*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
*

Reproductive allocation of two dioecious Rhamnus species in temperate forests of northeast China

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages 25-32 (2014)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1020-007
Published: Oct 14, 2013 - Copyright © 2014 SISEF

Research Articles

When a plant increases resource allocation to reproduction from its limited reserves, the allocation to the other functions is reduced. Because of these trade-offs, differences in reproductive allocation are believed to result in relative differences in life history traits. Dioecious plants provide an excellent opportunity for detecting such possible trade-offs in resource allocation. This study aims to present a finding about the gender-based cost of reproductive allocation. The trade-off between reproduction and foliage biomass was examined at different modular levels (shoot/sub-branch, branch, and shrub/tree level). There were no intra-annual trade-offs between reproduction and foliage biomass in either sex of either species at shoot/sub-branch level, branch level and shrub level. Inter-annual trade-offs were detected in females for both species. Inter-annual trade-offs existed at all three different modular levels in R. schneideri females, while the evidence of inter-annual trade-offs was only detected at branch level in R. davurica females. At the population level, the sex ratio was female-biased in 2010, and it did not significantly deviate from 1:1 in 2011 in R. davurica. However, the sex ratios were significantly female-biased in both 2010 and 2011 in R. schneideri. This study has shown that the degree of autonomy of the different plant organs influenced the trade-offs between reproduction and growth, which suggests a species- and sex-dependent modular autonomy.

Inter-annual Trade-off, Intra-annual Trade-off, Dioecious Species, Modular Autonomy

  Introduction 

Individuals that have superior lifetime reproduction are often more successful in the face of natural selection. However, when reproductive events happen, these often lead to reduced foliage growth ([20]) and delayed future reproduction ([28]). The resources that plants obtain from their environment are allocated to growth, maintenance and reproduction ([40], [3]). It may be assumed that, when a plant increases resource allocation to reproduction, the allocation to the other functions is reduced. Because of these trade-offs, differences in reproductive allocation are believed to result in relative differences in life history traits, like season-related flowering, fruiting and growth.

Dioecious plants provide an excellent opportunity for detecting possible trade-offs in resource allocation. In dioecious plants, the cost of reproduction in male individuals is different from that of females ([21]). Females do allocate more resources to reproduction than males, and the trade-offs between growth and reproduction would be more obvious if there was a shortage of resources ([1], [2], [12]). Several studies report that females, due to higher costs of reproduction, showed reduced vegetative growth ([4]), put off flowering or reduced flowering frequency ([7]) and had higher mortality rates if resources were insufficient ([12], [28], [37]). However, some authors found that females have growth rates equivalent to ([27]) or even higher than males ([32], [31]). Females may have compensatory mechanisms for their higher reproductive costs ([10]).

There is no overwhelming evidence with regard to the trade-offs between reproduction and growth in plants ([11]). The degree of autonomy of the different plant organs might be an important reason for this ([29]). In trees, if branches are autonomous units, the costs of reproduction may show up at lower modular levels, but may be compensated at higher combined modular levels, such as the crown, by non-reproductive branches ([18]). Then we can detect the trade-offs at the branch level but not at shrub/tree level. The degree to which the individual (modular) plant organs act in response to reproductive costs is different among species ([4]).

Trade-offs are also difficult to observe in plants because of the delayed cost of reproduction. Such delayed costs may appear in the form of lower frequency of flowering ([16]), higher mortality rates ([5], [22]) or lower growth rates of females ([30]). Fox & Stevens ([15]) found a trade-off between current reproduction and subsequent reproduction in Lindera benzoin, Cipollini & Whigham ([7]) in Salix alaxensis, while Nicotra ([27]) detected a delayed cost of reproduction in both males and females of Siparuna grandiflora.

According to Delph ([12]), only 29% of dioecious species have a 1:1 sex ratio, while 57% are male-biased and relatively few are female-biased. The reason for the male-biased sex ratios may be that males allocate fewer resources to reproduction than females and selection often tend to favor the sex with lower reproductive investment. However, some studies report that several populations in the genus Salix have female-biased sex ratios ([13], [9]). Differences in the costs of reproduction between neighboring males and females competing for resources as well as genetic effects can also form biased sex ratios ([17], [35]).

This study examines the differences in reproductive costs between the sexes of two dioecious species, Rhamnus davurica and Rhamnus schneideri var. manshurica. We aim to show possible trade-offs between reproduction and vegetative growth. Accordingly, specific objectives are: (1) to evaluate the intra-annual trade-offs between reproduction and vegetative growth at different plant organ (modular) levels; and (2) to compare inter-annual trade-offs between females and males.

  Materials and methods 

Study sites

This research was conducted at the Jiaohe experimental forest in Jilin province, in northeastern China (43° 58’ N, 127° 43’ E; elevation 450 m a.s.l.). A permanent plot was established in 2009, covering a rectangular area of 23.76 ha (660 × 360 m). The forest type is a mixed broadleaf-conifer forest, in which the average annual temperature is 3.8 °C. The hottest month is July with a mean day temperature of 21.7 °C, while the coldest month is January with an average day temperature of -18.6 °C. The mean annual precipitation is 695.9 mm. The main coniferous species in the forest are Abies holophylla and Pinus koraiensis, while the dominant deciduous species are Fraxinus mandshurica, Tilia amurensis and Acer mono ([42]).

The two species studied are Rhamnus davurica and Rhamnus schneideri var. manshurica. R. davurica occurs as a shrub or small tree, while R. schneideri var. manshurica only occurs as a shrub. Both species are common at the study site. R. davurica is usually taller than R. schneideri var. manshurica. Most individuals of both species have a single trunk, a few have double or multiple trunks. Both sexes are similar in vegetative phytomorph, but not in flowers. The flower is yellowish green with four petals. There are four stamens in a male flower, but only one stigma in a female flower. The phytomorphs in the Rhamnus species are shown in Fig. 1. In order to understand the classification standard, we just show male flowers in Fig. 1. Female flowers grow on the shoot in the same way as male flowers.

Fig. 1 - Sketch of phytomorph in dioecious Rhamnus species. (a): trunk and living branches; (b): a short current-year shoot.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Field measurements

The spatial distributions of the two studied species within the 360×660 m experimental plot are shown in Fig. S1 of the Supplementary Material. In order to examine the reproductive and vegetative allocation, female and male trees were observed in May 2010 and 2011. The numbers differ between years because not all plants were flowering and fruiting in both years. For this reason, a subset of trees was selected for analysis including only those individuals that were flowering and fruiting in both years. This involved 21 female and 18 male R. davurica and 57 female and 19 male R. schneideri. Five to ten reproductive branches were randomly selected in eight crown compartments (four horizontal sections and two vertical layers, following [19]). The number of reproductive branches was different because some individuals were very small and had no more than 5 reproductive branches.

The trade-off between reproduction and growth was studied at four modular levels (shoot/sub-branch, branch, tree/shrub and population level). We counted the flowers, leaves and fruits on all selected branches in May (flowering season) and August (fruiting season). At shoot/sub-branch level, the number of flowers, leaves and fruits was assessed. At the shrub/tree level, the number of branches was counted in every sample tree. That number was multiplied by the mean number of flowers, leaves and fruits of randomly selected branches on each individual tree. This approach produced an estimate of the number of flowers, leaves and fruits on a single tree. At the time of flowering, one reproductive branch (including flowers and leaves) was harvested in each sample trees for both sexes. At the time of fruiting, 10-20 fruits were harvested on each female sample tree from the eight crown sections described above.

The harvested branches and fruits were weighed after oven-drying at 80 °C for 2 days to obtain an estimate of the average weight for each sample tree. The flower, leaf and fruit biomass estimates were calculated using eqn. 1-3 in Tab. 1. The relative reproductive ratio (RR) was calculated using eqn. 4-5 in Tab. 1. All calculations were done for different modular levels.

Tab. 1 - Equations for calculating biomass and reproductive ratio (RR). DWfruits, DWflower, Nflowers and Nfruits are the dry weight of one fruit, one flower, flower number and fruit number, respectively. Brep is the sum of flower and fruit biomass for females or flower biomass for males; Bveg is the leaf biomass for both sexes.

Symbols Equations
eqn. 1 Flower biomass = Nflowers × DWflower
eqn. 2 Bveg = number of leaves × average dry mass of one leaf
eqn. 3 Fruit biomass = Nfruits × DWfruits
eqn. 4 Brep females = DWfruits × Nfruits + (Nflowers - Nfruits) × DWflower
eqn. 5 Brep males = DWflowers × Nflowers
eqn. 6 RR = Brep / (Brep + Bveg) × 100

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Growth diameter was estimated by year-ring analysis. Altogether, 64 trees (R. davurica: 20 females and 16 males; R. schneideri: 11 females and 17 males) were harvested in 2010. Across-sectional stem discs were cut 5 cm above ground level. Tree-ring widths were measured to the nearest 0.001 mm using the annual ring analyzer (Lintab 5). The tree ring samples were cross-dated using COFFCHA software.

Statistical analysis

Sometimes, it is difficult to decide if an effect is fixed or random ([8]). Therefore, differences in flower biomass, leaf mass and reproductive ratio at three levels were compared by factorial analyses of variance with two fixed-effects factors (sex and year). Pearson correlations were used to test the correlation between foliage biomass and reproductive biomass. Trees were grouped into diameter at breast height (DBH) classes. The sex ratio in each DBH class was determined during the study period. G-tests were used to analyze deviations from a 1:1 sex ratio for the two species in different years.

  Results 

Shoot/sub-branch level analysis

Both dioecious species, R. davurica and R. schneideri, show significant differences between females and males at the shoot level (Tab. 2). The differences between sexes in flower biomass and reproductive ratio were significant for both species, though differences between sexes in foliage biomass were significant only for R. davurica (Tab. 2). R. schneideri females invested more flower biomass than males in 2010, while R. schneideri males invested more flower biomass than females in 2011 (Fig. S2 in Supplementary Material). Females had higher reproductive ratios than males in 2010 in both species (Fig. 2a, b). R. davurica females invested more foliage biomass than males in both years, while in R. schneideri only females produced more foliage biomass than males in 2011 (Fig. 2c, d).

Tab. 2 - Results of analyses of variance examining the effects of sex and year on the flower, foliage, and the percentage of reproductive ratio (RR) at different modular level in Rhamnus species . (***): p<0.001; (**): p<0.01; (*): p<0.05.

Modular
level
Species Source of
variation
Flower Foliage biomass RR
Mean Sq F value Mean Sq F value Mean Sq F Value
Shoot R. davurica sex 0 5.94* 3.6 18.63*** 0.04 -
year 0 25.01*** 12.86 66.61*** 0.03 21.67
sex×year 0 0.04 0.23 1.2 0.03 23.22
Residuals 0 - 0.19 - 0 -
R. schneideri sex 0 46.60*** 0.01 2.8 0.45 124.10***
year 0 188.04*** 0.12 27.38*** 0.65 179.04***
sex×year 0 142.49*** 0.01 3.01 0.44 121.45***
Residuals 0 - 0 - 0 -
Branch R. davurica sex 0 0.11 34.49 8.86** 0.12 56.80***
year 0 0.26 210.06 53.96*** 0.15 69.97***
sex×year 0.01 8.80** 0.16 0.04 0.14 63.24***
Residuals 0 - 3.89 - 0 -
R. schneideri sex 0 0 87.66 63.00*** 0.46 58.10***
year 0.32 65.95*** 233.89 168.09*** 0.83 103.73***
sex×year 0.22 46.59*** 78.51 56.43*** 0.55 68.61***
Residuals 0 - 1.39 - 0.01 -
Shrub R. davurica sex 30.6 4.22 122452.19 2.35 0.04 16.83**
year 12.11 1.67 150.66 0 0.02 9.34**
sex×year 9.54 1.31 33945.72 0.65 0.02 9.01**
Residuals 7.26 - 52066.45 - 0 -
R. schneideri sex 9.18 0.32 53268.3 1.81 0.17 10.59**
year 373.96 12.97*** 137588.25 4.67* 0.24 15.60***
sex×year 39.02 1.35 110844.39 3.76 0.13 8.29**
Residuals 28.83 - 29456.93 - 0.02 -

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Fig. 2 - Comparison of reproductive ratio and foliage biomass between males and females in 2010 and 2011 at shoot/sub-branch levels for the two Rhamnus species studied. Letters denote significant differences (p<0.05), calculated using multiple comparisons. Error bars represent standard errors.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

No significant correlations were found between reproductive biomass and foliage biomass at the shoot/sub-branch level in R. davurica (Tab. 3). In R. schneideri, only a few branches (female: 3 of 344 branches; male: 5 of 177 branches) showed significant negative correlations, while most branches exhibited significant positive correlations between reproductive biomass and foliage biomass (Tab. 3). This means that when a shoot shows higher growth rate, it also invests more in reproduction. The significant negative correlation can be considered as a trade-off between reproduction and vegetation. Therefore, there is no evidence of a trade-off at shoot level. The observation may be attributed to more resources being available at a higher level.

Tab. 3 - Results of a correlation analysis between reproductive biomass and foliage biomass at the shoot/sub-branch and branch level based on the study data in 2011. Only the branches with eight or more shoots could be used in the analysis. Finally, 8 of 196 branches of female R. davurica, 26 of 178 branches of male R. davurica, 344 of 461 branches of female R. schneideri and 177 of 183 branches of male R. schneideri were used. Only the shrubs with 8 or more branches could be used in the correlation analysis. Finally, 12 of 21 R. davurica females, 18 of 18 R. davurica males, 57 of 57 R. schneideri females and 19 of 19 R. schneideri males were used.

Unit Species Sex Significant
negative
Significant
positive
Non-
significant
Total
Branch R. davurica Female 0 0 8 8
Male 0 0 26 26
R. schneideri Female 3 28 313 344
Male 5 51 121 177
Shrub R. davurica Female 0 4 8 12
Male 0 8 10 18
R. schneideri Female 1 9 47 57
Male 0 13 6 19

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

The differences between years in flower biomass, foliage biomass and reproductive ratio were significant for both species (Tab. 2). The reproductive ratio decreased for the females in both species. For the males in both species the differences in the reproductive ratio between years was not significant (Fig. 2a, b). A long-term cost of reproduction was detected at the shoot/sub-branch level just for females. The reproductive ratio decreased for females in both species (Fig. 2a, b). The foliage biomass decreased for both sexes in R. davurica, while foliage biomass increased for both sexes in R. schneideri (Fig. 2c, d). Flower biomass and fruit biomass decreased for females of both species. Flower biomass decreased for R. davurica males, but there was not significant difference between years in the flower biomass for R. schneideri males (Fig. S3 in Supplementary Material).

Branch level analysis

At the branch level, no significant differences were detected between sexes in flower biomass for both R. davurica and R. schneideri. However, differences between sexes in both foliage biomass and reproductive ratio were significant for both species (Tab. 2). R. davurica (in 2010) and R. schneideri (in 2011) showed significant differences between sexes in foliage biomass. The difference in reproductive ratio between males and females was significant in both R. davurica and R. schneideri in 2010 (Fig. 3a, b).

Fig. 3 - Comparison of reproductive ratio and foliage biomass between males and females in 2010 and 2011 at the branch level for the two Rhamnus species studied. Letters denote significant differences (p<0.05), and are calculated using multiple comparisons. Error bars represent standard errors.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

At the branch level, almost all 106 shrubs/ small trees (R. davurica: 12 females and 18 males; R. schneideri: 57 females and 19 males) showed significant positive or non-significant correlation between reproductive biomass and foliage biomass apart from one female R. schneideri (Tab. 3). This means no trade-off exists between reproduction and vegetation at branch level for two dioecious Rhamnus species.

The differences between years in foliage biomass and reproductive ratio were significant for both species, while the difference between years in flower biomass were significant in R. schneideri (Tab. 2). The reproductive ratio of females decreased in the subsequent year, while that of males was not significantly different for both species. This result is assumed to provide evidence of a delayed cost of reproduction for females at the branch level. The foliage biomass of males and females increased in the subsequent year for both dioecious species (Fig. 3c, d). The decrease of reproductive ratio and the increase of foliage biomass in females indicated inter-annual tradeoffs at branch level.

Shrub/tree level analysis

At the shrub/tree level, significant differences in reproductive ratio were detected between males and females for both R. davurica and R. schneideri, though no significant differences in flower biomass and foliage biomass were found (Tab. 2). Females invested more biomass into reproduction than males for both species in 2010, but there was no significant difference between sexes in reproductive allocation for both species in 2011 (Fig. 4a, b). The reproductive biomass correlated positively with the foliage biomass in the females of the two species at the shrub/tree level (R. davurica, Male: t = 1.12, correlation coefficient = 0.24, p>0.05; Female: t = 3.33, correlation coefficient = 0.74, p<0.01; R. schneideri, Male: t = 0.76, correlation coefficient = 0.15, p>0.05; Female: t = 2.73, correlation coefficient = 0.33; p<0.01). Thus, there was no trade-off between vegetative growth and reproduction in males and females of the two species.

Fig. 4 - Comparison of reproductive ratio and foliage biomass between males and females in 2010 and 2011 at the shrub/tree level for the two Rhamnus species studied. Letters denote significant differences (p<0.05), calculated using multiple comparisons. Error bars represent standard errors.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Differences between years in flower biomass, foliage biomass and reproductive ratio were significant for R. schneideri, but the difference between years was significant only in the reproductive ratio for R. davurica (Tab. 2). Both dioecious species showed different reproductive ratios in 2010 and 2011. The reproductive ratios of females decreased in the subsequent year for both species, while no significant difference was detected between the two years in males. Interestingly, the leaf biomass in female R. schneideri also increased in the subsequent year (Fig. 4c, d). These differences in the reproductive ratios between the two years may be due to a delayed costs of reproduction.

Population level

The sex ratio of R. davurica in 2010 was significantly female-biased, but it was 1:1 in 2011. The sex ratios in each DBH class were consistent with the population sex ratio apart from the 1-2 cm DBH class (Tab. 4, Fig. S4 in Supplementary Material). The sex ratios of R. schneideri were significantly biased in both 2010 and 2011, apart from the 0-2 cm and 4-6 cm classes (Tab. 4, Fig. S4 in Supplementary Material ).

Tab. 4 - Number of stems and sex ratios of two Rhamnus species in different DBH classes in the 360×660 m research plot. (DBH): diameter at breast height (cm); G(P): G-test results. (None): non-flowering trees; (***): p<0.001; (**): p<0.01; (*): p<0.05: (ns): p>0.05.

Species Parameters DBH classes (cm)
0-2 2-4 4-6 6-8 >8
R. davurica in 2010 Male 3 22 18 11 0
Female 9 78 136 62 19
None 11 88 87 28 10
Male/Female 0.33 0.28 0.13 0.18 0
G(P) 3.01ns 33.08*** 102.07*** 39.04*** 25.66***
R. davurica in 2011 Male 1 16 14 6 0
Female 3 18 21 11 0
Non-flowering 13 131 182 78 28
Male/Female 0.33 0.89 0.67 0.55 -
G(P) 0.93ns 0.12ns 1.39ns 1.45ns -
R. schneideri in 2010 Male 1 21 1 - -
Female 11 73 4 - -
Non-flowering 1 10 1 - -
Male/Female 0.09 0.29 0.25 - -
G(P) 9.36* 30.29*** 1.75ns - -
R. schneideri in 2011 Male 5 29 0 - -
Female 8 57 3 - -
Non-flowering 4 22 1 - -
Male/Female 0.63 0.51 0 - -
G(P) 0.67ns 9.23* 3.56ns - -

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

The age of females and males was not significantly different (R. davurica: 36.92 ± 1.4 years for males, 38.5 ± 1.63 years for females, t = 0.74, p = 0.47; R. schneideri: 53.73 ± 1.46 years for males, 49.39 ± 2.02 years for females, t = -1.74, p = 0.09). The radial growth of R. schneideri showed inter-sexual differences with the growth rate of females being higher than that of males (R. davurica: 0.79 ± 0.03 mm · year-1 for males, 0.84 ± 0.03 mm·year-1 for females, t = 0.97, p = 0.34; R. schneideri: 0.31 ± 0.02 mm · year-1 for males, 0.37 ± 0.02 mm · year-1 for females, t = 2.67, p = 0.008643 - Fig. S4). The variation of monthly average temperature and precipitation was similar in 2010 and 2011 (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5 - Monthly average temperature and monthly average precipitation in 2010 and 2011. The black dots indicate temperature, the grey squares indicate precipitation.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

  Discussion 

Intra-annual trade-off at different modular levels

Annual trade-off means that the correlation between foliage biomass and reproductive ratio is negative at 1 year. Namely, for each high reproductive biomass, there is a low foliage biomass. Unexpectedly, most males and females showed a non-significant correlation between foliage biomass and reproductive biomass for both species studied. Only a few individuals showed a trade-off at both the shoot/sub-branch level and branch level in R. schneideri. This findings indicate that, although some shoots and branches showed autonomy, the degree of modular autonomy was different between species, sexes and shrubs of the same sex.

The reproductive biomass was positively correlated with the foliage biomass at different levels for both sexes in R. schneideri. In R. davurica, the reproductive biomass was positively correlated with the foliage biomass among branches/shrubs, but neutral among shoots for both sexes. The positive correlation is probably due to the particular position of the shoots and/or branches. The better the position (e.g., full light exposure), the more foliage growth and reproduction that can be expected ([4]). Plant compensatory mechanisms may probably hide the trade-offs ([25]). During the investigation, we found that the flowers and immature fruits of both species were all green. These organs may also represent photosynthetic structures that can compensate the reproductive cost of a plant ([36]). Thus, females may have a greater compensatory advantage than males because of flower and fruit photosynthesis. Phenology patterns may provide another compensatory mechanism for reproduction. Both R. davurica and R. schneideri grow leaves before flowers. If a leaf is growing before flowering, a plant will first allocate more resources to foliage growth than to reproduction. Trade-off can be detected only for a short time when flowers and leaves are both on a tree. Thus, the trade-off cannot be determined during the entire reproductive period, ([24]). Interestingly, Verdú et al. ([39]) found that the lower cost of reproduction for Fraxinus ornus males results in better vegetative growth than in the hermaphrodites of that species. Such differences in sex-specific reproductive costs do not seem to be anymore significant under stressful conditions.

Inter-annual trade-off at different modular levels

Delayed costs of reproduction were found at different modular levels for the two dioecious species. The delayed cost was detected in R. schneideri females and R. davurica females at shoot, branch and shrub levels, but not in males. The fruit biomass decreased at most modular levels in the subsequent year in R. davurica females. However, the fruit biomass decreased at shoot level but not at any other higher modular levels in the subsequent year in R. schneideri females. This indicates that different species may have different reproductive strategies. Every single shoot of R. schneideri female decreased in the fruit biomass, but the number of fruits at higher modular levels may increase in the subsequent year.

At three different modular levels, the reproductive ratio decreased, while the foliage biomass increased in R. schneideri females. This result suggests the existence of an inter-annual trade-off in R. schneideri females, being the performances consistent at three different modular levels. In R. davurica, the inter-annual trade-offs only existed at branch level for females. Some studies found that the reproduction pattern of the lower-level modules was the same as the higher-level modules (e.g., [23]). Our study also confirmed the same performance in R. schneideri. Newell ([26]) found that branches allocated more resources for reproduction and had less opportunity to flower or bear fruit in the subsequent year than on previously non-fruiting branches. Thus, reproductive activity in a given year may cause reduced fruit biomass in the subsequent year. Vaughton & Ramsey ([38]) also found that Leucopogon melaleucoides females, which invest more energy in reproduction, will inhibit future growth in resource-limiting conditions and have no compensatory traits. No significant difference in monthly average temperature and precipitation was found between 2010 and 2011. In this study, climatic parameters may not be the key factors for the inter-annual trade-off.

Sex ratio is an important trait at the population level for dioecious species. The sex ratio is affected at germination by sex-linked genes ([33]), pollination intensity ([14]) and soil nitrogen ([41]). Sex ratios are affected by other factors as well, e.g., sexually different mortality rates ([34]). The sex ratio changed at reproduction from a significant female-bias in 2010 to a non-significant bias in 2011, because more females did not flower in 2011 in R. davurica. The change in sex ratio within two reproductive years may be an indication of a delayed cost at the population level. The lower flowering frequency in females may be the evidence of a long-term cost of reproduction ([6]).

  Conclusions 

The intra-annual trade-off between foliage biomass and reproductive structure was not detected at different modular levels neither in sex nor in Rhamnus species. The performances of inter-annual trade-offs were different at two sexes and two Rhamnus species. The inter-annual trade-offs were just detected in females for both Rhamnus species, although the performances were different between two species at four modular levels. The intra-annual trade-off is hardly clear because of compensatory mechanism in both sexes, while the inter-annual trade-off is clear in females because of their higher reproductive allocation.

  Acknowledgments  

This research is supported by the Special Research Program for Forestry Welfare of China (200904022) and the 12th five-year National Science and Technology Plan of China (2012BAC01B03), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200315), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China (NCET-12-0781) and the Program of the Co-Construction with Beijing Municipal Government of China (2012).

  References

(1)
Antos JA, Allen GA (1990). A comparison of reproductive effort in the dioecious shrub Oemleria cerasiformis using nitrogen, energy and biomass, as currencies. American Midland Naturalist 124: 254-262.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Barrett SCH, Pannell JR (1998). Baker’s law revisited: reproductive assurance in a metapopulation. Evolution 52: 657-668.
Online | Gscholar
(3)
Bazzaz FA, Chiariello NR, Coley PD, Pitelka LF (1987). Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. BioScience 37: 58-67.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Bañuelos MJ, Obeso JR (2004). Resource allocation in the dioecious shrub Rhamnus alpinus: the hidden costs of reproduction. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6: 397-413.
Online | Gscholar
(5)
Bierzychudek P, Eckhart V (1988). Spatial segregation of the sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist 132: 34-43.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Cipollini ML, Stiles EW (1991). Costs of reproduction in Nyssa sylvatica: sexual dimorphism in reproductive frequency and nutrient flux. Oecologia 86:585-593.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Cipollini ML, Whigham DF (1994). Sexual dimorphisms and cost of reproduction in the dioecious shrub Lindera benzoin (Lauraceae). American Journal of Botany 81:65-75.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Crawley MJ (2007). The R Book. The R Book. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, pp. 877.
Gscholar
(9)
Dawson TE, Bliss LC (1989). Patterns of water use and the tissue water relations in the dioecious shrub, Salix arctica: the physiological basis for habitat partitioning between the sexes. Oecologia 79: 332-343.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Dawson TE, Geber MA (1999). Sexual dimorphism in physiology and morphology. In: “Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants” (Geber MA ed). Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 175-215.
Gscholar
(11)
Delph LF, Meagher TR (1995). Sexual dimorphism masks life history trade-off in the dioecious plant Silene latifolia. Ecology 76: 775-785.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Delph LF (1999). Sexual dimorphism in live history. In: “Gender and sexual dimorphism in flowering plants” (Geber MA ed) . Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp. 149-173.
Gscholar
(13)
Elmqvist T, Agren J, Tunlid A (1988). Sexual dimorphism and between-year variation in flowering, fruit set and pollinator behavior in a boreal willow. Oikos 53:58-66.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Field DL, Pickup M, Barrett SCH (2012). The influence of pollination intensity on fertilization success, progeny sex ratio, and fitness in a wind-pollinated, dioecious plant. International Journal of Plant Science 173: 184-191.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Fox JF, Stevens GC (1991). Costs of reproduction in a willow: experimental responses vs. natural variation. Ecology 72: 1013-1023.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Garcia MB, Antor RJ (1995). Sex ratio and sexual dimorphism in the dioecious Borderea pyrenaica (Dioscoreaceae). Oecologia 101: 59-67.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Hamilton WD (1967). Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156: 477-488.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Hasegawa S, Takeda H (2001). Functional specialization of current shoots as a reproductive strategy in Japanese alder (Alnus hirsute var. sibirica). Canadian Journal of Botany 79:38-48.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Henriksson J (2001). Differential shading of branches or whole trees: survival, growth, and reproduction. Oecologia 126: 482-486.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Karlsson PS, Méndez M (2005). The resource economy of plant reproduction. In: “Reproductive allocation in plants” (Reekie EG ed). Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MS, USA, pp. 1-49.
Gscholar
(21)
Lloyd DG, Webb CJ (1977). Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review 43: 177-216.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Lovett Doust J, Lovett Doust L (1988). Modules of production and reproduction in a dioecious clonal shrub, Rhus typhina. Ecology 69: 741-750.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Matsushita M, Nakagawa M, Tomaru N (2011). Sexual differences in year-to-year flowering trends in the dioecious multi-stemmed shrub Lindera triloba: effects of light and clonal integration. Journal of Ecology 99: 1520-1530.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Miyazaki Y, Hiura T, Kato E, Funada R (2002). Allocation of resources to reproduction in Styrax obassia in a masting year. Annals of Botany 89: 767-772.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Munetaka T, Naoto U, Kenji S (2009). Compensatory mechanisms for reproductive costs in the dioecious tree Salix integra. Botany 87:315-323.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Newell EA (1991). Direct and delayed costs of reproduction in Aesculus californica. Journal of Ecology 79: 365-378.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Nicotra AB (1999). Reproductive allocation and the long-term costs of reproduction in Siparuna grandiflora, a dioecious neotropical shrub. Journal of Ecology 87: 138-149
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Obeso JR (2002). The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytologist 155: 321-348.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Obeso JR, Álvarez-Santullano M, Retuerto R (1998). Sex-ratios, size distributions, and sexual dimorphism in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium (Aquifoliaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 1602-1608.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Popp JW, Reinartz JA (1988). Sexual dimorphism in biomass allocation and clonal growth of Xanthoxylum americanum. American Journal of Botany 75: 1732-1741.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Rovere AE, Aizen MA, Kitzberger T (2003). Growth and climatic response of male and female trees of Austrocedrus chilensis, a dioecious conifer from the temperate forests of southern South America. Ecoscience 10: 195-203.
Gscholar
(32)
Sakai AK, Burris TA (1985). Growth in male and female Aspen clones: a twenty-five-year longitudinal study. Ecology 66: 1921-1927.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(33)
Shelton AO (2010). The origin of female-biased sex ratios in intertidal seagrasses (Phyllospadix spp.). Ecology 91: 1380-1390.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Stehlik I, Barrett SCH (2005). Mechanisms governing sex-ratio variation in dioecious Rumex nivalis. Evolution 59: 814-825.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
Taylor DR (1999). Genetics of sex ratio variation among natural populations of a dioecious plant. Evolution 53: 55-62.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(36)
Tozawa M, Ueno N, Seiwa K (2009). Compensatory mechanisms for reproductive costs in the dioecious tree Salix integra. Botany 87: 315-323.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
Ueno N, Kanno H, Seiwa K (2006). Sexual differences in shoot and leaf dynamics in a dioecious tree, Salix sachalinensis. Canadian Journal of Botany 84: 1852-1859.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(38)
Vaughton G, Ramsey M (2011). Reproductive allocation and costs in gynodioecious Leucopogon melaleucoides (Ericaceae): implications for the evolution of gender dimorphism. Plant Biology 13: 888-895.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(39)
Verdú M, Spanos K, Kanová I, Slobodník B, Paule L (2007). Similar gender dimorphism in the costs of reproduction across the geographic range of Fraxinus ornus. Annals of Botany 99: 183-191.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Willson MF (1983). Plant Reproductive Ecology. Wiley, New York, USA, pp. 291.
Gscholar
(41)
Yu L, Lu J (2011). Does landscape fragmentation influence sex ratio of dioecious plants? A case study of Pistacia chinensis in the Thousand-Island Lake region of China. PLoS One 6: e22903.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(42)
Zhang CY, Wang J, Zhao XH, Xia FC, Gadow KV (2011). Sexual dimorphism in reproductive and vegetative allometry for two dioecious Rhamnus plants in north-eastern China. European Journal of Forest Research 131: 1287-1296.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

(1)
Juan Wang
Chunyu Zhang
Xiuhai Zhao
The Key Laboratory for Forest Resources & Ecosystem Processes of Beijing, Beijing Forestry University, 100083 Beijing (China)
(2)
Klaus von Gadow
Faculty of Forestry and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Büsgenweg 5, D-37077 Göttingen (Germany)

Corresponding author

 
Xiuhai Zhao
bfuz@163.com

Citation

Wang J, Zhang C, Zhao X, von Gadow K (2014). Reproductive allocation of two dioecious Rhamnus species in temperate forests of northeast China. iForest 7: 25-32. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1020-007

Academic Editor

Roberto Tognetti

Paper history

Received: Apr 24, 2013
Accepted: Aug 02, 2013

First online: Oct 14, 2013
Publication Date: Feb 03, 2014
Publication Time: 2.43 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2014

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 50046
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 43234
Abstract Page Views: 1670
PDF Downloads: 3845
Citation/Reference Downloads: 17
XML Downloads: 1280

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 4056
Overall contacts: 50046
Avg. contacts per week: 86.37

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

Total number of cites (since 2014): 8
Average cites per year: 0.73

 
 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 

iForest Similar Articles

 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info