Biomass equations for European beech growing on dry sites

doi:10.3832/ifor1881-009

Biomass equations for European beech growing on dry sites

Tamalika Chakraborty⁽¹⁾ , Somidh Saha⁽²⁾, Albert Reif⁽¹⁾

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages 751-757 (2016)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1881-009
Published: Jun 17, 2016 - Copyright © 2016 SISEF

Technical Reports

PDF Version

Full Text

Citation

Geo-mapping

Biomass equations for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees growing on dry sites have not been published, although such equations are needed for a proper estimation of the biomass of beech trees growing naturally at their drought limit in dry forests. We aimed to: (1) develop new allometric above-ground biomass equations for European beech trees growing on dry sites; (2) compare these equations with existing biomass equations. We harvested 86 plants, ranging from saplings to trees, from forest stands on south-facing slopes at 5 locations in Germany and Switzerland. Whole plant weights were measured in the field after felling, and samples from stem, branches and leaves of every harvested plant were brought to the laboratory. We developed diameter- and height-based regression equations for the total above-ground biomass, stem with bark biomass, and biomass of the branches with leaves and further compared them with the existing equations from the literature. Our results showed that the 5 current diameter-based equations available in the literature significantly overestimate the total above-ground biomass, the stem with bark biomass and the biomass of branches and leaves. With increasing tree size, the proportion of the biomass of branches and leaves to the total tree biomass decreased significantly. We also found that the inclusion of height in biomass models did not influence the prediction of total above-ground biomass, but significantly improved the prediction of stem biomass. We recommend that researchers and foresters use the equations developed in this study to quantify the biomass of beech trees growing under similar site conditions.

Keywords

Above-ground Biomass, Stem Biomass, Abandoned Oak Coppiced Forest, Stunted Growth, Plant Size Allometry

Authors’ address

(1)

Chair of Vegetation Science, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacherstr. 4, D-79085 Freiburg (Germany)

(2)

Chair of Silviculture, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacherstr. 4, D-79085 Freiburg (Germany)

Corresponding author

Tamalika Chakraborty
tamalika.chakraborty@waldbau.uni-freiburg.de

Citation

Chakraborty T, Saha S, Reif A (2016). Biomass equations for European beech growing on dry sites. iForest 9: 751-757. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1881-009

Academic Editor

Giorgio Alberti

Paper history

Received: Sep 21, 2015
Accepted: Mar 30, 2016

First online: Jun 17, 2016
Publication Date: Oct 13, 2016
Publication Time: 2.63 months

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 49341
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 41431
Abstract Page Views: 2694
PDF Downloads: 4087
Citation/Reference Downloads: 42
XML Downloads: 1087

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 3079
Overall contacts: 49341
Avg. contacts per week: 112.18

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

Total number of cites (since 2016): 8
Average cites per year: 1.00

(no Plumx Metrics available for this paper)

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ^©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

(1)

Bartelink HH (1997)
Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L). Annals of Forest Science 54 (1): 39-50.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(2)

BMEL (2014)
The forest of Germany - Results from third national forest inventory. Federal Ministry of Nutrition and Agriculture, Berlin, Germany, pp. 56.
Gscholar

(3)

Brown JH, West GB, Enquist BJ (2000)
Scaling in biology. In: “Scaling in biology: patterns and processes, causes and consequences” (West GB ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 167-198.
Online | Gscholar

(4)

Chakraborty T (2010)
Effect of soil drought on vitality and growth on juvenile and understorey beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees: case study from a rocky gneiss outcrop near Freiburg, Black Forest, Germany. Master Thesis, University of Freiburg, Germany, pp. 74.
Online | Gscholar

(5)

Chakraborty T, Saha S, Reif A (2013)
Decrease in available soil water storage capacity reduces vitality of young understorey European beeches (Fagus sylvatica L.): a case study from the Black Forest, Germany. Plants 2 (4): 676-698.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(6)

Cienciala E, Cerny M, Apltauer J, Exnerova Z (2005)
Biomass functions applicable to European beech. Journal of Forest Science (Prague) 51 (4): 147-154.
Gscholar

(7)

Coll L, Balandier P, Picon-Cochard C (2004)
Morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica) seedlings to grass-induced belowground competition. Tree Physiology 24 (1): 45-54.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(8)

Ellenberg H (2009)
Vegetation Ecology of central Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 731.
Gscholar

(9)

Enquist BJ (2002)
Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiology 22 (15-16): 1045-1064.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(10)

Enquist BJ, West GB, Brown JH (2000)
Scaling in Biology. In: “Quarter-power scaling in vascular plants: Functional basis and ecological consequences” (West GB ed). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp. 167-198.
Gscholar

(11)

Evenari M, Shanan L, Tadmor N (1982)
The Negev: the challenge of a desert. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 437.
Gscholar

(12)

Gärtner S, Reif A, Xystrakis F, Sayer U, Bendagha N, Matzarakis A (2008)
The drought tolerance limit of Fagus sylvatica forest on limestone in southwestern Germany. Journal of Vegetation Science 19 (6): 757-768.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(13)

Gauer J, Aldinger E (2005)
Waldökologische Naturräume Deutschlands - Forstliche Wuchsgebiete und Wuchsbezirke, mit Karte 1:100.000 [Forest ecological growing zone of Germany: forest growing zone and growing area, with map of 1:100.000]. Report of the German Association of Forest Site Classification and Forest Tree Improvement, Henkel Druck, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 324. [in German]
Gscholar

(14)

IBM (2011)
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS v. 20). SPSS Inc. 20, New York, USA, pp. 428.
Gscholar

(15)

Kauter D, Lewandowski I, Claupein W (2003)
Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use - a review of the physiological basis and management influences. Biomass and Bioenergy 24 (6): 411-427.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(16)

Kohler M, Kockemann B, Peichl M, Schmitt J, Reif A (2006)
Impacts of the drought 2003 on the crown condition of suppressed and intermediate beech trees (Fagus sylvatica L.) at the ecotone between beech and downy oak forest in the nature reserve Innerberg, Suedbaden. German Journal of Forestry and Hunting 177 (5): 86-91.
Gscholar

(17)

Peters R (1997)
Beech forests. Geobotany Series 24, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 169.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(18)

Peuke AD, Schraml C, Hartung W, Rennenberg H (2002)
Identification of drought-sensitive beech ecotypes by physiological parameters. New Phytologist 154 (2): 373-387.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(19)

Pretzsch H (2000)
Die Regeln von Reineke, Yoda und das Gesetz der räumlichen Allometrie [The rules by Reineke, Yoda and the law of spatial allometry]. German Journal of Forestry and Hunting 171: 205-210. [in German]
Gscholar

(20)

Pyttel P (2011)
Aspekte einer nachhaltigen Bewirtschaftung durchgewachsener Niederwälder [Aspects of sustainable management in forests developed by coppicing]. PhD Thesis, Institute of Silviculture, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany, pp. 166. [in German]
Gscholar

(21)

Santa-Regina I, Tarazona T, Calvo R (1997)
Aboveground biomass in a beech forest and a Scots pine plantation in the Sierra de la Demanda area of northern Spain. Annals of Forest Science 54 (3): 261-269.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(22)

Sayer U (2000)
Die Ökologie der Flaumeiche (Quercus pubescens Willd.) und ihrer Hybriden auf Kalkstandorten an ihrer nördlichen Arealgrenze (Untersuchungen zu Boden, Klima und Vegetation) [The ecology of downy oak (Quercus pubescens Wild.) and their hybrids on calcareous sites at their northern distribution limit (study on soil, climate and vegetation)]. Dissertationes Botanicae Cramer vol 340, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 198. [in German]
Gscholar

(23)

Schulze E-D, Beck E, Muller-Hohenstein K (2005)
Plant Ecology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 702.
Gscholar

(24)

Standortskartierung A (2003)
Forstliche Standortsaufnahme [Forest site classification] (6th edn). IHW-Verlag und Verlagsbuchhandlung, Eching, Munich, Germany, pp. 352. [in German]
Gscholar

(25)

Stankic I, Marence J, Vusic D, Zecic Z, Benkovic Z (2014)
Structure of the common beech aboveground tree biomass in different stand conditions. Sumarski List 138 (9-10): 439-450.
Online | Gscholar

(26)

Suchomel C, Pyttel P, Becker G, Bauhus J (2012)
Biomass equations for sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) and hornbeam (Carpinus betulus L.) in aged coppiced forests in southwest Germany. Biomass and Bioenergy 46: 722-730.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(27)

Tomppo E, Gschwantner T, Lawrence M, McRoberts RE (2010)
National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting. Springer, London, UK and New York, USA, pp. 612.
Gscholar

(28)

Weiner J (1990)
Asymmetric competition in plant-populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5 (11): 360-364.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(29)

West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1997)
A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276 (5309): 122-126.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(30)

West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999a)
A general model for the structure and allometry of plant vascular systems. Nature 400 (6745): 664-667.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(31)

West GB, Brown JH, Enquist BJ (1999b)
The fourth dimension of life: fractal geometry and allometric scaling of organisms. Science 284 (5420): 1677-1679.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(32)

WSL (2015)
Swiss national forest inventory. Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research - WSL, Zürich, Switzerland.
Online | Gscholar

(33)

Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Makipaa R, Mencuccini M (2005)
Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs 4, pp. 63.
Gscholar

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Contents

Search

Journal Info

Journal Subjects and Fields

For Authors

For Reviewers

For Readers

SISEF Publishing

Search iForest Contents