Close Home
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
vol. 9, pp. 791-800
Copyright © 2016 by the Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology
doi: 10.3832/ifor1827-009

Collection: IUFRO division 8.02 - Mendel University Brno (Czech Republic) 2015
“Coppice forests: past, present and future”
Guest Editors: Tomas Vrska, Renzo Motta, Alex Mosseler

Research Articles

Tree-oriented silviculture: a new approach for coppice stands

Maria Chiara Manetti, Claudia Becagli, Dalila Sansone, Francesco PelleriCorresponding author

Introduction 

During the past centuries, coppice management has been strongly affected by socio-economic conditions and mainly aimed to address the needs of local communities and the well-being of town populations ([11], [23]). For example, short rotation time was required for coal production, pollarding was adopted for fodder production ([7]), and the grazing in the forest fostered heavy stand thinnings ([4]).

Nowadays, the forest structure of coppices in Italy reflects either the lack of forest management or even management practices not related to the ownership and socio-economics conditions, as well as to stand dynamics and functionality. The disconnection between silviculture, coppice services and human activity in Italy is a consequence of: (i) the abandonment of rural areas occurred in the second half of the last century; (ii) the prevalence and the fragmentation of private ownership (66% - [19]); (iii) the complex and restrictive national and regional laws ([2]). Moreover, the firewood harvested in Italy has recently become economically unprofitable due to the surplus on the local market of low-cost firewood from abroad ([6]). Indeed, Italy is currently the first importer of firewood worldwide, though coppice stands represent the 42% (3 663 143 ha) of the total forest area (8 759 200 ha - [19]). The most important consequences are a widespread of over-aged stand structures, an extensive degradation of coppices, a decreasing interest in local production and a loss of biodiversity ([26]).

Nevertheless, some important characteristics of coppices deserve to be safeguarded through a suitable silvicultural approach: (i) they provide wood products in short time; (ii) are strictly linked to the presence of human activities; (iii) supply very important non-wood forest goods (e.g., mushrooms, truffles, fruit berries); (iv) are established on marginal sites ([15]). To revitalize the coppice system, the silvicultural management should be a combination of different traditional and innovative options, according to site characteristics, stand structure, species composition, ecological efficiency, disturbance factors and societal and economic demand.

Tree-oriented silviculture is an innovative approach in coppice management aimed at enhancing a limited number of crop trees in the forest stand by applying well-defined silvicultural practices. Such approach has been developed in oak and beech high forests of central Europe, in order to produce valuable timber of merchantable size in shorter time with lower costs ([34], [20], [8], [1], [39], [29], [38], [32], [21], [31]) or to preserve and increase the presence of minor tree species ([37], [30], [33], [31]). Tree-oriented silviculture is based on the early selection of single crop trees within the stand whose free growth is favored over the full rotation period by applying frequent thinning. This strategy can be carried out in coppices both to maintain or improve tree biodiversity, enhancing the sporadic tree species like in mixed coppices ([33], [27]), and to improve the valuable timber trees like in chestnut (Castenea sativa Mill.) coppices ([23]). This silvicultural approach may be applied in different types of ownership, in localized but favorable areas, to the whole stand or it can be integrated with traditional silvicultural systems ([17], [25]). Its main limitation is the need of specialized and qualified personnel in all the phases along the rotation period, from the selection of crop trees to logging operations ([22]).

The goal of this study is to test two different silvicultural management systems in coppice stands of different age and specific composition, in order to evaluate the growth dynamics of valuable and merchantable trees, and the stand response from an ecological and biodiversity point of view. In particular, we focused on the short- and mid-term differences in tree growth and stand biodiversity in coppices managed under different silvicultural systems, in order to verify the suitability of tree-oriented silvicultural practices to different site conditions and species composition, according to multifunctional criteria.

This study reports the first results of experimental trials established by the Forestry Research Center in Arezzo (Italy) in mixed oak and chestnut coppices of central Italy. In the mixed coppices, the silvicultural objective was to differentiate the management and the timber assortments by maintaining the coppice system to produce valuable timber from sporadic tree species, selecting a few target trees per hectare and, through the conversion into high forest, creating favorable conditions for their growth and natural regeneration. Contrastingly, in chestnut coppices the goal was to obtain more valuable and larger-sized assortments in a shorter rotation period with lower costs.

Materials and methods 

The study areas

The research was carried out in two important forest districts of Tuscany (Italy): Monte Amiata (Siena) and Colline Metallifere (Grosseto), which were characterized by a wide presence of coppices and an intense human pressure over the centuries (Fig. S1 in Supplementary material).

Monte Amiata is one of the most important areas in Italy for chestnut timber production due to its extension (3500 ha, 12.5% of the total forest area), site quality and high productivity. Conversely, in the Colline Metallifere chestnut has a rather marginal role (1300 ha, 3% of total forest area), being mixed broadleaf forests (38 400 ha 80% of forest area), where Turkey oak is the dominant species, largely prevailing.

Up to the half of the last century, both the districts were characterized by mines (mercury in Monte Amiata; pyrite, copper, lead and zinc in Colline Metallifere), which exploited wood products from local coppices. Later, the mining crisis gave rise to a discontinued use of many coppices for timber production. Currently, the forest area is rather fragmented (often in patches < 1 ha) and the private ownership is common in both districts (90% in the Colline Metallifere and 80% in the Amiata).

The chestnut coppice stands in Monte Amiata are located between 800 and 1200 m a.s.l. on a trachyte bedrock; the most common soil is Andic Dystrudepts coarse-loamy, siliceous, mesic (unit GUA1 - ⇒ http:/­/­sit.­lamma.­rete.­toscana.­it/­websuoli/­), deep, soft, not gravel, not calcareous, acid, well-drained. The climate is mountain-Mediterranean, with an annual rainfall of 1547 mm concentrated in autumn and winter, and a mean annual temperature of 10 °C (Fig. S2 in Supplementary Material). Stand management differs depending on the property: in the public ownership the rotation time is 25-30 years, with thinning at the mid of rotation and a low number of standards; in private ownership, the rotation time is about 16 years, no thinnings are carried out and more than 60 standards per hectare are released.

The study areas on the Colline Metallifere are located from 580 to 750 m a.s.l. on typic ustorthents loamy-skeletal, mixed, calcareous, mesic, shallow soils (unit CBO1) originated from sandstone and limestone. The climate is Mediterranean with mean annual temperature of 11.7 °C and annual rainfall of 1047 mm (Fig. S2 in the Supplementary material). The forest area is mainly managed as coppice (coppice with standards), though conversion into high forests has been locally carried out. The prevailing stand types are Turkey oak (Quercus Cerris L.) coppices and mixed broadleaved coppices with hop hornbeam (Ostrya Carpinifolia Scop.) and flowering ash (Fraxinus ornus L.); chestnut coppices show a smaller extension, but are an important resource for local population.

Experimental trials

Eleven sample plots (Tab. 1) were established in both districts (3 in Monte Amiata and 8 in the Colline Metallifere) with different dominant tree species (chestnut or Turkey oak), mixture degree (presence of sporadic or valuable tree species), age (from 11 to 48 yrs) and site quality (from medium to good).

Tab. 1 - Main site characteristics and research structure of the analyzed study-cases.

In the chestnut coppices of both experimental areas, the impact of tree-oriented silvicultural practices (thesis A) was compared with the absence of management (thesis C) and with the standard stand silvicultural practices (thesis B), characterized by early and frequent thinnings from below ([5], [3]). In thesis A, 100 target trees per hectare were selected and crown thinning was carried out to make their crown completely isolated from the surrounding canopy. The thinning was focused only on stools, shoots and standards around the target trees, whereas no treatment was applied in the remaining stand. Target trees were selected according to tree vigor, stem features, crown shape, lack of disease symptoms (e.g., chestnut blight) and their spatial distribution. In both A and B stands, the first thinning was carried out early (11 yrs in Amiata and 17 yrs in Metallifere). However, a second thinning has been carried out three years later only in A stands of both districts, to ensure crown isolation for target trees.

Mixed coppices were analyzed only in the Colline Metallifere district, considering two different study-case: (i) young coppices (A37 and B18) where the management goal was to maintain the coppice system to preserve and enhance biodiversity; (ii) aged coppices (A39, FA and FB) where the conversion into high forest was carried out to preserve tree biodiversity. The plots have been chosen for their relatively high abundance of sporadic species, for suitable site conditions, good trail density to avoid excessive costs. In young coppices (i), the traditional management approach (clear cutting at 25-30 years) was integrated with the tree-oriented silvicultural practices: 5-20 sporadic tree species ha-1 were selected and favored by localized thinning at 13-15 yrs. Tree competitors around the target trees were removed and a buffer free space of 1-3 m (dètourage) was created to allow the free development of the crown.

In the aged coppices (ii), thesis A (tree-oriented silviculture) was applied in plot FA and compared with plot FB where thesis B was applied. During the second thinning in 2007 (at the age of 44 years in FA), 144 target trees were selected both in the dominant layer and among sporadic tree species, and their closer competitors were removed by thinning from above. The same number of crop trees were chosen in FB, but a thinning from below was carried out, reducing tree density by 39%.

Mixed coppiced were particularly rich of sporadic tree species, mainly wilde service tree Sorbus torminalis (L) Crantz. Therefore, tree-oriented silviculture was applied to stands with different ages (the aged coppice A39, 47 years old; and the young coppice A37, 15 years old) to verify the effect of the same treatment on tree growth in stands characterized by different age, density, and stools height.

Data collection and analysis

In all experimental plots, the species, the diameter at breast height (dbh), the total tree height (H) and the social rank of trees were measured before (BT) and after thinning (AT) since 2008 to 2014. In chestnut coppices, crown development was estimated based on the measure of four orthogonal radii and the main canopy cover characteristics (Leaf Area Index - LAI and transmittance - PAR) was monitored.

For each plot, the following stand parameters were calculated before and after the thinning: site quality (through the dominant height), stand density (number of stools, shoots and standards), productivity (basal area and volume), species composition (number of species, Shannon index - [35]), importance value (average of relative density and relative basal area of the considered species or layer - [12]). The canopy cover was assessed by measuring the LAI (using a LAI2000 instrument - Li-Cor, Linkoln, NE, USA) and PAR (AccuPAR Ceptometer - Decagon, Pullman, WA, USA) according to Cutini ([14]) and Bréda ([10]).

To allow the comparison of the different silvicultural options, an equivalent number of target trees (chosen among the largest trees of the stands) was considered in the analysis for all the three thesis (A, B, C). For all the target trees, several additional parameters (height at the crown base, crown area and stem quality) were recorded.

Differences among the three thesis were assessed at individual (crop trees) and stand level by comparing the current annual increment in diameter (Tab. 2) and the crown growth of the target trees, as well as the stand biodiversity. Differences in current annual increment in dbh (CAI) and periodical increment (PI) were tested through the analysis of variance (ANOVA), and compared by the post-hoc Tukey’s t-test. All analyses were carried out using the R package (⇒ http:/­/­www.­r-project.­org/­).

Tab. 2 - Statistics of the current annual increment (CAI dbh) of crop trees in the studied plots. (STD): standard deviation; (Qc); Quercus cerris; (St): Sorbus torminalis.

Results 

Stand characteristics and thinning

Chestnut coppices

The structural, ecological and stand parameters recorded before thinning (Tab. 3) revealed the suitability of the selected chestnut coppices in both districts for the application of a silvicultural approach aimed at producing high quality timber assortments. The stands in both areas showed good site quality, adequate number of stools, high productivity, a well-defined dominant layer and proper values of LAI (6.07 and 5.40 in Monte Amiata and Colline Metallifere, respectively) and PAR (1.68 and 4.51, respectively - [13]). The main differences were related to the age of the first thinning (11 years in Monte Amiata and 17 years in Colline Metallifere) and the species composition (pure chestnut in Monte Amiata, while up to 20% in number and 15% in basal area of other species - mainly Turkey oak - in Colline Metallifere).

Tab. 3 - Chestnut coppices in Monte Amiata (A) and Colline Metallifere (M). Mensurational parameters, tree diversity and importance value in the study areas before thinning occurrence. (a): Tree-oriented silviculture (b): stand silviculture; (c): control.

In the studied chestnut coppices, the thinning carried out in the two thesis (A: from above; B: from below) was characterized by different frequency and intensity (Tab. 4), resulting from differences in the social rank of the harvested trees (Fig. 1). In both districts, an additional thinning after three years was necessary in thesis A to ensure the crown isolation of the target trees. However, the faster canopy recover observed in the Monte Amiata required a larger tree removal as compared with the Colline Metallifere stands, likely due to the higher site fertility and the younger age of trees at the former site. Overall, considering the two thinnings, the basal area removed was higher in the thesis A than in B for both districts (Tab. 4).

Tab. 4 - Chestnut coppices. Number of selected target trees, thinning intensities and characteristics (I th: first thinning in thesis A and B, simultaneously; II th: second thinning only in thesis A) carried out in chestnut coppices managed under the two theses (A: tree-oriented silviculture; B: stand silviculture) in Monte Amiata and Colline Metallifere. (Cs): Castanea sativa; (Qc): Quercus cerris.
Fig. 1 - Percentage of basal area (BA) removed by thinning per social class in chestnut coppices managed under the two thesis (A: single-tree silviculture; B: stand silviculture) in the two districts analyzed (Amiata and Metallifere). (D): dominant; (I): intermediate; (d): dominated.

Mixed coppices

The main stand parameters recorded in the study areas before thinning are reported in Tab. 5. The young mixed coppices (B18 and A37) showed different values of dominant height, density and productivity, which were much more higher in A37 than B18, as well as the tree biodiversity (Shannon index = 1.48 and 0.51 in A37 and B18, respectively).

Tab. 5 - Structural parameters, tree diversity and importance value in mixed coppice plots before thinning in the Colline Metallifere. (Qc): Quercus cerris; (Qp): Q. petraea; (Qcr): Q. crenata; (Qi): Q. ilex; (Fo): Fraxinus ornus; (Ac): Acer campestre; (At): A. monspessulanum; (Oc): Ostrya carpinifolia; (Ia): Ilex aquifolium; (Jc): Juniperus communis; (Ms): Malus sylvestris; (Cm): Cornus mas; (Um): Ulmus campestris; (St): Sorbus torminalis; (Sd): S. domestica; (Pp): Pyrus pyraster.

The studied aged coppices (A39, FA and FB) had similar values for most parameters, except site quality (which was lower in FA) and the stand density and productivity (higher in A39). As for species composition, the number of sporadic and valuable tree species was higher in FA (13) and FB (12), while Shannon index was higher (1.69) in A39 than in FA and FB (1.12 and 0.85, respectively). Sorbus spp. was the most important sporadic species in all analyzed plots.

In the plots B18, A37 and A39 the applied silvicultural practices were aimed at enhancing biodiversity and improving timber quality of sporadic species, while conversion into high forest was carried out according to tree-oriented silviculture in FA and stand silviculture in FB. In the first case, thinning intensity was lower (Tab. 6) as harvesting was carried out mainly around the target trees. In B18 the thinning affected almost exclusively Turkey oak (91% of removed basal area), while in the other two areas (A37 e A39), also other species (34% in A37 and 31% in A39) and some valuable tree species (7% in A37 and 2% in A39) were removed.

Tab. 6 - Number of selected target trees, thinning intensities and characteristics of the mixed coppice plots in the Metallifere district. (Qc): Quercus cerris; (Qp): Q. petraea; (Qcr): Q. crenata; (Qi): Q. ilex; (Fo): Fraxinus ornus; (Ac): Acer campestre; (At): A. monspessulanum; (Oc): Ostrya carpinifolia; (Ia): Ilex aquifolium; (Jc): Juniperus communis; (Ms): Malus sylvestris; (Cm): Cornus mas; (Um): Ulmus campestris; (St): Sorbus torminalis; (Sd): S. domestica; (Pp): Pyrus pyraster.

In FA and FB stands, a first thinning from below was carried out in 2001 by the Forest Municipality, before the establishment of the experimental plots. In 2007, 144 target trees per hectare, chosen among the most vigorous Turkey oaks and valuable sporadic species, were selected in both FA and FB plots to verify the growth differences after the silvicultural approach applied. In both areas, thinning involved almost exclusively Turkey oak and the dominant layer (81% in FA and 68% in FB), which represented 80% of the basal area before thinning. The tree-oriented practices applied mainly impacted the dominant layer, thus the mean diameter of removed shoots was higher (14.2 vs. 12.5), despite a lower thinning intensity in terms of basal area (Tab. 6).

Chestnut coppices

Growth performances

ANOVA results based on current annual increment (CAI) of selected (target) trees collected before the first thinning did not reveal significant differences among theses (A vs. B and C) and districts (Monte Amiata, Colline Metallifere). In contrast, significantly higher CAIs of the target trees after thinning was observed in all thesis. As expected, such increments were much higher for thesis A, where the target shoots were completely isolated and the competition reduced (Fig. 2). In Monte Amiata, the growth rate resulted fairly constant over time as a consequence of the two thinnings carried out, while in the Colline Metallifere the trend was slowly decreasing. In this case, such negative response to thinning can be attributed to various causes (e.g., low intensity of thinning, stand age, stand fertility, seasonal climatic trend, etc). In addition, the presence of the gall wasp (Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu) at the experimental sites of both districts was first recorded in 2011. However, a reduction in tree growth after 2011-2012 was observed in all the three theses, though growth was higher in thesis A of Monte Amiata compared to B and C stands, which in turn showed similar values to those recorded in the Metallifere district.

Fig. 2 - Trends of current annual increment (CAI) in diameter at breast height (± standard error) of the chestnut target trees in the three theses (A, B, C: different silvicultural approaches) in the two districts analyzed. (At): after thinning.

ANOVA and the Tukey’s t-test (Fig. 3) revealed significant differences in periodic increments (PI) among the three silvicultural options over the whole period of observation (6 years in Metallifere and 7 years in Amiata). For both districts, the larger difference in diameter PI was recorded between the thesis A (characterized by two closed thinnings) and control plots (C), while the smaller was between C and B stands, where only one thinning was applied during the study period.

Fig. 3 - Analysis of variance and results of the Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons of periodic increment in diameter (PIdbh) of the chestnut target trees between the three theses (A, B, C: different silvicultural approaches) in the two districts analyzed (Amiata e Metallifere).

Canopy characteristics

Annual LAI values reflected the stand capacity to restore canopy cover under the different silvicultural options (Fig. 4). Before thinning, LAI was 6.7 and 5.5 in Amiata and Metallifere, respectively, indicating a good level of stand functionality with respect to the stand age in both district. In the first year after thinning LAI values decreased significantly in thesis A and B (depending on thinning intensities); however, the differences tend to disappear in short time (2-4 years, depending on stand age). The effect on LAI of second thinning carried out in thesis A showed the same pattern.

Fig. 4 - Mean annual LAI values recorded in chestnut coppice plots managed under the three thesis (A, B, C: different silvicultural approaches) in the two districts analyzed. (at): after thinning; (bt): before thinning.

The periodic increment of crown radius (PIcr) recorded in the three years after the first thinning, reflected the good reaction of the selected trees under the tree-oriented silvicultural approach on both sites (Tab. 7). In Monte Amiata (younger and more fertile stands), PIcr mean values were three times higher in the option A (0.72 m) than in the other two options, and no significant differences have been observed between B (0.26 m) and control plot (0.23 m) in this first period. Similar differences were observed in the Colline Metallifere, but the values were lower according to the adopted silvicultural system (A = 0.54; B = 0.26; C = 0.11).

Tab. 7 - Mean periodic increment of crown radius (in m, ± standard error) of the selected target trees in chestnut coppices and differences among the three theses in Monte Amiata and Colline Metallifere. (A): tree-oriented silviculture; (B): stand silviculture; (C): control. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between means after Tukey’s test (p<0.05).

Mixed coppices

Tree biodiversity

In young coppices the highest biodiversity values were observed in A37, also characterized by the highest fertility. Thinning did not seem to affect species composition and dynamics in the two plots (Fig. 5). In aged coppices, the differences detected in Shannon index values were likely due to stand density (as in the plot A39, characterized by the highest values of biodiversity) and to stand fertility (as in the plot FA, with higher dominant height values than FB). In the latter plots, the biodiversity increased after thinning, independently from the silvicultural option applied, and remained steady through time.

Fig. 5 - Shannon index (SH) before (BT) and after (AT) the thinning carried out in mixed coppice plots. Values after seven years from thinning (white bars) were recorded only for FA and FB plots.

Growth performances

In the plots managed to enhance the presence of valuable tree species (plots A39, A37 and B18), 171 target trees in 23.47 hectares belonging to 7 different species were selected to assess the incremental response to thinning and crown isolation. As expected, CAI increased for all target trees of all the observed species, independently from stand age and site fertility (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6 - Fig. 6 - Mean current annual increment in diameter (CAI dbh, in cm yr-1) of the selected target trees in the mixed coppices plots (A39, A37, B18), according to their species. Error bars represent the standard error. (Ac): Acer campestre; (Am): Acer monspessulanum; (Ap): Acer pseudoplatanus; (Ia): Ilex aquifolium; (Pa): Prunus avium; (Sd): S. domestica; (St): Sorbus torminalis.

Significant differences in CAI dbh of wild tree service (the most important valuable species present in the forest district) were also found between plots A39 and A37 by ANOVA and Tukey’s t-test (Fig. 7). Such differences turned out to be significant both before (2011) and after three years since thinning (2014), and can be mainly attributed to stand age, size of competitors, and thinning intensity, while the dimension of the selected crop trees and site fertility where similar in the two theses.

Fig. 7 - Analysis of variance and resuts of the Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons among means of current annual increment in diameter (cm yr-1) of the selected wild service trees in mixed coppices managed under the two silvicultural options (A37, A39), at the beginning of the experiment (a, 2011) and 3 years after thinning (b, 2014).

In the areas under conversion into high forest (FA and FB), no significant differences in CAI were observed 7 years after thinning among the two treatment applied (tree-oriented silviculture option, FA; stand silviculture option, FB - Tab. 8). However, FA had mean CAI values higher than FB both overall (0.87 vs. 0.78 m2 ha-¹ yr-¹) and for each of the target species considered (turkey oak, flowering ash and wild service tree). Both plots showed low mortality rate and an almost complete recover of the canopy 7 years after the thinning.

Tab. 8 - Stand dynamics of the aged mixed coppices under conversion into high forest, 7 years after thinning. (M): mortality rate; (CAI): current annual increment; (BA): basal area; (DBH): diameter at breast height; (FA): tree-oriented silviculture applied; (FB): stand silviculture applied; (Qc): Quercus cerris; (Fo): Fraxinus ornus; (Sd): Sorbus domestica.

Discussion and conclusions 

In this study, tree-oriented silviculture practices applied to coppice have proved to increase the growth of selected target trees as well as the stand biodiversity in terms of valuable timber preservation and production.

Chestnut coppices

In chestnut coppices the main goal of the practices applied was the improvement of valuable timber production. In this context, the observed tree growth and the recovery of biomass and canopy cover clearly demonstrated the suitability of the tree-oriented silvicultural approach applied to chestnut coppice ([24]). Moreover, the early selection of a limited number of target trees (50-100 trees ha-1), to be favored along the whole rotation period through thinning, led to an increase in the complexity of the stands. Indeed, such management type promoted the presence in close proximity within the same stand of different vertical and horizontal structures (unmanaged coppice, isolated trees and thinned stools). Irregular stand structures are currently considered to improve the environmental value at the landscape level ([28], [36], [12]).

In both silvicultural approaches (A: tree-oriented silvicultural option; B: stand silvicultural option) thinning should be applied early (10-15 years) to allow the improvement of both stem quality and crown shape, as well as to stimulate the radial growth of trees. In this study, the tree-oriented silviculture approach has promoted a higher dbh increment and a greater development of crown area as compared to stand silviculture approach. The removal of dominant competitor trees during the first thinning can lead to a higher production of larger wood assortments, thus making such interventions more economically feasible in stands aged 10-15 years. In fact, the market of small assortments has been subject to a remarkable contraction in the last years, making early thinning in chestnut coppices unprofitable and hardly viable even in suitable areas like Monte Amiata (Montini P, U.C. Amiata val d’Orcia, Siena, Italy, personal communication).

In this study, a higher and more regular radial growth of target trees was observed in stands characterized by frequent thinnings from above (option A), which could positively influence the timber quality and reduce the ring shake risk ([9], [18]). Furthermore, our results revealed that the higher thinning frequency in option A has caused an overall higher reduction of crown coverage in the short term. However, such negative effect was counterbalanced by the high rate of crown growth for target trees, which allowed a faster recovery of the canopy cover (2-3 years after thinning) as compared with the other silvicultural options tested. Indeed, the LAI values observed in both thinned areas at the end of the study period were similar to those recorded in the control plots or reported in the literature for similar coppice stands ([14]), indicating a good stand dynamics of the plots analyzed. However, site fertility should be taken into consideration when assessing the recovery of canopy cover after thinning, since soil fertility can affect the development of tree crowns.

Mixed coppices

In mixed coppices the tree-oriented silviculture was applied to increase tree biodiversity (that naturally tends to decrease with age in coppices) and to favor the valuable timber production and natural regeneration of sporadic species. This approach can be conveniently applied in mixed stands in two different cases: (i) to promote a restricted number of sporadic species trees within the coppice in areas characterized by good site quality, an adequate presence of valuable trees and a good road density, as pointed out for high forests by Spiecker ([37]) and [31]); (ii) to convert coppice stands into high forest by selecting a higher number of target trees chosen among the dominant and sporadic tree species.

In mixed coppices, single-tree localized thinning around a few number of sporadic tree species (target trees) may create suitable conditions for their growth, allowing them to reach the dominant or codominant layer fin the medium-long term, thereby tree composition can be preserved and stand biodiversity improved. Contrastingly, standard silvicultural practices can maintain the same level of tree biodiversity in the short period by preserving sporadic tree species in the dominated layer. This approach does not involve to any relevant improvement of growth conditions for sporadic tree species, therefore leading to a reduction of tree biodiversity in the medium-long period.

In this study, a positive effect of thinning on current increments in dbh was observed for all target trees of sporadic species. In particular, wild service tree (the most valuable and commom sporadic tree species in the study area) has shown differences in radial growth among different stand ages and coppice development. At half rotation period, its increase in growth after thinning is higher in young than in aged coppices, and this difference increases through time. Young target trees react faster and better to thinning, in particular those belonging to light demanding species. Moreover, in young coppices the early selection of target trees may favor their balanced development and affect their future commercial value. On the contrary, the number, the quality and further growth performances of target trees can be constrained in aged coppices, because the long period of competition experienced could compromise the stem form and architecture of sporadic and valuable tree species. Similar considerations have also been reported in the literature for high forests and other species ([16], [32], [21]).

We did not found any significant difference in tree growth between different silvicultural treatments in mixed aged coppices converted to high forests, though the growth of target trees was slightly higher in thesis A (tree-oriented silviculture) than in thesis B (stand silviculture). This could be due to the fact that the silvicultural practices have been applied after a first traditional thinning and in aged stands, and this could have influenced the growth response of target trees.

In conclusion, the tree-oriented silvicultural approach adopted in this study has proved to be sustainable from an ecological point of view ([23], [6]), whilst further studies and long-term surveys are needed to support its economical suitability. Since this innovative approach is not adopted yet in coppice stands in Italy, we recommend a careful planning since the first phases. The lack of an adequate professional manpower can strongly influence the production of valuable assortments, and a special attention should be payed to felling and logging operations, especially during the first thinning. In addition, a good skidding road density and stand fertility are fundamental requirements to be carefully evaluated before defining the management choices.

References

(1)
Abetz P, Kladtke J (2002). The target tree management system. Forstw Cbl 121: 73-82.
::Google Scholar::
(2)
Abrami A (2002). Il bosco ceduo nell’ordinamento giuridico forestale. In: “Il bosco ceduo in Italia” [The legal order of coppice sytems. In: “The coppice system in Italy”] (Ciancio O, Nocentini S eds). Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, Firenze, Italy, pp. 671-677. [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(3)
Amorini E, Manetti MC (2002). Selvicoltura nei cedui di castagno. Sostenibilità della gestione e produzione legnosa di qualità. In: “Il bosco ceduo in Italia” [Silviculture in chestnut coppices. Sustainable management and valuable timber production. In: “The coppice system in Italy”] (Ciancio O, Nocentini S eds). Accademia Italiana di Scienze Forestali, Firenze, Italy, pp. 219-248. [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(4)
Amorini E, Fabbio G, Gambi G (1979). Sistema di diradamento del bosco ceduo per l’avviamento all’altofusto. Sperimentazione in prospettiva dell’uso multiplo con il pascolo. [Thinning method of coppice for conversion to high forest. Experimental trials for multiple use with grazing]. Annali dell’Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura 10: 3-23. [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(5)
Amorini E, Bruschini S, Manetti MC (2000). Alternative silvicultural systems in chestnut coppice: effects of the silvicultural practice on stand structure and tree growth. Ecologia Mediterranea 26 (1-2): 155-162.
::Google Scholar::
(6)
Anonymous (2014). Piano della filiera legno 2012-2014. Documento di sintesi [Wood chain plan 2012-2014. Synthesis document] (Romano R ed). Osservatorio Foreste, INEA-MiPAF, Rome, Italy, pp. 34. [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(7)
Bargioni E, Zanzi Sulli A (1998). The production of fodder trees in Valdagno Vicenza, Italy. In: “The Ecological History of European Forests” (Kirby KJ, Watkins C eds). CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 43-52.
::Google Scholar::
(8)
Bastien Y, Wilhelm GJ (2000). Une sylviculture d’arbres pour produire des gros bois de qualité [A tree-oriented silviculture to produce large valuable timber]. Revue Forestière Française 5: 407-424. [in French]
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(9)
Becagli C, Amorini E, Manetti MC (2006). Incidenza della cipollatura in popolamenti cedui di castagno da legno del Monte Amiata [Ring shake incidence in chestnut coppice stands on Monte Amiata]. Annali CRA, Centro di ricerca per la Selvicoltura 33: 245-256. [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(10)
Bréda NJ (2003). Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. Journal of Experimental Botany 54 (392): 2403-2417.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(11)
Cantiani M (2006). Participatory approach in forest planning. Forest@ 3 (2): 281-299. [in Italian with English summary]
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(12)
Chapman RA, Heitzman E, Shelton MG (2006). Long-term changes in forest structures and species composition of an upland oak forest in Arkansas. Forest Ecology and Management 236: 85-92.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(13)
Cutini A, Fabbio G (1997). Impatto della gestione selvicolturale sulla funzionalità dei cedui di castagno [Inpact of silvicultural management on the chestnut coppices funcionality]. In: “Atti del Convegno Nazionale sul Castagno”. Cison di Valmarino (TV, Italy), 23-25 Oct 1997, pp. 245-257.
::Google Scholar::
(14)
Cutini A (2001). New management options in chestnut coppices: an evaluation on ecological basis. Forest Ecology and Management 141: 165-174.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(15)
Ducci F, Cantiani P, Cutini A, Dettori S (2015). Forests and no wooden products in Italy. In: Proceeding of the “II International Congress of Silviculture” (Ciancio O ed). Florence (Italy) 26-29 Nov 2014. AISF, Firenze, Italy, pp. 650-657.
::Google Scholar::
(16)
Duflot H (1995). Le frêne en liberté [Ash free growth]. Institut pour le Développement Forestier, Paris, pp. 192. [in French]
::Google Scholar::
(17)
Fantoni I, Miozzo M, Rella E (2012). Pianificazione e specie sporadiche: prime esperienze italiane in ambito del progetto LIFE+ PProSpoT [Forest planning and sporadic species. LIFE+ PProSpoT project: first experience in Italy]. Sherwood - Foreste e Alberi Oggi 184: 9-14. [in Italian]
::Online::Google Scholar::
(18)
Fonti P, Macchioni N, Thibaut B (2002). Ring shake in chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.): state of the art. Annals of Forest Science 59 (2): 129-140.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(19)
INFC (2005). Inventario Nazionale delle Foreste e dei Serbatoi Forestali di Carbonio [National Inventory of forests and forest Carbon pools]. Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali, Ispettorato Generale - Corpo Forestale dello Stato, Consiglio per la Ricerca e Sperimentazione in Agricoltura Unità di ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale (CRA-MPF), Trento, Italy, pp. 409. [in Italian]
::Online::Google Scholar::
(20)
Kerr G (1996). The effect of heavy or free growth thinning on oak (Quercus petraea and Q. robur). Forestry 69 (4): 303-317.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(21)
Lemaire J (2010). Le chêne autrement. Produire du chêne de qualité en moins de 100 ans en futaie régulière [Oak otherwise. Produce quality oak in less than 100 years in regular high forest]. Guide technique, Institut pour le Développement Forestier, Paris, France, pp.176. [in French]
::Google Scholar::
(22)
Manetti MC, Amorini E, Becagli C, Pelleri F, Pividori M, Schleppi P, Zingg A, Conedera M (2010b). Quality wood production from chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) coppice forests. Comparison between different silvicultural approaches. In: Proceedings of the “1st European Congress on Chestnut - Castanea 2009” (Bonous G, Beccaro GL eds). Acta Horticolturae 866: 683-692.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(23)
Manetti MC, Amorini E, Becagli C, Pelleri F, Fratini R, Marone E (2010a). Valorizzazione dei cedui di castagno: modalità di gestione e realtà socio-economica del territorio [Enhancing chestnut coppices: silvicultural management and socio-economic context]. Annali CRA, Centro di Ricerca per la Selvicoltura 36: 97-108. [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(24)
Manetti MC, Pelleri F, Becagli C, Conedera M, Schleppi P, Zingg A (2014). Growth dynamics and leaf area index in chestnut coppices subjected to a new silvicultural approach: single-tree-oriented management. Acta Horticolturae 1043: 121-128.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(25)
Melini D (2013). A spatial model for sporadic tree species distribution in support of tree oriented silviculture. Annals of Silvicultural Research 37 (1): 64-68.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(26)
Mori P, Pelleri F (2012). PProSpoT: un Life+ per le specie arboree sporadiche [PProSpoT: a LIFE+ project for the sporadic tree species]. Sherwood - Foreste e Alberi Oggi 179: 7-11. [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(27)
Mori P, Pelleri F (2014). Selvicoltura per le specie arboree sporadiche [Silviculture for the sporadic tree species]. Compagnia delle Foreste, Arezzo, Italy, pp. 144. [in Italian with English summary]
::Online::Google Scholar::
(28)
Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996). Forest and dynamics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA, pp. 520.
::Google Scholar::
(29)
Oosterbaan A, Hochbichler E, Nicolescu VN, Spiecker H (2008). Silvicultural principles, phases and measures in growing valuable broadleaved tree species. Report of the COST action E42 “Growing Valuable Broadleaved Tree Species” (ValBro), Web site, pp. 11.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(30)
Pelleri F, Giulietti V, Sansone D, Samola A, Nitti D (2010). La valorizzazione delle rosacee arboree: esperienze nei cedui delle Colline Metallifere (GR) [Enhancing minority tree species: the experiences in the Colline Metallifere coppice stands]. Sherwood - Foreste e Alberi Oggi 160: 5- 11 [in Italian]
::Google Scholar::
(31)
Pelleri F, Sansone D, Bianchetto E, Bidini C, Sichi A (2013). Selvicoltura d’albero in fustaie di faggio: valorizzazione delle specie sporadiche e coltivazione della specie dominante [Tree-oriented silviculture in European beech high forests: silvicultural practices aimed both at enhancing sporadic species and at managing the dominant species]. Sherwood - Foreste e Alberi Oggi 190: 43-47. [in Italian with English Summary]
::Online::Google Scholar::
(32)
Perin J, Claessens H (2009). Considerations sur la designation et le dètourage en chênes et hetre [Considerations on the selection and free thinning in oak and beech]. Forêt wallonne 98: 39-52. [in French]
::Google Scholar::
(33)
Sansone D, Bianchetto E, Bidini C, Ravagni S, Nitti D, Samola A, Pelleri F (2012). Selvicoltura d’albero nei cedui giovani: interventi di valorizzazione delle specie sporadiche nell’ambito del Progetto LIFE+ PProSpoT [Tree-oriented silviculture in young coppices. Silvicultural practices to enhance sporadic species: the LIFE+ PPRoSpoT project experience]. Sherwood - Foreste e Alberi Oggi 185: 5-10. [in Italian with English Summary]
::Online::Google Scholar::
(34)
Sevrin E (1997). Chênes sessile et péduncolé [Sessile and peduncolate oaks]. Institut pour le Développement Forestier, Paris, France, pp. 96. [in French]
::Google Scholar::
(35)
Shannon CE (1948). The mathematical theory of communication. In: “The Mathematical Theory of Communication” (Shannon CE, Weaver W eds). University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, USA, pp. 29-125.
::Google Scholar::
(36)
Spiecker H (2003). Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone. Journal of Environmental Management 67: 55-65.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(37)
Spiecker H (2006). Minority tree species: a challenge for a multi-purpose forestry. In: “Nature based forestry in central Europe. Alternative to industrial forestry and strict preservation”. Studia Forestalia Slovenica 126: 47-59.
::Google Scholar::
(38)
Spiecker H, Hein S, Makkonen-Spiecker K, Thies M (2009). Valuable broadleaved forests in Europe. EFI Research Report 22, Brill, Leiden, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 256.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(39)
Wilhelm GJ (2003). Qualification-grossissement: la stratégie sylvicole de Rhénanie-Palatinat [Qualification-sizing: the silvicultural strategy of Rhineland-Palatinate]. Rendez--Vous techniques, Office National des Forêts, Paris, France, vol. 1, pp. 4-9. [in French]
::Google Scholar::

Download

Paper Contents

Paper Sections

Paper Figures

Paper Tables

Supplementary Material

 
 
Close

 

Manetti MC, Becagli C, Sansone D, Pelleri F (2016).
Tree-oriented silviculture: a new approach for coppice stands
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 9: 791-800. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1827-009
Close
First Previous Next Last
 
Close
© iForest

Download Reference

Paper ID# ifor1827-009
Title Tree-oriented silviculture: a new approach for coppice stands
Authors Manetti MC, Becagli C, Sansone D, Pelleri F
Format
Close Download