Performance assessment of two plotless sampling methods for density estimation applied to some Alpine forests of northeastern Italy

doi:10.3832/ifor4335-016

Performance assessment of two plotless sampling methods for density estimation applied to some Alpine forests of northeastern Italy

Monica Notarangelo⁽¹⁾ , Marco Carrer⁽²⁾, Emanuele Lingua⁽²⁾, Nicola Puletti⁽¹⁾, Chiara Torresan⁽³⁾

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 385-391 (2023)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4335-016
Published: Dec 19, 2023 - Copyright © 2023 SISEF

Research Articles

PDF Version

Full Text

Citation

In this study, we tested two plotless sampling methods, the ordered distance method and point-centred quarter method, to estimate the tree density and basal area in some managed Alpine forests in northeastern Italy. We selected nine independent forest stands, classified according to the spatial distribution patterns of trees (cluster, random, regular). A plotless sampling survey was simulated within the selected stands and the tree density and basal area were estimated by applying both the ordered distance method and point-centred quarter method. We compared the estimates, in terms of accuracy and precision, between the two methods and against estimates obtained from a simulated survey based on a plot-based sampling method. The point-centred quarter method outperformed the ordered distance method in terms of both accuracy and precision, showing higher robustness towards the bias related to non-random spatial patterns. However, both the plotless methods we tested can provide unbiased accuracy of estimates which, in addition, do not differ from estimates of plot-based sampling. The satisfactory results are encouraging for further tests over other Italian Alpine as well as Apennine forests. If confirmed, the plotless sampling method, especially the point-centred quarter method, could represent an effective alternative whenever plot-based sampling is deemed redundant, or expensive.

Keywords

Distance-based Density Estimator, Ordered Distance Method, Point-centred Quarter Method, Accuracy, Precision, Conditional Inference Trees, Forest Monitoring

Authors’ address

(1)

0000-0002-1968-8832
0000-0002-2142-959X
Research centre for forestry and wood - Council for Agricultural Research and Economics - CREA, p.za Nicolini 6, I-38123 Trento (Italy)

(2)

0000-0003-1581-6259
0000-0001-9515-7657
Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry - TESAF, University of Padua, v.le dell’Università 16, I-35020 Legnaro, PD (Italy)

(3)

0000-0003-4529-4615
Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council of Italy, v. Biasi 75, I-38098 San Michele all’Adige, TN (Italy)

Corresponding author

Monica Notarangelo
monica.notarangelo@crea.gov.it

Citation

Notarangelo M, Carrer M, Lingua E, Puletti N, Torresan C (2023). Performance assessment of two plotless sampling methods for density estimation applied to some Alpine forests of northeastern Italy. iForest 16: 385-391. - doi: 10.3832/ifor4335-016

Academic Editor

Mirko Di Febbraro

Paper history

Received: Feb 23, 2023
Accepted: Oct 25, 2023

First online: Dec 19, 2023
Publication Date: Dec 31, 2023
Publication Time: 1.83 months

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 9854
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 8446
Abstract Page Views: 756
PDF Downloads: 570
Citation/Reference Downloads: 3
XML Downloads: 79

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 338
Overall contacts: 9854
Avg. contacts per week: 204.08

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)

(no Plumx Metrics available for this paper)

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ^©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

(1)

Adnan S, Maltamo M, Coomes DA, Valbuena R (2017)
Effects of plot size, stand density, and scan density on the relationship between airborne laser scanning metrics and the Gini coefficient of tree size inequality. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 47 (12): 1590-1602.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(2)

Ahmed M, Ogden J (1987)
Population dynamics of the emergent conifer Agathis australis (D. Don) Lindl. (kauri) in New Zealand I. Population structures and tree growth rates in mature stands. New Zealand Journal of Botany 25: 217-229.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(3)

Baddeley A, Turner R (2005)
spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Journal of Statistical Software 12 (6): 1-42.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(4)

Basiri R, Moradi M, Kiani B, Maasumi Babaarabi M (2018)
Evaluation of distance methods for estimating population density in Populus euphratica Olivier natural stands (case study: Maroon riparian forests, Iran). Journal of Forest Science 64: 230-244.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(5)

Bonham CD (2013)
Measurements for terrestrial vegetation (2nd edn). John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, pp. 161-169.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(6)

Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CG, Olshen RA (1984)
Classification and regression trees. Taylor and Francis, Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA, USA, pp. 386.
Gscholar

(7)

Bryant DM, Ducey MJ, Innes JC, Lee TD, Eckert RT, Zarin DN (2004)
Forest community analysis and the point-centered quarter method. Plant Ecology 175 (2): 193-203.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(8)

Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001)
Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, USA, pp. 448.
Gscholar

(9)

Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954)
Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35: 445-453.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(10)

Clayton G, Cox TF (1986)
Some robust density estimators for spatial point processes. Biometrics 2 (4): 753-767.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(11)

Cogbill CV, Thurman AL, Williams JW, Zhu J, Mladenoff DJ, Goring SJ (2018)
A retrospective on the accuracy and precision of plotless forest density estimators in ecological studies. Ecosphere 9 (4): 1-34.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(12)

Cottam G (1953)
Some sampling characteristics of a population of randomly dispersed individuals. Ecology 34 (4): 741-757.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(13)

Cottam G, Curtis J (1956)
The use of distance measures in phytosociological sampling. Ecology 37 (3): 451-460.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(14)

Engeman RM, Sugihara RT, Pank LF, Dusenberry WE (1994)
A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation. Ecology 75 (6): 1769-1779.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(15)

Hijbeek R, Koedam N, Khan MNI, Kairo JG, Schoukens J (2013)
An evaluation of plotless sampling using vegetation simulations and field data from a mangrove forest. PLoS One 8(6): e67201.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(16)

Gasparini P, Di Cosmo L, and Floris A (2022)
Area and Characteristics of Italian Forests. In "Italian National Forest Inventory - Methods and Results of the Third Survey" (Gasparini P, Di Cosmo L, Floris A, De Laurentis A eds). Springer, Berlin 2022, pp 261-262.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(17)

Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006)
Unbiased recursive partitioning: a conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15 (3): 651-674.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(18)

Hothorn T, Zeileis A (2015)
partykit: a modular toolkit for recursive partitioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16: 3905-3909.
Online | Gscholar

(19)

Jamali H, Ebrahimi A, Ardestani EG, Pordel F (2020)
Evaluation of plotless density estimators in different plant density intensities and distribution patterns. Global Ecology and Conservation 23: e01114.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(20)

James FC, Shugart HH (1970)
A quantitative method of habitat description. National Audubon Society, Audubon Field Notes 24 (6): 727-736.
Gscholar

(21)

Khan MNI, Hijbeek R, Berger U, Koedam N, Grueters U, Islam SMZ, Hasan AM, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2016)
An evaluation of the plant density estimator the point-centred quarter method (PCQM) using Monte Carlo simulation. PLoS One 11(6): e0157985.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(22)

Kiani B, Fallah A, Tabari M, Hosseini S, Parizi M-H (2013)
A comparison of distance sampling methods in Saxaul (Halloxylon ammodendron Camey Bunge) shrub-lands. Polish Journal of Ecology 61: 207-219.
Gscholar

(23)

Krebs CJ (1999)
Ecological methodology (2nd edn). Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, USA, pp. 620.
Gscholar

(24)

Kumarathunge DP, Thattil RO, Nissanka SP (2011)
Evaluation of the plotless sampling method to estimate aboveground biomass and other stand parameters in tropical rain forests. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 9 (4): 425-431.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(25)

Laycock WA (1965)
Adaptation of distance measurements for range sampling. Journal of Range Management 18 (4): 205-211.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(26)

Moore PG (1954)
Spacing in plant populations. Ecology 35: 222-227.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(27)

Morisita M (1957)
A new method for the estimation of density by spacing method applicable to non randomly distributed populations. Physiology and Ecology 7: 134-144. [In Japanese]
Online | Gscholar

(28)

Nielson RM, Sugihara RT, Boardman TJ, Engeman RM (2004)
Optimization of ordered distance sampling. Environmetrics 15 (2): 119-128.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(29)

Ochal W, Socha J, Pierzchalski M (2017)
The effect of the calculation method, plot size, and stand density on the accuracy of top height estimation in Norway spruce stands. iForest 10: 498-505.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(30)

Pielou EC (1959)
The Use of Point-to-Plant Distances in the Study of the Pattern of Plant Populations. Journal of Ecology 47 (3): 607-613.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(31)

Pollard JH (1971)
On distance estimators of density in randomly distributed forests. Biometrics 27 (4): 991-1002.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(32)

R Core Team (2020)
R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
Online | Gscholar

(33)

Risser PG, Zedler PH (1968)
An evaluation of the grassland quarter method. Ecology 49: 1006-1009.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(34)

Ruch DG, Torke BG, Badger KS, Reidy CR (2008)
Point-centered quarter analysis of four forest types at Hayes Arboretum in Wayne County, Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 117 (2): 136-141.
Gscholar

(35)

Shiver BD, Borders BE (1996)
Sampling techniques for forest resource inventory. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, pp. 372.
Gscholar

(36)

Silva LB, Alves M, Elias RB, Silva L (2017)
Comparison of T-square, point centered quarter, and N-tree sampling methods in Pittosporum undulatum invaded woodlands. International Journal of Forestry Research 2017: e01114.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(37)

Sparks JC, Masters RE, Payton ME (2002)
Comparative evaluation of accuracy and efficiency of six forest sampling methods. Proceedings of Oklahoma Academic Sciences 82: 49-56.
Gscholar

(38)

White NA, Engeman RM, Sugihara RT (2008)
A comparison of plotless density estimators using Monte Carlo simulation on totally enumerated field data sets. BMC Ecology 8 (1): 6.
CrossRef | Gscholar

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Contents

Search

Journal Info

Journal Subjects and Fields

For Authors

For Reviewers

For Readers

SISEF Publishing

Search iForest Contents