The carbon market for the forestry sector is internationally recognized as a policy tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, to support afforestation and to improve forest management activities, which would not be economically viable without the sale of carbon credits. The international market is regulated by standards based on Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, and in many countries, domestic markets are emerging, managed by governments whose credits can be used to meet national climate targets under the UNFCCC. In Italy, the market is currently unregulated, despite the approval of a law to establish a national registry for agriculture- and forest-based carbon credits. An analysis of the voluntary carbon credit market for the Italian forestry sector from 2011 to 2024 revealed an active market, with credit transactions priced in line with other European domestic markets. Although volumes are lower, they have been growing in recent years and peaked in the period 2021-2022. Monitoring by the Carbon Monitoring Unit highlighted critical issues and verified the impact and future prospects of the market if it is regulated by the introduction of National Guidelines and the National Registry of agriculture and forestry carbon credits.
Keywords
, , , ,
Citation
Maluccio S, Grassi T, Romano R (2026). Regulation and future prospects of the Italian voluntary forestry carbon credit market. iForest 19: 219-225. - doi: 10.3832/ifor5120-019
Academic Editor
Marco Borghetti
Paper history
Received: Dec 19, 2025
Accepted: Apr 05, 2026
First online: Jun 08, 2026
Publication Date: Jun 30, 2026
Publication Time: 2.13 months
© SISEF - The Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2026
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Breakdown by View Type
(Waiting for server response...)
Article Usage
Total Article Views: 418
(from publication date up to now)
Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 88
Abstract Page Views: 162
PDF Downloads: 96
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 72
Web Metrics
Days since publication: 15
Overall contacts: 418
Avg. contacts per week: 195.07
Article Citations
Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Mar 2025)
(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)
Publication Metrics
by Dimensions ©
Articles citing this article
List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.
(1)
Cevallos G, Grimault J, Bellassen V (2019)Domestic carbon standards in Europe - Overview and perspectives. Research Report, Institute for Climate Economics - I4CE, Paris, France, pp. 7-8.
Online |
Gscholar
(2)
Chiti T, Rey A, Abildtrup J, Böttcher H, Diaci J, Frings O, Lehtonen A, Schindlbacher A, Zavala MA (2024)Carbon farming in the European forestry sector. From Science to Policy 17, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 88.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(3)
CMU-CREA (2011)Nucleo Monitoraggio Carbonio [Carbon Monitoring Unit]. Consiglio nazionale per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria, Rome, Italy, website. [in Italian].
Online |
Gscholar
(4)
Erbach G, Jensen L, Chahri S, Claros E (2021)Fit for 55 package. Briefing: Towards climate neutrality. EPRS - European Parliamentary Research Service, European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 4.
Online |
Gscholar
(5)
Forest Trends Ecosystem Marketplace (2020a)The only constant is change. State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2020, Second Installment Featuring Core Carbon and Additional Attributes Offset Prices, Volumes and Insights. Forest Trends Association, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 1.
Online |
Gscholar
(6)
Forest Trends Ecosystem Marketplace (2020b)Voluntary carbon and the post-pandemic recovery. State of Voluntary Carbon Markets Report, Special Climate Week NYC2020 Installment. Forest Trends Association, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 2-6.
Online |
Gscholar
(7)
Forest Trends Ecosystem Marketplace (2023)State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2023. Forest Trends Association, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 13.
Online |
Gscholar
(8)
Forest Trends Ecosystem Marketplace (2024)State of the Voluntary Carbon Market 2024. Forest Trends Association, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 10.
Online |
Gscholar
(9)
Gasparini P, Di Cosmo L, Floris A, De Laurentis Editors D (2022)Italian National Forest Inventory methods and results of the third survey. Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 598.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(10)
Greenfield P (2023)Revealed: more than 90% of rainforest carbon offsets by biggest certifier are worthless, analysis shows. The Guardian.
Online |
Gscholar
(11)
Huang Z, Zhang W (2024)Forecasting carbon prices in China’s pilot carbon market: a multi-source information approach with conditional generative adversarial networks. Journal of Environmental Management 359: 120967.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(12)
International Swaps and Derivatives Association (2024)Navigating the risks of greenwashing in the voluntary carbon market. Website.
Online |
Gscholar
(13)
Kreibich N, Hermwille L (2021)Caught in between: credibility and feasibility of the voluntary carbon market post-2020. Climate Policy 21 (7): 939-957.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(14)
Maluccio S, Andrighetto N, Brotto L, Caverni L, Crecco L, Giordano D, Pepe A, Pettenella D, Pinato F, Rivieccio R, Romano R (2020)Progetti forestali di sostenibilità 2020 [Sustainable forestry projects 2020]. Carbon Monitoring Unit, CREA, Rome, Italy, pp. 20-25. [in Italian]
Gscholar
(15)
Maluccio S, Grassi T, Romano R (2024)Progetti forestali di sostenibilità in Italia 2021-2022 [Sustainable forestry projects in Italy 2021-2022]. Carbon Monitoring Unit, CREA, Rome, Italy, pp. 19-25 [in Italian]
Gscholar
(16)
Maluccio S, Grassi T, Romano R (2025)Progetti forestali di sostenibilità in Italia 2023-2024 [Sustainable forestry projects in Italy 2023-2024]. Carbon Monitoring Unit, CREA, Rome, Italy, pp. 14-25. [in Italian]
Gscholar
(17)
Michaelowa A, Michaelowa K, Hermwille L, Espelage A (2022)Towards net zero: making baselines for international carbon markets dynamic by applying “ambition coefficients”. Climate Policy 22 (9-10): 1343-1355.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(18)
Motta R (2007)È possibile migliorare il bosco? [Can we “improve” the forest?] Forest@ 4 (3): 244-245. [in Italian with English abstract]
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(19)
Nabuurs G-J, Delacote P, Ellison D, Hanewinkel M, Lindner M, Nesbit M, Ollikainen M, Savaresi A (2015)A new role for forests and the forest sector in the EU post-2020 climate targets. From Science to Policy 2, European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, pp. 32.
Gscholar
(20)
Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Fang J, Houghton R, Kauppi PE, Kurz WA, Phillips OL, Shvidenko A, Lewis SL, Canadell JG, Ciais P (2011)A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333 (6045): 988-993.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(21)
Probst BS, Toetzke M, Kontoleon A, Díaz Anadón L, Minx JC, Haya BK, Schneider L, Trotter PA, West TA, Gill-Wiehl A, Hoffmann VH (2024)Systematic assessment of the achieved emission reductions of carbon crediting projects. Nature Communications 15 (1): 1.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(22)
Procton A, Barber C, Bennett G, Peterson A, Calderón C, Song J (2025)State of the voluntary carbon market 2025 - Meeting the Moment Renewing Trust in Carbon Finance. Forest Trends Association, Washington DC, USA, pp. 5-12.
Online |
Gscholar
(23)
Raihan A, Begum RA, Mohd Said MN, Abdullah SMS (2019)A review of emission reduction potential and cost savings through forest carbon sequestration. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution 16 (3): 1-7.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(24)
Ranjan R (2024)Balancing greenwashing risks and forest carbon sequestration benefits: a simulation model linking formal and voluntary carbon markets. Forest Policy and Economics 168 (7): 103317.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(25)
Sampson RN, Sedjo RA (1997)Economics of carbon sequestration in forestry: an overview. In “Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology”. Taylor and Francis Inc., vol. 27, pp. 8.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(26)
Sasaki N (2025)Addressing scandals and greenwashing in carbon offset markets: a framework for reform. Global Transitions 7: 375-382.
Gscholar
(27)
Sylvera (2023)The state of carbon credits 2023. Website.
Online |
Gscholar
(28)
UNIDROIT (2024)Study LXXXVI - W.G. 2 - Doc. Working Group on the Legal Nature of Verified Carbon Credits. Rome (Italy) 2 Apr 2024. International Institute for the Unification of Private Law - UNIDROIT, Rome, Italy, pp. 60.
Online |
Gscholar
(29)
Van Der Gaast W, Sikkema R, Vohrer M (2016)The contribution of forest carbon credit projects to addressing the climate change challenge. Climate Policy 18 (1): 42-48.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(30)
Vass MM, Elofsson K (2016)Is forest carbon sequestration at the expense of bioenergy and forest products cost-efficient in EU climate policy to 2050? Journal of Forest Economics 24: 82-105.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(31)
Verma P, Ghosh PK (2024)The economics of forest carbon sequestration: a bibliometric analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability 26: 2989-3019.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(32)
Walker K, Wan F (2012)The harm of symbolic actions and green-washing: corporate actions and communications on environmental performance and their financial implications. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2): 227-242.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(33)
West TAP, Wunder S, Sills EO, Börner J, Rifai SW, Neidermeier AN, Frey GP, Kontoleon A (2023)Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science 381 (6660): 873-877.
CrossRef |
Gscholar
(34)
Woodland Carbon Code (2024)Home page. Scottish Forestry, UK, website.
Online |
Gscholar
(35)
World Bank (2024)State and trends of carbon pricing 2024. World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 35-55.
Gscholar
(36)
Wunder S (2015)Revisiting the concept of payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 117: 234-243.
Gscholar