*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
*

Forest therapy in Italy: proposal of a standard procedure for validation of suitable sites

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 192-202 (2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4543-017
Published: Jul 04, 2024 - Copyright © 2024 SISEF

Research Articles

The social and health benefits that green areas and forests can provide are now recognized in the scientific community worldwide. There is a growing interest in and demand for forest care initiatives and nature-based therapy, also as a result of the impacts of Covid-19 pandemic. In Italy, the increasing interest in alternative and integrated solutions for care and healthcare promotion have laid the basis for the implementation of several projects and activities, particularly those known as Forest Therapy (FT). These initiatives provide a business opportunity for forestry and social sectors, for the development of rural areas, and they are a cost-saving opportunity for the National Health System because of the expected benefits (as assessed by several clinical studies confirming the therapeutic effectiveness of these activities). Despite the importance, in Italy there is not a specific legal basis and standardized procedures to determine the suitability of a FT site. As a result, FT initiatives have been carried out in different environments, whether in urban or extra-urban forest areas, with the implementation of activities deemed suitable in a “self-referential” approach. Establishing a standard procedure for the recognition of FT suitable locations and related FT activities is a first step for the promotion of an important instrument that can meet several social needs. This work proposes (i) a standard procedure (“iter”) for the validation of a Forest Therapy and Urban forest therapy (UFT) site by the competent authority to obtain the official "environmental recognition" of site suitability; (ii) the technical and objective criteria to assess the stationary and environmental parameters of a site in order to be qualified as a FT/UFT site, both in natural and urban contexts. The iter and criteria proposed take into account the relevant national regulations, the literature found on the subject, and the expertise of scientists and technicians. The procedure and criteria proposed can be used as basis of a regulation on FT in Italy, ensuring suitable sites officially recognised by public institutions and providing a high-quality service to society. Finally, a baseline regulation would also facilitate opportunities for dedicated funding, as well as the recognition of “green prescriptions” for the prevention and treatment of certain health problems.

Forest, Forest Therapy, Urban Forest Therapy, Site Suitability, Validation Process

  Introduction 

Spending time in nature to get benefits for physical and mental health has been practiced by society for centuries in different cultures. In 1982 the Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries gave for the first time the definition of “Shinrin Yoku” (“Forest Bathing”). Since then, the concept became the subject of several studies demonstrating how and why “immersion” in natural environments provide benefits to psychophysical health and can contribute to tackling certain non-communicable pathologies ([42], [46], [4]). From Green Care to Forest Care Initiatives, there are many general terms indicating practices that improve physical, psychological, and social conditions with playful and/or recreational interaction with nature, even though nature-based therapy ([11]). In particular, the benefits of immersion in forest environments are associated with reduced levels of stress, anxiety, and depression ([32], [17], [36], [13]), increase in creativity ([55]), with positive effects also on the respiratory, cardiovascular and immune systems ([29], [21], [25], [12]). The role of forests for the contemporary society and their ecosystem services influencing human health ([44]) are crucial. According to an estimate of the European Strategy and Policy Analysis System ([14]), by 2030 at least two-thirds of the world’s population will live in urban areas (83% in Italy). The progressive moving away from nature has effects on people’s psycho-physical well-being, lifestyle-related disease and mental illnesses, and consequently on the relative health costs ([28], [27], [51], [52]). Spending time in forests has become increasingly valued by people living in urban settings, with high levels of stress and sedentary lifestyle ([1], [50]). Besides, there are evidence that forest immersion facilitates preventive and therapeutic measures for mental and physical health ([49], [54], [47]). In recent years an increase in the activities “labelled” as Forest bathing (FB) and Forest therapy (FT) in forest areas (often confused with each other) has been observed. This new trend responds to the growing demand for access to natural environments associate with the growing awareness of their importance, exacerbated by the climate crisis and the pandemic period, as mentioned in the State of the World’s Forests report ([16], [10], [40]). At present, FB and FT are developed in different countries, according to different locations, practices, and specific peculiarities ([56]). In Korea FT is recognized as a good practice for individuals and it has been promoted also for its positive effects on the development of local circular economy ([48]). In Japan FB and FT, promoted by the Forest Therapy Society and other institutions, are recognized as medical practices, and are supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries ([22]). Also, Japan has a certification system for FT sites (since 2005, 65 forests have been approved) and forest therapists, that also has a positive effect on the development of circular economy ([30], [57]). In Italy, FB and FT can be considered an evolution of initiatives that have already been conducted for over a century in search of psychophysical wellbeing, such as those promoted by the Italian Alpine Club (CAI) and various environmental associations. The topic of FT and FB has been addressed by an increasing number of research projects and studies conducted at national level, e.g., the Green for Care project (⇒ https:/­/­www.­greenforcare.­eu/­) or the collaboration between CAI and the National Research Council of Italy ([31], [37]). All these initiatives have been developed in very different sites without public recognizing of the suitability and qualified therapists with personalised therapy program. Indeed, although the Italian National Forestry Strategy ([38]) recognizes the importance of FT initiatives among the socio-cultural services of forests, actually there is not a specific regulatory framework, neither common public standards for FT sites evaluation (e.g., forest composition, accessibility, etc.) and for the training of the medical and technical staff involved in FT. In particular, the characteristics of forests where FT is carried out are often not sufficiently analysed to establish if the site is suitable for the FT/UFT activities in terms of safety and effectiveness, considered as key requirements by recent studies ([19], [23]). There are only some private associations and certification bodies which have proposed standards to certify suitable areas for “forestry wellbeing” or sites called “forests of wellbeing”, with the purpose of FB activities or generic “improving wellbeing and health of people” ([20], [5]). The present and future challenges of the growth of the national forestry sector impose a regulation and a framework identifying suitable FT sites and releasing the suitability qualification to protect users as well as the natural environments ([43]). Such recognition could potentially enhance the competitiveness and multifunctionality of enterprises ([26]) and territories, mainly mountainous and marginal or rural areas. Then, FT represents an important entrepreneurial and employment opportunity for the Italian forestry sector and for many rural areas ([7], [8], [45]). It could also lead to a health system of “green prescriptions” ([6], [36]) for preventive and therapeutic purposes with benefits for the National Health System. Recognizing a site suitable to be used for FT and assess its specific characteristics is the focus of this paper. Although some studies have found no significant differences in the results of activities carried out between natural and urban environments ([35]), the work distinguishes between FT in natural sites and Urban Forest Therapy (UFT). They are both important but very different because of their locations, which entail different environmental features and management methods ([33]). Urban forestry sites are exploited especially by people living in the city, who can access them more quickly and frequently ([53]). “Natural sites”, far from urban areas, are less exposed to noise and visual disturbance, and to air pollution, but they require longer time to be reached. This study proposes: (i) a standard procedure (“iter”) for the validation of a FT/UFT site by the competent authority to obtain the official “environmental recognition” of site suitability; (ii) the technical and objective criteria to assess the stationary and environmental parameters that a potential area must possess to be qualified and recognized as a FT/UFT site.

  Materials and methods 

Iter

The procedure to validate the FT site suitability is mainly based on methodologies adopted in Italy for the institutional recognition of Monumental Trees ([34]) and of Old Growth Forests ([24]). In particular, the procedure for the identification of monumental trees starts with an identification form where all the characteristics of the candidate tree must be reported. The form is filled by an agricultural or forestry technician of the Municipality, which proposes the candidature to the Region. The competent regional office checks and validates the information reported and, if these meet the monumental criteria, the tree is included in the National List of Monumental Trees. The inclusion requires some management activities to guarantee the maintenance of the good health and conditions of the Monumental Tree. A similar procedure is used for the identification and the official recognition of Old Growth Forests. The candidature is presented to the competent regional office through an identification form, where the scientific information relating to the characteristics of the site are reported. The regional office checks and validates the information reported and if these meet the scientific criteria needed for the forest to be considered an Old Growth Forest, the site is added to the National Network of Old Growth Forests.

The Technical Information Sheets (TIS)

To realize the procedure described above, four Technical Information Sheets (TIS) are proposed with 90 parameters representing the minimum criteria to be assessed to consider the site suitable or not for FT. The sheets are related to; (1) Identification registry; (2) Management; (3) Accessibility and use; and (4) Protection and regulation. The TIS include key information about the site need to be reported by the applicant. The list of criteria comes from the scientific literature available on the web on the broad topic of forest care, using combinations of key words, e.g., forest therapy, wellness, activities, etc. Several works were retrieved from grey literature, including conference proceedings, scientific papers in print, and from information gathered through the research group’s contacts with Universities and research institutes. This explorative research shows a mosaic of information and data revealing the heterogeneity of forest care sites and initiatives in Italy. The literature collected was subsequently filtered selecting FT initiatives and discarding generic leisure, recreational and sports forest bathing activities, which do not involve the support of therapists. The selected criteria reflect the essential features of the forest environment for the development of forest therapy activity and services, such as location, landscape features, characteristics of forests, forest management, accessibility, anthropogenic conditions, etc. An important guideline in this selection has been a study carried out in Bulgaria ([9]) that considers 22 indicators to characterise the forest, environmental and anthropic features of the sites where FT projects can be implemented. Fourteen of these indicators have been proposed in this study, some of which were modified or broken down into a larger number of indicators, based on the characteristics of Italian forests. For example, the indicator “Composition of forest stand (tree species, number and type - coniferous and deciduous)” has been split into a larger number of items to capture more aspects (Vegetation species, Percentage of forest cover, Distribution of the tree component, Large live trees, Deadwood and decaying wood, etc). Moreover, several other parameters have been added to characterise areas where FT initiatives could be implemented (information on site location, management activities, silvicultural systems, facilities, equipment, environmental constraints, risks, etc.). Regarding the FT sites in Italy, several studies have been considered. Based on Doimo et al. ([11]), 12 sites from the 232 forest-based care site initiatives have been identified including 9 declared as FT site and 3 declared Social Inclusion (Physiological and Psychological, in Motivation-Effects) sites. Further 6 cases including FT initiatives have been added from Meneguzzo et al. ([36]). Based on these 18 cases, two types of contexts where FT initiatives can take place are identified: (i) Site: a delimited, demarcated forest area, equipped and managed, with circuits with tracks, generally with irregular ring, that is closed circuit; (ii) Pathway: a track that develops in an open area through a natural wooded environment or a mixed one (from wooded to grazing, etc.), which may be equipped, where the start point is other than the end point.

Depending on the environment where FT initiatives are carried out two site typologies can be distinguished: (i) Forest therapy (FT) sites in a natural forest environment context; (ii) Urban forest therapy (UFT) sites of environmental of anthropogenic origin with characteristics that can be traced back to a forest but located in peri-urban or urban contexts (parks, botanical gardens, green areas of hospital, schools, etc.).

All selected parameters were sorted by themes, fields, and items, as shown and explained in detail in the result section.

  Results 

As mentioned above, the aim of the work is to propose a possible institutional iter for the assessment and validation of the FT/UFT site suitability through the submission of Technical Information Sheets (TIS) containing the necessary information on the sites’ characteristics. TIS must be provided by applicants and assessed by competent authority.

The site suitability validation iter

This process begins when the proponent of a FT or UFT site wishes to obtain the official recognition of site suitability, i.e., the therapeutic environment status and provides the basic information useful for carrying out an objective assessment of the candidate site. To this purpose, the proponent must submit the request through an application form to the Italian competent authority (regional or national), by filling out the TIS (see above) with all the detailed information necessary for the complete analysis of the environment. After receiving the filled TIS, the designated authority would process the application on a stepwise basis (Fig. 1). The first step is the preliminary analysis of the information given in the TIS, together with a remote check, to verify the reliability of the data carried out by bibliography information’s and with the help of auxiliary data of thematic digital maps (DEM, topography, protection regulation, etc.). In case of negative outcome, the application is rejected with motivation. Here two possibilities are considered, depending on the reasons of rejection and the possibility of modifying/adjustment. If the reasons for the rejection are “adjustable” (e.g., unsuitable routes in terms of length or width, missing services, etc.), the proponent can submit a new assessment request after the changes have been implemented. Otherwise, if the unsuitability of the site or pathway is due to structural conditions that cannot be modified (e.g., excessive noise or excessive slope, etc.), the request will be definitely rejected, and the location is excluded. Fig. 2 is a representation of the site suitability validation iter. In case the application form is deemed eligible, the authority may proceed to the second step. This entails specific on-site investigations, through a special technical-scientific evaluation undertaken by independent experts with proven experience in forestry. Here there are two possible outcomes again. If the evaluation is positive, the site or path will be declared suitable for all purposes. If the assessment is negative and the grounds for exclusion can be changed, a new application may be requested, and the needed adjustment should follow. Otherwise, the location must be definitively excluded.

Fig. 1 - (a) Site, with ring track and station to stop; (b) Pathway.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

Fig. 2 - Flow chart of the iter (or process) of the accreditation of a site suitability of a Forest / Urban Forest Therapy project by the submission of application forms. Based on our own elaboration.

  Enlarge/Shrink   Download   Full Width  Open in Viewer

At the end of this second step, in case of positive assessment, the area can be officially recognized as suitable to host a FT initiative, and a monitoring system can be provided within the management plan of the site area (e.g., Forest Assessment Plan) to verify the maintenance of the recognized suitability over time.

Site information and requirements in the Technical Information Sheets

The TIS are drawn up to identify and qualify sites on the basis of technical and scientific parameters regarding features and characteristics of the station (site or pathway), the landscape, the ecology, the vegetation, and the anthropic traits. These depend on location, morphology, the specific composition of the forest stand, its age, structure, stage of development, type of forest management, including the presence and characteristics of the road network for the use of the area. The TIS are divided in four themes: (1) Identification; (2) Management; (3) Accessibility and Use; (4) Protection regulation. The first sheet (Identification - Tab. 1) summarises all the information (32 items) needed to identify the property and to classify the proposed therapeutic initiative (FT or UFT). The first block of information needs to be provided in any case, the other information depending on whether it is a “Site” or a “Pathway”.

Tab. 1 - Technical Information Sheets 1: Identification registry for a site/pathway where Forest Therapy or Urban Forest Therapy activities is proposed. Based on our own elaboration.

1. Identification registry
General
Info
Project Promoters Name of the legal delegate of the project Name
Forest therapy Natural forest environment yes/no
Urban forest therapy Environment referable to a forest or forest-like located in peri-urban and urban areas contexts (e.g. public or botanical gardens, etc.). yes/no
Name of the owner or holder by type of ownership Public Name(s)
Private Name(s)
Collective Name(s)
Others Name(s)
Site Location Place, Municipality, Province Name(s)
Extent of area (site) by type of ownership Public m2
Private m2
Collective m2
Others m2
Total m2
Internal paths Number Number
Total length of paths within the area m/km
Geographic coordinates web Mercator (EPGS 3857) Site-centre coordinates (Sc) Coordinates
Coordinates of main access points (S1, S2, etc.) Coordinates
Regional Technical Map (1:5000) ID Code Number
Cadastral map Land registry references Number
Pathway Location Start of the route Place, Municipality, Province Name(s)
Route arrival Place, Municipality, Province Name(s)
Total length of the route divided by property type Public m/km
Private m/km
Collective m/km
Others m/km
Total m/km
Route typology Ministerial Decree n. 563734 of 28/10/2021 “Forest and forestry and silvo-pastoral roads”. (a) Primary main roads: road infrastructure with a carriageway
of 3.5 to a maximum of 6 metres.
m/km of the total
(b) Secondary main roads: road infrastructure with a carriageway width of 2.5 to 3.5 metres m/km of the total
(c) Permanent minor roads of paths and tracks with a carriageway width of no more than 2.5 metres and a natural surface. m/km of the total
Geographic coordinates web Mercator (EPGS 3857) Starting Point Coordinates (SPC) N, E
Coordinates of landmarks along the route (e.g., P1, P2, ...) N, E
Arrival Point Coordinates (APC) N, E

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

The second sheet (Management - Tab. 2 and Tab. 3) collects most of the data needed and is broken down into two different parts or themes of investigation: “A. Geomorphologicaland Landscape Features” and “B. Ecological and Vegetation Features”. These sheets include information about the characteristics of the project area and its surroundings that may affect its usability from a visual and acoustic point of view, and information about air and/or water. The characteristics proposed as technical-scientific criteria for the two themes provide the most important information for an evaluation which is objective and guarantees the good quality of the initiative. The compilation of this section implies technical knowledge that can only be obtained by professional experts (e.g., agricultural or forest scientists) through field analyses and the study of the Forest Assessment Plan. The theme A (Geomorphologicaland Landscape Features) investigates five specific fields: Morphology, Naturalistic elements, Anthropic elements, Territorial context, and Disturbing elements. The 28 items refer to the elements visible both externally and internally to the perimeter of the site or pathway. In particular, it is important to know the average distance (in metres) from possible important anthropogenic polluting structures, such as built-up areas, busy highways, industrial and craft workshops, sewage treatment plants, etc. These elements could influence the quality of the proposed services and their distance from the site or pathway have to be considered in relation to prevailing wind regimes that might transport pollutants to the site. However, the presence of forest belts, placed to create an adequate barrier of several km between the site of interest and the sources of pollutants, can represent an effective obstacle for pollutants before they reach the site. In the Theme B (Ecological and Vegetation Features) 25 items are included, grouped in 12 fields: Vegetation species, Percentage of forest cover, Distribution of the tree component, Large live trees, Deadwood and decaying wood, Phytopathologies, Vegetation mapping, Management/assessment plan, Additional historical information, Silvicultural systems, Main forest category, Main forest type, Fauna. Here there are the most important parameters (type of tree, shrub and herbaceous species, specific composition, age of the trees, etc.) for the evaluation and identification for the therapeutic services that can potentially be provided. In this context, the availability of a georeferenced tree census for the candidate area is particularly useful. Such a tool is part of modern Forest Management Plans and can be carried out through remote sensing LiDAR or ground tree inventory for trees with a diameter of more than 50 cm, conducting a hypsometric survey and recording the projection of tree crowns on the ground. All this makes it possible to assess the tree cover density, which could be a discriminating element depending on the purpose of the activity. In general, regardless of the quantity of species, sufficiently open and bright forests are recommended. It is also important to detect the presence of any “alien species”, extraneous to the ecological context of the area. For an exhaustive list of alien species, the database of the Italian Botanical Society’s Invasive Species Working Group and its publications could be considered (Ministry of Ecological Transition). The recent EU Regulation on the management of newly invasive species (Reg. No. 1143/2014/ EC - [15]) should also be considered. In addition, the presence of species that are toxic to touch or have poisonous parts must be considered. It is important to know the vegetation evolution of the species (tree and shrub species) as well as the emission into the air of volatile compounds and pollen, depending on the season. The protection of personal health cannot ignore considerations about respiratory well-being, and therefore the control of “best periods of forest use”, in relation to individual sensitivities to allergenic pollens. Then the evaluator should consider the potential allergenic index of the most representative species with medium to high allergenicity. Based on the possible presence of forest cover data, the Index of Urban Green Zones Allergenicity (IUGZA) of the forest phytocoenosis will be calculated, where possible, assuming a standard cover, in order to establish a gradient of potential allergenicity of the various phytocoenosis. A seasonal pollen calendar must be drawn up, based on available data collected by the Italian Aerobiology Association and the Regional Environmental Agencies, for the main allergenic families including native Italian tree species (Betulaceae, Corylaceae, Oleaceae, Cupressaceae). Of particular importance is also the presence and level of spread of plant diseases, which must be periodically verified and monitored, as they could compromise health and create potential safety hazards for individuals. Finally, information is required on the current silvicultural system, categories and types of forest. This information can be found in scientific bibliography or reported in the Forest Management Plans of the area. Particularly important is the availability of the Forest Management Plan for forest sites and the Management and Maintenance Plan for sites in areas such as gardens, botanical gardens, etc. The management plan is critical for a site designated to FT or UFT to plan the operations needed to guarantee good health and usability of the site over time. Forest management for a proper site maintenance can improve the resilience of the environment, by overcoming possible natural or anthropic disturbance factors, that could alter the ecosystem services it provides.

Tab. 2 - Technical Information Sheets 2a: Management. Geomorphological and landscape features for a site/pathway where Forest Therapy or Urban Forest Therapy activities are proposed. Based on our own elaboration. Interior: inside the area site or within 50 metres on each side of the path. Exterior (visible): outside the area site or along the path.

2. Management - 2A. Geomorphological and landscape features
Morphology Altitude highest point m a.s.l.
Midpoint m a.s.l.
lowest point m a.s.l.
Slope Media %
Maximum %
Exposure Average degrees from 0°N
Prevailing degrees from 0°N
Outcropping rocks Outcropping area/total area %
- Interior Exterior (visible)
Naturalistic elements Waterways Permanent number number
m m
Seasonal number number
m m
Lakes Number number number
total surface area m2 m2
Other elements Waterfalls number number
Viewpoints number number
(specify) number number
Anthropic elements Historical buildings (e.g. castles, bridges, etc.) number number
Traditional and historical artefacts (e.g. terracing, dry-stone walls, etc.) number number
Modern infrastructure (e.g. buildings, wind farms, high-voltage pylons, ski lifts, bridges, viaducts, etc.). number number
Other (specify) number number
Territorial context Forest % %
Pasture meadows % %
Seasonal agricultural crops % %
Permanent agricultural crops (arboriculture, olive groves, vineyards, etc.) % %
Urban area % %
Peri-urban area (e.g. industrial areas, etc.) % %
Disturbing elements Urban agglomerations up to 40.000 inhabitants Place name
Distance (m/Km)
Urban agglomeration with more than 40.000 inhabitants Place name
Distance (m/Km)
Quarries (active or disused) Name
Distance (m/Km)
Landfills Name
Distance (m/Km)
Airports Name
Distance (m/Km)
Industrial areas or establishments Name
Distance (m/Km)
Highways Name
Distance (m/Km)
Other fast-flowing roads Name
Distance (m/Km)
Provincial roads Name
Distance (m/Km)
Local roads Name
Distance (m/Km)
Railway line Name
Distance (m/Km)
Other disturbing elements (specify) Name
Distance (m/Km)
Notes Other additional useful information

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

Tab. 3 - Technical Information Sheets 2b: Management. Ecological and vegetation features for a site/pathway where Forest Therapy or Urban Forest Therapy activities are proposed. Based on our own elaboration. Site: inside the area site or within 50 metres on each side of the path. Pathway: outside the area site or along the path out of 50 metres.

2. Management - 2B. Ecological and vegetation features Site Pathway
Vegetation species List of tree species name name
% of presence % of presence
Shrub species list name name
% of presence % of presence
Herbaceous species list name name
% of presence % of presence
Percentage of forest cover Ratio of forest area to total area % %
Distribution of the tree component Areas with more than 20% tree cover along the route % %
Open areas along the route % %
More % %
Large live trees Plants with a diameter at breast height (DBH) >50 cm number number
prevailing species prevailing species
Presumed age of the oldest specimen years years
Deadwood and decaying wood Presence of live habitat trees/veteran trees (DBH >50 cm, with cavities constituting habitats for fauna - birds, insects, etc.). sporadic sporadic
widespread widespread
abundant abundant
Presence of standing dead habitat trees/veteran trees (DBH >50 cm) sporadic sporadic
widespread widespread
abundant abundant
Presence of dead wood on the ground (similar size to standing trees) sporadic sporadic
widespread widespread
abundant abundant
Phytopathologies Type name name
Vegetation mapping At a scale of 1:10.000 or other detail yes/no and scale number yes/no and scale number
Management/assesment plan Type of plan (e.g. Forest Management Plan or equivalent instrument, Green Management and Maintenance Plan, etc.). valid (expiry date) valid (expiry date)
expired (date) expired (date)
in drafting stage in drafting stage
absent absent
Additional historical information Last management and/or harvest activities year year
typology typology
Concerned area Concerned area
Last anthropogenic or natural disturbance of which there are evident traces (fire, grazing, illegal cutting, litter picking, collection of dry plants, extensive crashes, landslides, etc.). year year
typology typology
Concerned area Concerned area
Other historical information on documentary bases - -
Silvicultural systems Forest % %
Coppice % %
Mixed % %
Other (e.g., arboriculture, garden, botanical garden, etc.) % %
Main forest category Physiognomic unit based on the dominance of one or more building species (e.g., chestnut, beech, peccary, hornbeam oak, pioneer invasion thickets, etc.). name name
Main forest type Characterization of the homogeneity of flora, station, dynamic trends and, silvicultural and management trends (where appropriate) name name
Fauna Presence of wildlife (e.g., identified animals) Species Name Name
Presence of free-range farm animals Species Name Name

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

The third sheet (Accessibility and Use - Tab. 4) proposes five specific fields: Accessibility, Practicability, Usability, External Facilities and Additional Information. The 13 items relate to the transport and logistics infrastructures, to the actual accommodation and any other infrastructures facilitating the use of the site or pathway, as well as the opportunities for developing therapeutic initiatives. A site needs be easily accessible, therefore distances longer than 500 metres and paths with a high degree of difficulty should be avoided. Slope, difference in altitude between departure and arrival points, length, accessibility from the main road and exposure can influence the pathways, which should not require significant physical effort. Ad hoc experiences for people with disabilities can also be planned within a site or pathways, which can also be enjoyed by the able-bodied, in an overall time not exceeding one hour. Longer distances can also be provided for the pathways, including at least one overnight stay in a refuge or equipped accommodation in the forest.

Tab. 4 - Technical Information Sheets 3: Accessibility and Use sheet, for a site/pathway where Forest Therapy or Urban Forest Therapy activities are proposed. Based on our own elaboration. Site: inside the area or within 50 metres on each side of the path. Pathway: outside the area site or along the path out of 50 metres.

3. Accessibility and use Site Pathway
Accessibility Main road Name Name
Distance to access (m/Km) Distance to access (m/Km)
Parking Name Name
Distance to access (m/Km) Distance to access (m/Km)
Public bus Line name Line name
Useful stopping distance (m/Km) Useful stopping distance (m/Km)
Train Line name Line name
Site distance (m/Km) Site distance (m/Km)
Specific transport Starting point Starting point
Place name Place name
Practicability Path(s) number number
Total length (m/km) Total length (m/km)
Pavement of path(s) Natural m/km -
Reinforced m/km -
Accessible for the disabled yes/no yes/no
Usability Facilities Equipped refreshments number number
Reception/ticket office yes/no yes/no
Bivouac number number
Managed refuge number number
Infirmary yes/no yes/no
More (specify) (specify)
Equipment Benches number number
Tables number number
Drinking fountains number number
Information Signage number number
Educational Signage number number
First aid kit yes/no yes/no
Defibrillator yes/no yes/no
Wi-Fi network yes/no yes/no
Other (specify) number number
Specialised personnel Companion number number
Medical/nursing number number
Other (specify) number number
External Structures Hospital or medical facility Distance (m/Km) Distance (m/Km)
Nearby accommodation (specify: B&B, Hotel, etc.) Distance (m/Km) Distance (m/Km)
Upcoming restaurants Distance (m/Km) Distance (m/Km)
Notes Other additional useful information - -

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

The fourth sheet (Protection regulation - Tab. 5) includes two specific fields: Protected areas, and Risks and Constraints. Here there are 9 items and it is required to indicate if the area is subject to specific environmental constraints. This information represents an important point of reference for understanding the management and improvement limits that have to be respected (e.g., protected areas), as well as the risks that the constrained area might suffer from, or that users might encounter.

Tab. 5 - Technical Information Sheets 4: Protection regulation, for a site/pathway where Forest Therapy or Urban Forest Therapy activities are proposed. Based on our own elaboration. Site: inside the area or within 50 metres on each side of the path. Pathway: outside the area site or along the path out of 50 metres.

4. Protection regulation Site Pathway
Protected Areas National Park (name) m2 m
Regional Park (name) m2 m
Natural reserve (name) Integral m2 m
Orientate m2 m
Specials m2 m
Biogenetic m2 m
Wetlands (name) m2 m
Other protected areas (name) Regional Protected Natural Areas, m2 m
Natural monuments, m2 m
Suburban parks, m2 m
Provincial parks, m2 m
Oases of environmental associations m2 m
Natura 2000 Network (name) Site of Community Interest (SCI) m2 m
Special Protection Area (SPA) m2 m
Special Area of Conservation (SAC) m2 m
UNESCO sites m2 m
Restrictions and risks Landslide risk Category name m2 m/km
Hydraulic risk Category name m2 m/km
Landscape restriction Category name m2 m/km
Other existing restrictions or risks (detailed descriptions providing useful information not foreseen in the sheet) - -

  Enlarge/Reduce  Open in Viewer

  Discussion and conclusion 

In Italy, as well as in most other countries, there is a lack of regulatory framework relating FT and relative activities, which lead the proliferation of locations and non-professional initiatives. This study contributes to fill this gap, proposing the development of standards for the recognition of FT/UFT sites. The official recognition by public institutions is critical to provide a public health service to the society, which considers disease prevention as increasingly important. The standard procedure described in the study is based on the analysis of technical and site-specific criteria required to evaluate when a site is suitable for FT/UFT as treatment sites. The proposed iter can represent the base for a regulation of sites where FT/UFT activities are carried out, so that high quality health services through FT/UFT can be provided. This procedure builds upon the use of TIS to assess forests and their environmental characteristics. Indeed, each area has its own specific forestry features and properties, accommodating and performing specific functions suitable for target subjects/groups or activities ([2]). In this paper the distinction between FT and UFT have been stressed. Forests in urban environments are very important but they have different advantage and disadvantages to the locations in extra-urban and more natural environments. Forests in urban context suffer from a greater number of stresses for vegetation and disturbing factors (noise, pollution, etc.), but they are more easily accessible and can therefore be more frequently enjoyed by a larger share of population. This is particularly important considering the ongoing urbanization process, which brings to the increase in psychophysical stress and other non-communicable diseases in the urban-dwelling population related to sedentary lifestyles and mental illness, and consequently an increase in health costs that FT/UFT initiatives can contribute to reducing. The evaluation and recognition of site suitability needs be carried out by local authorities, accordingly to the national political-legal framework oversees forests and the overall forestry sector. Indeed, any productive or recreational projects on forest land always need to be authorized by the regional administration to comply with regulation relating to environmental protection, risks areas (e.g., hydraulic or landslide risk). Of course, the recognition of FT site suitability must be updated and verified periodically: it is essential that all the requirements are met not only at the time of submission of the application for eligibility but also over time, according to the provisions defined in the regional forest management programme and planning tools. For this purpose, a Site Management Plan (or equivalent instrument) must be produced to identify how the forest and stationary characteristics, which are relevant to the intended therapeutic activity, will be maintained in the short and long term. This is ensured by the definition and planning of silvicultural interventions, that also aimed at protecting the natural capital and enhancing ecosystem services, according to the current environmental regulation. The present study is part of the activities envisaged by an agreement signed by a broad partnership (memorandum of understanding between the parties) composed of research institutions, universities, and public administrations, including the Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forests (⇒ https:/­/­www.­reterurale.­it/­terapiaforestale/­contatti). The project partners are currently developing an online platform as a reference for the census of all the FT/UFT sites in Italy (⇒ https:/­/­www.­reterurale.­it/­terapiaforestale/­retenazionale). This is another contribute to supporting FT initiatives in Italy, making them more visible and institutionalized. A public database could be useful to collect all the information of the FT suitable sites at national level, adding data regarding the most important features of the site (type of sites, use, etc.). Another important output of this agreement is the definition of specific methodologies to be used for the analysis and classification of the therapeutic characteristics in each site and their benefits for users. In fact, once the site is recognised as suitable from a forest perspective, other two more steps are necessary. Firstly, an on-field evaluation of the quality atmosphere (e.g., concentration of volatile organic pollutants) and properties (e.g., concentration of monoterpenes emitted by plants) of the site is required. This inspection should be performed by authoritative scientists and specialists belonging to governmental research bodies and validated by the Superior Health Institute. The characterization of the forest atmosphere determines the specific vocation of different forest types and the “therapeutic specialization” of the site. Moreover, it is necessary to consider that the therapeutic function cannot ignore the connection between silvicultural and medical sciences ([41]). Secondly, the site would be related to different disorders or diseases (anxiety, depression, etc.) in order to provide an effective therapeutic service, and become the base for guidelines according to an institutional regulation. The site should be used for target groups on the basis of a medical prescription by therapist scientists (psychologists, psychiatrists).

FT and UFT initiatives can be considered amongst the new frontiers of preventive and curative medicine in the same way as thermal treatment. The recognition of the Italian sites and the activities could lead to future “green prescriptions”, as it happens in few other countries such as Korea ([39]). Furthermore, it might represent a concrete and useful means of relieving the National Health System in terms of costs. Last but not least, it could be an interesting opportunity for the local development and employment, in both inland rural areas and urbanised contexts. The main business opportunities are related to the creation of new professional profiles (such as guides for the sites), the increasing of hospitality, and to the sustainable forest management of dedicated sites ([3], [9]). This is especially true in a country like Italy where forests cover more than 36% of its land area ([18]), where under 15% of the national population live and only 16% of the forest area has a Forest Management Plan. Finally, FT can also represent a chance to revitalize the forestry sector, which is increasingly focused on multifunctionality and the provision of ecosystem.

  Acknowledgements 

We want to thank Lorenzo Crecco and Antonio Pepe who, during their scholarship at Policies and Bioeconomy Centre of CREA, contributed to the first idea of the manuscript draft. Thanks also to Sonia Marongiu for final revision.

Raoul Romano (RRo) conceived the idea of the study with Rosa Rivieccio (RRi), and together they drafted the manuscript. Tables are designed and by RRo and RRi. Figures are drawn up by RRi. Stefano Orsini (SO) gave effective suggestions in its improvement. The manuscript was reviewed by RRo, RRi, and SO, and edited by RRi, and SO.

  References

(1)
Antonelli M, Donelli D, Maggini V, Gallo E, Mascherini V, Firenzuoli F, Gavazzi G, Zabini F, Venturelli E, Margheritini G, Bassi I, Iseppi L, Meneguzzo F (2023). Demographic, psychosocial, and lifestyle-related characteristics of forest therapy participants in Italy: a multicenter cross-sectional survey. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1627.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Bach Pagès A, Peñuelas J, Clarà J, Llusià J, Campillo i López F, Maneja R (2020). How should forests be characterized in regard to human health? Evidence from existing literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (3): 1027.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Bachinger M, Rau H (2019). Forest-based health tourism as a tool for promoting sustainability. In: “International Dimensions of Sustainable Management”. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 87-104.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Boere K, Lloyd K, Binsted G, Krigolson OE (2023). Exercising is good for the brain but exercising outside is potentially better. Scientific Reports 13 (1): 1140.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Borriello G, Grazioli E, Zavarella P, Paolini R, Ianniello A, Silvestri D, Cerulli C, Parisi A (2022). Experiencing forest therapy in the Italian landscape: bathing in the Selva of Castelfidardo. Preprints 2022: 2022010275.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Buckley RC (2019). Therapeutic mental health effects perceived by outdoor tourists: a large-scale, multi-decade, qualitative analysis. Annals of Tourism Research 77: 164-167.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Cubbage F, Harou P, Sills E (2007). Policy instruments to enhance multi-functional forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 9 (7): 833-851.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Di Iacovo FP, Connor D (2009). Supporting policies for social farming in Europe: progressing multifunctionality in respojnsaive rural areas. ARSIA, Agenzia Regionale per lo Sviluppo e l’Innovazione nel settore Agricolo-forestale, Firenze, Firenze, Italy, pp. 130.
Online | Gscholar
(9)
Dodev Y, Zhiyanski M, Glushkova M, Shin WS (2020). Forest welfare services - the missing link between forest policy and management in the EU. Forest Policy and Economics 118: 102249.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Doimo I, Masiero M, Gatto P (2020). Forest and wellbeing: bridging medical and forest research for effective forest-based initiatives. Forests 11 (8): 791.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Doimo I, Masiero M, Gatto P (2021). Disentangling the diversity of forest care initiatives: a novel research framework applied to the Italian context. Sustainability 13: 492.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Donelli D, Antonelli M, Baraldi R, Corli A, Finelli Gardini F, Margheritini G, Meneguzzo F, Neri L, Lazzeroni D, Ardissino D, Piacentini G, Zabini F, Cogo A (2023a). Exposure to forest air monoterpenes with pulmonary function tests in adolescents with asthma: a cohort study. Forests 14: 2012.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Donelli D, Meneguzzo F, Antonelli M, Ardissino D, Niccoli G, Gronchi G, Baraldi R, Neri L, Zabini F (2023b). Effects of plant-emitted monoterpenes on anxiety symptoms: a propensity-matched observational cohort study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20 (2023): 2773.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
ESPAS (2019). Global trends to 2030: challenges and choices for Europe. European Political Strategy Centre, European Commission Publications Office, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 52.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
European Parliament (2014). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council no. 1143/2014 of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species. Document 32014R1143, EUR-Lex, web site.
Online | Gscholar
(16)
FAO/UNEP (2020). The state of the world’s forests 2020. Forests, Biodiversity and People. UNEP and FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 214.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Farrow MR, Washburn K (2019). A review of field experiments on the effect of forest bathing on anxiety and heart rate variability. Global Advances in Health and Medicine 8: 21649561 1984865.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Gasparini P, Di Cosmo L, Floris A, De Laurentis D (2022). Italian National Forest Inventory Methods and Results of the Third Survey. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 576.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Gobster PH, Kruger LE, Schultz CL, Henderson JR (2023). Key characteristics of forest therapy trails: a guided, integrative approach. Forests 14: 186.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Grilli G, Sacchelli S (2020). Health benefits derived from forest: a review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17: 6125.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Ideno Y, Hayashi Yukina K A, Ueda K, Iso H, Noda M, Lee JS, Suzuk S (2017). Blood pressure-lowering effect of Shinrin yoku (Forest bathing): a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 17: 409.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Imai M (2012). An introduction to the Forest Therapy Society of Japan, Forest Therapy and Forest Therapist. In: “Forest Medicine” (Li Q ed). Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, NY, USA, pp. 233-241.
Gscholar
(23)
Immich G, Robl E (2023). Development of structural criteria for the certification and designation of recreational and therapeutic forests in Bavaria, Germany. Forests 14: 1273.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Interministerial Decree (2021). Approval of guidelines for the indentification of Old Growth Forest sites. Interministerial Decree n. 604983 of November 18th, 2021. Serie Generale Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 303 del 22.12.2021, pp. 27-29. [in Italian]
Online | Gscholar
(25)
Kotte D, Li Q, Shin WS, Michalsen A (2019). International handbook of forest therapy. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, UK, pp. 610.
Online | Gscholar
(26)
Lawrence G, Lyons K, Wallington T (2010). Food Security, Nutrition and Sustainability (1st edn). Routledge, London, UK, pp. 320.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Leavell MA, Leiferman JA, Gascon M, Braddick F, Gonzalez JC, Litt JS (2019). Nature-based social prescribing in urban settings to improve social connectedness and mental well-being: a review. Current Environmental Health Reports 6 (4): 297-308.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Lee I, Choi H, Bang KS, Kim S, Song M, Lee B (2017). Effects of forest therapy on depressive symptoms among adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14 (3): 321.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
Li N, Lee B, Liu RJ, Banasr M (2010). mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science 329: 959-964. 2010.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(30)
Li Q (2023). New concept of forest medicine. Forests 14: 1024.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Luchesa MV, Gatto P (2021). Forest bathing o Shinrin-yoku. Sherwood 254: 15-18. [in Italian]
Gscholar
(32)
Mao G, Cao Y, Wang B, Wang S, Chen Z, Wang J, Xing W, Ren X, Lv X, Dong J, Yan J (2017). The salutary influence of forest bathing on elderly patients with chronic heart failure. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 14 (4): 368.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(33)
Marušáková L, Sallmannshofer M, Kašpar J, Schwarz M, Tyrväinen L, Bauer N (2019). Human health and sustainable forest management. In: “Human Health and Sustainable Forest Management” (Marušáková L, Sallmannshofer M eds). Forest Europe, Zvolen, Slovakia, pp. 58-97.
Online | Gscholar
(34)
MASAF (2013). Law no. 10 of January, 14th: Rules for the development of green urban areas. Ministero dell’Agricoltura, della Sovranità Alimentare e delle Foreste - MASAF, G.U. no. 27, 1st February 2013. [in Italian]
Online | Gscholar
(35)
Menardo E, Brondino M, Hall R, Pasini M (2021). Restorativeness in natural and urban environments: a meta-analysis. Psychological Reports 124 (2): 417-437.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(36)
Meneguzzo F, Albanese L, Antonelli M, Baraldi R, Becheri FR, Centritto F, Donelli D, Finelli F, Firenzuoli F, Margheritini G, Maggini V, Nardini S, Regina M, Zabini F, Neri L (2021). Short-term effects of forest therapy on mood states: a pilot study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 9509.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(37)
Meneguzzo F, Zabini F (2020). Terapia forestale - una collaborazione tra il Club Alpino italiano e il Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche. CNR editions, Rome, Italy, pp. 128. [in Italian]
Online | Gscholar
(38)
MIPAAF (2022). Strategia forestale nazionale [National Forest Strategy]. Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali - MIPAAF, Rome, Italy, Web site. [in Italian]
Online | Gscholar
(39)
Nabhan GP, Orlando L, Smith Monti L, Aronson J (2020). Hands-on ecological restoration as a nature-based health intervention: reciprocal restoration for people and ecosystems. Ecopsychology 12: 195-202.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Naomi AS (2020). Access to nature has always been important; with COVID-19, it is essential. Health Environments Research and Design Journal 13 (4): 242-244.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(41)
Oh KH, Shin WS, Khil TG, Kim DJ (2020). Six-step model of nature-based therapy process. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (3): 685.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(42)
Park BJ, Tsunetsugu Y, Kasetani T, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 15 (1): 18-26.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(43)
Rosa CD, Collado S (2019). Experiences in nature and environmental attitudes and behaviors: setting the ground for future research. Frontiers in Psychology, 763.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(44)
Sandifer PA, Sutton-Grier AE, Ward BP (2015). Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation. Ecosystem Services 12: 1-15.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(45)
Secco L, Paletto A, Romano R, Masiero M, Pettenella D, Carbone F, De Meo I (2018). Orchestrating forest policy in Italy: mission impossible? Forests 9 (8): 468.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(46)
Sempik J, Hine R, Wilcox D (2010). Green care: a conceptual framework. A Report of the Working Group on the Health Benefits of Green Care, COST Action 866, Green Care in Agriculture, Centre for Child and Family Research, Loughborough, UK, pp. 121.
Gscholar
(47)
Sen M (2020). Forests: at the heart of a green recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. UN DESA - Department of Economic and Social Affairs Policy Briefs, New York, NY, USA, pp. 4.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(48)
Shin WS, Yeoun PS, Yoo RW, Shin CS (2010). Forest experience and psychological health benefits: the state of the art and future prospect in Korea. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 15 (1): 38-47.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(49)
Song C, Ikei H, Miyazaki Y (2016). Physiological effects of nature therapy: a review of the research in Japan. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13 (8): 781.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(50)
Sung J, Woo JM, Kim W, Lim SK, Chung EJ (2012). The effect of cognitive behavior therapy-based “forest therapy” program on blood pressure, salivary cortisol level, and quality of life in elderly hypertensive patients. Clinical and Experimental Hypertension 34 (1): 1-7.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(51)
Takayama N, Morikawa T, Bielinis E (2019). Relation between psychological restorativeness and lifestyle, quality of life, resilience, and stress-coping in forest settings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (8): 1456.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(52)
Turunen AW, Halonen J, Korpela K, Ojala A, Pasanen T, Siponen T, Tiittanen P, Tyrväinen L, Yli-Tuomi T, Lanki T (2023). Cross-sectional associations of different types of nature exposure with psychotropic, antihypertensive and asthma medication. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 80 (2): 111-118.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(53)
Vujcic M, Tomicevic-Dubljevic J, Grbic M, Lecic-Tosevski D, Vukovic O, Toskovic O (2017). Nature based solution for improving mental health and well-being in urban areas. Environmental Research 158: 385-392.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(54)
Wolf KL, Lam ST, McKeen JK, Richardson GR, Van Den Bosch M, Bardekjian AC (2020). Urban trees and human health: a scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (12): 4371.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(55)
Yu CP, Hsieh H (2020). Beyond restorative benefits: evaluating the effect of forest therapy on creativity. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 51: 126670.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(56)
Zhang S, Teng J, Zeng Y, Song H, Gu Z (2022). The effects of forest therapy on public mental health and circular economy: a policy support model in Japan. Frontiers in Public Health 10: 341.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(57)
Zhang Z, Ye B (2022). Forest therapy in Germany, Japan, and China: Proposal, development status, and future prospects. Forests 13 (8): 1289.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

(1)
Rosa Rivieccio 0000-0001-9749-8500
Raoul Romano 0000-0001-9657-0689
Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria, Centro di Ricerca Politiche e Bioeconomia (CREA-PB), v. Ardeatina 546, I-00178 Roma (Italy)
(2)
Stefano Orsini 0000-0003-1049-8642
IFOAM Organics Europe, Brussels (Belgium)

Corresponding author

 

Citation

Rivieccio R, Romano R, Orsini S (2024). Forest therapy in Italy: proposal of a standard procedure for validation of suitable sites. iForest 17: 192-202. - doi: 10.3832/ifor4543-017

Academic Editor

Marco Borghetti

Paper history

Received: Dec 15, 2023
Accepted: Apr 23, 2024

First online: Jul 04, 2024
Publication Date: Aug 31, 2024
Publication Time: 2.40 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2024

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 3935
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 2796
Abstract Page Views: 404
PDF Downloads: 691
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 44

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 104
Overall contacts: 3935
Avg. contacts per week: 264.86

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 

iForest Similar Articles

 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info