The recreational valuation of a natural forest park using travel cost method in Iran

doi:10.3832/ifor0497-002

The recreational valuation of a natural forest park using travel cost method in Iran

B Sohrabi Saraj⁽¹⁾, A Yachkaschi⁽¹⁾, D Oladi⁽¹⁾, S Fard Teimouri⁽¹⁾, H Latifi⁽²⁾

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 85-92 (2009)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0497-002
Published: Jun 10, 2009 - Copyright © 2009 SISEF

Research Articles

PDF Version

Full Text

Citation

Geo-mapping

One of the most important benefits of a forest, which can be considered over the revenue yielded from timber and other wood based products, is the recreational benefits for visitors. Considering the novelty and necessity of evaluating bio-environmental economics of forest parks in developing countries such as Iran, the present study will focus on the evaluation of the Willingness to Pay (WTP) for a northern Iranian Forest park (Abbas Abad-Behshahr as a case study) utilizing one of the worldwide common methods of evaluation (Travel Cost Method). Based on the method, the park was considered as the centre of the fivefold region as concentric circles. The number of visitors was determined using questionnaires and the park’s value was determined by estimation of the visitors access cost using Travel Cost Method. Furthermore, the economic value extracted timber products of the neighbouring forestry plan was reckoned. The calculated factor was then compared to the economic value of the park. As a result, the park’s recreational value was judged to be much more than produced timber values. Therefore, it is concluded that the unparalleled natural, historical and bio-environmental values of the park would be preserved by planning an appropriate and well- programmed management system, considering the unique conditions of the Park. Thus, it can fulfil the recreational requirements of the people in the local/national scale.

Keywords

Recreational evaluation, Abbas Abad Forest Park, Travel Cost Method (TCM), Willingness to Pay (WTP)

Authors’ address

(1)

Dept. of forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Mazandaran, 10 km Sari-Neka Rd, P.O. Box 737, Sari (Iran)

(2)

Faculty of Forest and Environmental Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg (Germany)

Corresponding author

H Latifi
hooman.latifi@felis.uni-freiburg.de

Citation

Sohrabi Saraj B, Yachkaschi A, Oladi D, Fard Teimouri S, Latifi H (2009). The recreational valuation of a natural forest park using travel cost method in Iran. iForest 2: 85-92. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0497-002

Academic Editor

Marco Borghetti

Paper history

Received: Dec 22, 2008
Accepted: Apr 09, 2009

First online: Jun 10, 2009
Publication Date: Jun 10, 2009
Publication Time: 2.07 months

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 57952
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 49605
Abstract Page Views: 2595
PDF Downloads: 4915
Citation/Reference Downloads: 91
XML Downloads: 746

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 5432
Overall contacts: 57952
Avg. contacts per week: 74.68

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

Total number of cites (since 2009): 13
Average cites per year: 0.87

(no Plumx Metrics available for this paper)

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ^©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

(1)

Adamowicz W (1994)
Habit formation and variety seeking in a discrete choice model of recreation demand. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 19 (1): 19-31.
Gscholar

(2)

Adamowicz W, Louviere J, Williams M (1994)
Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 271-292.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(3)

Arbab H (2003)
Environmental and natural resources economics. Nei Publications, pp.73.
Gscholar

(4)

Bell FW, Leeworthy VR (1990)
Recreational demand by tourists for saltwater beach days. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18 (3): 189-205.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(5)

Brown G, Mendelsohn R (1984)
The hedonic travel cost method. The Review of Economics and Statistics 66: 427-433.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(6)

Caulkins P, Bishop RC, Bouwes NW (1986)
The travel cost model for lake recreation: a comparison of two methods for incorporating site quality and substitution effects. American Agriculture Economics Association, pp. 291-297.
Gscholar

(7)

Clawson M (1959)
Methods of measuring the demand for and value of outdoor recreation. Resources for the future, Reprint Number 10, Brookings Institutions, Washington, DC, USA.
Gscholar

(8)

Clawson M, Knetsch JL (1966)
Economics of outdoor recreation. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, ML, USA.
Gscholar

(9)

Common M, Sen A, Selden T (1999)
The travel cost method. Australian journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 43 (4): 457-477.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(10)

Cooper JC (2000)
Nonparametric and semi-nonparametric recreational demand analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82 (2): 451-462.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(11)

Dixon JA, Sherman PB (1991)
Economics of protected areas. Ambio 20: 68-74.
Gscholar

(12)

Englin J, Mendelsohn R (1991)
A hedonic travel cost analysis for valuation of multiple components of site quality: the recreation value of forest management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21 (3): 275-290.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(13)

Fix P, Loomis J (1998)
Comparing the economic value of mountain biking estimated using revealed. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41 (2): 227-236.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(14)

Fletcher JJ, Adamowicz W, Graham-Tomasi T (1990)
The travel cost model of recreation demand: theoretical and empirical issues. Leisure Sciences 12: 119-147.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(15)

Freeman AM (1993)
The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the future, Washington, DC, USA.
Gscholar

(16)

Garrod G, Willis K (1992)
The amenity value of woodland in Great Britain: a comparison of economic estimates. Environmental and Resource Economics 2 (4): 415-434.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(17)

Gossling S (1999)
Ecotourism: a means to safeguard biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Ecological Economics 29: 303-320.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(18)

Hanley N (1989)
Valuing rural recreatin benefits. Journal of Agricultural Economics 40 (3): 361-374.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(19)

Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamovicz V (1998)
Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 11 (3-4): 413-428.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(20)

Hotelling H (1947)
The economics of exhaustible resources. Journal of Political Economy 39: 137-175.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(21)

Kavianpour K, Esmaeili A (2002)
Recreational-economical evaluation of Si Sangan forest park. Pajouhesh and Sazandegi 55: 92-95.
Gscholar

(22)

Krutilla JV, Fisher AC (1975)
The economics of natural environments: studies in valuation of commodity and amenity resources. The Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future, Baltimore, ML, USA.
Gscholar

(23)

Majnounian H (1977)
Economic evaluation of Khazaneh forest park. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, Iran, pp. 105.
Gscholar

(24)

Mankhaus S, Lober DJ (1996)
International ecotourism and the valuation of tropical rainforests in Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Management 47: 1-10.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(25)

Mugambi D, Mugendi D, Wambugu A, Mburu J (2006)
Estimating recreational benefits of Kakamega forest in Kenya using the travel cost method. In: Proceedings of the Symposium: “Prosperity and Poverty in a Globalised World-Challenges for Agricultural Research”. Tropentag, Bonn, Germany.
Gscholar

(26)

Offenbach LA, Goodwin BK (1994)
A travel-cost analysis of the demand for hunting trips in Kansas. Review of Agricultural Economics 16 (1): 55-61.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(27)

Oladi DJ (2005)
An introduction to ecotourism (translation). University of Mazandaran Press, Mazandaran, Iran, pp. 384.
Gscholar

(28)

Rosenberger R (1999)
The value of ranch open space to tourists. Growth and change 30 (3): 66-73.
Gscholar

(29)

Shrestha RK, Stein TV, Clark J (2007)
Valuing nature-based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River region, Florida. Journal of Environmental Management (in press).
CrossRef | Gscholar

(30)

Willis KG (1991)
The recreational value of the forestry commission estate in Great Britain: a Clawson-Snetsch travel cost analysis. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 38 (1): 58-75.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(31)

Wood ME (2002)
Ecotourism: principles, practices, and policies for sustainability, United Nations Environmental Program, Tour Mirabeau, France and the International ecotourism society, Burlington, VA, USA.
Gscholar

(32)

Wunder S (2000)
Ecotourism and economic incentives- an empirical approach. Ecological Economics 32: 465-479.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(33)

Yachkaschi A (1975)
An introduction to the Iranian national and forest parks. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, Iran, pp. 135.
Gscholar

(34)

Zobeiri M (2000)
Forest measurement. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, Iran, pp.401.
Gscholar

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Contents

Search

Journal Info

Journal Subjects and Fields

For Authors

For Reviewers

For Readers

SISEF Publishing

Search iForest Contents