Close Home
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
vol. 8, pp. 809-817
Copyright © 2015 by the Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology
doi: 10.3832/ifor1367-008

Research Articles

Bud flush phenology and nursery carryover effect of paper birch provenances

Amalesh Dhar (1-2)Corresponding author, Nicole Balliet (1), Christopher DB Hawkins (1-3), Michael R Carlson (4), Vicky G Berger (4), Ronald Mahoney (5)

Introduction 

Paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh) is one of the most widely distributed birch species in North America. Recently, researchers have shown that the presence of birch in mixedwood stands plays a significant role in nutrient cycling, and in the disease and insect pest control for conifers species ([5], [1], [49], [17]). Moreover, the presence of birch in young conifer plantations improves soil nutrient status and reduces the risk of root disease ([6], [48], [44]). All these beneficial characteristics help to promote birch as a new commercial reforestation species in British Columbia (BC - [5], [12], [18], [19]). However, knowledge concerning geographic variation or patterns of genetic variation within and among provenances is scarce ([5], [6], [16], [9]). Therefore, further study in relation to variability in birch’s phenotypic traits is needed prior to establishing seed zones and seed transfer guidelines.

Transfer of a provenance to a new environment may predispose it to both positive and negative impacts on growth depending on transfer direction ([22], [53]). Moreover, when tree species are transferred to a new environment they must regulate the timing of bud flush and flowering during the spring, as well as the timing of growth cessation and dormancy development during late summer and fall, in order to reduce the risk of frost damage ([21]). In this regard, bud flush phenology is critical because it determines the beginning of the growing season and the probability of damage due to late spring frosts ([4]). However, the annual rhythm of bud development in many forest trees species (such as birch, Douglas fir - Pseudotsuga menziesii Mirb.) are controlled by chilling temperature, duration of chilling (for birch temperatures ≤ 5°C for a few weeks) and accumulation of spring heat sums ([24], [40]). In addition, these chilling characteristics do not just determine susceptibility to frost damage. Chilling also affects bud and leaf development ([40]) and can vary from species to species ([35]) or differ within species by latitudinal origin ([14]). After meeting the chilling requirement, positive temperatures lead to bud development and the process may accelerate when temperature starts to increase ([25]). However, extended photoperiod may overcome the lack of chilling if trees are exposed to long days before meeting their chilling requirement irrespective of provenance origin ([8]). Although air temperature appears to be the most significant environmental factor influencing the initiation of bud flush in Betula spp., photoperiod and soil temperature may also play important roles ([10], [31], [16]).

Apart from the above mechanisms regulating spring bud flush, observations from common garden studies at different geographic locations suggest variability in spring bud phenology within species. Studies in northern Europe suggest northern provenances of B. pubescens Ehrh., B. nana L., B. pendula ([51], [36]) and Acer platanoides L. ([56]) flush before southern provenances in a continental climate. Furthermore, continental provenances of B. pendula and B. pubescens flush earlier than those of coastal provenances ([37]), while inland provenances of Ulmus glabra (Huds.) flushed earlier than those of coastal provenances ([38]). Conversely, other studies have demonstrated that southern provenances of Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. and B. papyrifera flush slightly before northern provenances, and coastal populations of Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii and B. papyrifera flush before continental provenances at a continental site ([39], [11], [16]. Therefore, it is important to determine the potential transfer responses before initiating any transfer guidelines.

A significant change in abiotic factors can occur in mountainous regions over a short distance ([54]). Therefore, elevational transects provide an ideal methodology for studying the variation of plant functional traits in response to environmental factors. Based on the study by Myking ([37]), low elevation provenances of Betula spp. flush before high elevation provenances. A similar trend was also observed in provenance trials with other species, Fagus sylvatica L. in Polish and Finnish provenance trials ([7], [56]). Conversely, Sharik & Barnes ([46]) observed no elevational trend for flushing in a Betula spp. provenance trial in the USA. Therefore, an investigation of phenology responses along elevational transects is prerequisite before developing any seed transfer guidelines.

Nursery practices may lead to alteration of a population’s phenotypic expression. This may ultimately influence the genetic acclimation (genotype by environment interaction - phenotype - in a single generation) of forest trees to plantation sites ([3]). Consequently, any nursery with an environment greatly different from the site of seed origin may alter seedling growth and development after planting ([3], [15]). Moreover, when northern provenances grown at southern nurseries are planted back in the north, their flushing phenology may be out of phase with that of the local populations because bud flush phenology depends not only on the present (growing) environment, but also on the environment in which the buds were formed ([56], [20]). Therefore, study of nursery carryover effects is another factor needed to consider before developing any seed transfer guidelines.

From a previous investigation on geographic variability of paper birch provenances across BC, Hawkins & Dhar ([16]) suggested some regional and population differentiation for certain traits. Despite promising results from this initial research, the populations of that study were not collected along elevational transects. Also, there was no investigation of nursery effects on birch bud flush. Therefore, a study was designed to investigate genecology (geographic variation in bud flush) of paper birch provenances at three different common garden locations in British Columbia (Canada) and Northern Idaho (USA) as well as to determine if there was any nursery carryover effect on birch bud flush. Campbell & Sorensen ([3]) and Hawkins ([15]) suggested that a nursery environment/climate different from the stocks’ site of origin could impact its field performance. In addition, our study also determined whether provenance responses were related to their site of origin (clinal variation).

Materials and methods 

Provenances

In 1998, paper birch seed was collected from four different geographic regions: Salmon Arm, Prince George, Prince Rupert (British Columbia) and Idaho (Idaho, USA) (Fig. 1, Tab. 1). For Prince Rupert, Prince George and Salmon Arm regions, 5-8 provenance samples (depending on elevation range) were collected along elevational transects. Stands within each region were chosen within ± 10 to 20 m of a pre-determined elevation, beginning at the bottom of an elevational transect and continuing every 100 m thereafter. Following initial analysis, 3 provenances from each of 3 BC regions were selected (lowest, mid and highest elevation) for further experimentation. One population from northern Idaho was also sampled. At all sites, five non-clonal (half-sib or no genetic relationship as birch generally does not reproduce vegetatively in BC) trees within each stand (provenance) were chosen for seed collection. These trees were of good health, form and had produced seed. Seed was collected and bulked to represent a provenance for each elevation.

Fig. 1 - Paper birch provenance collection sites, common garden and nursery locations, and paper birch geographic distribution in North America.
Tab. 1 - Geographic origin and climatic variables of different paper birch provenances, nurseries and common gardens. Mean annual temperature (MAT), mean temperature of the coldest month (MTCM), mean annual precipitation (MAP), extreme temperature difference (TD), and days of frost free period (FFP). Climate BC Model (⇒ http:/­/­climatemodels.­forestry.­ubc.­ca/­climatebc) based on 30-year mean climatic data, 1981-2009. (#): Salmon Arm and Prince George sources are continental while Prince Rupert is a maritime climate. (*): All nursery locales and common garden sites have a continental climate.

Nurseries and common gardens trial

All 10 provenances of paper birch seedlings were grown at three different nurseries (NW: Canfor J.D. Little Forestry Centre, Prince George, BC; LN: Landing Nursery, Vernon, BC; UI: the University of Idaho, Moscow, ID - Tab. 1) to determine the importance of nursery practices and environment on the growth and acclimation of the seedlings after planting ([5]). Seeds were hand sown at each nursery in early May 1999 in PSB 515A styroblocks (Beaver Plastics, Edmonton, AB - 284 seedlings m2), lifted in November 1999 and placed in cold storage until the spring of 2000 when they were planted. In spring 2000, seedlings from all three nurseries were planted at 3 common gardens: late April in Sandpoint (Idaho), early May in Skimikin (Salmon Arm) and mid-May in Red Rock (Prince George - Tab. 1). In this study we did not measure any nursery practice as each nursery had unique cultural regimes to optimize seedling growth with respect to local climatic conditions. As this was a preliminary study, it can be viewed as a benchmark for any follow-up studies.

All seedlings were identified according to provenance, geographic region and nursery for tracking their response in the common gardens. In total, 16 seedlings per provenance-nursery were planted at 2 × 2 m spacing in a randomized single tree interlocking block design (16 trees per provenance planted as 4 trees in each of 4 replications for each of the 3 nurseries: 16 × 3 = 48 seedlings per provenance), allowing for comparisons among geographic region (4), provenance within geographic regions (10), nursery (3) and among common gardens (3). The experiment at different common garden locations was conducted under natural light (photoperiod), temperature and precipitation conditions. The average duration of photoperiod and temperature during the early growing season (April-June) varied by 20-90 minutes and up to 3 °C among the three common garden locations. Precipitation was similar at Sandpoint and Red Rock, while Skimikin was much drier (Tab. 1).

Assessment of bud flush

All ten provenances planted at Red Rock, Sandpoint and Skimikin were surveyed for spring bud flush in 2001 and 2003 (Tab. 1). The bud flush survey involved recording bud burst for 10 buds on a single branch, preferably the terminal. If the terminal did not have 10 buds, then buds on the next highest branch were examined and so on until a total of 10 buds were surveyed. For each survey, the total number of buds burst (for each tree) was recorded until all 10 buds flushed. The date of individual bud flush was identified when the first green ragged edges visually appear between the bud scales, almost like the opening of a “clam shell” ([16]). All phenological assessments were done at least twice a week, and all trees were surveyed at all three common garden locations. In this study, 80% bud flush was chosen as the point of analysis, meaning the duration required to have 8 of 10 buds flush.

Climate data

All temperature data were acquired from the nearest weather reporting station (on site for Skimikin and Sandpoint, and within 10 km for Red Rock) to each common garden location. Red Rock is situated of the same glacial plain as the reporting station, therefore distance was not a concern for weather data. Temperature data were used to calculate growing degree days (GDD) or heat sum for each common garden location in each year. Budflush_GDD were calculated based on mean daily temperature starting on January 1st of each year using the formula (eqn. 1):

\begin{equation} GDD = \sum \left [\frac{(T_{max} + T_{min})}{2} - T_{thres} \right ] \end{equation}

(heat accumulated when T > Tthres, and if T < Tthres then heat sum = 0) where Tmax is the maximum temperature and Tmin the minimum temperature recorded over each 24-h period, Tthres is the threshold temperature. The threshold temperature for budflush_GDD calculation was 0 °C ([20], [41], [45], [16]). Day length was calculated on the 21st day of each month for each population and common garden using the US Naval Observatory tables (⇒ http:/­/­www.­weatherimages.­org/­latlonsun.­html). The different climatic variables were estimated for each provenance by using Climate BC version 4.72, ([55] - ⇒ http:/­/­climatemodels.­forestry.­ubc.­ca/­climatebc/­).

Data analysis

All data were analyzed based on 80% bud flush using SYSTAT® (version 12, SYSTAT Software Inc) general linear model (GLM). During GLM, Type III sums of squares (Yates’s weighted squares of means) was used as our data were unbalanced (number of provenance per region was not equal). In the literature there is ongoing debate about the use of sums of squares for unbalanced data. Some suggest using Type II sums of squares (Yates’s weighted squares of means - [32], [28]), while other researchers suggest using Type III sums of squares ([29], [47], [23]). We used Type III sums of squares for the GLM.

Initially, both provenance and region were considered as main effects for statistical analysis. When region was considered as a main effect, all provenances within a region were pooled to form an analytical unit and the analysis was run with four regions (Prince George, Prince Rupert, Salmon Arm and Idaho). However, GLM for both provenance and geographic region showed similar results for significance and F values. Therefore, a nested GLM was conducted, where different provenances are nested within region (independent variable). This was considered a main effect and modeled in the GLM procedure for 80% bud flush and growing degree days (budflush_GDD - dependent variable) to describe the geographic variation for paper birch provenances. The final model used in the analysis was as follows (eqn. 2):

\begin{equation} B_{80\%} = m + G + N + P(R) + G \text{x} N + G \text{x} P(R) + N \text{x} P(R) + \varepsilon \end{equation}

where B80% is the bud flush proportion (80%, the number of days required to reach 8 of 10 buds flushed), m is the grand mean, G is the common garden location, N is the nursery, P(R) is the provenance (P) nested within the geographic region (R), and ε is the error. A separate model was run for each year (2001 and 2003) due to different sample sizes. In this study, seed source was the only random factor and all the others were fixed.

Subsequently pairwise comparisons were conducted using Tukey’s multiple comparison tests to determine specific differences among provenances. The relationship between bud flush performance of provenances and their source climate for a given individual test site was used to improve and validate bud flush response functions. Therefore, simple regression analyses were carried out to look at the response of provenances planted at different common gardens as function of the climate differences between provenance source locations and the respective common gardens. Variables were duration of frost free period (FFP), mean annual temperature (MAT), degree days (DD) and mean annual precipitation (MAP). A similar regression analysis was also done with response variables (Day of Year, DoY and budflush_GDD) to predict the effect of seed transfer distance. Seed transfer distance was calculated based on the latitudinal difference of the seed origin and common garden location (latitude of seed origin - latitude of common garden location). To simplify the analysis of relationships between climate variables of provenance source location and bud flush, we employed a principle component analysis (PCA). The PCA was conducted using the programming language R version 3.0.1 ([43]). For all response variables, general normality tests were carried out with SYSTAT® version 12.0 and transformation was made when required.

Results 

Based on GLM analysis, of 80% bud flush among the common gardens was significantly different for budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD or heat sum requirement in both years (Tab. 2). Generally budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD increased with increased common garden latitude (Fig. 2). Bud flush at the Sandpoint (southern) common garden was on an average 22 days in 2001 and 24 days in 2003 earlier than at the Red Rock (northern) common garden (Fig. 2a, Fig. 2c). When individual provenances were considered, provenance 33 from the Salmon Arm region required the least number of days for bud flush in both years at all three common garden locations, which was followed by the Idaho provenance (13). Considering heat requirement (budflush_GDD based on 0 °C), different provenances responded differently at different common garden locations (Fig. 2b, Fig. 2d). However in all instances, Prince Rupert provenances (61, 63 and 66) required the greatest number of days (budflush_DoY) and amount of heat (budflush_GDD) to flush. Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05) showed a significant difference among geographic regions in all years, except for between Salmon Arm and Idaho in 2001 (P = 0.084) and 2003 (P = 0.792). This might be due to the close proximity and similar environmental conditions of the two geographic regions. When provenances were nested within geographic region, both budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD showed significant total population variation in 2003 and close to significant in 2001, indicating the existence of genetic differences among provenances and common garden locations’ environmental impact (Tab. 2).

Tab. 2 - Results of the GLM analysis for days (budflush_DoY) to 80 % spring bud flush and growing degree days (budflush_GDD) in 2001 and 2003. Significant results (α = 0.05) are reported in italic.
Fig. 2 - Least square mean (LSM) of budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD for 80% bud flush (± SE) by provenance, region and latitude at each common garden in 2001 and 2003. (GDD): Growing degree days; (SP): Sandpoint; (SK): Skimikin; (RR): Red Rock; (SA): Salmon Arm; (ID): Idaho; (PG): Prince George; (PR): Prince Rupert.

A significant difference among nurseries for birch bud flush was observed for both budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD at the beginning of seedling establishment (2001), but the relationship was not significant in 2003 (Tab. 2). Provenances grown at Landing Nursery required the greatest number of days (budflush_DoY) and budflush_GDD as compared to the other two nurseries in 2001, while in 2003 the difference was considerably less, thus also indicating the absence of a nursery carryover effect (Fig. 3a, Fig. 3b, Fig. 3c, Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3 - Least square mean (LSM) of Budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD in 2001 and 2003 to 80 % bud flush (± SE) by provenance, region and latitude at each nursery with common garden pooled. (GDD): Growing degree days; (SP): Sandpoint; (SK): Skimikin; (RR): Red Rock; (SA): Salmon Arm; (ID): Idaho; (PG): Prince George; (PR): Prince Rupert.

The influence of elevation on paper birch bud flush showed an inconsistent trend at all three common garden locations. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) in the timing of bud flush (budflush_DoY) and budflush_GDD among provenances along an elevational transect for each of the Prince George, Prince Rupert and Salmon Arm regions at all three common garden locations, except Prince Rupert provenances at Red Rock (Fig. 4a, Fig. 4b). The influence of elevation showed an inconsistent trend and different regions required different budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD to flush. For example, the middle elevation provenance (760 m a.s.l.) from Salmon Arm region required fewer budflush_DoY and less budflush_GDD for flush at all three common garden locations than provenances from higher (1200 m a.s.l.) or lower (460 m a.s.l.) elevation. Prince George provenances showed the opposite trend such as the middle elevation provenance (1000 m a.s.l.) requiring more budflush_DoY (Fig. 4a) and budflush_GDD to flush (Fig. 4b).

Fig. 4 - Least square mean (LSM) of Budflush_DoY and budflush_GDD for 80% bud flush (± SE) by elevation at each common garden location along elevational transects for each climatic region in 2003. (SP): Sandpoint; (SK): Skimikin; (RR): Red Rock; birch bud flush values followed by the same letter (a, b, c or A, B, C, or x, y, z) within each region along elevational transect are not significantly different (α = 0.05, Tukey’s test for multiple comparison with region along elevational transect, meter a.s.l.).

A linear relationship (P < 0.001) was observed between the timing of bud flush (budflush_DoY) and latitudinal seed transfer distance (Fig. 5). The most rapid bud flush was observed with decreasing seed transfer distance towards the south at the southern common gardens, whereas at the northern common garden the opposite trend was observed (Fig. 5). However without any apparent detrimental effect on phenology (e.g., buds fail to flush,, multiple dominant buds), provenances may be transferred up to 5° of latitude toward the north and 7° of latitude toward the south.

Fig. 5 - Day of the Year to 80% bud break by provenance in relation to latitudinal seed transfer distance for Red Rock (upper line), Skimikin (middle line) and Sandpoint (lower line) common gardens. (DoY): Day of year; (Seed transfer distance): latitude of seed origin - latitude of garden location.

When regression analysis was carried out for budflush_DoY, budflush_GDD and seed transfer distance for bud flush against provenance source location climatic variables (MAT, DD, FFP and MAP), there was no correlation or a very poor relationship (low R2) was observed. None of the source variables explained more than 25% of the observed variation (see Tab. SM1 - Appendix 1). Therefore, further principal components analysis (PCA) was conducted to determine the impact of source location climate variables on bud flush (Tab. SM1 and Fig. SM3 - Appendix 1). The PCA identified three main variation components, which in total explained 99.1% of the data set variability. Component I contributed 66.7% to the variance (eigenvalue = 2.7), component II contributed 32.2% (eigenvalue = 1.29) and component III contributed 0.2% eigenvalue = 1.22). FPP, MAT and DD showed strong correlations with the component I, while MAP with the component II.

Discussion 

Paper birch planted at Sandpoint (Idaho, USA) flushed slightly earlier than those planted at Skimikin (BC), and much earlier than those planted at Red Rock (BC - Fig. 2). This indicated that birch bud flush follows a general geographic trend and progresses from south to north ([26], [16]). A similar phenological trend was also observed in a genetic study on paper birch carried out by Morgenstern ([33]). Apart from the geographic (common garden) location, it is evident that the observed bud flush is a consequence of local temperature or photoperiod or their interaction ([30]). When we consider the average temperature in January, February, March and April at the common garden location, Sandpoint (-3.5, -0.9, +3.7, +7.4 °C, respectively) was warmer than Skimikin (-4.6, -1.2, +3.6, +6.7 °C) and Red Rock (-9.2, -5.9, -0.4, +4.6 °C). This implies that temperature during the winter and spring played an important role in regulating the timing of birch bud flush, which is consistent with other studies ([20], [50], [31], [42], [16]). According to Heide ([20]), warmer weather in January, February and March considerably reduced the thermal requirement for Betula spp. bud flush if the fall chilling requirement had been met. This suggests that if a southward transfer is associated with warmer temperature then bud flush will be faster, while for a northward transfer, associated with cooler temperatures, bud flush should take longer.

Besides air temperature, photoperiod may also play an important regulatory role on birch bud flush because air temperature may vary significantly from year to year, while photoperiod does not ([21]). Therefore, many temperate and boreal plant species rely on photoperiod to constrain their development to a “safe period” and the consequence of this photoperiodic constraint appears to increase with increasing latitude of seed origin ([34]). Although this was not a controlled photoperiod experiment, previous controlled photoperiod and translocation experiments in this region suggest that photoperiod had a significant impact on paper birch bud flush ([16]). Therefore, we may assume that photoperiod itself or an interaction between local temperature and photoperiod could have an impact on birch flush. Li et al. ([30]) observed that long photoperiod promoted bud flush at warmer temperatures. In addition, local soil temperature may be another contributory factor which could influence spring bud phenology of paper birch. The Red Rock common garden soil remains below zero in the early growing season compared to the Skimikin and Sandpoint common gardens. Birch with warm roots (14 oC throughout the experimental period) flushed significantly earlier than those with cold roots (mean 0 °C) in greenhouse and controlled growth chamber experiments ([16]).

The nursery carryover effect on paper birch bud flush appears to be overcome within three years of initial seedling establishment. This implies that nursery effect may not be a significant residual factor in the timing of paper birch bud flush. In another study, the same group of provenances also showed a nursery carryover effect for height growth up to four years after planting ([9]). A similar result was also reported by Carlson et al. ([6]) in other paper birch provenance trials in British Columbia. The reasons for a nursery carryover effect were not identified, but it may be due to temperature effects during seedling dormancy induction in the nursery. Southern nurseries are much warmer than northern ones during the fall period. The nursery carryover effect was present in the stock planted in all common garden location as bud flush phenology depends not only on the present (growing) environment, but also on the environment in which the buds were formed ([56], [20]). Based on the study by Westergaard & Eriksen ([56]), low temperatures during bud formation of Acer platanoides L. resulted in a more shallow dormancy level, while Heide ([20]) indicated that high autumn temperatures delay spring bud flush in Betula species. Bowden-Green & Rooke ([2]) and Lang ([27]) reported that a photoperiod at the nursery location shorter than the seed source photoperiod may have a direct impact on seedling size variation, as photoperiod can markedly alter the vegetative development of woody plants, particularly the timing of growth cessation.

In this study, a clear population differentiation was expected as the elevational differences of the highest and lowest collected provenances were large and might limit gene flow ([54]). Nonetheless, the results indicate an inconsistent trend and birch bud flush did not proceed from the lowest elevation to the highest as previously suggested by Myking ([37]) and Sulkinoja & Valanne ([51]). This was unexpected, but not unprecedented, as Sharik & Barnes ([46]) found an absence of elevational differentiation among populations of two Betula species from the Appalachian Mountains grown in a Michigan common garden. They concluded that factors other than temperature do regulate bud flush, likely the photoperiod or a photoperiod-temperature interaction ([33]). Further investigation with a greater number of provenances is required to validate whether this elevational trend on birch bud flush is stable.

When provenances from continental or inland regions (Prince George) were compared with those of a maritime or coastal region (Prince Rupert), the order of bud flush followed a longitudinal or inverse continentality trend, i.e., continental populations flushed earlier than maritime populations. A similar result was reported by Wielgolaski & Inouye ([57]) in a Pinus sylvestris L. provenance trial where continental provenances flushed before coastal provenances at a continental site. This might be due to a maritime climatic effect. According to Veen ([52]), provenances from maritime origin respond more slowly than continental provenances when brought to a continental site, because maritime climates experience gradually increasing temperatures in spring with long periods of late frosts; whereas continental climates experience rapidly increasing temperatures with short periods of late frosts. As a result, coastal provenances are exposed to forcing temperatures much earlier (late winter/early spring) than continental provenances, thereby they are “prevented” from growing by a longer chilling requirement, while provenances from a continental climatic region require a minimum amount of heat because there is less chance of late spring frosts ([37]). Seed transfer from a continental to a coastal climate may result in premature bud flush and frost damage as frost resistance during bud break in paper birch is low ([13]).

The coefficient of determination for the linear regressions to 80% bud flush are very low in all combinations, which indicate that factors other than latitude must be involved in explaining the variation among the provenances. Differences in climatic adaptation among the birch population might exist as origin of some of the provenances locations had different climatic conditions compared to that of the common gardens ([53]). The best correlation with climate variables was found at Skimikin garden, which is almost in the middle of the provenances source location. Looking at latitudinal seed transfer distance, our results suggest that latitudinal transfer northward up to 5° and southward up to 7° may be possible without any detrimental effect on bud flush, as this only leads to a later bud flush than that of local provenances. Similar observations were also reported by Hawkins & Dhar ([16]) in another birch provenance trial in BC. For the same provenances trial, Dhar et al. ([9]) reported that a transfer of 5° latitude in both directions had no negative impact on B. papyrifera height growth. Given the small number of provenances in the study, this information should be used with caution.

Conclusion 

The overall results of this short term experiment suggests that: (1) there is no single factor that determines the onset of bud flush in paper birch in a common garden; rather it is a complex interaction among local genetic characteristics and environmental conditions at the growing site; (2) none of the regions showed the expected elevational cline for bud flush; rather, inconsistent trends were observed; (3) nursery displacement affects bud flush in the initial year of establishment but disappeared within a short time period; (4) seed transfer may be extended up to 5° northward and 7° southward with apparent minimal negative implications. However. caution may be needed when transferring provenances from inland regions to the coast. Although this information is useful for initiating seed zone development and seed transfer guideline for paper birch provenances in BC, the result should be considered with caution as findings for this study were based on a small number of provenances. Further study with several common garden experiments at different latitudes and elevations is highly recommended to determine the intra- and inter-population variability and plasticity of this species.

References

(1)
Benowicz A, Guy R, Carlson MR, El-Kassaby YA (2001). Genetic variation among paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) populations in germination, frost hardiness, gas exchange and growth. Silvae Genetica 50: 7-13.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(2)
Bowden-Green R, Rooke H (1980). Projected recovery of plantable trees per bed foot. Unpublished Report, BC Forest Service, Silvicultural Branch, Victoria, BC, Canada, pp. 1.
::Google Scholar::
(3)
Campbell RK, Sorensen FC (1984). Genetic implications of nursery practices. In: “Forest Nursery Manual: Production of Bareroot Seedlings” (Duryea ML, Landis TD eds). Martinus Nijhoff/ Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 83-191.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(4)
Cannell MGR, Smith RI (1986). Climatic warming, spring budburst and frost damage on trees. Journal of Applied Ecology 23: 177-191.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(5)
Carlson MR, Berger VG, Hawkins CDB (2000a). Seed source testing of paper birch (Betula papyrifera) in the interior of British Columbia. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 10: 25-34.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(6)
Carlson MR, Hawkins CDB, Berger V, Mahoney R, Hooge BD (2000b). A genecology study of paper birch in British Columbia and Idaho. Unpublished establishment report no. EP106913, BC Ministry of Forests and Range, Victoria, BC, Canada, pp. 1-5.
::Google Scholar::
(7)
Chmura DJ, Rozkowski R (2002). Variability of beech provenances in spring and autumn phenology. Silvae Genetica 51 (2/3): 123-127.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(8)
Dhar A, Hawkins CDB (2013). Differential and interactive effects of photoperiod and temperature on paper birch bud flush. Unpublished data, Mixedwood Ecology project, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada. [in preparation]
::Google Scholar::
(9)
Dhar A, Balliet N, Hawkins CDB (2014). Variability in height growth, survival and nursery carryover effect of Betula papyrifera provenances. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29: 132-143.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(10)
Fraser DA (1956). Ecological studies of forest trees at Chalk River, Ontario, Canada. II. Ecological conditions and radial increment. Ecology 37: 777-89.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(11)
Gould PJ, Harrington CA, St Claire (2011). Incorporating genetic variation into a model of budburst phenology of coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 41: 139-150.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(12)
Hamann A, Wang T (2006). Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87: 2773-2786.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(13)
Hannerz M (1994). Winter injuries to Norway spruce observed in plantations and in a seed orchard. Report no. 6, SkogForsk, Uppsala, Sweden, pp. 22.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(14)
Hannerz M, Ekberg I, Norell L (2003). Variation in chilling requirement for completing bud rest among provenances of Norway spruce. Silvae Genetica 52: 161-168.
::Google Scholar::
(15)
Hawkins CDB (1998). Interactions of forest seedling nurseries and seed orchards. In: “Tree Improvement: Applied Research and Technology Transfer”. (Puri S ed). Science Publishers Inc., Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 125-139.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(16)
Hawkins CDB, Dhar A (2012). Spring bud phenology of 18 Betula papyrifera populations in British Columbia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27: 507-519.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(17)
Hawkins CDB, Dhar A, Rogers BJ (2012a). How much birch (Betula papyrifera) is too much for maximizing spruce (Picea glauca) growth: a case study in boreal spruce plantation forests, Journal of Forest Science 58 (7): 314-327.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(18)
Hawkins CDB, Dhar A, Lange J (2012b). Vegetation management with glyphosate has little impact on understory species diversity or tree growth in a sub boreal spruce plantation - a case study. Plant Biosystems 147: 105-114.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(19)
Hawkins CDB, Dhar A (2013). Birch (Betula papyrifera) white spruce (Picea glauca) interactions in mixedwood stands: implications for management. Journal of Forest Science 59: 137-149.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(20)
Heide OM (1993). Daylength and thermal time responses of budburst during dormancy release in some northern deciduous trees. Physiologia Plantarum 88: 531-540.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(21)
Häkkinen R, Linkosalo T, Hari P (1998). Effects of dormancy and environmental factors on timing of bud burst in Betula pendula. Tree Physiology 18: 707-712.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(22)
Hänninen H (2006). Climate warming and the risk of frost damage to boreal forest trees: identification of critical ecophysiological traits. Tree Physiology 26: 889-898.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(23)
Hector A, Felten S, Schmid B (2010). Analysis of variance with unbalanced data: an update for ecology and evolution. Journal of Animal Ecology 79: 308-316.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(24)
Junttila O, Hänninen H (2012). The minimum temperature for budburst in Betula depends on the state of dormancy. Tree Physiology 32: 337-345.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(25)
Kramer K (1994). Selecting a model to predict the onset of growth of Fagus sylvatica. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 172-81.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(26)
Kriebel HB, Wang CW (1962). The interaction between provenance and degree of chilling in bud-break of sugar maple. Silvae Genetica 11: 125-130.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(27)
Lang HP (1989). Risks arising from the reduction of the genetic variability of some Alpine Norway spruce provenances by size grading. Forestry 62: 49-52.
::Google Scholar::
(28)
Langsrud Y (2003). ANOVA for unbalanced data: use Type II instead of Type III sums of squares. Statistics and Computing 13: 163-167.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(29)
Lewsey JD, Gardiner WP, Gettinby G (1997). A study of simple unbalanced factorial designs that use type II and type III sums of squares. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 26: 1315-1328.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(30)
Li C, Junttila O, Ernstsen A, Heino P, Palva ET (2003). Photoperiodic control of growth, cold acclimation and dormancy development in silver birch (Betula pendula) ecotypes. Physiologia Plantarum 117: 206-212.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(31)
Linkosalo T, Lechowicz MJ (2006). Twilight far-red treatment advances leaf bud burst of silver birch (Betula pendula). Tree Physiology 26: 1249-1256.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(32)
Macnaughton DB (1998). Which sums of squares are best in unbalanced analysis of variance? MatStat Research Consulting Inc., Toronto, Canada, pp. 1-33.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(33)
Morgenstern EK (1996). Geographic variation in forest trees genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 209.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(34)
Morison JIL, Morecroft MD (2006). Plant growth and climate change. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 232.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(35)
Murray MB, Cannell MGR, Smith RI (1989). Date of budburst of fifteen tree species in Britain following climatic warming. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 693-700.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(36)
Myking T, Heide OM (1995). Dormancy release and chilling requirement of buds of latitudinal ecotypes of Betula pendula and B. pubescens. Tree Physiology 15: 697-704.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(37)
Myking T (1997). Dormancy, budburst and impacts of climatic warming in coastal-inland and altitudinal Betula pendula and B. pubescens ecotypes. In: “Phenology in Seasonal Climates” (Lieth H, Schwartz MD eds). I. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp. 51-66.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(38)
Myking T, Skroppa T (2007). Variation in phenology and height increment of northern Ulmus glabra populations - implications for conservation. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 22: 369-374.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(39)
O’Driscoll J (1976). Sitka spruce international ten provenance experiment: results to end of Nursery stage. Forest Genetic Resource Information No. 7, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(40)
Park A, Puettmann K, Wilson E, Messier C, Kames S, Dhar A (2014). Can boreal and temperate forest management be adapted to the uncertainties of 21st century climate change? Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 33 (4): 251-285.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(41)
Pellis A, Laureysens I, Ceulemans R (2004). Genetic variation of bud and leaf phenology of seventeen poplar clones in a short rotation coppice culture. Plant Biology 6: 38-46.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(42)
Pudas E, Leppälä M, Tolvanen A, Poikolainen J, Vanäläinen A, Kubin E (2008). Trends in phenology of Betula pubescens across the boreal zone in Finland. International Journal of Biometeorology 52: 251-259.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(43)
R Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(44)
Richards AE, Forrester DI, Bauhus J, Scherer-Lorenzen M (2010). The influence of mixed species tree plantations on the nutrition of individual species: a review. Tree Physiology 30: 1192-1208.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(45)
Rousi M, Pusenius J (2005). Variations in phenology and growth of European white birch (Betula pendula) clones. Tree Physiology 25: 201-210.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(46)
Sharik TL, Barnes BV (1976). Phenology of shoot growth among diverse populations of yellow birch and sweet birch. Canadian Journal of Botany 54: 2122-2129.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(47)
Shaw RG, Mitchell-Olds T (1993). ANOVA for unbalanced data: an overview. Ecology 74: 1638-1645.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(48)
Simard SW, Heineman JL, Mather WJ, Sachs DL, Vyse A (2001). Effects of operational brushing on conifers and plant communities in the southern interior of British Columbia: results from PROBE 1991-2000 protocol for operational brushing evaluations. Land Management Handbook No. 48, BC Ministry of Forests, BC, Canada, pp. 379.
::Online::Google Scholar::
(49)
Simard SW, Sachs DL, Vyse A, Blevins LL (2004). Paper birch competitive effects vary with conifer tree species and stand age in interior British Columbia forests: implications for reforestation policy and practice. Forest Ecology and Management 198: 55-74.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(50)
Simpson DG, Binder WD, L’Hirondelle S (2000). Paper birch genecology and physiology: spring dormancy release and fall cold acclimation. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 10:191-198.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(51)
Sulkinoja M, Valanne T (1987). Leafing and bud size in Betula provenances of different latitudes and altitudes. Report of the Kevo Subarctic Research Station 20: 27-33.
::Google Scholar::
(52)
Veen B (1954). General remarks on provenance research in forestry. Euphytica 3: 89-96.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(53)
Viherä-Aarnio A, Velling P (2008). Seed transfers of silver birch (Betula pendula) from the Baltic to Finland - Effect on growth and stem quality. Silva Fennica 42: 735-751.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(54)
Vitasse Y, Delzon S, Bresson CC, Michalet R, Kremer A (2009). Altitudinal differentiation in growth and phenology among populations of temperate-zone tree species growing in a common garden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:1259-1269.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(55)
Wang T, Hamann A Spittlehouse DL, Murdock TQ (2012). ClimateWNA - high-resolution spatial climate data for western North America. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 51: 16-29.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(56)
Westergaard L, Eriksen EN (1997). Autumn temperature affects the induction of dormancy in first-year seedlings of Acer platanoides L. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 12: 11-16.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(57)
Wielgolaski FE, Inouye DW (2003). High latitude climates. In: “Tasks for Vegetation Science 39. Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science” (Schwartz MD ed). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp.175-194.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::

Download

Paper Contents

Paper Sections

Paper Figures

Paper Tables

Supplementary Material

 
 
Close

 

Dhar A, Balliet N, Hawkins CDB, Carlson MR, Berger VG, Mahoney R (2015).
Bud flush phenology and nursery carryover effect of paper birch provenances
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 8: 809-817. - doi: 10.3832/ifor1367-008
Close
First Previous Next Last
 
Close
© iForest

Download Reference

Paper ID# ifor1367-008
Title Bud flush phenology and nursery carryover effect of paper birch provenances
Authors Dhar A, Balliet N, Hawkins CDB, Carlson MR, Berger VG, Mahoney R
Format
Close Download