*

Slope shape effect on runoff and soil erosion under natural rainfall conditions

Hüseyin Sensoy (1)   , Ömer Kara (2)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 110-114 (2014)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0845-007
Published: Dec 18, 2013 - Copyright © 2014 SISEF

Research Articles


Slope is often non-uniform along the hillslope, with variations describing concave and convex shapes associated with natural hillslopes. This is because runoff generations vary significantly over short distances, with changes in surface alteration during or between flow events on different slope shapes. The aim of this research is to determine the effects of slope shapes on runoff and soil erosion. A field experiment was conducted from September 2007 to September 2009 on hillside field plots located in the northern part of the city of Bartin in northwestern Turkey. The experiment focused on complex topography including uniform, concave, and convex slopes. Nine experimental field plots were established on a 30 per cent slope, including three replications of field plots per different shape treatment. Runoff and soil loss by water erosion were measured in these plots under natural rainfall conditions. A total of 158 rainy days and 69 runoff events were registered over the period of investigation. Runoff and soil loss were greater in uniform plots than in concave and convex plots. The greatest amount of runoff was measured between September 2007 and August 2008 (Period1: P1), with 211.53 mm from uniform plot1 and during September 2008 and August 2009 (Period2: P2) with 430.06 mm from uniform plot3. The lowest runoff quantities with 157.44 and 371.63 mm from concave plot3 and concave plot1, respectively, were measured at P1 and P2. The highest soil loss was recorded at 2.97 kg m-2 and 6.16 kg m-2 during P1 and P2 from uniform plot2 and uniform plot3, respectively, and soil loss was lowest from concave plot3 and concave plot1, with a total of 0.23 kg m-2 and 0.67 kg m-2, respectively. The distribution of eroded soil was separated into >2 mm (coarse) and ≤2 mm (fine) size classes, and suspended quantity in runoff was also determined. Results indicated that the majority of soil lost from the uniform plots is composed of fine particles rather than coarse and suspended material. On the other hand, both concave and convex slopes demonstrated larger variability in the size distribution of eroded particles from individual plots.

  Keywords


Slope Shape, Runoff, Soil Erosion, Field Plot, Rainfall

Authors’ address

(1)
Hüseyin Sensoy
Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Bartin, TR-74100 Bartin (Turkey)
(2)
Ömer Kara
Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Forestry, Karadeniz Technical University, TR-61080 Trabzon (Turkey)

Corresponding author

 
Hüseyin Sensoy
hsensoy@bartin.edu.tr

Citation

Sensoy H, Kara Ö (2014). Slope shape effect on runoff and soil erosion under natural rainfall conditions. iForest 7: 110-114. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0845-007

Academic Editor

Giustino Tonon

Paper history

Received: Oct 30, 2012
Accepted: Jul 15, 2013

First online: Dec 18, 2013
Publication Date: Apr 02, 2014
Publication Time: 5.20 months

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 25432
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 18826
Abstract Page Views: 422
PDF Downloads: 5232
Citation/Reference Downloads: 47
XML Downloads: 905

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 2352
Overall contacts: 25432
Avg. contacts per week: 75.69

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Jan 2020)

Total number of cites (since 2014): 10
Average cites per year: 1.25

 

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

 
(1)
Agassi M, Bradford JM (1999)
Methodologies for interrill soil erosion studies. Soil Tillage Research 49: 277-287.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(2)
Aryal SK, Mein RG, O’Loughlin EM (2003)
The concept of effective length in hillslopes: assessing the influence of climate and topography on the contributing areas of catchments. Hydrological Processes 17: 131-151.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(3)
Assouline S, Ben-Hur M (2006)
Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on the dynamics of interrill erosion during soil surface sealing. Catena 66: 211-220.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(4)
Bagarello V, Ferro V (2004)
Plot-scale measurement of soil erosion at the experimental area of Sparacia (southern Italy). Hydrological Processes 18: 141-157.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(5)
Bagarello V, Ferro V (2010)
Analysis of soil loss data from plots of differing length for the Sparacia experimental area, Sicily, Italy. Biosystems Engineering 105 (3): 411-422.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(6)
Boix-Fayos C, Martinez-Mena M, Arnau-Rosalen E, Calvo-Cases A, Castillo V, Albaladejo J (2006)
Measuring soil erosion by field plots: understanding the sources of variation. Earth-Sciences Reviews 78: 267-285.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(7)
Bracken LJ, Kirkby MJ (2005)
Differences in hillslope runoff and sediment transport rates within two semi-arid catchments in southeast Spain. Geomorphology 68: 183-200.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(8)
Chaplot VAM, Le Bissonnais Y (2003)
Runoff features for interrill erosion at different rainfall intensities, slope lengths, and gradients, in an agricultural loessial hillslope. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67: 844-851.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(9)
Gabriels D (1999)
The effect of slope length on the amount and size distribution of eroded silt loam soils: short slope laboratory experiments on interrill erosion. Geomorphology 28: 169-172.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Gascuel Odoux C, Cros-Cayot S, Durand P (1996)
Spatial variations of sheet flow and sediment transport on an agricultural field. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 21: 843-851.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(11)
Hancock GR, Loch RJ, Willgoose GR (2003)
The design of post-mining landscapes using geomorphic principles. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 28: 1097-1110.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(12)
Huang C, Gascuel Odoux C, Cros-Cayot S (2001)
Hillslope topographic and hydrologic effects on overland flow and erosion. Catena 46: 177-188.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(13)
Kara O, Sensoy H, Bolat I (2010)
Slope length effects on microbial biomass and activity of eroded sediments. Journal of Soils and Sediments 10: 434-439.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Kinnell PIA (2000)
The effect of slope length on sediment concentrations associated with side-slope erosion. Soil Science Society of America Journal 64: 1004-1008.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Kinnell PIA (2007)
Runoff dependent erosivity and slope length factors suitable for modeling annual erosion using the universal soil loss equation. Hydrological Processes 21: 2681-2689.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(16)
Liu BY, Nearing MA, Risse LM (1994)
Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 37: 1835-1840.
Gscholar
(17)
Meyer DL, Kramer AL (1969)
Erosion equations predict land slope development. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 50: 522-523.
Gscholar
(18)
Moreno de las Heras M, Nicolau JM, Merino-Martin L, Wilcox BP (2010)
Plot-scale effects on runoff and erosion along a slope degradation gradient. Water Resources Research 46 (4): 4503
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Parsons AJ, Brazier RE, Wainwright J, Powell DM (2006)
Scale relationships in hillslope runoff and erosion. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 31: 1384-1393.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Rejman J, Brodowski R (2005)
Rill characteristics and sediment transport as a function of slope length during a storm event on loess soil. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30: 231-239.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(21)
Rieke-Zapp DH, Nearing MA (2005)
Slope shape effects on erosion: A laboratory study. Soil Science Society of America Journal 69: 1463-1471.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(22)
Römkens MJM, Helming K, Prasad SN (2001)
Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes. Catena 46: 103-123.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(23)
Wendt RC, Alberts EE, Hjelmfelt AT Jr. (1986)
Variability of runoff and soil loss from fallow experimental plots. Soil Science Society of America Journal 50: 730-736.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(24)
Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978)
Predicting rainfall erosion losses. A guide to conservation planning. USDA Agricultural Handbook 537, Washington, DC, pp. 58.
Gscholar
(25)
Young RA, Mutchler CK (1969a)
Effect of slope shape on erosion and runoff. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 12: 231-233.
Gscholar
(26)
Young RA, Mutchler CK (1969b)
Soil movement on irregular slopes. Water Resources Research 5: 1084-1089.
CrossRef | Gscholar
 

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info