iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Increasing dissolved organic carbon concentrations in freshwaters: what is the actual driver?

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 106-108 (2010)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor0546-003
Published: Jul 15, 2010 - Copyright © 2010 SISEF

Review Papers

Collection/Special Issue: NFZ Summer School 2009 - Birmensdorf (Switzerland)
Long-term ecosystem research: understanding the present to shape the future
Guest Editors: Marcus Schaub (WSL, Switzerland)

Since the beginning of the 1990s, an increase in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) has been observed in rivers and lakes in various parts of Europe and North America. The processes responsible for the increased DOC concentrations are complex and not entirely understood. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the recent debate about increases in the DOC concentrations in surface water and their possible drivers.

Dissolved organic carbon, Atmospheric deposition, Freshwater, Climate change


Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is a broad classification for organic molecules of varied origin and composition in aquatic systems. The size of these organic compounds is defined as the fraction that can pass through a 0.45µm filter. The main source of DOC is leaching of decomposed organic matter from soils into freshwater systems. In soil and water, DOC is an important source of carbon and energy for microorganisms and thus plays an important role in many chemical and photochemical reactions and transformations. These complex mechanisms make both aquatic ecosystems and the global carbon cycle sensitive to changes in DOC concentrations. Long-term observations over the last few decades show a steady increase in DOC in freshwaters. During a 12-year period (1988-2000), Freeman et al. ([10]) found an increase of 65% for a series of streams and lake catchments in the United Kingdom. Increases in DOC concentration are also evident in large areas of Europe and North America ([7], [14], [23], [26], [27], [28]). Using time series (1990-2004) of 522 remote streams and lakes in northern Europe and North America, Monteith et al. ([23]) found upward slopes for 70% of their analyzed time series. Some studies, however, report stagnating or negative trends ([9], [13], [17]). Whether there really is a widespread positive trend in DOC concentrations has been the subject of heated debates ([25], [30]).

Understanding the trends in DOC concentrations in surface water is important not only because of its role in the global carbon cycle ([1]), but also because changes can affect surface water pH and acid neutralizing capacity ([20]). In addition, high DOC concentrations reduce light penetration in water by giving it a brownish hue. This affects the aquatic productivity, which has implications for the aquatic food chain and lake stratification ([19]). An increase in DOC is generally beneficial for aquatic biota. Because organic molecules are strong complexing agents for toxic aluminium for a given level of total aluminium content, fish have a better chance of survival at higher DOC concentrations ([16]). On the other hand, an increased leaching of DOC from the soil is coupled with an increased leaching of metal ions and their transport into surface water ([22]). The resulting decrease in water quality and transparency increases the cost of water treatment. In order to protect surface water quality, it is essential to clarify the processes that lead to the dissolution and transfer of dissolved organic matter.

  Possible drivers of increased DOC 

Many researchers have tried to identify and evaluate the factors that govern both DOC production in the soil and its transport to the drainage network. In the following, we provide an overview of possible drivers that lead to increased DOC concentrations in freshwater.

Changes in air temperature

Changes in air temperature may directly influence DOC export from peat soils by altering decomposition and mineralization of organic matter, both sensible to changes in moisture and temperature ([6], [10], [30], [32]). Hence, greater soil aeration under warmer and dryer conditions will increase decomposition through greater enzymatic activity. Although these authors argue that climate change leads to greater DOC concentrations in freshwater systems, Evans et al. ([5]) noted that no quantitative process-based data are available to prove that this mechanism affects DOC production. Other field and laboratory studies indicate that DOC concentrations are not responsive to warming ([11]). Experimental tests suggest that more than 10 °C of additional warming would be required to yield increase in DOC, a level of change not anticipated by even the most pessimistic IPCC scenario. Monteith et al. ([23]) also found no correlation between regional temperature patterns and DOC trends.

Increased precipitations

Increased precipitation alters the water budget and discharge, which then increases DOC concentrations ([15]). This can affect the mass of DOC export independently of any changes in DOC concentrations. However, various analyses of stream water suggest no consistent hydrologic trends in recent decades ([7], [21]).

Land use changes

Land use changes, such as altered forestry practices ([29]), draining of peatlands ([32]), or changes in grazing or burning of grassland and peatlands ([12]), can also influence the retention and the export of organic carbon from catchments. However, Monteith et al. ([23]) did not find any consistent land use changes in northern Europe and North America where increasing DOC trends had been observed.

Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide

Increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) stimulates primary plant production, as shown in laboratory experiments ([11]). Under elevated CO2 levels, the proportion of DOC in the soil solution derived from recently assimilated CO2 was ten times higher compared to the control ([11]). However, the magnitude of the ambient CO2 increase measured at global monitoring stations since 1990 amounts to only 8% of the concentration used in the experiments, and even laboratory experiments failed to reproduce the magnitude of DOC increase ([22]).

Decreased atmospheric sulphur deposition

Decreased atmospheric sulphur deposition is subject of several recent studies suggesting to influence patterns and trends in DOC concentrations in freshwaters ([2], [3], [31]). Increases in both acidity of soils and ionic strength of soil solution (associated with a high sulfate loading) reduce soil solution DOC concentrations ([18]). Monteith et al. ([23]) showed that DOC concentrations have increased in proportion to the rates at which atmospherically deposited anthropogenic sulphur and sea salt have declined. In contrast, Hudson et al. ([16]) observed no correlation of DOC with sulphate deposition.

Accumulation of atmospherically deposited nitrogen

Accumulation of atmospherically deposited nitrogen is proposed to increase DOC concentrations because of higher rates of soil microbial decomposition ([8]). Nitrogen retention can improve ecosystem productivity, resulting in increased litter production. It can influence the rate of carbon mineralization in litter and soil. However, as many regions in northern Europe and North America are already at a nitrogen saturation level, further nitrogen deposition does not necessarily lead to increasing DOC leaching ([23]).

  State of current research 

Based on the work of Evans et al. ([5]), Roulet & Moore ([25]) concluded that the origin and interactions of DOC in hydrological catchments are very difficult to determine because many of the processes occurring are still unknown. Tools that may help to determine the age and origin of DOC in rivers and lakes are analyses of its chemical composition or its14 C and13 C isotopic signature ([25]). Eimers et al. ([4]) note an important issue about differences in reporting methods. Some studies consider changes in average measured DOC whereas others compute discharge weighted concentrations. These differences in reporting methods and varying record length complicate the comparison of the results among studies and regional generalization. Due to contradictory findings reported in literature, Porcal et al. ([24]) point out that descriptive studies have their limitations and that detailed modelling studies that integrate key mechanisms are considered necessary to allow testing of various scenarios. They also mention the need for more studies investigating how run-off and temperature related changes in DOC affect metal and nutrient export to rivers and lakes.


Increasing DOC concentrations have been observed in lakes and streams throughout large areas of Europe and North America. Although several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this widespread phenomenon, Evans et al. ([5]) argue that none is particularly convincing. For these authors, the most realistic mechanism is a complex interaction of changing atmospheric deposition and rising temperature. This short review of recent literature shows that it is not possible to explain the increase in DOC by one single driver for all sites.


We would like to thank the organizers of the 5th NFZ Summer School, who gave us the opportunity to write this short paper, especially Marcus Schaub. We would also like to acknowledge the valuable commentaries provided by two anonymous reviewers.


Battin TJ, Luyssaert S, Kaplan LA, Aufdenkampe AK, Richter A, Tranvik LJ (2009). The boundless carbon cycle. Nature Geoscience 2: 598-600.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Clark JM, Chapman PJ, Adamson JK, Lane SN (2005). Influence of drought-induced acidification on the mobility of dissolved organic carbon in peat soils. Global Change Biology 11: 791-809.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Clark JM, Chapman PJ, Heathwaite AL, Adamson JK (2006). Suppression of dissolved organic carbon by sulfate induced acidification during simulated droughts. Environmental Science and Technology 40: 1776-1783.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Eimers MC, Watmough SA, Buttle JM (2008). Long-term trends in dissolved organic carbon concentration: a cautionary note. Biogeochemistry 87: 71-81.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Evans CD, Chapman PJ, Clark JM, Monteith DT, Cresser MS (2006). Alternative explanations for rising dissolved organic carbon export from organic soils. Global Change Biology 12: 2044-2053.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Evans CD, Freeman C, Monteith DT, Reynolds B, Fenner N (2002). Climate change - Terrestrial export of organic carbon - Reply. Nature 415: 862-862.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Evans CD, Monteith DT, Cooper DM (2005). Long-term increases in surface water dissolved organic carbon: Observations, possible causes and environmental impacts. Environmental Pollution 137: 55-71.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Findlay S (2005). Increased carbon transport in the Hudson River: unexpected consequence of nitrogen deposition? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3: 133-137.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Forsius M, Vuorenmaa J, Mannio J, Syri S (2003). Recovery from acidification of Finnish lakes: regional patterns and relations to emission reduction policy. Science of the Total Environment 310: 121-132.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Freeman C, Evans CD, Monteith DT, Reynolds B, Fenner N (2001). Export of organic carbon from peat soils. Nature 412: 785-785.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Freeman C, Fenner N, Ostle NJ, Kang H, Dowrick DJ, Reynolds B, Lock MA, Sleep D, Hughes S, Hudson J (2004). Export of dissolved organic carbon from peatlands under elevated carbon dioxide levels. Nature 430: 195-198.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Garnett MH, Ineson P, Stevenson AC (2000). Effects of burning and grazing on carbon sequestration in a Pennine blanket bog, UK. The Holocene 10: 729-736.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Gunn JM, Snucins E, Yan ND, Arts MT (2001). Use of water clarity to monitor the effects of climate change and other stressors on oligotrophic lakes. In: Proceedings of the 5<sup>th</sup> National Science Meeting of the “Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network”. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Victoria, Canada, pp. 69-88.
Hejzlar J, Dubrovský M, Buchtele J, Ruzicka M (2003). The apparent and potential effects of climate change on the inferred concentration of dissolved organic matter in a temperate stream (the Malse River, South Bohemia). The Science of the Total Environment 310: 143-152.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Hongve D, Riise G, Kristiansen JF (2004). Increased colour and organic acid concentrations in Norwegian forest lakes and drinking water - a result of increased precipitation? Aquatic Science 66: 231-238.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Hudson JJ, Dillon PJ, Somers KM (2003). Long-term patterns in dissolved organic carbon in boreal lakes: the role of incident radiation, precipitation, temperature, southern oscillation, and sulfate deposition (acid precipitation). Hydrology and Earth System Science 7: 390-398.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Jeffries DS, Clair TA, Couture S, Dillon PJ, Dupont J, Keller W, McNicol DK, Turner MA, Vet R, Weeber R (2003). Assessing the recovery of lakes in south-eastern Canada from the effects of acidic deposition. Ambio 32: 176-182.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Kalbitz K, Solinger S, Park J-H, Michalzik B, Matzner E (2000). Controls on the dynamics of organic matter in soils: a review. Soil Science 165: 277-304.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Keller W, Heneberry JH, Dixit SS (2003). Decreased acid deposition and the chemical recovery of Killarney, Ontario, lakes. Ambio 32: 183-189.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Kullberg A, Bishop KH, Hargeby A, Jansson M, Petersen RC (1993). The ecological significance of dissolved organic-carbon in acidified waters. Ambio 22: 331-337.
Online | Gscholar
McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (2002). A step increase in streamflow in the conterminous United States. Geophysical Research Letters 29: 2185-2188.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, de Wit HA, Forsius M, Hogasen T, Jeffries DS, Kopacek J, Skjelkvale BL, Vesely J, Vuorenmaa J, Wilander A (2007a). Increases in DOC in remote lakes and rivers: a signal of climate change or return to pre-acidification conditions? In: “Trends in surface water chemistry and biota; The importance of confounding factors” (de Wit H, Skjelkvåle BL eds). Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo. ICP Waters Report 87/2007: 39-49.
Monteith DT, Stoddard JL, Evans CD, de Wit HA, Forsius M, Hogasen T, Wilander A, Skjelkvale BL, Jeffries DS, Vuorenmaa J, Keller B, Kopacek J, Vesely J (2007b). Dissolved organic carbon trends resulting from changes in atmospheric deposition chemistry. Nature 450: 537-540.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Porcal P, Koprivnjak JF, Molot LA, Dillon PJ (2009). Humic substances-part 7: the biogeochemistry of dissolved organic carbon and its interactions with climate change. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 16: 714-726.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Roulet N, Moore TR (2006). Environmental chemistry: browning the waters. Nature 444: 283-284.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Skjelkvåle BL, Stoddard J, Andersen T (2001a). Trends in surface water acidification in Europe and North America (1989-1998). Water, Air and Soil Pollution 130: 787-792.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Skjelkvåle BL, Mannio J, Wilander A, Andersen T (2001b). Recovery from acidification of lakes in Finland, Norway and Sweden 1990-1999. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 5: 327-337.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Skjelkvåle BL, Stoddard JL, Jeï¬ries DS, Tørseth K, Høgasen T, Bowman J, Mannio J, Monteith DT, Mosello R, Rogora M, Rzychon D, Vesely J, Wieting J, Wilander A, Worsztynowicz A (2005). Regional scale evidence for improvements in surface water chemistry 1990-2001. Environmental Pollution 137: 165-176.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Tetzlaff D, Malcolm IA, Soulsby C (2007). Influence of forestry, environmental change and climatic variability on the hydrology, hydrochemistry and residence times of upland catchments. Journal of Hydrology 346: 93-111.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Tranvik LJ, Jansson M (2002). Climate change - Terrestrial export of organic carbon. Nature 415: 861-862.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Vuorenmaa J, Forsius M, Mannio J (2006). Increasing trends of total organic carbon concentrations in small forest lakes in Finland from 1987 to 2003. Science of the Total Environment 365: 47-65.
CrossRef | Gscholar
Worrall F, Burt TP, Shedden R (2003). Long terms records of riverine carbon flux. Biogeochemistry 64: 165-178.
CrossRef | Gscholar

Authors’ Affiliation

C Sucker
Forest Research Institute Baden-Wuerttemberg, Wonnhaldestr. 4, D-79100 Freiburg (Germany)
K Krause
Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Zürcherstrasse 111, CH-8903 Birmensdorf (Switzerland)

Corresponding author


Sucker C, Krause K (2010). Increasing dissolved organic carbon concentrations in freshwaters: what is the actual driver?. iForest 3: 106-108. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0546-003

Paper history

Received: May 25, 2010
Accepted: Jun 01, 2010

First online: Jul 15, 2010
Publication Date: Jul 15, 2010
Publication Time: 1.47 months

© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2010

  Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Creative Commons Licence

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 52201
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 44442
Abstract Page Views: 2547
PDF Downloads: 4414
Citation/Reference Downloads: 50
XML Downloads: 748

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 5088
Overall contacts: 52201
Avg. contacts per week: 71.82

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

Total number of cites (since 2010): 24
Average cites per year: 1.71


Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ©

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.


iForest Similar Articles


This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. More info