This paper presents an open-source Decision Support System (DSS) able to quantify the economic value of forest ecosystem services and their dynamic trade-offs. Provisioning, regulation and support services, as well as cultural services, can be evaluated by the model. Best management forestry practices can be identified by optimizing specific objective functions, e.g., maximizing the economic value or identifying the ideal rotation period. The model was applied to a silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) stand in central Italy as a case study. Results show the importance of economic parameters (e.g., discount rate) and management practices (e.g., presence/absence of silvicultural thinning) in defining forest values. The main strengths and weaknesses of the DSS are discussed in light of its potential for application in the sector of Payment for Ecosystem Services.
Keywords
, , ,
Citation
Sacchelli S (2018). A Decision Support System for trade-off analysis and dynamic evaluation of forest ecosystem services. iForest 11: 171-180. - doi: 10.3832/ifor2416-010
Academic Editor
Luca Salvati
Paper history
Received: Feb 23, 2017
Accepted: Nov 23, 2017
First online: Feb 19, 2018
Publication Date: Feb 28, 2018
Publication Time: 2.93 months
© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2018
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Breakdown by View Type
(Waiting for server response...)
Article Usage
Total Article Views: 44864
(from publication date up to now)
Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 37360
Abstract Page Views: 2991
PDF Downloads: 3614
Citation/Reference Downloads: 15
XML Downloads: 884
Web Metrics
Days since publication: 2467
Overall contacts: 44864
Avg. contacts per week: 127.30
Article Citations
Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)
Total number of cites (since 2018): 8
Average cites per year: 1.33
Publication Metrics
by Dimensions ©
Articles citing this article
List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.
(1)
Almansa C, Martìnez-Paz JM (2011)What weight should be assigned to future environmental impacts? A probabilistic cost benefit analysis using recent advances on discounting. Science of the Total Environment 409 (7): 1305-1314.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(2)
Armbrecht J (2014)Use value of cultural experiences: a comparison of contingent valuation and travel cost. Tourism Management 42: 141-148.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(3)
Baerenklau KA, Gonzàlez-Cabàn A, Paez C, Chavez E (2010)Spatial allocation of forest recreation value. Journal of Forest Economics 16: 113-126.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(4)
Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Waage S, Winthrop R (2013)A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services 5: 27-39.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(5)
Bartkowski B, Lienhoop N, Hansjürgens B (2015)Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: a critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity. Ecological Economics 113: 1-14.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(6)
Bottalico F, Pesola L, Vizzarri M, Antonello L, Barbati A, Chirici G, Corona P, Cullotta S, Garfì V, Giannico V, Lafortezza R, Lombardi F, Marchetti M, Nocentini S, Riccioli F, Travaglini D, Sallustio L (2016)Modeling the influence of alternative forest management scenarios on wood production and carbon storage: A case study in the Mediterranean region. Environmental Research 144: 72-87.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(7)
Brander LM, Koetse MJ (2011)The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 2763-2773.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(8)
Brazee RJ (2001)The Faustmann formula: fundamental to forest economics 150 years after publication. Forest Science 47: 441-442.
Online |
Gscholar
(9)
CMCC (2014)The carbon market. International Climate Policy and Carbon Markets 32: 11.
Gscholar
(10)
Costanza R, D’Arge R, De Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Suttonkk P, Van Den Belt M (1997)The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387: 253-260.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(11)
Costanza R, De Groot R, Sutton P, Van Der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014)Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26: 152-158.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(12)
Czembrowski P, Kronenberg J (2016)Hedonic pricing and different urban green space types and sizes: insights into the discussion on valuing ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning 146: 11-19.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(13)
D’Amato D, Rekola M, Li N, Toppinen A (2016)Monetary valuation of forest ecosystem services in China: a literature review and identification of future research needs. Ecological Economics 121: 75-84.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(14)
De Groot R, Brander L, Van Der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, Christie M, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L, Hussain S, Kumar P, McVittie A, Portela R, Rodriguez LC, Ten Brink P, Van Beukering P (2012)Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services 1: 50-61.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(15)
Faustmann M (1849)On the determination of the value which forestland and immature stands pose for forestry. Reprinted in Journal of Forest Economics 1: 7-44.
Gscholar
(16)
Farley J, Costanza R (2010)Payments for ecosystem services: from local to global. Ecological Economics 69: 2060-2068.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(17)
Federici S, Vitullo M, Tulipano S, De Lauretis R, Seufert G (2008)An approach to estimate carbon stocks change in forest carbon pools under the UNFCCC: the Italian case. iForest 1: 86-95.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(18)
Gazzetta Ufficiale (2016)Law 28 December 2015, n. 221 “Disposizioni in materia ambientale per promuovere misure di green economy e per il contenimento dell’uso eccessivo di risorse naturali” [Environmental provisions for promote green economy measures and for the containment of excessive use of natural resources]. GU General Series no. 13 (18-01-2016), Web site. [in Italian]
Online |
Gscholar
(19)
Gsottbauer E, Logar I, Van Den Bergh J (2015)Towards a fair, constructive and consistent criticism of all valuation languages: comment on Kallis et al. (2013). Ecological Economics 112: 164-169.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(20)
Gürlük S (2006)The estimation of ecosystem services’ value in the region of Misi rural development project: results from a contingent valuation survey. Forest Policy and Economics 9: 209-218.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(21)
Häyhä T, Franzese PP (2014)Ecosystem services assessment: a review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective. Ecological Modelling 289: 124-132.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(22)
Häyhä T, Franzese PP, Paletto A, Fath BD (2015)Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosystem Services 14: 12-23.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(23)
Hoogstra-Klein MA, Hengeveld GM, Jong R (2017)Analysing scenario approaches for forest management: one decade of experiences in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 85 (2): 222-234.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(24)
Kallio AMI, Hänninen R, Vainikainen N, Luque S (2008)Biodiversity value and the optimal location of forest conservation sites in Southern Finland. Ecological Economics 67: 232-243.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(25)
Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F (2013)Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators - A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators 28: 54-78.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(26)
Kortsch T, Hildebrand J, Schweizer-Ries P (2015)Acceptance of biomass plants - Results of a longitudinal study in the bioenergy-region Altmark. Renewable Energy 83: 690-697.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(27)
Kumar M, Kumar P (2008)Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective. Ecological Economics 64: 808-819.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(28)
ISAFA (1970)Tavole stereometriche ed alsometriche costruite per boschi italiani [Yield tables for Italian forests]. Web site. [in Italian]
Online |
Gscholar
(29)
Langner A, Irauschek F, Perez S, Pardos M, Zlatanov T, Nordström EM, Lexer MJ (2017)Value-based ecosystem service trade-offs in multi-objective management in European mountain forests. Ecosystem Services 26: 245-257.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(30)
Lankia T, Kopperoinen L, Pouta E, Neuvonen M (2015)Valuing recreational ecosystem service flow in Finland. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism 10: 14-28.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(31)
Lupp G, Konold W, Bastian O (2013)Landscape management and landscape changes towards more naturalness and wilderness: Effects on scenic qualities - The case of the Müritz National Park in Germany. Journal for Nature Conservation 21: 10-21.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(32)
Maguire KB (2009)Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 3528-3533.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(33)
Mazzaro De Freitas FL, Sparovek G, Mörtberg U, Silveira S, Klug I, Berndes G (2017)Offsetting legal deficits of native vegetation among Brazilian landholders: effects on nature protection and socioeconomic development. Land Use Policy 68: 189-199.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(34)
Mohammed AJ, Inoue M (2017)Identifying salient forest SES attributes for sustainability: a multi-country study. Land Use Policy 60: 197-205.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(35)
Ninan KN, Inoue M (2013)Valuing forest ecosystem services: what we know and what we don’t. Ecological Economics 93: 137-149.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(36)
Norgaard RB (2010)Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69: 1219-1227.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(37)
Pearce D, Moran D (1994)The economic value of biodiversity. IUCN - The World Conservation Union, Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, pp. 106.
Gscholar
(38)
Plumecocq G (2014)The second generation of ecological economics: how far has the apple fallen from the tree? Ecological Economics 107: 457-468.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(39)
Ribe RG (2009)In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the US Pacific Northwest: the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 245-260.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(40)
Riccioli F, Fratini R, El Asmar JP, El Asmar T (2012)The use of benefit transfer to estimate the recreational and touristic value of two wooded areas in Tuscany. Journal of Service Science and Management 5: 14-19.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(41)
Richardson L, Loomis J, Kroeger T, Casey F (2015)The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation. Ecological Economics 115: 51-58.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(42)
Rose SK, Chapman D (2003)Timber harvest adjacency economies, hunting, species protection, and old growth value: seeking the dynamic optimum. Ecological Economics 44: 325-344.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(43)
Sacchelli S, Zambelli P, Zatelli P, Ciolli M (2013)Biomasfor - An open-source holistic model for the assessment of sustainable forest bioenergy. iForest 6: 285-293.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(44)
Sacchelli S, Fabbrizzi S (2015)Minimisation of uncertainty in decision-making processes using optimised probabilistic fuzzy cognitive maps: a case study for a rural sector. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 52: 31-40.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(45)
Secco L, Favero M, Masiero M, Pettenella DM (2017)Failures of political decentralization in promoting network governance in the forest sector: Observations from Italy. Land Use Policy 62: 79-100.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(46)
Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ (2014)Validating a method for transferring social values of ecosystem services between public lands in the Rocky Mountain region. Ecosystem Services 8: 166-177.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(47)
TEEB (2010)The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Progress Press, Malta, pp. 36.
Gscholar
(48)
Ten Brink BJE, Van Vliet AJH, Heunks C, Pearce DW, Howarth A (2000)Technical report on biodiversity in Europe: an integrated economic and environmental assessment. RIVM report 481505019, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, pp. 74.
Online |
Gscholar
(49)
Turner MG (1989)Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20: 171-197.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(50)
Turner RK, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiou S (2003)Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics 46: 493-510.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(51)
Tuscany Region (2003)Tuscany Regional Forest Law 48/2003. Web site.
Online |
Gscholar
(52)
Uggla Y, Forsberg M, Larsson S (2016)Dissimilar framings of forest biodiversity preservation: Uncertainty and legal ambiguity as contributing factors. Forest Policy and Economics 62: 36-42.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(53)
Venn TJ (2005)Financial and economic performance of long-rotation hardwood plantation investments in Queensland, Australia. Forest Policy and Economics 7: 437-454.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(54)
Wang W, Fu B (2013)Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services. Forest Policy and Economics 26: 145-146.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(55)
Wright D, Dey P, Brammer J, Hunt P (2011)Bioenergy decision support systems: worth the effort? In: Proceedings of the “World Renewable Energy Congress”. Linköping (Sweden), 8-13 May 2011. Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings, vol. 1, no. 57, pp. 9-16.
Gscholar
(56)
Yoo J, Simonit S, Connors JP, Kinzig AP, Perrings C (2014)The valuation of off-site ecosystem service flows: Deforestation, erosion and the amenity value of lakes in Prescott, Arizona. Ecological Economics 97: 74-83.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(57)
Xie XF (2009)Solver for nonlinear programming. Web site.
Online |
Gscholar
