*

Green oriented urban development for urban ecosystem services provision in a medium sized city in southern Italy

Francesco Martinico, Daniele La Rosa   , Riccardo Privitera

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages 385-395 (2014)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1171-007
Published: May 19, 2014 - Copyright © 2014 SISEF

Research Articles

Collection/Special Issue: RegioResources21
Spatial information and participation of socio-ecological systems: experiences, tools and lessons learned for land-use planning
Guest Editors: Daniele La Rosa, Carsten Lorz, Hannes Jochen König, Christine Fürst


In southern Italy many cities are characterized by a lack of public urban greenspaces. Non-urbanized areas in these cities are suffering from surrounding urbanization pressures. These areas still provide important ecosystem services even if they are limited in size, highly fragmented and often neglected by local planning. New planning strategies are needed in order to protect and enhance the provision of ecosystem services delivered by existing Non-Urbanized areas, but municipalities usually have limited funds for acquiring public green areas via land expropriations. At the same time, requests for new urban development are still considerable. Consequently, it is not realistic to propose strategies for green areas that do not include new developments. The paper illustrates a strategy for a Green Oriented Urban Development (GOUD) that has been applied for the Master Plan of Catania, a medium sized city in Sicily (southern Italy). The strategy includes a limited amount of developments as well as new greenspaces in selected areas (Resource Zones), through the transfer of property and development rights between the municipality and developers. The strategy will allow to enhance the provision of ecosystem services, especially cultural services (thanks to a dramatic increase of accessibility to new greenspaces), regulating services (through climate regulation by new green land covers) and provisioning services such as urban agricultural products. Results show that it is possible to improve urban ecosystem services creating a more liveable and healthy urban environment at reduced cost for the municipal administrations.

  Keywords


Urban Development, Ecosystem Services, Urban Planning

Authors’ address

(1)
Francesco Martinico
Daniele La Rosa
Riccardo Privitera
Department of Architecture, University of Catania, v. S. Sofia, I-95125 Catania (Italy)

Corresponding author

 
Daniele La Rosa
dlarosa@darc.unict.it

Citation

Martinico F, La Rosa D, Privitera R (2014). Green oriented urban development for urban ecosystem services provision in a medium sized city in southern Italy. iForest 7: 385-395. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1171-007

Academic Editor

Raffaele Lafortezza

Paper history

Received: Oct 31, 2013
Accepted: Dec 27, 2013

First online: May 19, 2014
Publication Date: Dec 01, 2014
Publication Time: 4.77 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 13859
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 9981
Abstract Page Views: 284
PDF Downloads: 2738
Citation/Reference Downloads: 33
XML Downloads: 823

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 1984
Overall contacts: 13859
Avg. contacts per week: 48.90

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Aug 2019)

Total number of cites (since 2014): 9
Average cites per year: 1.50

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Barbarossa L, La Rosa D, Privitera R (2013)
Agriculture in greenways: a methodology for planning connected urban and peri-urban farmlands in a Mediterranean city. In: Proceedings of “Fábos Conference on Landscape and Greenway Planning 2013: Pathways to Sustainability” (Fábos JG, Lindhult M, Ryan RL, Jacknin M eds). Amherst (MS, USA), 12-13 April 2013. Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MS, USA, pp. 309-318.
Gscholar
(2)
Benedict MA, McMahon E (2006)
Green infrastructure: linking landscapes and communities. Island Press Washington, DC, USA, pp. 299.
Gscholar
(3)
Bengston DN, Fletcher JO, Nelson KC (2004)
Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 69: 271-286.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999)
Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics 29: 293-301.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Bougherara D, Grolleau G, Mzoughi N (2009)
Buy local, pollute less: what drives households to join a community supported farm? Ecological Economics 68: 1488-1495.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali L, Knight TM, Pullin AS (2010)
Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landscape and Urban Planning 97: 147-155.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Brabec E, Smith C (2002)
Agricultural land fragmentation: the spatial effects of three land protection strategies in the eastern United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 58: 255-268.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Byrne J, Sipe N (2010)
Green and open space planning for urban consolidation - a review of the literature and best practice. Griffith University Urban Research Program, Brisbane, Australia.
Online | Gscholar
(9)
Cairns J, Palmer SE (1995)
Restoration of urban waterways and vacant areas: the first steps toward sustainability. Environmental Health Perspectives 103: 452-453.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Davies ZG, Jill LE, Heinemeyer A, Leake JR, Gaston KJ (2011)
Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:1125-1134.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
EEA (2010)
Urban atlas. Web site.
Online | Gscholar
(12)
Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE (2011)
Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environmental Pollution 159: 2078-2087.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ndumbaro F, Khamis M (2012)
Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments - mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecological Indicators 18: 421-433.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Gillham O (2002)
The limitless city: a primer on the urban sprawl debate. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 328.
Gscholar
(15)
Groenewegen PP, Berg AE, Vries S, Verheij RA (2006)
Vitamin G: effects of green space on health, well-being, and social safety. Study Protocol, BMC Public Health 6: 149-149.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Grêt-Regamey A, Celio E, Klein TM, Wissen Hayek U (2013)
Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive 3D procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 109: 107-116.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(17)
Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN (2013)
Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics 86: 235-245.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(18)
Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, Kroll F, Seppelt R (2012)
Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany. Ecology and Society 17 (3): 22.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Haughton C, Hunter G (2003)
Sustainable cities. Rutledge, London, UK, pp. 368.
Gscholar
(20)
Hubacek K, Kronenberg J (2013)
Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 109 (1): 1-6.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Kaplowitz MD, Machemer P, Pruetz P (2008)
Planners’ experiences in managing growth using transferable development rights (TDR) in the United States. Land Use Policy 25: 378-387. doi:
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Kelly ED (1993)
Managing community growth: policies, techniques, and impacts. Praeger, Westport, CT, USA, pp. 264.
Gscholar
(23)
Kenworthy JR (2006)
The eco-city: ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environment and Urbanization 18: 67-85
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Koschke L, Fürst C, Frank S, Makeschin F (2012)
A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecological Indicators 21: 54-66.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(25)
Kowarik I (2011)
Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental Pollution 159: 1974-1983.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(26)
La Greca P, La Rosa D, Martinico F, Privitera R (2011)
Agricultural and green infrastructures: the role of non-urbanised areas for eco-sustainable planning in a metropolitan region. Environmental Pollution 159: 2193-2202.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(27)
La Rosa D, Privitera R (2013)
Characterization of non-urbanized areas for land-use planning of agricultural and green infrastructure in urban context. Landscape and Urban Planning 109: 94-106.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(28)
La Rosa D, Wiesmann D (2013)
Land-cover and impervious surface extraction using parametric and non-parametric algorithms from the open-source software R: an application to sustainable urban planning in Sicily. GIScience and Remote Sensing 50: 231-250.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(29)
La Rosa D (2012)
Non urbanised areas in metropolitan context: between ecosystem services and urban sprawl. CreateSpace, Charleston, SC, USA, pp. 138.
Gscholar
(30)
Lang T, Barling D, Caraher M, (2001)
Food, social policy and the environment: towards a new model. Social policy and Administration 35: 538-558.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(31)
Levinson A (1997)
Why oppose TDRs? Transferable development rights can increase overall development. Regional Science and Urban Economics 27: 283-296.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(32)
Lovell ST, Taylor JR (2013)
Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landscape Ecology 28: 1447-1463.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(33)
Maes J, Baracchini ML, Zulian G (2011)
A European assessment of the provision of ecosystem services: towards an atlas of ecosystem services. EUR 24750 EN - 2011, EC/JRC, Ispra, Italy, pp. 88.
Gscholar
(34)
Maruani T, Amit-Cohen I (2007)
Open space planning models: a review of approaches and methods. Landscape and Urban Planning 81: 1-13.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(35)
McConnel V, Kopits E, Walls M (2003)
How well can markets for development rights work? Evaluating a farmland preservation program. Discussion Paper 03-08, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 54.
Gscholar
(36)
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005)
Ecosystems and human wellbeing: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 100.
Gscholar
(37)
Miller AJ (1999)
Transferable development rights in the constitutional landscape: has Penn central failed to weather the storm? Natural Resources Journal 39: 459-516.
Online | Gscholar
(38)
Millward H (2006)
Urban containment strategies: a case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities. Land Use Policy 23: 473-485.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(39)
Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002)
Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution 116: 381-389.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(40)
Pendall R, Martin J, Fulton W (2002)
Holding the line: urban containment in the United States. The Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 45.
Online | Gscholar
(41)
Porter DR (1997)
Managing growth in America’s communities. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 336.
Gscholar
(42)
Regione Sicilia (2009)
Volo fotogrammetrico, lidar, ortofoto e cartografia [Photogrammetric flight, lidar, orthophoto and mapping]. Web site. [in Italian]
Online | Gscholar
(43)
Rowntree RA, Nowak DJ (1991)
Quantifying the role of urban forests in removing atmospheric carbon dioxide. Journal of Arboriculture 17: 269-275.
Online | Gscholar
(44)
Ruliffson JA, Gobster PH, Haight RG, Homans FR (2002)
Niches in the urban forest: organizations and their role in acquiring metropolitan open space. Journal of Forestry 100: 16-23.
Gscholar
(45)
Ryan RL, Hansel Walker JT (2004)
Protecting and managing private farmland and public greenways in the urban fringe. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 183-198.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(46)
Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ, (2012)
A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography 31: 748-760.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(47)
Stanghellini S, Cosmi V (2012)
L’economia del Piano [The economy of the plan]. Annex to Catania Master Plan, Internal document, Catania, Italy, pp. 88.
Gscholar
(48)
TEEB (2011)
TEEB manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, Geneva, Switzerland.
Online | Gscholar
(49)
Tobias S (2013)
Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 9: 243-251.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(50)
Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Warren PH, Davies RG, Gaston KJ (2007)
Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 83: 308-317.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(51)
Uggla Y (2012)
Construction of “nature” in urban planning: a case study of Stockholm. Town Planning Review 83: 69-85.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(52)
Walmsley A (1995)
Greenways and the making of urban form. Landscape and Urban planning 33: 81-127.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(53)
Wiebe K, Tegene A, Kuhn B (1997)
Managing public and private land through partial interests. Contemporary Economic Policy 15: 35-43.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(54)
Young RF (2010)
Managing municipal green space for ecosystem services. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 9 (4): 313-321.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website