Risk assessment of GM trees in the EU: current regulatory framework and guidance

doi:10.3832/ifor0101-006

Risk assessment of GM trees in the EU: current regulatory framework and guidance

J Aguilera⁽¹⁾ , KM Nielsen^(2-3), J Sweet⁽⁴⁾

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 127-131 (2013)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0101-006
Published: Apr 08, 2013 - Copyright © 2013 SISEF

Review Papers

Collection/Special Issue: COST Action FP0905
Biosafety of forest transgenic trees and EU policy directives
Guest Editors: Cristina Vettori, Matthias Fladung

PDF Version

Full Text

Citation

The use of genetically modified organisms - their release into the environment, import, and utilisation as food/feed or food/feed ingredients - is regulated in the European Union (EU). For placing onto the market, current legislations require a comprehensive and science-based risk assessment. This risk assessment (RA) is performed by applicants and then evaluated by national authorities in close cooperation with the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) has published a comprehensive set of guidance documents for applicants and risk assessors for the RA of GM plants (GMP), their products for food and/or feed use, and their cultivation. In those documents, the strategy and the criteria to conduct the assessment are explained, as well as the scientific data to be provided by the applicant. The assessment starts with the molecular characterisation of the GMP. If the GMP or products derived from it are to be consumed, the evaluation of its composition, potential toxicity and/or allergenicity, and nutritional value constitute further cornerstones of the process. The environmental risk assessment (ERA) considers biotic and abiotic interactions and the impacts of the management of the GM plant when it is intended for cultivation. In the case of GM trees special emphasis would be placed on assessing their characteristic features such as their longevity, ability to disperse and their ecological significance in a range of environments. The outcome of the assessment is reflected in a published opinion from the EFSA GMO panel that indicates whether the GMP and its products raise any safety issues. This scientific opinion constitutes one of the elements taken into account by the different European regulatory authorities prior to a decision regarding authorisation to commercialise the product.

Keywords

GM Trees, Genetically Modified, Transgenic, Recombinant DNA, Risk Identification, Risk Characterization, Exposure Assessment

Authors’ address

(1)

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), v. Carlo Magno 1/a, I-43126 Parma (Italy)

(2)

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, N9037 Tromsø (Norway)

(3)

Genøk-Center for Biosafety, Science Park, N9024 Tromsø (Norway)

(4)

Sweet Environmental Consultants, 6 Green Street, Willingham, CB24 5JA Cambridge (UK)

Corresponding author

J Aguilera
jaime.aguilera@efsa.europa.eu

Citation

Aguilera J, Nielsen KM, Sweet J (2013). Risk assessment of GM trees in the EU: current regulatory framework and guidance. iForest 6: 127-131. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0101-006

Academic Editor

Gabriele Bucci

Paper history

Received: Dec 19, 2012
Accepted: Mar 01, 2013

First online: Apr 08, 2013
Publication Date: Jun 01, 2013
Publication Time: 1.27 months

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 55508
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 46325
Abstract Page Views: 2718
PDF Downloads: 4832
Citation/Reference Downloads: 96
XML Downloads: 1537

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 4245
Overall contacts: 55508
Avg. contacts per week: 91.53

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

Total number of cites (since 2013): 7
Average cites per year: 0.64

(no Plumx Metrics available for this paper)

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ^©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

(1)

Ahuja RM (2009)
Transgene stability and dispersal in forest trees. Trees 6: 1125-1135.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(2)

Bialozyt R (2012)
Gene flow in poplar - experiments, analysis and modeling to prevent transgene outcrossing. iForest 5: 147-152.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(3)

Brunner A, Li J, DiFazio SP, Shevchenko O, Montgomery BE, Mohamed R, Wei H, Ma C, Elias AA, VanWormer K, Strauss S (2007)
Genetic containment of forest plantations. Tree Genetics and Genomes 3: 75-100.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(4)

Codex Alimentarius (2009)
Foods derived from modern biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Rome.
Online | Gscholar

(5)

DiFazio SP, Slavov, GT, Burzyk J, Leonardi S, Strauss SH (2004)
Gene flow from tree plantations and implications for transgenic risk assessment. In: “Plantation Forest Biotechnology for the 21^st Century” (Walter C, Carson M eds). Research Signpost, India, pp. 405-422.
Gscholar

(6)

EC (2001)
Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union, L106, pp. 1-39.
Gscholar

(7)

EC (2002)
Commission Decision (2002/623/EC) of 24 July 2002 establishing guidance notes supplementing Annex II to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 200, pp. 22-33.
Gscholar

(8)

EC (2003)
Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed. Official Journal of the European Union, L 268, pp. 1-23.
Gscholar

(9)

EFSA (2009)
Scientific opinion on guidance for the risk assessment of genetically modified plants used for non-food or non-feed purposes. EFSA Journal 1164: 1-42.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(10)

EFSA (2010)
Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 8: 1879.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(11)

EFSA (2011a)
Scientific opinion on guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 9: 2150.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(12)

EFSA (2011b)
Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. EFSA Journal 9: 2316.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(13)

Firbank LG (2008)
Assessing the ecological impacts of bioenergy projects. Bioenergy Research 1: 12-19.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(14)

Fladung M (2011)
Genetically modified trees for a sustainable, environmentally responsible and resource-saving production of wood for energy production. Gesunde Planzen 63: 101-110.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(15)

Fladung M, Altosaar I, Bartsch D, Baucher M, Boscaleri F, Gallardo F, Häggman H, Hoenicka H, Nielsen K. M, Paffetti D, Séguin A, Stotzky G, Vettori C (2012)
European discussion forum on transgenic tree biosafety. Nature Biotechnology 30: 37-38.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(16)

Harfouche A, Meilan R, Altman A (2011)
Tree genetic engineering and applications to sustainable forestry and biomass production. Trends in Biotechnology 29: 9-17.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(17)

Harfouche A, Meilan R, Kirst M, Morgante M, Boerjan W, Sabatti M, Scarascia Mugnozza G (2012)
Accelerating the domestication of forest trees in a changing world. Trends in Plant Science 17: 64-72.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(18)

Hoenicka H, Fladung M (2006)
Biosafety in Populus spp. and other forest trees: from non-native species to taxa derived from traditional breeding and genetic engineering. Trees 20: 131-144.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(19)

Kikuchi A, Watanabe K, Tanaka Y, Kamada H (2008)
Recent progress on environmental biosafety assessment of genetically modified trees and floricultural plants in Japan. Plant Biotechnology 25: 9-15.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(20)

OECD (2012a)
Safety assessment of transgenic organisms: OECD Consensus Documents. Web site, OECD, Paris.
Online | Gscholar

(21)

OECD (2012b)
OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Web site, OECD, Paris.
Online | Gscholar

(22)

Walter C, Fladung M, Boerjan W (2010)
The 20-year environmental safety record of GM trees. Nature Biotechnology 28: 656-658.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(23)

Whitham TG, Bailey JK, Schweitzer JA, Shuster SM, Bangert RK, LeRoy CJ, et al. (2006)
A framework for community and ecosystem genetics: from genes to ecosystems. Nature Reviews Genetics 7: 510-523.
CrossRef | Gscholar

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Contents

Search

Journal Info

Journal Subjects and Fields

For Authors

For Reviewers

For Readers

SISEF Publishing

Search iForest Contents