AB, Evans JR (2009). Nitrogen in cell walls of sclerophyllous leaves accounts for little of the variation in photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency. Plant, Cell and Environment 32: 259-270.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Herrick J, Thomas R (2001). No photosynthetic down-regulation in sweetgum trees (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) after three years of CO2 enrichment at the Duke Forest FACE experiment. Plant, Cell and Environment 24: 53-64.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Hikosaka K (2004). Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis-nitrogen relationship: patterns, physiological causes, and ecological importance. Journal of Plant Research 117: 481-494.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Hungate BA, Dijkstra P, Wu Z, Duval BD, Day FP, Johnson DW, Megonigal JP, Brown AL, Garland JL (2013). Cumulative response of ecosystem carbon and nitrogen stocks to chronic CO2 exposure in a subtropical oak woodland. New Phytologist 200: 753-766.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Hungate BA, Dukes JS, Shaw MR, Luo Y, Field CB (2003). Nitrogen and climate change. Science 302: 1512-1513.
CrossRef | Gscholar
IPCC (2013). Summary for policymakers. climate change: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovermental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1-33.
Kwon B, Kim HS, Yi MJ (2019). The quantity and pattern of leaf fall and nitrogen resorption strategy by leaf-litter in the Gwangneung natural broadleaved forest. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 21: 208-220.
Online | Gscholar
Leakey AD, Ainsworth EA, Bernacchi CJ, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR (2009). Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 2859-2876.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Lee JC, Kim DH, Kim GN, Kim PG, Han S-H (2012). Long-term climate change research facility for trees: CO2-enriched open top chamber system. Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 14: 19-27.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Liberloo M, Tulva I, Raïm O, Kull O, Ceulemans R (2007). Photosynthetic stimulation under long-term CO2 enrichment and fertilization is sustained across a closed Populus canopy profile (EUROFACE). New Phytologist 173: 537-549.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Liu J, Zhang D, Zhou G, Duan H (2012). Changes in leaf nutrient traits and photosynthesis of four tree species: effects of elevated [CO2], N fertilization and canopy positions. Journal of Plant Ecology 5: 376-390.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Luo Y, Su B, Currie WS, Dukes JS, Finzi A, Hartwig U, Hungate B, McMurtrie RE, Oren R, Parton W (2004). Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience 54: 731-739.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Makino A, Osmond B (1991). Effects of nitrogen nutrition on nitrogen partitioning between chloroplasts and mitochondria in pea and wheat. Plant Physiology 96: 355-362.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Martínez-Carrasco R, Pérez P, Morcuende R (2005). Interactive effects of elevated CO2, temperature and nitrogen on photosynthesis of wheat grown under temperature gradient tunnels. Environmental Experimental Botany 54: 49-59.
CrossRef | Gscholar
McCarthy HR, Oren R, Johnsen KH, Gallet-Budynek A, Pritchard SG, Cook CW, LaDeau SL, Jackson RB, Finzi AC (2010). Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytologist 185: 514-528.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Medlyn B, Dreyer E, Ellsworth D, Forstreuter M, Harley P, Kirschbaum M, Le Roux X, Montpied P, Strassemeyer J, Walcroft A (2002). Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data. Plant, Cell and Environment 25: 1167-1179.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Mozdzer TJ, Caplan JS (2018). Complementary responses of morphology and physiology enhance the stand-scale production of a model invasive species under elevated CO2 and nitrogen. Functional Ecology 32: 1784-1796.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Norby RJ, Warren JM, Iversen CM, Medlyn BE, McMurtrie RE (2010). CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107: 19368-19373.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Norby RJ, De Kauwe MG, Domingues TF, Duursma RA, Ellsworth DS, Goll DS, Lapola DM, Luus KA, MacKenzie AR, Medlyn BE (2016). Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. New Phytologist 209: 17-28.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD (2004). Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2 - do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytologist 162: 253-280.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Pettersson R, McDonald AJS (1994). Effects of nitrogen supply on the acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2. Photosynthesis Research 39: 389-400.
CrossRef | Gscholar
R Core Team (2016). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Online | Gscholar
Reich PB, Hungate BA, Luo Y (2006). Carbon-nitrogen interactions in terrestrial ecosystems in response to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 611-636.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Reich PB, Hobbie SE, Lee TD, Pastore MA (2018). Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment. Science 360: 317-320.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Rütting T (2017). Nitrogen mineralization, not N2 fixation, alleviates progressive nitrogen limitation - Comment on “Processes regulating progressive nitrogen limitation under elevated carbon dioxide: a meta-analysis” by Liang et al. (2016). Biogeosciences 14: 751-754.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Sang WG, Kim JH, Shin P, Baek JK, Lee YH, Cho JI, Seo MC (2019). Evaluation of Photochemical Reflectance Index (PRI) response to soybean drought stress under climate change conditions. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 21: 261-268.
Online | Gscholar
Sharkey TD (2016). What gas exchange data can tell us about photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 39: 1161-1163.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Sharwood RE, Crous KY, Whitney SM, Ellsworth DS, Ghannoum O (2017). Linking photosynthesis and leaf N allocation under future elevated CO2 and climate warming in Eucalyptus globulus. Journal of Experimental Botany 68: 1157-1167.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Sholtis JD, Gunderson CA, Norby RJ, Tissue DT (2004). Persistent stimulation of photosynthesis by elevated CO2 in a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) forest stand. New Phytologist 162: 343-354.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Taiz L, Zeiger E (2010). Photosynthesis: the light reactions. In: “Plant Physiology” (5th edn). Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, USA, pp. 163-198.
Online | Gscholar
Talhelm AF, Pregitzer KS, Kubiske ME, Zak DR, Campany CE, Burton AJ, Dickson RE, Hendrey GR, Isebrands JG, Lewin KF (2014). Elevated carbon dioxide and ozone alter productivity and ecosystem carbon content in northern temperate forests. Global Change Biology 20: 2492-2504.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Terrer C, Vicca S, Stocker BD, Hungate BA, Phillips RP, Reich PB, Finzi AC, Prentice IC (2018). Ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 governed by plant-soil interactions and the cost of nitrogen acquisition. New Phytologist 217: 507-522.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Tissue DT, Griffin KL, Ball JT (1999). Photosynthetic adjustment in field-grown ponderosa pine trees after six years of exposure to elevated CO2. Tree Physiology 19: 221-228.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Uddling J, Wallin G (2012). Interacting effects of elevated CO2 and weather variability on photosynthesis of mature boreal Norway spruce agree with biochemical model predictions. Tree Physiology 32: 1509-1521.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Vicente R, Pérez P, Martínez-Carrasco R, Feil R, Lunn JE, Watanabe M, Arrivault S, Stitt M, Hoefgen R, Morcuende R (2016). Metabolic and transcriptional analysis of durum wheat responses to elevated CO2 at low and high nitrate supply. Plant and Cell Physiology 57: 2133-2146.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Walker AP, Beckerman AP, Gu L, Kattge J, Cernusak LA, Domingues TF, Scales JC, Wohlfahrt G, Wullschleger SD, Woodward FI (2014). The relationship of leaf photosynthetic traits - Vcmax and Jmax - to leaf nitrogen, leaf phosphorus, and specific leaf area: a meta-analysis and modeling study. Ecology and Evolution 4: 3218-3235.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Wang YP, Houlton BZ (2009). Nitrogen constraints on terrestrial carbon uptake: Implications for the global carbon-climate feedback. Geophysical Research Letters 36 (24): 623.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Ward EJ, Oren R, Sigurdsson BD, Jarvis PG, Linder S (2008). Fertilization effects on mean stomatal conductance are mediated through changes in the hydraulic attributes of mature Norway spruce trees. Tree Physiology 28: 579-596.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Warren JM, Jensen AM, Medlyn BE, Norby RJ, Tissue DT (2015). Carbon dioxide stimulation of photosynthesis in Liquidambar styraciflua is not sustained during a 12-year field experiment. AoB Plants 7: 351.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

Woo Kyung Song
HoonTaek Lee 0000-0002-6661-8298
Forest Ecology and Climate Change Division, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455 (Republic of Korea)
Woo Kyung Song
Si Yeon Byeon
HoonTaek Lee 0000-0002-6661-8298
Min Su Lee
Hyun Seok Kim
Department of Forest Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826 (Republic of Korea)
Daun Ryu 0000-0002-0782-0859
Hyun Seok Kim
Interdisciplinary Program in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826 (Republic of Korea)
Jun Won Kang 0000-0002-6859-7750
Department of Forestry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566 (Republic of Korea)
Sim Hee Han
Forest Biotechnology Division, National Institute of Forest Science, Gyeonggi 16631 (Republic of Korea)
Chang Young Oh
Urban Forests Research Center, National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455 (Republic of Korea)
Hyun Seok Kim
National Center for AgroMeteorology, Seoul 08826 (Republic of Korea)
Hyun Seok Kim
Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826 (Republic of Korea)

Corresponding author

Hyun Seok Kim


Song WK, Byeon SY, Lee HT, Lee MS, Ryu D, Kang JW, Han SH, Oh CY, Kim HS (2020). Species-specific morphological and physiological characteristics and progressive nitrogen limitation under elevated CO2 concentration. iForest 13: 270-278. - doi: 10.3832/ifor3288-013

Academic Editor

Silvano Fares

Paper history

Received: Nov 08, 2019
Accepted: May 06, 2020

First online: Jul 03, 2020
Publication Date: Aug 31, 2020
Publication Time: 1.93 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2020

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 1200
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 951
Abstract Page Views: 95
PDF Downloads: 135
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 19

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 43
Overall contacts: 1200
Avg. contacts per week: 195.35

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Jun 2020)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.


iForest Similar Articles


This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info