## Diversity pattern of vegetation in and around proposed Kotlibhel hydroelectric project along the Alaknanda River in Garhwal Himalaya (India)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 38-43 (2011)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0557-004

Technical Reports

The study made an assessment of the floral status of the project site of Kotlibhel hydrolectric project (Stage 1B) at Alaknanda valley in the Ganga river system (India). Study area included two broad zones: Influence (IZ) and Submergence zone (SZ). Influence zone showed higher species richness in all vegetation strata. In the upper layer, there were 26 tree species, middle layer consisted of 32 shrub species and ground layer (understory) contained 41 species. Maximum density in the tree layer (36.4 plants/ha) was found for Haldinia cordifolia in the Influence zone. On the other hand, shrub and herb species showed highest density in the Submergence zone. Highest density of shrubs species was recorded for Ficus hederacea (844.0 plants/ha), while highest density of herbs for Desmodium triflorum (5540.1 plants/ha). Significant differences in Shannon diversity were found between Influence and Submergence zones for shrub and herb species (P<0.001), but not for trees. Simpson diversity was not significantly different for tree, shrub and herb species in both zones. Differences in Margalef species richness were found (P<0.001) for all vegetation layers in both zones. Distribution pattern of the species showed contagious patterns for both Submergence and Influence zone. Maximum Shannon diversity (3.561) was recorded in the Influence zone for herb species, followed by shrubs species (3.184) and tree species (2.593). Submergence zone showed lower Shannon diversity than the Influence zone, where a higher Shannon diversity (3.480) was recorded for herb species. Pinus roxburghii showed the highest IVI in the Influence zone (71.88) and Mangifera indica in Submergence zone (58.77).

# Introduction

Forests are being degraded and fragmented rapidly in the Indian subcontinent. The human influences on biodiversity and ecosystem are rapid and large, leading to frequent changes in land and resource use, increased frequency of biotic invasions, reduction in species number, creation of stresses and the potential for changes in the climate system ([9]). The loss of biodiversity actually hampers and contrasts economic development ([8]). The depletion of biodiversity is an alarming problem of the world. The rate of extinction has been enhanced by human-related habi-tat loss and climate change ([19]). Land and water resources are limited and their wide utilization is increasing, especially for countries like India, where population pressure is continuously increasing ([21]). The implications of these are remarkable, as will lose crucial life-supporting systems through the loss of important habitats, undermining rural livelihoods because of the degradation of natural resources on which people depend. It shall also diminish economic opportunities, as options for developing medicines and foods will reduce and the natural resource base for tourism will be damaged. Transfer of forest and agricultural lands to industries, hydroelectricity and thermal electricity projects, etc. are current investments. But what do we do to compensate the loss of the agriculture and forest? This is important in a context where the 70% of the country population lives in villages and depends on agriculture and forest for his livelihood. In addition, social and environmental aspects also need attention. Everybody knows why and to what extent forest resources are essential to protect life on earth. Therefore, documentation on current habitat structure and resource distribution and richness is necessary to estimate their loss. Biodiversity is also being depleted because of legal and illegal trade in economically and medicinally important species ([19]). Keeping in view the necessity of documentation on flora degradation before now, a study was conducted in the project area of Kotlibhel hydroelectric power project 1B (KHEP-1B) in Uttarakhand. The project is likely to submerge about 502.35 ha of land, classified as “Submergence zone”. Some of the areas around the reservoir are also going to be disturbed due to different project related activity and was classified as “Influence zone” The present study deals with the diversity pattern and vegetation characters of the Influence and Submergence zone of the KHEP-1B.

# Methodology

To analyze plant diversity, a study was conducted in the area of about 350 km2 along rivers Alaknanda and Ganga between Srinagar and Devprayag. The area covers a stretch of about 30 km long and 7 km wide.

The vegetational analysis was conducted since June 2005 to Feb 2006. The study area was divided into two subareas: “Influence zone” (IZ) and “Submergence zone” (SZ) along the reservoir, as proposed by the Dam authority. The area subjected to submersion up to full reservoir level (FRL - approx. 325 m a.s.l.) was considered as submergence zone and the area along the reservoir up to 7 km radius around the reservoir was considered as influence zone. Some 8 transects were analyzed in the entire study area: Supana-Sundari, Switpul-Swit, Bhallagaun-Hakgaun, Bagwan-Golta, Mullagaun-Kothi, Gunkhal-Semi, Dhanchera-Pali and Saud- Sariyakhal. Each transect was 1500 m long, from the river water level along an increasing altitudinal gradient (Fig. 1). Transects were spatially distributed so as to minimize the autocorrelation among the vegetation. Along each transect, six circular plots (each of 10 m radius) at 200 m intervals were sampled. Circular plots were used for sampling due to undulating surface of the study area. Trees in circular plots were enumerated.

Fig. 1 - The study area.

Within each 10 m radius plot, a nested circular plot of 5 m radius was sampled for recording shrubs, whereas four nested circular plots of 1 m radius were established for herbs analisys. Herbs were recorded by point-intercept method for their proportional representation in the area. In order to prepare a checklist and best represent the species from the area, an intensive search was made by re-tracing belt transects in three different seasons.

Species characterized by short stature, including annual or biennial herbs, and by spiny structures (thorns and spines) were classified as shrubs. Herbs included shade- loving, annual, biennial or perennial, herbaceous species. Trees with cbh (circumference at breast height, i.e., 1.37 m above the ground) > 31.5 cm were individually counted in the 10 m radius plot. Herbarium sheets of species which could not be identified in the field were prepared, and identified later at the Department of Botany, HNB Garhwal University. Taxa names were assigned after the nomenclature proposed by Bentham & Hooker ([2]).

Frequency, density, abundance and their relative values for each species were obtained using the equations reported below ([11]). The Important Value Index (IVI) for different species was calculated as sum of relative frequency (RF), relative density (RD) and relative abundance (A) of each species as follows (eqn. 1):

$$IVI = RF + RV + A$$

AF ratio for different species was determined for eliciting the distribution pattern in terms of regular (AF<0.025), random (AF=0.025-0.05) and contagious (AF>0.05), as follows ([4] - eqn. 2):

$$AF = \frac{Abundance}{Frequency}$$

The Shannon’s ([17]) H’ and Simpson’s ([18]) D diversity indices were independently obtained as follows (eqn. 3, eqn. 4):

$$H^{\prime} = - \sum p_{i} \ln p_{i}$$
$$D = \sum p_{i}^{2}$$

where pi represents the proportional abundance of i-th species in any given transect.

Species richness (SR) was calculated (eqn. 5) following Margalef ([12]):

$$SR = \frac{S - 1} {\ln(N)}$$

where S is the number of species and N the total number of individuals of all species.

# Results

## Vegetation analysis

In tree layer of IZ, maximum density (36.4 plants/ha) and frequency (95.8 %) was observed for Haldinia cordifolia followed by Pinus roxburghii (density: 33.1 plants/ha; frequency: 89.6 %) and Holoptelea integrifolia (density: 29.2 plants/ha; frequency: 77.1 %). The IVI of different species ranged between 1.43 to 71.88 in IZ. Within SZ highest density (33.8 plants/ha) was recorded for Lannea coromendelica and lowest density (1.3 plants/ha) was recorded for Celtis australis, Ougenia ooginansis and Terminalia chebula. In this zone maximum frequency (31.3 %) was also found for Lannea coromendelica followed by Pinus roxburghii (29.2 %) and Holoptelea integrifolia (27.1). The IVI values of different species within SZ were between 1.73 to 58.77 (Tab. 1).

Tab. 1 - Vegetational characteristics of tree species in the Influence and Submergence zones of the study area. (NR): species present but not recorded within sampled quadrate; (Abs): absent. For the list of additional species found outside the sample plots, see Tab. SM1 in Supplementary Material.

Species Influence zone Submergence zone
Den Abu Fre IVI A/F Den Abu Fre IVI A/F
Acacia catechu 7.3 1.83 12.5 9.25 0.15 22.5 2.33 18.8 29.31 0.1
Aegle marmalos 9.3 2 14.6 10.05 0.14 13.9 2.62 27.1 14.24 0.12
Albizia lebbek 4 2 6.3 3.53 0.32 2 1 6.3 3.71 0.16
Bauhinia variegata 2.7 1.33 6.3 3.67 0.21 Abs
Bombex cieba 4 1.5 8.3 9.65 0.18 9.3 2 14.6 10.64 0.14
Carica papaya 1.3 1 4.2 1.63 0.24 NR
Cassia fistula 2 1.5 4.2 2.61 0.36 6.6 3.33 6.3 6.46 0.53
Celtis australis NR 1.3 2 2.1 1.73 0.96
Dalbergia sissoo 2 1 6.3 4.07 0.16 2 1.5 4.2 3.45 0.36
Delonix regia 0.7 1 2.1 1.74 0.48 Abs
Eucalyptus camaldulensis Abs 4.6 7 2.1 11.14 3.36
Ficus religiosa NR 3.3 2.5 4.2 3.55 0.6
Grevillia robusta NR 2.7 4 2.1 3.76 1.92
Haldinia cordifolia 36.4 1.2 95.8 46.99 0.01 8 4 6.3 8.73 0.64
Holoptelea integrifolia 29.2 1.19 77.1 37.55 0.02 26.5 3.08 27.1 23.87 0.11
Juglans regia 1.3 2 2.1 1.43 0.96 Abs
Lannea coromendelica 3.3 1.25 8.3 7.06 0.15 33.8 3.4 31.3 31.71 0.11
Leucaena leucocephala 4 2 6.3 4.38 0.32 9.3 2.8 10.4 8.68 0.27
Mallotus philippensis 27.8 1.2 72.9 33.57 0.02 25.8 2.6 31.3 26.14 0.08
Mangifera indica 6.6 2.5 8.3 23.6 0.3 12.6 2.71 14.6 58.77 0.19
Melia azedarach 4 2 6.3 4.34 0.32 6 3 6.3 5.55 0.48
Morus alba 4 3 4.2 4.29 0.72 NR
Musa paradisca 2.7 2 4.2 2.29 0.48 Abs
Ougenia ooginansis NR 1.3 1 4.2 6.71 0.24
Phyllanthus emblica 2 1.5 4.2 2.05 0.36 Abs
Pinus roxburghii 33.1 1.16 89.6 71.88 0.01 32.5 3.5 29.2 38.96 0.12
Pyrus phasia 1.3 1 4.2 1.64 0.24 Abs
Syzygium cumini 4.6 2.33 6.3 4.52 0.37 NR
Tectona grandis 1.3 1 4.2 2.24 0.24 Abs
Terminalia chebula 1.3 2 2.1 2.11 0.96 1.3 2 2.1 2.91 0.96
Toona hexandra 3.3 1.25 8.3 3.84 0.15 NR
Total 199.4 - - 300 - 225.3 - - 300 -

In the IZ shrub layer, Murrya koenigii was the dominant species with maximum frequency (100%), density (589.2 plants/ha) and IVI (14.5), while in the SZ Ficus hederacea was the dominant shrub with highest frequency (89.6 %), density (844.0 plants/ ha) and IVI (35.14). Minimum density (8.0 plants/ha) was observed for Eupatorium adenophorum and Rhus parviflora. Lowest frequency (4.2 %) was also observed for Eupatorium adenophorum, Rhus parviflora and Urtica dioica (Tab. 2).

Tab. 2 - Vegetational characteristics of shrub species in the Influence and Submergence zones of the study area. (NR): species present but not recorded within sampled quadrate; (Abs): absent. For the list of additional species found outside the sample plots, see Tab. SM2 in Supplementary Material.

Species Influence zone Submergence zone
Den Abu Fre IVI A/F Den Abu Fre IVI A/F
Adathoda zeylanica 299.9 2.8 83.3 9.3 0.03 146 1.49 77.1 15.12 0.02
Aerva sanquinolenta 66.4 1.5 35.4 3.1 0.04 53.1 3.33 12.5 3.23 0.27
Agave fastigata 108.8 2.4 35.4 3.7 0.07 45.1 3.4 10.4 2.72 0.33
Artemisia roxburghiana 400.8 3.4 93.8 11.4 0.04 47.8 3.6 10.4 2.79 0.35
Asparagus adscendens 100.9 5.4 14.6 2.3 0.37 NR
Bambusa arundinaceae 74.3 3.5 16.7 2.1 0.21 106.2 3.33 25 6.46 0.13
Barleria cristata 467.1 3.7 100 12.7 0.04 42.5 2 16.7 3.56 0.12
Cajanus mollis 98.2 3.4 22.9 2.8 0.15 61 2.09 22.9 4.96 0.09
Cannavis sativa 456.5 4 89.6 11.9 0.05 NR
Carrisa opeca 355.7 2.8 100 11.1 0.03 506.9 4.66 85.4 25.9 0.06
Cassia tora 169.9 1.8 72.9 6.8 0.03 124.7 3.13 31.3 7.87 0.1
Colebrookia oppositifolia 164.6 4.1 31.3 4.2 0.13 39.8 2.14 14.6 3.18 0.15
Cotinus coggygria 55.7 4.2 10.4 1.4 0.4 90.2 4.25 16.7 4.82 0.26
Debregeasia longifolia 47.8 3 12.5 1.4 0.24 18.6 2.33 6.3 1.4 0.37
Eupatorium adenophorum 292 2.8 83.3 9.2 0.03 8 1.5 4.2 0.82 0.36
Euphorbia royleana 63.7 2.7 18.8 2 0.14 18.6 2.33 6.3 1.4 0.37
Ficus hederacea 103.5 2.6 31.3 3.4 0.08 844 7.57 89.6 35.14 0.09
Lantana camara 453.9 3.6 100 12.5 0.04 499 4.7 83.3 25.39 0.06
Murrya koenigii 589.2 4.6 100 14.5 0.05 29.2 2.2 10.4 2.29 0.21
Nyctanthes arbo-tritis 84.9 3.6 18.8 2.3 0.19 100.9 4.75 16.7 5.11 0.29
Pueraria tuberosa 63.7 4 12.5 1.7 0.32 809.5 7.09 87.5 34.53 0.08
Pupalia lapaca 61 1.9 25 2.4 0.08 NR
Reinwardtia indica 90.2 1.7 41.7 3.8 0.04 NR
Rhus parviflora 445.9 3.7 93.8 12 0.04 8 1.5 4.2 0.82 0.36
Ricinus communsis 483.1 3.8 100 12.9 0.04 NR
Rubus ellipticus 464.5 3.8 95.8 12.4 0.04 Abs
Sida cordifolia 98.2 1.4 54.2 4.7 0.03 NR
Tephrosia candida 236.2 3.7 50 6.4 0.07 50.4 4.75 8.3 2.55 0.57
Urtica dioica 50.4 2.4 16.7 1.7 0.14 10.6 2 4.2 0.89 0.48
Woodfordia fruiticosa 172.5 2.6 52.1 5.6 0.05 21.2 2 8.3 1.78 0.24
Xanthium indicum 90.2 3.4 20.8 2.5 0.16 NR
Ziziphus oxyphylla 252.1 5.6 35.4 5.7 0.16 90.2 2.13 33.3 7.26 0.06
Total 6961.9 - - 200 - 3771.6 - - 200 -

In the IZ herb layer, Chrysopogon aciculatus showed highest density (5506.9 plants/ha) followed by Cynadon dactylon (3781.8 plants/ha) and Evolvulus alsinoides (3416.9 plants/ha). These species have also maximum frequency (100 %) among all herb species. The observed IVI for herb species was between 1.59 to 16.52 in this zone. On the other hand, in the SZ highest density (5540.1 plants/ha) was calculated for Desmodium triflorum followed by Heteropogon melanocarpus (5490.3 plants/ha) and Heteropogon controtus (5457.1 plants/ha), whereas maximum frequency (96.4 %) was recorded for Heteropogon melanocarpus and lowest frequency (13.5 %) for Digitaria ciliaris. The observed IVI value in this zone ranged between 2.87 to 14.25 (Tab. 3).

Tab. 3 - Vegetational characteristics of herb species in the Influence and Submergence zones of the study area. (NR): species present but not recorded within sampled quadrate; (Abs): absent. For the list of additional species found outside the sample plots, see Tab. SM3 in Supplementary Material.

Species Influence zone Submergence zone
Den Abu Fre IVI A/F Den Abu Fre IVI A/F
Ajuga bracteosa 1791.4 0.97 44.3 6.3 0.03 1161.1 2.05 19.8 2.97 0.09
Alysicarpus bupleurifolius 2023.6 1.07 43.2 6.58 0.03 2023.6 1.83 29.7 4.82 0.07
Anaphalis adnata 1227.4 1.73 29.7 4.27 0.04 Abs
Artimissia capalaris 879.1 2.43 14.1 2.49 0.14 1857.7 1.3 29.7 4.6 0.07
Arundinella nepalensis 1061.6 1.54 15.1 2.86 0.15 NR
Bidens pilosa 1940.7 2 42.7 6.41 0.03 Abs
Brachiaria ramosa 597.1 1.96 8.9 1.63 0.24 1459.7 2 16.7 3.12 0.17
Cassia absus 1210.8 1.51 15.6 3.13 0.16 3715.5 1.43 58.3 9.13 0.03
Celosia argentea 1327 1.79 27.6 4.26 0.06 2537.8 1.37 37.5 6.06 0.06
Chrysopogon aciculatus 5506.9 1.45 100 16.52 0.02 1310.4 1.96 30.2 3.94 0.05
Chrysopogon fulvus 2040.2 1.66 51 7.22 0.03 1808 2.13 31.3 4.66 0.06
Crotolaria medicagina 663.5 1.47 13.5 2.11 0.11 1426.5 1.48 31.3 4.17 0.05
Cynadon dactylon 3781.8 1.76 100 13.81 0.01 4362.4 1.22 43.2 8.83 0.07
Cynoglosum glochidiatum 2703.7 2.75 49 8.1 0.04 928.9 1.45 22.4 2.87 0.06
Cyperus comprsssus 829.3 2.16 12 2.25 0.18 2040.2 2.14 42.7 5.81 0.04
Datura innoxia 1409.9 1.56 18.8 3.69 0.13 1973.9 2.87 24 4.32 0.11
Desmodium triflorum 3018.8 2.04 97.4 12.41 0.01 5540.1 2.08 84.9 13.45 0.02
Digitaria ciliaris 1575.8 1.43 19.8 4.03 0.13 1625.5 2.07 13.5 3.1 0.28
Eragrostis minor 1310.4 1.43 14.1 3.16 0.21 1443.1 1.32 24.5 3.68 0.08
Euphorbia hirta 1244 1.43 25 3.92 0.06 1360.1 1.94 32.3 4.16 0.04
Evolvulus alsinoides 3416.9 1.8 100 13.24 0.01 1758.2 1.84 30.2 4.51 0.06
Fumaria indica 879.1 1.76 13.5 2.45 0.15 1111.3 1.82 21.4 3.02 0.08
Galium aprine 978.6 2.36 14.6 2.69 0.14 1824.6 1.67 46.9 5.85 0.03
Geranium ocelatum 564 1.46 9.9 1.66 0.18 2007 2.59 42.7 5.77 0.04
Heteropogon controtus 1459.7 1.3 18.2 3.73 0.14 5457.1 2.05 89.6 13.7 0.02
Heteropogon melanocarpus NR 5490.3 2.09 96.4 14.25 0.02
Ipomoea hederifolia 514.2 2.23 9.9 1.59 0.17 1575.8 1.42 27.6 4.09 0.07
Leucas cephalotes 547.4 1.68 6.3 1.35 0.44 1277.2 1.82 19.3 3.08 0.11
Leucas lanata 1210.8 1.27 22.9 3.71 0.07 2471.5 1.85 53.6 7.18 0.03
Malva sylvestris 1327 1.73 19.3 3.6 0.11 1509.4 1.36 22.9 3.65 0.09
Micromaria biflora 2189.5 2.93 39.1 6.51 0.05 1426.5 1.91 15.6 3 0.18
Nepeta hindostana 1443.1 1.26 20.3 3.87 0.11 1210.8 1.79 18.2 2.92 0.11
Nicotiana plumbaginifolia 1161.1 2.51 25 3.79 0.06 1327 3.17 20.3 3.22 0.1
Origanum vulgare 1725 1.19 30.7 5.13 0.06 Abs
Oxalis corniculata 912.3 2.17 14.1 2.54 0.15 1608.9 1.5 26 4.01 0.07
Physalis divaricata 1177.7 2.21 25.5 3.86 0.06 2703.7 2.75 69.8 8.69 0.02
Rumx hastatus 1874.3 2.12 41.1 6.18 0.04 1874.3 3.77 32.3 4.82 0.06
Scutellaria scandems 1310.4 2.5 24.5 3.99 0.07 1741.6 1.22 38.5 5.12 0.04
Sedum multicaule 1127.9 2.11 17.7 3.17 0.11 2156.3 1.79 49.5 6.47 0.03
Sida rhombifolia 1111.3 1.63 22.9 3.55 0.07 1575.8 1.63 18.8 3.42 0.14
Sida cordata 1327 2.04 29.2 4.38 0.05 NR
Viola canescens 1310.4 1.52 22.9 3.86 0.08 1327 2.64 25 3.57 0.07
Total 63710.6 - - 200 - 78008.6 - - 200 -

## Distribution pattern

The abundance/frequency ratios (A/F) obtained showed that most of species were contagiously distributed in both IZ and SZ. In the tree layer, 84.5 % species were found in contagious pattern within IZ and 15.4% were randomly distributed. For shrubs in the IZ, 50% species were in contagious and 50% in random distribution, while in SZ 95.8% species were in contagious distribution and 4.2 % were in regular distribution pattern (Tab. 1, Tab. 2, Tab. 3).

## Diversity

Among all vegetation layer of IZ and SZ, the maximum number of species was encountered for the herb layer of IZ (41) and the minimum (20) for the tree layer in the SZ. Shannon diversity (H’) was highest for the herb layer of IZ (3.561) and minimum for shrub layer of the SZ (2.370). The Simpson diversity was ranging between 0.034 to 0.138. Margalef index showed maximum value for the herb layer in the IZ (4.8) and minimum (3.2) for shrub layer in the SZ (Tab. 4).

Tab. 4 - Diversity indices and species richness in the both zone of study area. IZ: Influence Zone; SZ: Submergence Zone

Diversity indices Tree Shrub Herb
IZ SZ IZ SZ IZ SZ
Species Richness 26 20 32 24 41 37
Shannon index (H) 2.430 2.643 3.184 2.37 3.561 3.48
Simpson index (CD) 0.134 0.086 0.050 0.138 0.034 0.036
Margalef index (SR) 4.6 4.0 3.9 3.2 4.8 4.3

Shannon and Simpson diversity indices for tree layer did not show significant differences between IZ and SZ after t-test. On the other hand, Margalef index for trees showed significant difference between these two zones (P<0.001, df. 13). Shannon diversity and Margalef indices for shrubs were significantly different bewteen IZ and SZ (P<0.001, df 12), while no significant differences were detected for Simpson diversity index. Herbs also showed the similar trend as shrubs of IZ and SZ.

# Discussion

Disturbance has become a widespread feature in most of the forest all over the Himalaya ([20]). Knowledge on ecological process and biotic pressure may help in understanding the persistence of long-lived plant communities. Tree density observed in this study is lower than that recorded for mid-elevational forests in Central Himalaya ([7]), but similar to those reported (5 to 325 plants/ha) by Sanjeev et al. ([15]) in a micro watershed area of Mussoorie in Garhwal Himalaya. Similarly, shrub densities in this study are lower than those reported by Hussain et al. ([5]) but similar to what observed by Khera et al. ([7]). Furthermore, Negi et al. ([13]) reported herb density in Garhwal Himalaya similar to that found in the present study.

The changes in the dispersion patterns may reflect the reactions of species to disturbance, as well as to changes in the habitat conditions ([14]). The analysis of species’ distribution pattern based on the A/F ratio indicated that most of the species of both zones were distributed in contagious pattern. Joshi & Tiwari ([6]) and Bhandari et al. ([3]) also reported a fairly similar distribution pattern of woody vegetation in different parts of Garhwal Himalaya.

Shannon species diversity (H′) and concentration of dominance (cd) of the present study sites are more or less similar to the values reported by Kunwar & Sharma ([10]) in a comparative study between two community forests in Dolpa district of mid-west Nepal. These values were comparable with those reported for the Chir pine forest in Garhwal Himalaya ([3]). The low diversity oberved in this investigation may be interpreted as due to greater anthropogenic pressure.

Species richness in out study showed higher values for ground vegetation (herbs), followed by shrubs and trees. Khera et al. ([7]) also found the same pattern of species richness. Hussain et al. ([5]) also found overall 63 tree, 56 shrub, 90 herb and 21 grass species in Kumaon Himalaya. In a comparative study between Panchayat and Reserve forest in Garhwal Himalaya, Negi et al. ([13]) reported a similar richness trend (Herb>Tree>Shrub). Saxena & Singh ([16]) have also recorded high species richness (4 to 22) and diversity (0.74 to 3.10) for shrub layer in Kumaun Himalaya. Influence zone showed a higher species richness in our study, while Adhikari et al. ([1]) found higher richness in the Submergence zone of the Tehri hydroelectric dam in Uttarakhand.

# Conclusion

The vegetation of the study area is important for sustaining the livelihood of local people. The present study suggests that the influence zone has the maximum species diversity and richness. Diversity was high where the dominance of canopy species was major and low near agricultural fields or on disturbed sites. The vegetation composition of both zones was found almost in similar pattern, though species richness was larger in the Influence zone. Hence, it may be hypothesized that after construction of proposed hydropower project there may be negligible effect on the species richness of the surrounding vegetation, but definitely a significant portion of the vegetation is going to be lost for ever. The change in landuse of riverine belt might also change the micro habitat requirement of many species. This of course require detailed investigation in order to conclude species specific impact of the proposed hydropower project.

# References

(1)
Adhikari BS, Uniyal SK, Rawat GS (2009). Vegetation structure and community patterns of Tehri Dam Submergence Zone, Uttarakhand, India. EurAsian Journal of Biosciences. 3: 40-49.
Gscholar
(2)
Bentham G, Hooker JD (1883). Genera Planta-rum (3 vols). London, UK.
Gscholar
(3)
Bhandari BS, Mehta JP, Tiwari SC (1998). Woody vegetation structure along an altitudinal gradient in a part of Garhwal Himalaya. Journal of Hill Research 11 (1): 26-31.
Gscholar
(4)
Curtis JT, Cottam G (1956). Plant ecology workbook. Laboratory field reference manual. Burgers Publication Co., MN, USA, pp. 193.
Gscholar
(5)
Hussain MS, Sulatana A, Khan JA, Khan A (2008). Species composition and community structure of forest stands in Kumaon Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Tropical Ecology 49 (2):167-181.
Online | Gscholar
(6)
Joshi NK, Tiwari SC (1990). Phytosociological analysis of woody vegetation along an altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalya. Indian Journal of Forestry 13 (4): 322-328.
Online | Gscholar
(7)
Khera N, Kumar A, Ram J, Tewari A (2001). Plant biodiversity assessment in relation to disturbances in mid elevation forest of Central Himalaya, India. International Society for Tropical Ecology 42 (1): 83-95.
Online | Gscholar
(8)
Kim KC, Weaver RD (1994). Biodiversity and landscapes. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, pp. 3-27.
Gscholar
(9)
Kumar A, Ram J (2005). Anthropogenic disturbances and plant biodiversity in forest of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 309-311.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(10)
Kunwar RM, Sharma SP (2004). Quantitative analysis of tree species in two community forests of Dolpa district, mid-west Nepal. Himalayan Journal of Sciences 2 (3): 23-28.
Gscholar
(11)
Misra R (1968). Ecology work book. Oxford and IBH publishing Co. New Delhi, India, pp. 244.
Gscholar
(12)
Margalef R (1958). Information theory in ecology. General Systems 3: 36-71.
Gscholar
(13)
Negi BS, Chauhan DS, Todaria NP (2008). Comparative plant diversity between panchayat and adjoining reserve forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Journal of Forestry 31(4): 585-593.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(14)
Sagar R, Rahgubanshi AS, Singh JS (2003). Comparison of community composition and species diversity of understory and overstory tree species in a dry tropical forest of northern India. Journal of Environment Management 88: 1037-1046.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(15)
Sanjeev B, Gera M, Sankhayan PL (2006). Phytosociological analysis of Arnigad micro watershed in Mussoorie hills of Garhwal Himalaya. Indian Forester 132 (1): 19-30.
Gscholar
(16)
Saxena AK, Singh JS (1982). A phytosociological analysis of woody species in forest in forest communities of a part of Kumaon Himalaya. Vegetatio 50: 2-3.
Gscholar
(17)
Shannon CE,Wiener W (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA, pp. 117.
Gscholar
(18)
Simpson EM (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(19)
Singh JS, Kushwaha SPS (2008). Forest biodiversity and conservation in India. International Forestry Review 10 (2): 292-304.
CrossRef | Gscholar
(20)
Singh JS, Singh SP (1992). Forests of Himalaya: structure, functioning and Impact of management. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital, India.
Gscholar
(21)
Vittala SS, Govindaiah S, Honne Gowda H (2008). Prioritization of sub-watersheds for sustainable development and management of natural resources: An integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and socio-economic data. Current Science 95 (3): 345-354.
Online | Gscholar

#### Authors’ Affiliation

(1)
V Singh
S Dasgupta
V Jhaldiyal
DS Chauhan
NP Todaria
Department of Forestry, HNB Gharwal University Campus, Srinagar, Garhwal, Uttarakhand (India)

#### Citation

Singh V, Dasgupta S, Jhaldiyal V, Chauhan DS, Todaria NP (2011). Diversity pattern of vegetation in and around proposed Kotlibhel hydroelectric project along the Alaknanda River in Garhwal Himalaya (India). iForest 4: 38-43. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0557-004

#### Paper history

Accepted: Dec 13, 2010

First online: Jan 27, 2011
Publication Date: Jan 27, 2011
Publication Time: 1.50 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2011

#### Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

#### Article Usage

Total Article Views: 29648
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 22037
Abstract Page Views: 1361

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 4174
Overall contacts: 29648
Avg. contacts per week: 49.72

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Jul 2021)

Total number of cites (since 2011): 2
Average cites per year: 0.18

#### iForest Database Search

Search By Author

Search By Keyword

Citing Articles

Search By Author

Search By Keywords

#### PubMed Search

Search By Author

Search By Keyword