Close Home
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry
vol. 2, pp. 4-6
Copyright © 2009 by the Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology
doi: 10.3832/ifor0472-002

Collection: Cost Action E29 Meeting 2008 - Istanbul (Turkey)
“Future Monitoring and Research Needs for Forest Ecosystems”
Guest Editors: Marcus Schaub (WSL, Birmensdorf, CH)

Research Articles

Growth patterns of forest stands - the response towards pollutants and climatic impact

W. BeckCorresponding author

Introduction 

Up to now within the ICP Forests monitoring program a broad variety of parameters were compiled which are mainly related to the causes side of the cause-effect relationships between site factors and tree growth. Tree growth data (breast height diameter, tree height) do only exist at time steps of five years as mandatory parameters. These data can be used for calculation of growing stock and carbon stock. However, the data obtained from this calculation do not allow an exact assignment to a certain year. Parameters which reflect the changing growth conditions year by year are urgently needed. Such a parameter of tree vigour should be easily accessed within monitoring programs year by year as well as available as time series retrospective to enable an insight into the growth history of the stand. Crown condition data are seen as suitable parameters since the beginning of ICP Forests monitoring program. Such crown condition assessments are quick, easy and cheap to do. The interpretation of such data sequences which are still short, may be complicated by the occurrence of strong fructification (masting) years of beech and oak. In these cases, generally the foliage is lowered. Such effects may not be interpreted as a lowered tree vigour. Usually, if crown condition is weak it is suggesting that current tree vigour is lowered. On the other hand, if crown condition is well it is difficult to prove that tree vigour is well. Growth rates can be lowered considerably while foliage is still inconspicuous ([7]). In particular, the relations between crown condition and wooden increment of trees and stands are far away from being clarified and must still be seen as a field of future research. Physiological investigations of these relationships may be useful to improve our understanding in principle by case studies.

Knowledge about the development of an entire forest stand’s life span may be obtained by dendroecological investigations. The growth and site history of a stand may be reconstructed using tree ring time series by taking increment cores which cover the whole range between pith and bark of dominant trees and subsequent tree ring analysis. Such ring width time series of allocated woody substance contain much information on the environmental conditions and impacts which affected the growth course of trees. The formation of wood is the final result of the complete metabolic balance. It is the share of the balance between produced matter by the foliage, respiration and higher priorities of allocation to other tree organs (roots, fruits etc.) which was not consumed elsewhere. This remaining share refers directly to the state of reserve pool. Therefore, the amount of new wood formation can be understood as a suitable tree vigour indicator.

Contrary to crown condition data tree ring widths are not visually rated but measured. This fact offers the advantage that observer related estimation errors are avoided and that the tree ring data quality can be checked using regional master chronologies to test synchronism and cross correlations. Tree growth rates are affected by both pollutants and climatic stress. According to this complexity a comprehensive dendroecological analysis of tree and stand growth patterns is considered to be an appropriate tool to quantify response of a forest stand to changing environmental factors.

Methods 

The following dendroecological investigative branches were applied to 86 tree ring chronologies from German Level II plots to get information on tree’s response to external factors:

  • growth course (homogeneity vs. structural breaks)
  • autocorrelation and sensitivity parameter in tree ring series, their relationships and temporal drifts (robustness vs. susceptibility to be damaged);
  • appearance, impact strength and frequency of pointer years;
  • analysis and modelling of climate-growth relationships ([5], [2], [1]);
  • forecasting of future stand development based on discovered climate-effect relationships and climatic scenarios.

This contribution concentrates on the first two points.

Analysis of growth courses

Fundamental knowledge on normality of growth courses for each tree species is required as a precondition to evaluate findings from tree ring analysis appropriately. Structural breaks within growth time series may be verified by the methods of linear or non-linear r-phases splines ([9], [10]) or singular spectrum analysis (SSA - [8]).

Autocorrelation and sensitivity

Autocorrelation within time series describes the dependence of the current tree ring width at each time step t from preceding ring widths ([13], [4] - eqn. 1):

\begin{equation} TRW_t \thicksim (TRW_{t-1}; TRW_{t-2}; TRW_{t-3}; \ldots; TRW_{t-p}) \end{equation}

Consecutive tree ring widths are never independent on its own. The natural meaning of this mathematical parameter is that current impacts are damped but persist as after-effects. Autocorrelation can be seen as an expression of the biological inheritance of tree growth and as buffering ability of trees against external forces. This robustness prevents trees and forests from immediate suffering and dying off by singular external impacts. It is a principle of survival. In the following discussions only the most important first order autocorrelation AR(1) which describes the relation of TRW t to TRW t-1 is taken into consideration.

The sensitivity parameter S within tree ring series indicates the year-to-year fluctuations of ring widths ([14] - p. 92). It shows if equalised or more extreme environmental factors did affect tree growth. High sensitivity of ring widths must be seen as a clear indicator of stress conditions. Both, autocorrelation and sensitivity parameter may be calculated and applied to entire time series or to sub-ranges of these.

Results 

The variety of results and findings from the analysis of 86 sample plots can not described here. Two examples of methods mentioned above (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2) illustrate the potential of the dendroecological analysis of tree growth time series. The method of a linear 3 phases spline was applied to the time series of relative basal area increment (rBAI) of the Level II plot Huenfeld in Hesse, Germany (Fig. 1). The years 1915 and 1976 were estimated as breakpoints within the whole development. In contrast to a simple linear trend the application of the 3 phases spline led to a decrease of the mean square error from 1.36606 to 0.60408.

Fig. 1 - German Level II plot Huenfeld, Hesse; old grown stand of Common Beech; time series of relative basal area increment (rBAI) together with the estimated linear 3-phases spline and the breakpoints of 1915 and 1976.
Fig. 2 - Data visualisation by ellipses (mean ± standard deviation) of both, first order autocorrelation AR(1) (abscissa) and sensitvity parameter (ordinate) of always 20 sample trees per chronology; Values were calculated within the two time spans from 1951 to 1990 and after 1990 up to the year of sampling the tree cores (2005-2007). Data: 29 chronologies of Common beech from Germany.

Some 29 beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) plots were investigated using running time windows to calculate AR(1) and S along the whole time series of mean radial increment. It was found that there is a long time span where AR(1) and S show only random walks. However, in the most cases from the late 1980 years up to now, AR(1) decreases and S increases dramatically. Therefore, a calculation of the means of AR(1) and S was carried out for two time intervals which range from 1950 to 1990 and from 1991 up to the point of taking increment cores (2005-2007) for all individual series of the 29 beech chronologies. In diagrams AR(1) and S may be displayed jointly as ellipses which contain their means in its centre and means ± standard deviations are shown by the ellipses edge line. Fig. 2 shows how AR(1) (seen as robustness) and S (as susceptibility to be damaged) have changed after 1990.

Discussion 

Growth trend changes may only be determined before the background of existing normality concepts or models. Light demanding tree species show a degressive shape of diameter curve and a monotonic decreasing trend of the tree ring width curve which is still distinct from zero at high ages, accordingly. Shade tolerant species show a long lasting, nearly linear diameter growth trend and according to this behaviour, constant ring widths on average. Growth trend changes have to be determined, when deviations from these principal patterns occur not only temporary but last for decades. Growth releases may occur gradually, for instance as sustained accelerated growth, or abruptly following the impact of extreme external forces. In many cases a sharp negative pointer year may induce an enduring growth depression. The actual status of a forest stand (structure, level of current increment) may only be evaluated and understood appropriately if preceding growth phases are known and taken into consideration (Fig. 1). The example of the Huenfeld beech chronology shows that an evaluation of the current increment level would fail completely without the knowledge of the preceding phases of the time series.

Both, autocorrelation AR(1) and sensitivity parameter S may be used to investigate growth patterns at several hierarchical levels. The calculation of mean values of AR(1) and S for entire time series and their application to the individual trees of a chronology may give hints, if the stand is uniform or differentiated regarding the criteria robustness and sensibility to external forces. In many cases a temporal drift of AR(1) and S may be observed when these parameters are calculated within a time window running along the whole time series. The simultaneous decrease of AR(1) and increase of S after 1990 must be interpreted as an increased disposition to be damaged, especially against unfavourable climatic impacts. Similar patterns of the temporal drift of the AR(1) - S relation were also found for a number of spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) stands within the German Level II program.

Conclusions 

Tree ring analysis can provide information on trees and stand development in the past up to now and is carried out only once. The response of trees to current environmental influences may be traced by high resolution diameter increment measurements as an appropriate monitoring method. Comparable results are attained by a concerted sampling strategy to choose trees for taking increment cores and dendrometer trees, respectively.

Among other tree species in Germany beech must be evaluated as to be stronger influenced by climate change. Similar findings are reported by Piovesan et al. ([12]) for Italy. The inclusion of well developed and tested dendroecological methods into future monitoring programs will provide many advantages and new findings. Especially the elaboration and analysis of tree ring networks (chronologies well scattered with respect to space and altitude) are currently seen as successful fields of ecological research ([6], [11], [3], [12]). Ongoing depositions and increasing climatic stress require urgently the quantification of the growth response of forests as an indicator of tree and stand vigour.

Acknowledgements 

Increment cores were taken from 86 German Level II plots from 2005 to 2007. I am grateful to the colleagues from all forest research stations of the German bundeslaender for logistic assistance and support of my fieldwork. I wish to thank my colleague Dr. Walter Seidling for repeated perusals of the manuscript.

References

(1)
Beck W (2006). Finding best regression approach for description of climate-growth relationships by floating time spans of varying width. In: “TRACE - Tree rings in Archaeology, Climatology and Ecology”, Volume 5; Proceedings of the Dendro-Symposium 2006 (Tervunen, Belgium, October 20-22, 2006). Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich, Reihe Umwelt/Environment, Band/Volume 74, pp. 44-53.
::Google Scholar::
(2)
Biondi F, Waikul K (2004). DENDROCLIM2002: a C++ program for statistical calibration of climate signals in tree-ring chronologies. Computers and Geosciences 30: 303-311.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(3)
Büntgen U, Frank DC, Kaczka RJ, Verstege A, Zwijacz-Kozica T, Esper J (2007). Growth response to climate in a multi-species tree-ring network in the West Carpathian Tatra Mountains, Poland and Slovakia. Tree Physiology 27: 689-702.
::Google Scholar::
(4)
Cook ER, Kairiukstis LA (1992). Methods of dendrochronology: applications in the environmental sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London.
::Google Scholar::
(5)
Fritts HC (1976). Tree rings and climate. The Blackburn Press, Reprint of Second Printing. Academic Press, London, UK.
::Google Scholar::
(6)
Dittmar C, Zech W, Elling W (2003). Growth variations of Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under different climatic and environmental conditions in Europe - a dendroecological study. Forest Ecology and Management 173: 63-78.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(7)
Elling W, Dittmar C (2003). Neuartige Zuwachsdepressionen bei Buchen. AFZ/Der Wald 58, vol. 1, pp. 42 - 45.
::Google Scholar::
(8)
Golyandina N, Nekrutkin V, Zhigljavsky AA (2001). Analysis of time series structure: SSA and related techniques. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 90, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
::Google Scholar::
(9)
Kublin E (1992). Ein Verfahren zur Trendanalyse von Zuwachsreihen. In: “Modelle zu automatisierten Zuwachsmeß- und Auswertetechniken, klimaorientierte Wachstumsmodelle, Inventurmethoden und ihre Anwendungen”. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt, Band 106, pp. 103-121.
::Google Scholar::
(10)
Kublin E, Gantert C (1993). Trendanalysen von Zuwachsreihen mit Hilfe von Spline-Regression, Zustandsraum- und nichtparametrischen Regressionsmodellen. In: “Tagungsberichte der Arbeitsgruppe Ökologie”, Heft 4.
::Google Scholar::
(11)
Piovesan G, Biondi F, Barnabei M, Di Filippo A, Schirone B (2005). Spatial and altitudinal bioclimatic zones of the Italian peninsula identified from a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) tree-ring network. Acta Oecologia 27: 197-210.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(12)
Piovesan G, Biondi F, Di Filippo A, Alessandrini A, Maugeris M (2008). Drought-driven growth reduction in old beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests of the central Apennines, Italy. Global Change Biology 14: 1-17.
::CrossRef::Google Scholar::
(13)
Schlittgen R, Streitberg BHJ (1994). Zeitreihenanalyse, 5. Auflage, R. Oldenbourg Verlag München, Wien.
::Google Scholar::
(14)
Schweingruber FH (1983). Der Jahrring. Standort, Methodik, Zeit und Klima in der Dendrochronologie. Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern-Stuttgart, Germany.
::Google Scholar::
 
Close

 

Beck W (2009).
Growth patterns of forest stands - the response towards pollutants and climatic impact
iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 2: 4-6. - doi: 10.3832/ifor0472-002
Close
First Previous Next Last
 
Close
© iForest

Download Reference

Paper ID# ifor0472-002
Title Growth patterns of forest stands - the response towards pollutants and climatic impact
Authors Beck W
Format
Close Download