Logging residue chipping options for short rotation poplar plantations

doi:10.3832/ifor4130-015

Logging residue chipping options for short rotation poplar plantations

Raffaele Spinelli^(1-2-3) , Matevž Mihelič⁽⁴⁾, Barnabáš Kováč⁽⁵⁾, Patrik Heger⁽⁵⁾, Natascia Magagnotti^(1-2-3)

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 23-29 (2023)
doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor4130-015
Published: Jan 15, 2023 - Copyright © 2023 SISEF

Research Articles

PDF Version

Full Text

Citation

Geo-mapping

Short rotation poplar plantations grow on flat and even terrain, and the interrow spacing is wide enough for easy machine access. If the terrain is firm enough, one may consider moving the classic roadside chipping operation directly into the field (i.e., terrain chipping), thus saving on wood extraction cost. This study compared the efficiency and cost of roadside and terrain chipping conducted with exactly the same equipment, to assess the benefits offered by the versatile deployment of a standard chipping operation, whereby the operation can be moved inside the stand whenever terrain conditions are suitable. The study was conducted at 12 sample plots, containing about one truck load of chips each (i.e., approximately 11 bone-dry tons or BDT). Plots were arranged as alternate windrows on a 8.5 ha field. Data was collected for the whole supply chain, from field to factory. The factory was located 14 km from the field. Delivered cost was 53 € BDT^-1 and 70 € BDT^-1 for roadside and terrain chipping, respectively, i.e., terrain chipping was 1/3 more expensive than roadside chipping, even if the latter included the additional cost of forwarding the residues to the roadside. The chipper-truck used for the test could not cope with small scattered residue piles (32 BDT ha^-1), and the cumbersome reposition maneuver became the main hurdle to efficient operation. Further improvements might be achieved by pre-bunching the residues, introducing a dedicated terrain chipper or bundling the residues and taking the bundles to the factory for centralized chipping.

Keywords

Forestry, Efficiency, Productivity, Cost

Authors’ address

(1)

0000-0001-9545-1004
0000-0003-3508-514X
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto per la Bioeconomia - CNR IBE, Firenze (Italy)

(2)

0000-0001-9545-1004
0000-0003-3508-514X
Australian Forest Operations Research Alliance, University of the Sunshine Coast - AFORA USC, Maroochydore DC, Queensland (Australia)

(3)

0000-0001-9545-1004
0000-0003-3508-514X
Forestry Research Institute of Sweden - SKOGFORSK, Upssala (Sweden)

(4)

0000-0003-0306-9014
University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical faculty, Ljubljana (Slovenia)

(5)

IKEA Industry Sro, Malacky (Slovakia)

Corresponding author

Raffaele Spinelli
raffaele.spinelli@ibe.cnr.it

Citation

Spinelli R, Mihelič M, Kováč B, Heger P, Magagnotti N (2023). Logging residue chipping options for short rotation poplar plantations. iForest 16: 23-29. - doi: 10.3832/ifor4130-015

Academic Editor

Rodolfo Picchio

Paper history

Received: May 09, 2022
Accepted: Nov 15, 2022

First online: Jan 15, 2023
Publication Date: Feb 28, 2023
Publication Time: 2.03 months

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Breakdown by View Type

(Waiting for server response...)

Article Usage

Total Article Views: 19509
(from publication date up to now)

Breakdown by View Type
HTML Page Views: 17267
Abstract Page Views: 1065
PDF Downloads: 982
Citation/Reference Downloads: 0
XML Downloads: 195

Web Metrics
Days since publication: 676
Overall contacts: 19509
Avg. contacts per week: 202.02

Article Citations

Article citations are based on data periodically collected from the Clarivate Web of Science web site
(last update: Feb 2023)

(No citations were found up to date. Please come back later)

(no Plumx Metrics available for this paper)

Publication Metrics

by Dimensions ^©

Articles citing this article

List of the papers citing this article based on CrossRef Cited-by.

(1)

Allen J, Browne M, Hunter A, Boyd J, Palmer H (1998)
Logistics management and costs of biomass fuel supply. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 28 (6): 463-477.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(2)

Angus-Hankin C, Stokes B, Twaddle A (1995)
The transportation of fuel wood from forest to facility. Biomass and Bioenergy 9: 191-203.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(3)

Belbo H, Vivestad H (2018)
Predicting delay factors when chipping wood at forest roadside landings. International Journal of Forest Engineering 29 (2): 128-137.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(4)

Bergström D, Di Fulvio F (2019)
Review of efficiencies in comminuting forest fuels. International Journal of Forest Engineering 30 (1): 45-55.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(5)

Björheden R (2008)
Optimal point of comminution in the biomass supply chain. In: Proceedings of the “OSCAR Nordic-Baltic Conference on Forest Operations”. Forest and Landscape Working Paper no. 30/2008, University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Life Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 99.
Gscholar

(6)

Björheden R (2011)
Comminution and transport -keys for more efficient forest fuel supply systems. In: “Efficient Forest Fuel Supply Systems” (Thorsén Björheden R, Eliasson L eds). Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 116.
Gscholar

(7)

Björheden R, Eriksson LO (1989)
Optimal storing, transport and processing for a forest-fuel supplier. Journal of Operational Research 43 (1): 26-33.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(8)

Björheden R, Thompson M, Rickards J (1995)
Forest work study nomenclature, WP 3.04.02. Test edition valid 1995-2000. International Union of Forestry Research Organisations - IUFRO, Department of Operational Efficiency, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Garpenberg, Sweden. pp. 16.
Gscholar

(9)

Eliasson L, Eriksson A, Mohtashami S (2017)
Analysis of factors affecting productivity and costs for a high-performance chip supply system. Applied Energy 185: 497-505.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(10)

FAO (2005)
The potential for fast-growing commercial forest plantations to supply high value roundwood. In: “Planted Forests and Trees Working Papers” (James R, Del Lungo A eds). Working Paper FP/33, Forest Resources Development Service, Forest Resources Division, FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 120.
Gscholar

(11)

Figueiredo Da Silva J, Ramos A (2019)
Analysis of the truck transportation of eucalyptus logging residues to Portuguese power plants. International Journal of Forest Engineering 30 (1): 35-44.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(12)

Helby P, Rosenqvist H, Roos A (2006)
Retreat from Salix - Swedish experience with energy crops in the 1990s. Biomass and Bioenergy 30: 422-427.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(13)

Kärhä K, Vartiamäki T (2006)
Productivity and costs of slash bundling in Nordic conditions. Biomass and Bioenergy 30: 1043-1052.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(14)

Lindegaard K, Adams P, Holley M, Lamley A, Henriksson A, Larsson S, Engelbrechten H, Lopez G, Pisarek M (2016)
Short rotation plantations policy history in Europe: lessons from the past and recommendations for the future. Food and Energy Security 5 (3): 125-152.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(15)

Magagnotti N, Spinelli R, De Francesco F, Lombardini C (2016)
A versatile terrain and roadside chipper for energy wood production in plantation forestry. Baltic Forests 22 (1): 107-115.
Gscholar

(16)

Magagnotti N, Spinelli R, Kärhä K, Mederski P (2021)
Multi-tree cut-to-length harvesting of short-rotation poplar plantations. European Journal of Forest Research 140: 345-354.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(17)

Manner J, Nordfjell T, Lindroos O (2013)
Effects of the number of assortments and log concentration on time consumption for forwarding. Silva Fennica 47 (4): ID1030.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(18)

McEwan A, Marchi E, Spinelli R, Brink M (2020)
Past, present and future of industrial plantation forestry and implication on future timber harvesting technology. Journal of Forest Research 31: 339-351.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(19)

Mortazavi R, Johansson J (2013)
Road transport vehicles for hauling uncomminuted forest energy products in Sweden. International Journal of Forestry Research 2013: 1-7.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(20)

Nurminen T, Korpunen H, Uusitalo J (2006)
Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fennica 40 (2): 335-363.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(21)

Picchi G, Eliasson L (2015)
Chip truck utilization for a container handling chipper truck when chipping logging residues and the effect of two grapple types on chipping efficiency. International Journal of Forest Engineering 26 (3): 203-11.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(22)

Spinelli R, Hartsough BR (2001)
A survey of Italian chipping operations. Biomass and Bioenergy 21: 433-444.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(23)

Spinelli R, Visser R (2009)
Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. Biomass and Bioenergy 33: 429-433.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(24)

Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Picchi G (2012)
A supply chain evaluation of slash bundling under the conditions of mountain forestry. Biomass and Bioenergy 36: 339-345.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(25)

Spinelli R, Schweier J, De Francesco F (2013)
Harvesting techniques for non-industrial biomass plantations. Biosystems Engineering 113: 319-324.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(26)

Spinelli R, Di Gironimo G, Esposito G, Magagnotti N (2014)
Alternative supply chains for logging residues under access constraints. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29 (3): 266-274.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(27)

Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Pari L, De Francesco F (2015)
A comparison of tractor-trailer units and high-speed forwarders used in Alpine forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 30 (5): 470-477.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(28)

Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Assirelli A, Martins JP, Mihelic M (2021)
A long-term follow-up study of slash bundling in fast-growing eucalypt plantations. Forests 12 (11): 1548.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(29)

Stanton B, Eaton J, Johnson J, Rice D, Schuette B, Moser B (2002)
Hybrid poplar in the Pacific Northwest: the effects of market-driven management. Journal of Forestry 100: 28-33.
Online | Gscholar

(30)

Tahvanainen T, Anttila P (2011)
Supply chain cost analysis of long-distance transportation of energy wood in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy 35: 3360-3375.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(31)

Talbot B, Suadicani K (2005)
Analysis of two simulated in-field chipping and ex-traction systems in spruce thinnings. Biosystems Engineering 91: 283-292.
CrossRef | Gscholar

(32)

Väätäinen K, Ala-Fossi A, Nuutinen Y, Röser D (2006)
The effect of single grip harvester’s log bunching on forwarder efficiency. Baltic Forestry 12 (1): 64-69.
Online | Gscholar

(33)

Yoshioka T, Sakurai R, Kameyama S, Inoue K, Hartsough BR (2017)
The optimum slash pile size for grinding operations: grapple excavator and horizontal grinder operations model based on a Sierra Nevada, California survey. Forests 8 (11): 442.
CrossRef | Gscholar

iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry

Contents

Search

Journal Info

Journal Subjects and Fields

For Authors

For Reviewers

For Readers

SISEF Publishing

Search iForest Contents