Soil nutrient status, nutrient return and retranslocation in poplar species and clones in northern Iran

doi:10.3832/ifor0976-006

Soil nutrient status, nutrient return and retranslocation in poplar species and clones in northern Iran

Ali Salehi⁽¹⁾ , Neda Ghorbanzadeh⁽¹⁾, Maryam Salehi⁽²⁾

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages 336-341 (2013)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0976-006
Published: Aug 29, 2013 - Copyright © 2013 SISEF

Research Articles

PDF Version

Full Text

Citation

Geo-mapping

In this study several same-aged poplar species and clones were selected including Populus deltoides Marsh. CV. “Lux” (P.d “Lux”), Populus deltoides Marsh. CV. “Harvard” (P.d “Harvard”), Populus x canadensis Moench “Triplo” (P.xc “Triplo”), Populus x canadensis Moench “I-45/51” (P.xc “I-45/51”), planted in poplar research station about 20 years ago in the north of Iran, and Populus caspica Bornm. (P. caspica) as endemic and endangered poplar species. Some quantitative characteristics of the trees and soil samples were taken based on completely randomized block design. Samplings of live and senescent leaves were carried out in two-stages, mid-summer during the peak nutritional activities of trees and mid-autumn for senescent leaves. Soil samples were analyzed to determine organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (N), available phosphorus (P) and exchangeable potassium (K). OC, total of N, P and K were also determined in live and senescent leaves. The results showed that P.d “Harvard” had the highest total height, DBH and diameter of crown compared to the other species and clones. The amount of OC, N and P in soil and live leaves of P.d “Harvard” clone are more than those of the other species and clones. OC, N, P, and K returned by senescent leaves were higher and lower for P.d “Harvard” and P. caspica respectively. P retranslocation for all of the clones and species was higher compared to N and K. The highest retranslocation percentage was observed in P. caspica (N=18.93, P=39.63, K=24.02) and the lowest (N=12.09, P=32.46, K=21.14) in P.d “Harvard” clone. It could be concluded that poplar species and clones have different nutritional requirements and retranslocation capabilities. It appears that P.d “Harvard” clone showed higher quantitative growth it could be beneficial for maintaining the soil nutrient status for successive plantings.

Keywords

Poplar, Retranslocation, Nutrient Return, Soil Properties, Plantation

Authors’ address

(1)

Department of Forestry, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Guilan, Guilan (Iran)

(2)

Department of Forestry, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Tehran (Iran)

Corresponding author

Ali Salehi
asalehi@guilan.ac.ir

Citation

Salehi A, Ghorbanzadeh N, Salehi M (2013). Soil nutrient status, nutrient return and retranslocation in poplar species and clones in northern Iran. iForest 6: 336-341. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0976-006

Academic Editor

Roberto Tognetti

Paper history

Received: Feb 18, 2013
Accepted: May 11, 2013

First online: Aug 29, 2013
Publication Date: Dec 02, 2013
Publication Time: 3.67 months

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 48981
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 40821
Abstract Page Views: 2356
PDF Downloads: 4664
Citation/Reference Downloads: 26
XML Downloads: 1114

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 3893
Overall contacts: 48981
Avg. contacts per week: 88.07

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

Total number of cites (since 2013): 3
Average cites per year: 0.27

(no Plumx Metrics available for this paper)

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ^©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

(1)

Asadi F, Mirzaie-Nodoushan H (2011)
Evaluation of different treatments in sexual reproduction of Populus caspica for broadening its genetic basis in the nature. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research 19: 441-452.
Gscholar

(2)

Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, Rothe A (2002)
Impact of several common tree species of temperate forest on soil fertility. Annals of Forest Science 59: 233-254.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(3)

Berg B, Davey M, De Marco A, Emmett B, Faituri M, Hobbie S, Johansson MB, Liu C, Mc Claugherty C, Norell L, Rutigliano F, Vesterdal L, De Virzo Santo A (2010)
Factors influencing limit values for pine needle litter decomposition: a synthesis for boreal and temperate pine forest systems. Biogeochemistry 100: 57-73.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(4)

Binkley D, Sollins P (1995)
Factors determining in soil pH in adjacent conifer and alder-conifer stands. Soil Science Society of America Journal 54: 1427-1433.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(5)

Breeman NV (1995)
Nutrient cycling strategies. Plant and soil Journal 1: 321-326.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(6)

Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Pérez-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright IJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, Bodegom Pv, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Dìaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J, Reich PB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaieretti MV, Westoby M (2008)
Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecology Letter 11: 1065-71.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(7)

Cuevas E, Lugo AE (1998)
Dynamics of organic matter and nutrient return from litterfall in stands of tropical tree plantation species. Forest Ecology and Management 112: 263-279.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(8)

Duchesne L, Ouimet R, CamireHoule D (2001)
Seasonal nutrient transfers by foliar resorption, leaching and litter fall in a northern hardwood forest at Lake Clair Watershed, Quebec, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 333-344.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(9)

Fife D, Nambiar E, Saur E (2008)
Retranslocation of foliar nutrients in evergreen tree species planted in a Mediterranean environment. Tree Physiology 28:187-196.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(10)

Hagen-Thorn A, Armolaitis KS, Callesen I, Stjernquist (2004)
Macronutrients in tree stems and foliage: a comparative study of six temperate forest species planted at the same sites. Annals of Forest Science 61: 489-498.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(11)

Hagen-Thorn A, Varnagiryte I, Nihlgard B, Armolaitis K (2006)
Autumn nutrient resorption and losses in four deciduous forest tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 228: 33-39.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(12)

Hashemi SF, Hojati SM, Hosseini-Nasr SM, Jalilvand H (2012)
Comparison of nutrient elements and elements retranslocation of Acer velutinum, Zelkova carpinifolia and Pinus brutia in Darabkola-Mazandaran. Iranian Journal of Forest 4: 175-185.
Gscholar

(13)

Huang J, Wang X, Yan, E (2007)
Leaf nutrient concentration, nutrient resorption and litter decomposition in green broad-leaved forest in eastern China. Forest Ecology and Management 239: 150-158.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(14)

Jackson ML (1967)
Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
Gscholar

(15)

Khiewtam RS, Ramakrishnan PS (1993)
Litter and fine root dynamics of relic sacred grove forest of Cherrapunjee in northeastern India. Forest Ecology and Management 60: 327-344.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(16)

Killingbeck K (1996)
Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Journal of Ecology 77: 1716-1727.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(17)

Lodhiyal LS, Lodhiyal N (1997)
Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency in short rotation, high density Central Himalayan Tarai poplar plantations. Annals of Botany 79: 517-527.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(18)

Lodhiyal N, Lodhiyal LS (2003)
Aspects of nutrient cycling and nutrient use pattern of Bhabar Shisham forests in Centeral Himalaya, India. Forest Ecology and Management 176: 237-252.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(19)

Liu XXU, Berninger H, Li O (2004)
Nutrient distribution in Picea likiangensis trees growing in a plantation in West Sichuan, Southwest China. Silva Fennica 38: 235-242.
Gscholar

(20)

Mahmood H, Limon SH, Rahman MS, Azad AK, Islam MS, Khairuzzaman M (2009)
Nutrients (N, P and K) dynamics associated with the leaf litter of two agroforestry tree species of Bangladesh. iForest 2: 183-186.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(21)

Mahmood H, Mohammad R, Hasan S, Saidur R, Zaber HM (2011)
Nutrient dynamics associated with leaf litter decomposition of three agroforestry tree species (Azadirachta indica, Dalbergia sissoo, and Melia azedarach) of Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research 22: 577-582.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(22)

Miller NG, Alpert P (1984)
Plant association and edaphic features of a high arctic mesotopographic setting. Arctic and Alpin Reserch. 16: 11-24.
Gscholar

(23)

Morrison IK (2003)
Decomposition and element release from confined jack pine needle litter on and in the feather moss layer. Journal of Forest Research 33: 16-22.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(24)

Niinemets U, Kull K (2003)
Leaf structure vs. nutrient relationships vary with soil conditions in temperate shrubs and trees. Journal of Ecology 24: 209-219.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(25)

Onyekwelu JC, Mosandl R, Stimm B (2006)
Productivity, site evaluation and state of nutrition of Gmelina arborea plantations in Oluwa and Omo forest reserves, Nigeria. Forest Ecology and Management 229: 214-227.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(26)

Parzych A, Astel A, Trojanowski J (2008)
Fluxes of biogenic substances in precipitation and througfall in woodland ecosystems of the Slowinski National Park. Archives of Environmental Protection 34: 13-24.
Gscholar

(27)

Piatek KB, Lee Allen H (2000)
Site preparation effects on foliar N and P use, retranslocation, and transfer to litter in 15-years old Pinus taeda. Forest Ecology and Management 129: 143-152.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(28)

Rahajoe JS (2003)
The role of litter production and decomposition of dominant tree species on the nutrient cycle in natural forest with various substrate conditions, Doctoral dissertation, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, pp. 250.
Gscholar

(29)

Rostamabadi A, Tabari M, Salehi A, Sayad E, Salehi A (2010)
Comparison of nutrition, nutrient return and nutrient retranslocation between stands of Alnus subcordata and Taxodium distichum in Tashbandan, Amol (Mazandaran). Journal of Wood & Forest Science and Technology 17: 65-78.
Gscholar

(30)

Rouhi-Moghaddam E, Hosseini SM, Ebrahimi E, Tabari M, Rahmani A (2008)
Comparison of growth, nutrition and soil properties of pure stands of Quercus castanifolia and mixed with Zelkova carpinifolia in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 1149-1160.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(31)

Sharma JC, Sharma Y (2004)
Nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems - a review. Agriculture Review 25: 157-172.
Online | Gscholar

(32)

Singh K, Chauhan HS, Rajput DK, Singh DV (1989)
Report of a 60 month study on litter production, changes in soil chemical properties and productivity under poplar (P. deltoides) and Eucalyptus (E. hybrid) interplanted with aromatic grasses. Agroforestry Systems 9: 37-45.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(33)

Townsend AC, Cleveland G, Bustamante M (2007)
Controls over foliar N/P ratios in tropical rain forests. Ecology 88: 107-118.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(34)

Victor A, Dimitrios A, Alexandros T, Georgios B, Georgios S (2001)
Litterfall, litter accumulation and litter decomposition rates in four forest ecosystems in northern Greece. Forest Ecology and Management 144: 113-127.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(35)

Wright I, Westoby M (2003)
Nutrient concentration, resorption and lifespan: leaf traits of Australian sclerophyll species. Functional Ecology 17:10-19.
CrossRef | Gscholar

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Contents

Search

Journal Info

Journal Subjects and Fields

For Authors

For Reviewers

For Readers

SISEF Publishing

Search iForest Contents