Close Home
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
vol. 9, pp. 483-489
Copyright © 2016 by the Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology
doi: 10.3832/ifor1708-008

Research Articles

Combined pre-hardening and fall fertilization facilitates N storage and field performance of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings

Guolei Li (1)Corresponding author, Jiaxi Wang (1), Juan A Oliet (2), Douglass F Jacobs (3)

Introduction 

More nitrogen (N) is retranslocated from perennial tissues to new apical growth tissues in seedlings with rich N reserves, especially when seedlings are outplanted in poor fertility soil ([34], [27], [48]). Thus, additional N fertilization during nursery culture may provide an effective solution for enhancing field performance and has received worldwide attention ([40], [1], [48], [29]).

Exponential fertilization during the pre-hardening stage and fall fertilization during the hardening stage are two approaches to facilitate N storage in seedlings ([40], [39], [9]). Exponential fertilization reflects application of fertilizer at exponential rates corresponding closer to the desired relative growth rate of plants during their exponential phase of growth ([40], [3]). It synchronizes nutrient supply with crop demand, referred to as steady-state nutrition ([15]), and has proven to facilitate nutrient storage in a variety of tree species ([41], [26], [31], [33], [35], [30]). Previous studies comparing one exponential fertilization rate with one or more conventional fertilization rates, have effectively demonstrated that greater plant N reserves induced by exponential fertilization have the potential to promote seedling field performance over conventional fertilization ([10], [6], [51]). When outplanted onto a field site, how seedlings respond to varying exponential fertilization rates in the nursery has been studied on several species, including western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg. - [12]), northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) and white oak (Q. alba L. - [37]). However, less attention has been given to pines (Pinus spp.), which are among the most widely distributed and planted species worldwide.

Fall fertilization is another approach to facilitate nutrient loading. Fall fertilization could counter nutrient dilution due to biomass accumulation and promote storage of nutrient reserves in seedlings ([45]). Therefore, it has been implemented in a variety of tree species such as loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L. - [39]), slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii Engelm. - [16]), red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait. - [17]), Norway spruce (P. abies (L.) Karsten - [32], [13]), black spruce (Picea mariana Milli.B.S.P. - [4]), Lutz spruce (Picea x lutzii Littl. - [19]), Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco - [45], [23], [24]), holm oak (Q. ilex spp. ballota Desf. - [28], [1]), Olga Bay larch (Larix olgensis Henry - [20], [54]).

In addition, the efficacy of fall fertilization on seedling nutrient reserves is dependent on pre-hardening nutrient status ([4], [21]). If seedlings are provided with high rates of fertilizer and thus have substantial amounts of stored nutrients during the pre-hardening period, then fall fertilization has little additional impact on nutrient reserves ([4]). For example, in the deciduous Chinese cork oak (Quercus variabilis Blume), root N concentration was affected by the interaction of pre-hardening and fall fertilization ([21]). Due to variable strategies of nursery fertilization among tree species ([44]), little information is available on how the combination of pre-hardening and fall fertilization impacts nutrient storage of Pinus spp. seedlings.

Stored nutrients in nursery seedlings are often correlated with early seedling survival after outplanting ([45], [48]), and nutrient differences among fall fertilization treatments are influenced by pre-hardening fertilization ([4], [21]). Earlier papers have primarily dealt with the relationship between field performance and pre-hardening or fall fertilization independently ([31], [32], [12], [6], [10], [28], [29]), but expanded study aimed at understanding how their interactive effects impact nursery and field performance are needed, especially for species of widely planted genera such as Pinus.

Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.) is a native evergreen coniferous species and the most widely planted species in northern China. Because of its resistance to drought and low soil fertility, it is planted across a wide range of site types and is often exposed to environmental stresses ([53], [52]). Nursery fertilization has been shown to promote Chinese pine seedling nutrient reserves ([14], [50]), suggesting potential to increase stress resistance and improve outplanting performance ([48], [29]). Thus, our objectives were to: (1) examine the combined effects of these two nutrient loading approaches on Chinese pine seedling nutrient storage in the nursery; and (2) assess how field performance responds to the application of combined exponential and fall fertilizations in the nursery. We focused on N because this nutrient is often the most limiting factor for seedling growth in peat-growing media ([11]), is required in the largest amount for intensive nursery culture of conifers ([35]), and is highly correlated with field performance after outplanting ([48], [29]). We hypothesized that: (1) pre-hardening and fall fertilization would each promote nutrient reserves in Chinese pine seedling yet vary in their effectiveness; (2) pre-hardening and fall fertilization would be more advantageous in combination than individually; and (3) outplanting performance would be strongly correlated with seedling growth and nutrient storage from the nursery phase.

Materials and methods 

Nursery fertilization treatments and outplanting trial

The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse at the Chinese Academy of Forestry Sciences in Beijing (40° 40′ N, 116° 14′ E). Our experiment investigated the main and interacting effects of three rates of pre-hardening N fertilization and four rates of N fertilization during hardening (fall fertilization). On 21 February 2010, seeds from a regional seed orchard (National Seed Orchard for Chinese Pine, Qigou Forest Farm, 41° 00′ N, 118° 27′ E, 526 m a.s.l.) were sown into plastic containers (8 cm diameter × 8 cm deep, 187 ml capacity) filled with a 3:1 (v:v) peat:vermiculite medium. Thirty containers were randomly assigned to a tray (53 cm long × 44.5 cm wide), providing a density of 127 seedlings m-2.

Three pre-hardening fertilization rates based on another Pinus species study ([26]), starting 1 week after germination and continuing for 25 weeks, were tested: (i) 40 mg N per seedling; (ii) 80 mg N per seedling; and (iii) 120 mg N per seedling following exponential (E) functions ([25], [10]). A total of 48 trays were arranged in a completely randomized design with sixteen trays for each rate.

In this study, the average initial N content per seed (NS) was determined to be 1.58 mg N. The total number of fertilizations (t) was 25. N was supplied as urea (Xilong Chemical Co., China), a N source commonly used in Chinese nurseries. Elemental P and K were supplied as KH2PO4 (Guangdong Guanghua Sci-Tech Co. Ltd., China). On 16 August the pre-hardening fertilization was terminated, each seedling received total amounts of 26.2 mg P and 32.9 mg K which were evenly split and applied weekly in addition to the N fertilizer (1 March-16 August, 2010). The desired amounts of N, P and K were dissolved in distilled water and added manually to each seedling once per week with a hand-sprayer. No micronutrients were applied during the experiment. Seedlings were rinsed after each application to avoid foliar fertilizer burn. Additional irrigation was provided as necessary, about two times each week. The trays on raised benches were rotated every week to minimize edge effect.

Fall fertilization started two weeks after the pre-hardening fertilization ended when most seedlings had already formed the terminal buds, and lasted for four weeks (30 August-20 September, 2010). The doses of N were evenly split and applied weekly as four fall fertilization rates: (i) control (no additional fertilization); (ii) 12 mg N per seedling; (iii) 24 mg N per seedling; and (iv) 48 mg N per seedling. Fall fertilization was applied within each of the three pre-hardening regimes (40, 80, 120 mg N per seedling) as a factorial 3×4 design that was randomly arranged with four replications per treatments combination. The desired amount of N was supplied as urea; 20 ml of appropriate fertigation solution was added by hand to each seedling. On 24 October, all seedlings were moved outdoors to hasten hardening. After 28 November, seedlings were stored under snow cover over winter.

Temperature was measured with a JL-18 Series thermometer (Huayan Instrument and Equipment Co., Shanghai, China) at 10-min intervals. From sowing throughout the end of the pre-hardening fertilization, the daily average for day:night temperature in the greenhouse was 25:18 °C, respectively. During the fall N application period and until the seedlings were moved outdoors, greenhouse temperatures averaged 19:14 °C (day:night). Once outside, seedlings were exposed to temperatures averaging 13:9 °C (day: night).

On 1 May 2011, seedlings from the twelve fertility treatments were shipped and outplanted in a previously cultivated land at the Beijing Forestry University Northern Experimental Base at Pingquan, Hebei province (41° 13′ N, 118° 40′ E). The soil was ploughed before outplanting. Weeds were removed by hand. The site has an average elevation of 765 m a.s.l. with a small slope (< 2%). The depth of soil varied between 45 and 60 cm. The surface soil (0-20 cm) is 73% sand, 11% silt, and 16% clay (a sandy clay loam) with a pH of 6.2 and soil organic carbon of 0.7%. Average total N, available P, and available K were 628.7, 139.5, and 113.5 mg kg-1, respectively. The soil was considered to have moderate fertility according to the macronutrient classification criteria ([2]). The area has a temperate continental monsoon climate, characterized by dry winter and spring seasons. During 2011 and 2012, mean annual air temperature was 7.4 °C and 6.8 °C, respectively. Annual rainfall was 486 mm in 2011 and 626 mm in 2012.

The field experiment was arranged as a randomized complete block experimental design with four replicates. Each block measured 14×16.5 m2 and was separated from adjacent blocks by 1 m buffers. Fifteen randomly selected seedlings from a tray per treatment were planted in single parallel rows within each block, resulting in a total of 720 seedlings planted. Seedlings were planted in 0.4×0.4×0.4 m manually dug planting holes with a 1×1.5 m2 spacing.

Harvesting and measurements

Seedlings were sampled prior to planting to evaluate biomass allocation and N storage responses to nursery fertilization. Thirty-two seedlings per nursery fertilization treatment (eight seedlings per replicated tray) were randomly chosen. After carefully washing, seedlings were separated into needles, stems and roots. Organs of seedlings were oven-dried at 65 °C for 48 h to determine biomass. Organ N concentration was determined from a composite sample of eight seedlings for each treatment from a tray using semi-micro Kjeldahl distillation ([5]).

Immediately after planting on 2 May 2011, seedling height and diameter were measured (T1). When seedling growth ceased in late October of 2011 (T2) and 2012 (T3), survival, height and diameter were measured. Survival was calculated as the number of saplings of the original fifteen remaining alive for each nursery-treatment replicate at the time of each annual measurement. Diameter was measured at ground rate on each tree stem, and total seedling height was measured from the root collar to the tip of the terminal bud. Net increment of height in cm (or diameter in mm) was defined as the difference observed between T2 and T1, and between T3 and T2.

Statistical analyses

Effects of pre-hardening fertilization (3 rates), fall fertilization (4 rates), and their interactions were assessed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) applied on a completely randomized design at the nursery experiment and on a randomized complete block design in the outplanting trial. When ANOVA results showed a significant effect, post-hoc Duncan’s test was carried out for multiple comparisons among treatments (α=0.05). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS® 16.0 (Chicago, Illinois, USA). The “explore” function of SPSS was used to examine data prior to ANOVA, and survival was arsine-transformed to fulfill normality and variance homogeneity requirements.

Results 

Nursery phase

Fertilization factors and its interaction did not significantly affect biomass of specific organs or the whole plant (Tab. 1). The foliage, stem, and root biomass of seedlings averaged 0.33 ± 0.01, 0.16 ± 0.001, and 0.40 ± 0.01 g, respectively. N concentration in foliage, root and whole plant was higher at 120 than at 40 and 80 mg N per seedling of per-hardening fertilization. Fall fertilization enhanced foliar N concentration relative to the control (Tab. 1, Fig. 1). Organ N content did not differ among pre-hardening fertilization or fall fertilization, although pre-hardening fertilization marginally affected N content of three organs (Tab. 1). Overall mean of N content was 7.7 ± 0.16, 3.5 ± 0.08, and 6.7 ± 0.13 mg in foliage, stem and root, respectively. The N content of whole plants, however, was influenced by the interaction of pre-hardening fertilization and fall fertilization (Tab. 1, Fig. 2). At the lowest pre-hardening fertilization regime (40 mg N per seedling), 24 mg N per seedling of fall fertilization significantly increased the N content. At 80 mg N per seedling of pre-hardening fertilization regime, 12 mg N per seedling of fall fertilization yielded a similar effect.

Tab. 1 - P-values derived from ANOVA of the main effects pre-hardening fertilization (PF), fall fertilization (FF) and of their interaction effect (PF×FF) on Chinese pine seedling biomass, N concentration and N content prior to plating.
Fig. 1 - Chinese pine seedling organ N concentration (means ± SE) in relation to pre-hardening and fall fertilization prior to planting. No significant interaction between pre-hardening and fall fertilization occurred in N concentration. Bars marked with different letters significantly differed for each organ and the whole plant after Duncan’s test (α = 0.05).
Fig. 2 - Effect of combination treatments between pre-hardening fertilization and fall fertilization (0, 12, 24, 48) on Chinese pine seedling N content (mg N/ seedling) prior to planting and total height (cm) at the end of first growing season (2011) after planting. Means ± SE marked with different letters significantly differed after Duncan’s test (α = 0.05).

Field performance

For all field attributes, the interaction of pre-hardening fertilization and fall fertilization only had a significant effect on total height at the first growing season after outplanting (Tab. 2). The combination of pre-hardening at 40 mg N per seedling and 24 mg N per seedling of fall fertilization (24 mg) yielded the maximum height (Fig. 2). Within the highest pre-hardening fertilization regime, 24 and 48 mg N per seedling of fall fertilization decreased height compared to the control.

Tab. 2 - P-values derived from ANOVA of main effects pre-hardening fertilization (PF), fall fertilization (FF) and of their interaction effect (PF×FF) on Chinese pine seedlings survival, total height, diameter and their increments prior to planting (Initial), at the end of first (2011) and second (2012) growing seasons after planting.

Pre-hardening fertilization had no significant effect on survival either during the first or second growing season (Tab. 2). Survival of 40, 80 and 120 mg N per seedling of pre-hardening fertilization was 90%, 95%, and 89% in the first growing season, and was 79%, 79%, and 70% in the second growing season, respectively. Pre-planting height was superior for the highest pre-hardening fertilization rate. However, first-year height increment of later rate was minimum. There was no significant difference in second-year height among pre-hardening rates. The dominance of total height in the highest exponential fertilization vanished at end of the second growing season (Tab. 2, Fig. 3). Both first-year and second-year diameter increments were superior in the 40 mg N per seedling of pre-hardening fertilization treatment, with the greatest diameter occurring in the lowest pre-hardening fertilization rate at the end of second growing season (Tab. 2, Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 - Chinese pine seedlings total height, diameter and their increments in relation to pre-hardening and fall fertilization at planting (Initial), at the end of first and second growing seasons after planting. Error bars represent SE of increments at the end of first and second growing seasons, and of size prior to planting. Bars marked with different capital and lower case letters significantly differed for total height (diameter) and its increment according to Duncan’s test (α = 0.05), respectively. Comparison letters for first-year height are not presented owing to an occurring interaction.

Fall fertilization also did not affect survival of Chinese pine seedlings. Survival of the control, 12, 24 and 48 mg N per seedling of fall fertilization was 92%, 93%, 93%, and 87% in the first growing season, and was 81%, 74%, 77%, and 73% in the second growing season, respectively. Pre-planting height and diameter were similar between fall-unfertilized and fertilized seedlings. Compared to the control, significant height increments in 12 and 24 mg N per seedling of fall fertilization treatments were not observed until the second growing season.

Discussion 

Effect of pre-hardening fertilization on nursery and field performance

Under luxury N consumption, seedling dry mass remains unchanged but tissue N content continuously increases ([40], [25], [34], [3]). As defined by the conceptual model ([40]), absence of effects of exponential fertilization on biomass indicated that 40 mg N already reflected luxury consumption for the studied seedlings. This result is similar to our previous study on Chinese pine seedlings ([49]). Deficiency, luxury consumption, and toxicity have been determined in species of Quercus and Picea by evaluating the nursery response to more than six exponential fertilization rates ([35], [3], [36]). For red pine, Timmer & Armstrong ([41]) proposed that 9.75 mg N yielded luxury consumption. In another study of red pine, however, 25 mg N was not designated as luxury consumption because a significant increase in biomass was still detected at 75 mg N ([26]). These conflicting results for Pinus spp. suggest that a wider range of nutrient availability should be tested to more accurately quantify N luxury consumption under varying cultural systems.

In recent years, there has been a trend to determine nursery fertilization in light of field performance on a specific site condition as well as seedling biomass and nutrient reserves accumulated during nursery growth ([12], [13], [27], [19], [47]). For example, in very dry Mediterranean environments some studies showed that seedlings with low nutrient concentration or content performed better ([42], [43], [7]), whereas other studies indicated that increased tissue nutrient reserves improves seedling field performance ([22], [8], [48], [29]). These contrasting results suggest that insight into nursery fertilization and field outplanting should be further tested, in particular with relation to climatic planting conditions or soil characteristics. In the present study, greater plant N reserves induced by the highest exponential fertilization rate did not promote survival and growth performance in the following two growing seasons. In contrast, the lowest pre-hardening fertilization rate (40 mg) yielded desirable growth performance. These findings suggest that, under the relatively dry conditions of our study, rational reduction of nursery fertilization might be a choice to improve seedling outplanted performance once these nursery fertilization rates are within the luxury range.

Effect of fall fertilization on nursery and field performance

The benefit of fall fertilizer on enhancement of foliage N concentration was found in Chinese pine as well as other tree seedlings ([23], [39], [16], [13], [19]). This result is consistent with the goal of fall fertilization to nutrient load by enhancing foliar N concentration ([9]). Increased foliar N concentration in fall-fertilized Chinese pine seedlings did not facilitate foliar N content, in accordance with that reported for holm oak seedling ([28]) but in contrast to results for Douglas-fir, loblolly pine, and Norway spruce seedlings ([23], [39], [13]). Lack of increased foliar N content could be attributed to the absence of increasing foliar biomass of fall-fertilized seedlings, as per other previous studies ([16], [28]).

The present and earlier findings of fall fertilization indicated mixed survival and growth responses to increased foliar N concentration. Fall fertilization had no effect on survival of Chinese pine, corresponding to results for Norway spruce, Douglas-fir, and Lutz spruce ([46], [13], [19]). However, reduced survival was reported in fall-fertilized longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) seedlings ([38]). Pre-planting diameter and height of fall-fertilized seedlings was similar to that of non fall-fertilized seedlings for Chinese pine and several other species ([24], [16], [13], [28]). These trends were maintained in first-year diameter for Chinese pine, which was contrary to that reported for slash pine seedlings ([16]). For height, favorable effects of fall fertilization did not appear until the second growing season in our study, despite frequent reports of improved first-year height growth in fall fertilized seedlings ([24], [16], [13]). Inconclusive growth performance across these studies again demonstrates that comprehensive consideration of both nursery and field performance determines rational N supply in the nursery for seedling production to meet a particular site condition. Overall, 12 and 24 mg N fall fertilization rates are more effective during hardening for Chinese pine seedling in terms of foliar N concentration prior to planting, and total height and height increment at the second year after outplanting.

Interaction between pre-hardening and fall fertilization on nursery seedling N storage and subsequent field performance

In previous studies investigating fall fertilization, seedlings generally received the same dose of pre-hardening fertilization and were subsequently fall-fertilized at multiple treatment rates ([46], [16], [13], [19]). This precludes the ability to distinguish how pre-hardening fertilization affects fall fertilization; and the use of a single pre-hardening fertilization rate potentially contributes to the inconsistent results of fall fertilization among studies. For black spruce seedlings, interactions influenced both N concentration and content of the whole plant ([4]). Interaction only occurred in root N concentration of Chinese cork oak seedlings ([21]) and in N content of the whole plant for Chinese pine in our study. Additionally, fall fertilization had adverse effects on N content when seedlings were fertilized at the pre-hardening rate of 120 mg N, indicating that this rate may have the approximated optimal nutrient input whereas additional fertilization has proven to induce some toxicity ([18]).

First-year height after outplanting indicated that fall fertilization had a slightly advantageous effect under 40 and 80 mg N per seedling of pre-hardening fertilization regimes, whereas negative impacts were observed at the highest rate. This could be related to incipient toxicity for seedlings fertilized at 120 mg that were subsequently fertilized with additional N in the fall. This interactive effect of pre-hardening and fall fertilization was transitory and vanished at the second-year of outplanting.

Conclusions 

Based on nursery seedling growth and N content during the pre-hardening period, the three pre-hardening fertilization rates (40, 80 and 120 mg N) induced luxury consumption of Chinese pine seedlings. Fall fertilization of seedlings that received 40-80 mg N per seedling during pre-hardening further N loaded Chinese pine. For the highest pre-hardening fertilization rate, however, fall fertilization decreased N content.

Maximum diameter was observed in the lowest nursery exponential fertilization rate at the second year after outplanting. Supplemental fertilization during fall with 12 and 24 mg N per seedling were more effective in enhancing both total height and height increment at the second year after outplanting. Considering nursery and field performance, fertilization cost and potential nitrate leaching risks, combining pre-hardening fertilization with fall fertilization may serve as a more effective means to promote N storage and outplanting growth as compared with pre-hardening fertilization alone. Further research is needed, however, to optimize application rates under this fertilization scheme for Chinese pine and other important reforestation species under varying cultural regimes.

Acknowledgements 

The study was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China (contract no. TD2011-08). We specially thank the Meteorological Bureau of Pingquan County for assistance with providing weather data.

References

(1)
Andivia E, Fernández M, Vázquez-Piqué J (2011). Autumn fertilization of Quercus ilex ssp. ballota (Desf.) Samp. nursery seedlings: effects on morpho-physiology and field performance. Annals of Forest Science 68: 543-553.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(2)
Bao SD (2000). Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis. Chinese Agriculture Press, Beijing, China, pp. 522.
::Google Scholar::
(3)
Birge ZKD, Salifu KF, Jacobs DF (2006). Modified exponential nitrogen loading to promote morphological quality and nutrient storage of bareroot-cultured Quercus rubra and Quercus alba seedlings. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 21: 306-316.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(4)
Boivin JR, Salifu KF, Timmer VR (2004). Late-season fertilization of Picea mariana seedlings: intensive loading and outplanting response on greenhouse bioassays. Annals of Forest Science 61: 737-745.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(5)
Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS (1982). Nitrogen-total. In: “Methods of Soil Analysis” (Page AL ed). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 595-624.
::Google Scholar::
(6)
Close DC, Bail I, Hunter S, Beadle CL (2005). Effects of exponential nutrient-loading on morphological and nitrogen characteristics and on after-planting performance of Eucalyptus globulus seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management 205: 397-403.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(7)
Cortina J, Vilagrosa A, Trubat R (2013). The role of nutrients for improving seedling quality in drylands. New Forests 44: 719-732.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(8)
Cuesta B, Villar-Salvador P, Puértolas J, Jacobs DF, Rey-Benayas JM (2010). Why do large, nitrogen rich seedlings better resist stressful transplanting conditions? A physiological analysis in two functionally contrasting Mediterranean forest species. Forest Ecology and Management 260: 71-78.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(9)
Dumroese RK (2003). Hardening fertilization and nutrient loading of conifer seedlings. In: Proceedings of the “Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations - 2002” (Riley LE, Dumroese RK, Landis TD eds). Proceedings RMRS-P-28, Rocky Mountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, UT, USA, pp. 31-36.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(10)
Dumroese RK, Page-Dumroese DS, Salifu KF, Jacobs DF (2005). Exponential fertilization of Pinus monticola seedlings: nutrient uptake efficiency, leaching fractions, and early outplanting performance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 2961-2967.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(11)
Folk RS, Timmer VR, Scarrat JB (1992). Evaluating peat as a growing medium for jack pine seedlings. 1. Conventional laboratory indices. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22: 945-949.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(12)
Hawkins BJ, Burgess D, Mitchell AK (2005). Growth and nutrient dynamics of western hemlock with conventional or exponential greenhouse fertilization and planting in different fertility conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35: 1002-1016.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(13)
Heiskanen J, Lahti M, Luoranen J, Rikala R (2009). Nutrient loading has a transitory effect on the nitrogen status and growth of outplanted Norway spruce seedlings. Silva Fennica 43: 249-260.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(14)
Huang GY, Dong LF, Qi FM (2004). Fertilization effect and application of diagnosis and recommendation integrated system in container system seedling raising of Pinus tabulaeformis. Journal of West China Forestry Science 33 (3): 26-29.
::Google Scholar::
(15)
Imo M, Timmer VR (1992). Nitrogen uptake of Mesquite seedlings at conventional and exponential fertilization regimes. Soil Science Society of American Journal 56: 927-934.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(16)
Irwin KM, Duryea ML, Stone EL (1998). Fall-applied nitrogen improves performance of 1-0 slash pine nursery seedlings after outplanting. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 22: 111-116.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(17)
Islam MA, Apostol KG, Jacobs DF, Dumroese RK (2009). Fall fertilization of Pinus resinosa seedlings: nutrient uptake, cold hardiness, and morphological development. Annals of Forest Science 66.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(18)
Jacobs DF, Timmer VR (2005). Fertilizer-induced changes in rhizosphere electrical conductivity: relation to forest tree seedling root system growth and function. New Forests 30: 147-166.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(19)
Jonsdottir RJ, Sigurdsson BD, Lindström A (2013). Effects of nutrient loading and fertilization at planting on growth and nutrient status of Lutz spruce (Picea x lutzii) seedlings during the first growing season in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28: 631-641.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(20)
Li GL, Liu Y, Zhu Y, Li QM, Dumroese RK (2012). Effect of fall-applied nitrogen on growth, nitrogen storage, and frost hardiness of bareroot Larix olgensis seedlings. Silva Fennica 46: 345-354.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(21)
Li GL, Zhu Y, Liu Y, Wang JX, Liu JJ, Dumroese RK (2014). Combined effects of pre-hardening and fall fertilization on nitrogen translocation and storage in Quercus variabilis seedlings. European Journal of Forest Research 133: 983-992.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(22)
Luis VC, Puértolas J, Climent J, Peters J, González-Rodriguez A, Morales D, Jiménez M (2009). Nursery fertilization enhances survival and physiological status in Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis) seedlings planted in a semiarid environment. European Journal of Forest Research 128: 221-229.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(23)
Margolis HA, Waring RH (1986a). Carbon and nitrogen allocation patterns of Douglas-fir seedlings fertilized with nitrogen in autumn. I. Overwinter metabolism. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 897-902.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(24)
Margolis HA, Waring RH (1986b). Carbon and nitrogen allocation patterns of Douglas-fir seedlings fertilized with nitrogen in autumn. II. Field performance. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16: 903-909.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(25)
McAlister JA, Timmer VR (1998). Nutrient enrichment of white spruce seedlings during nursery culture and initial plantation establishment. Tree Physiology 18: 195-202.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(26)
Miller BD, Timmer VR (1994). Steady-state nutrition of Pinus resinosa seedlings: response to nutrient loading, irrigation and hardening regimes. Tree Physiology 14: 1327-38.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(27)
Oliet JA, Tejada M, Salifu KF, Collazos A, Jacobs DF (2009). Performance and nutrient dynamics of holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) seedlings in relation to nursery nutrient loading and post-transplant fertility. European Journal of Forest Research 128: 253-263.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(28)
Oliet JA, Salazar JM, Villar R, Robredo E, Valladares F (2011). Fall fertilization of Holm oak affects N and P dynamics, root growth potential, and post-planting phenology and growth. Annals of Forest Science 68: 647-656.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(29)
Oliet JA, Puértolas J, Planelles R, Jacobs DF (2013). Nutrient loading of forest tree seedlings to promote stress resistance and field performance: a Mediterranean perspective. New Forests 44: 449-469.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(30)
Qu LY, Ali M, Quoreshi AM, Koike T (2003). Root growth characteristics, biomass and nutrient dynamics of seedlings of two larch species raised under different fertilization regimes. Plant and Soil 255: 293-302.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(31)
Quoreshi AM, Timmer VR (2000). Early outplanting performance of nutrient-loaded containerized black spruce seedlings inoculated with Laccaria bicolor: a bioassay study. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 744-752.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(32)
Rikala R, Heiskanen J, Lahti M (2004). Autumn fertilization in the nursery affects growth of Picea abies container seedlings after transplanting. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19: 409-414.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(33)
Salifu KF, Timmer VR (2001). Nutrient retranslocation response of Picea mariana seedlings to nitrogen supply. Soil Science Society of America Journal 65: 905-913.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(34)
Salifu KF, Timmer VR (2003a). Nitrogen retranslocation response of young Picea mariana to nitrogen-15 supply. Soil Science Society of America Journal 67: 309-317.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(35)
Salifu KF, Timmer VR (2003b). Optimizing nitrogen loading of Picea mariana seedlings during nursery culture. Journal of Forest Research 33: 1287-1294.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(36)
Salifu KF, Jacobs DF (2006). Characterizing fertility targets and multi-element interactions in nursery culture of Quercus rubra seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 63: 231-237.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(37)
Salifu KF, Jacobs DF, Birge ZKD (2009). Nursery nitrogen loading improves field performance of bareroot oak seedlings planted on abandoned mine lands. Restoration Ecology 17: 339-349.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(38)
Shoulders E (1959). Caution needed in fall application of nitrogen to nursery stock. Tree Planters Notes 38: 25-27.
::Google Scholar::
(39)
Sung SS, Black CC, Kormanik TL, Zarnoch SJ, Kormanik PP, Counce PA (1997). Fall nitrogen fertilization and the biology of Pinus taeda seedling development. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 1406-1412.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(40)
Timmer VR (1996). Exponential nutrient loading: a new fertilization technique to improve seedling performance on competitive sites. New Forests 13: 275-295.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(41)
Timmer VR, Armstrong G (1987). Growth and nutrition of containerized Pinus resinosa at exponentially increasing nutrient additions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 17: 644-647.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(42)
Trubat R, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A (2008). Short-term nitrogen deprivation increases field performance in nursery seedlings of Mediterranean woody species. Journal of Arid Environments 72: 879-890.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(43)
Trubat R, Cortina J, Vilagrosa A (2010). Nursery fertilization affects seedling traits but not field performance. Journal of Arid Environments 74: 491-497.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(44)
Valdecantos A, Cortina J, Ramón Vallejo V (2006). Nutrient status and field performance of tree seedlings planted in Mediterranean degraded areas. Annals of Forest Science 63: 249-256.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(45)
Van Den Driessche R (1985). Late season fertilization, mineral nutrient reserves, and retranslocation in planted Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seedlings. Forest Science 31: 485-496.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(46)
Van Den Driessche R (1988). Nursery growth of conifer seedling using fertilizers of different solubilities and application time, and their forest growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Science 18: 172-180.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(47)
Villar-Salvador P, Puértolas J, Jacobs DF (2013). Nitrogen nutrition and drought hardening exert opposite effects on the stress tolerance of Pinus pinea L. seedlings. Tree Physiology 33: 221-232.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(48)
Villar-Salvador P, Puértolas J, Cuesta B, Peñuelas JL, Uscola M, Heredia-Guerrero N, Rey Benayas JM (2012). Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival. New Forests 43: 755-770.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(49)
Wang J, Li G, Pinto J, Liu J, Shi W, Liu Y (2015). Both nursery and field performance determine suitable nitrogen supply of nursery-grown, exponentially fertilized Chinese pine. Silva Fennica 49 (3): 1295.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(50)
Wang XS (2014). Fertilization experiments on container seedlings of Pinus tabulaeformis. Protection Forest Science and Technology 6: 46-47.
::Google Scholar::
(51)
Way DA, Seegobin SD, Sage RF (2007). The effect of carbon and nutrient loading during nursery culture on the growth of black spruce seedlings: a six-year field study. New Forests 34: 307-312.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(52)
Wu G, Feng ZW (1994). Study on the social characteristics and biomass of the Pinus tabulaeformis forest systems in China. Acta Ecologica Sinica 14: 415-422.
::Google Scholar::
(53)
Xu HC, Sun ZF, Guo GR, Feng L (1981). Geographic distribution of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. and classification of provenance regions. Scientia Silvae Sinicae 17: 258-270.
::Google Scholar::
(54)
Zhu Y, Dumroese RK, Pinto JR, Li GL, Liu Y (2013). Fall fertilization enhanced nitrogen storage and translocation in Larix olgensis seedlings. New Forests 44: 849-861.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

Download

Paper Contents

Paper Sections

Paper Figures

Paper Tables

 
 
Close

 

Li G, Wang J, Oliet JA, Jacobs DF (2016).
Combined pre-hardening and fall fertilization facilitates N storage and field performance of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 9: 483-489. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1708-008
Close
First Previous Next Last
 
Close
© iForest

Download Reference

Paper ID# ifor1708-008
Title Combined pre-hardening and fall fertilization facilitates N storage and field performance of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings
Authors Li G, Wang J, Oliet JA, Jacobs DF
Format
Close Download