*
 

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

*

Improving the harvester functionality by optimizing the manipulator kinematic scheme

Alexander Lagerev (1)   , Igor Lagerev (2), Anna Makulina (3)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 227-233 (2025)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4753-018
Published: Aug 26, 2025 - Copyright © 2025 SISEF

Research Articles


To minimize the negative impact of wheeled and tracked forest vehicles on soil and vegetation, it is crucial to protect natural ecosystems during activities such as wood harvesting and tree maintenance. This study focuses on one of these measures, namely, maximizing the area of the harvester’s working zone, within which it can cut down trees without additional movement, thereby preserving soil integrity. The manipulator kinematic scheme, typical for most modern harvesters, was considered, and calculated dependencies were obtained to determine the shape and basic geometric characteristics of the working zone. A mathematical model has been developed to determine the optimal values of the lengths of the manipulator links, ensuring the maximum area of the harvester’s working zone, taking into account the necessary design and operating restrictions. Model results demonstrate the effectiveness of the design phase of harvester manipulators. When designing harvesters with a load moment in the range from 150 kN·m to 300 kN·m, optimizing the combination of link lengths in the manipulator’s kinematic scheme can increase the working zone area by up to 30%. This increase is associated with the increase in the maximum radius of the working zone, which can reach from 15% to 17%. This leads to a similar increase in the width of the strip of felled trees that can be cleared with a single pass by the harvester. A greater effect of optimizing the manipulator kinematic scheme was observed when operating harvesters in logging areas with trees of smaller average diameter. Optimizing the manipulator kinematic scheme resulted more effective in logging areas with smaller diameter trees. By reducing the number of longitudinal passes in the logging area, the negative impact of mechanized logging on the forest ecosystem can be minimized.

  Keywords


Harvester, Logging, Kinematic Scheme, Working Zone, Optimization

Authors’ address

(1)
Alexander Lagerev 0000-0003-0380-5456
Faculty of Technology and Design, Academician IG Petrovskii Bryansk State University, Bryansk, 241036 (Russia)
(2)
Igor Lagerev 0000-0002-0921-6831
Rectorat, Kuban State Technological University, Krasnodar, 350072 (Russia)
(3)
Anna Makulina 0009-0002-1698-2582
Faculty of Physics and Mathematics, Academician IG Petrovskii Bryansk State University, Bryansk, 241036 (Russia)

Corresponding author

 
Alexander Lagerev
ntv-brgu@yandex.ru

Citation

Lagerev A, Lagerev I, Makulina A (2025). Improving the harvester functionality by optimizing the manipulator kinematic scheme. iForest 18: 227-233. - doi: 10.3832/ifor4753-018

Academic Editor

Rodolfo Picchio

Paper history

Received: Nov 05, 2024
Accepted: Aug 05, 2025

First online: Aug 26, 2025
Publication Date: Aug 31, 2025
Publication Time: 0.70 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 9
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 6
Abstract Page Views: 2
PDF Downloads: 1
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 0

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 1
Overall contacts: 9
Avg. contacts per week: 63.00

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Mar 2025)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)


 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Buhtoyarov L, Popikov P, Klubnichkin V (2015)
Optimization of parameters of energy-efficient hydraulic mechanism turning manipulator forest machines. Forestry Engineering Journal 5 (4): 215-223.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Cambi M, Certini G, Neri F, Marchi E (2015)
The impact of heavy traffic on forest soils: a review. Forest Ecology and Management 338: 124-138.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Diniz CCC, Lopes ES, Koehler HS, Miranda GM, Paccola JE (2020)
Comparative analysis of maintenance models in forest machines. Floresta e Ambiente 27(2): e20170994.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Eliasson L (2005)
Effects of forwarder tyre pressure on rut formation and soil compaction. Silva Fennica 39 (4): 549-557.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Grebner DL, Bettinger P, Siry JP (2014)
Introduction to forestry and natural resources. Academic Press, London, UK, pp. 430.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Grigorev I, Burgonutdinov A, Makuev V, Tikhonov E, Shvetsova V, Timokhova O, Revyako S, Dmitrieva N (2022)
The theoretical modeling of the dynamic compaction process of forest soil. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering 19 (3): 2935-2949.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Humphrey P, Harvey C, Visser R (2024)
Deploying an early-stage cyber-physical system for the implementation of Forestry 4.0 in a New Zealand timber harvesting context. iForest 17: 353-359.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Ilintsev A, Bogdanov A, Nakvasina E, Amosova I, Koptev S, Tretyakov S (2020)
The natural recovery of disturbed soil, plant cover and trees after clear-cutting in the boreal forests, Russia. iForest 13: 531-540.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Kalyashov VA, An DT, Khitrov EG (2019)
Modern machine systems and technologies for timber harvesting and reforestation in mountain cutting areas. Resources and Technology 19 (2): 1-47.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Kim I, Seo J, Woo H, Choi B (2025)
Assessing rutting and soil compaction caused by wood extraction using traditional and remote sensing methods. Forests 16: 86.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Kormanek M, Dvorák J, Tylek P, Jankovsky M, Nuhlícek O, Mateusiak A (2023)
Impact of MHT9002HV tracked harvester on forest soil after logging in steeply sloping terrain. Forests 14: 977.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Kowsari E, Ghabcheloo R (2024)
Optimal sway motion reduction in forestry cranes. Frontiers in Robotics 11: 1417741.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
La Hera P, Morales DO, Mendoza-Trejo O (2024)
Combining optimization and dynamic movement primitives for planning energy optimal forestry crane motions. IAES International Journal of Robotics and Automation 13 (2): 180-193.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Labelle ER, Hansson L, Högbom L, Jourgholami M, Laschi A (2022)
Strategies to mitigate the effects of soil physical disturbances caused by forest machinery: a comprehensive review. Current Forestry Reports 8: 20-37.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Lagerev AV, Lagerev IA (2019)
Optimization of design and power characteristics of hydraulically-driven three-section loader cranes. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 12 (3): 64-72.
Gscholar
(16)
Lagerev IA, Lagerev AV, Tarichko VI (2021)
Modeling the swing of mobile loader cranes with anchor outriggers when operating on weak soils. E3S Web of Conferences 326: 00011.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Lagerev IA, Lagerev AV, Makulina AV (2024)
Optimization of geometric characteristics of the harvester hydraulic manipulator kinematic scheme. The certificate on official registration of the computer program: RU 2024612783.
Online | Gscholar
(18)
Lindroos O, Ringdahl O, La Hera P, Hohnloser P, Hellstrom T (2015)
Estimating the position of the harvester head - a key step towards the precision forestry of the future? Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 36 (2): 147-164.
Gscholar
(19)
Liska S, Klvac A, Skoupy RA (2011)
Evaluation of John Deere 1490D operation phase in typical conditions of the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science 57 (9): 394-400.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Lourenço JL, Bento LC, Coimbra AP, De Almeida AT (2022)
Comparative evaluation of mobile platforms for non-structured environments and performance requirements identification for forest clearing applications. Forests 13: 1889.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Mederski PS, Bembenek M, Karaszewski Z, Lacka A, SzczepaA, Alvarez A, Rosinska M (2016)
Estimating and modeling harvester productivity in pine stands of different ages, densities and thinning intensities. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 37 (1): 27-36.
Gscholar
(22)
Mederski PS, Borz SA, Duka A, Lazdins A (2021)
Challenges in forestry and forest engineering - case studies from four countries in East Europe. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering 42 (1): 117-134.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Mendoza-Trejo O, Rojas ADL, Morales DO, Lindroos O, Cruz-Villar CA, La Hera P (2022)
Exploring the design of highly energy efficient forestry cranes using gravity compensation. Croatian Journal Forest Engineering 43 (2): 257-270.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Naghdi R, Solgi A, Ilstedt U (2016)
Soil chemical and physical properties after skidding by rubber tired skidder in Hyrcanian forest. Geoderma 265: 12-18.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Nurmi J, Mattila J (2017)
Global energy-optimal redundancy resolution of hydraulic manipulators: experimental results for a forestry manipulator. Energies 10: 647.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
Pandur Z, Kopseak H, Sušnjar M, Landekić M, Sporčić M, Bačić M (2022)
Effect of forwarder multipassing on forest soil parameters changes. iForest 15: 476-483.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
Popikov P, Drapalyuk M, Druchinin D (2020)
Reducing amplitude of load swinging during operation of hydraulic manipulators of forest transport machines. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering: 595-608.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
Rao SS (2009)
Engineering optimization: theory and practice. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, USA, pp. 813.
Gscholar
(29)
Raymond K (2010)
Innovative harvesting solutions: a step change harvesting research programme. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 55 (3): 4-9.
Gscholar
(30)
Siciliano B, Khatib O (2016)
Springer handbook of robotics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 2227.
Gscholar
(31)
Siipilehto J, Rajala M (2019)
Model for diameter distribution from assortments volumes: theoretical formulation and a case application with a sample of timber trade data for clear-cut sections. Silva Fennica 53 (1): 10062.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Syunev V, Seliverstov A, Gerasimov Yu Sokolov A (2011)
Wood harvesting machinery in the focus of bioenergy: constructive solutions, design, engineering calculation. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 143.
Gscholar
(33)
Vereecken H, Schnepf A, Hopmans JW, Javaux M, Roose DOT, Vanderborght J (2016)
Modeling soil processes: review, key challenges, and new perspectives. Vadose Zone Journal 15: 1-57.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(34)
Wang J (2022)
Forest and biomass harvest and logistics. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 386.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info